乡村旅游地文化胁迫类型、格局与机理研究——以苏州东山镇为例

doi:10.11821/dlyj020191039

地理研究 ›› 2020, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (10): 2249-2267.doi: 10.11821/dlyj020191039

• 专栏：典型乡村产业转型与发展 • 上一篇下一篇

乡村旅游地文化胁迫类型、格局与机理研究——以苏州东山镇为例

徐冬¹(), 黄震方²(), 洪学婷², 李东晔², 沈伟丽²

1.南京大学地理与海洋科学学院,南京 210046
2.南京师范大学地理科学学院,江苏省地理信息资源开发与利用协同创新中心,南京 210023

收稿日期:2019-11-29 修回日期:2020-04-27 出版日期:2020-10-20 发布日期:2020-12-20
通讯作者: 黄震方
作者简介:徐冬（1992-）,男,河南开封人,博士,主要研究方向为旅游地理与旅游规划。E-mail:xudong_njnu@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(41671137);国家自然科学基金项目(41871141);国家自然科学基金项目(41771147);江苏省研究生科研与实践创新计划项目(KYCX19_0764)

Types, spatial pattern and mechanism of cultural stress of rural tourism destination: A case study of Dongshan town in Suzhou

XU Dong¹(), HUANG Zhenfang²(), HONG Xueting², LI Dongye², SHEN Weili²

1. School of Geography and Ocean Science, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210046, China
2. School of Geographical Science, Nanjing Normal University, Jiangsu Center for Collaborative Innovation in Geographical Information Resource Development and Application, Nanjing 210023, China

Received:2019-11-29 Revised:2020-04-27 Online:2020-10-20 Published:2020-12-20
Contact: HUANG Zhenfang

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

快速城镇化背景下乡村旅游地文化日益受到冲击,并表现出衰落的现象已是客观不争的事实。紧跟新时期乡村振兴战略和文旅融合发展趋势,综合运用质性研究和空间计量方法,以苏州东山镇为例,探索了乡村旅游地文化胁迫类型、格局与机理,结果表明：① 乡村旅游地文化胁迫量表包含23个题项、5个维度,即“自然景观文化胁迫”“聚落景观文化胁迫”“生产生活文化胁迫”“人际交往文化胁迫”“精神仪式文化胁迫”;② 乡村文化胁迫空间多呈沿街、邻水分布,各维乡村文化胁迫空间分布差异较大。乡村文化胁迫空间总体上呈显著集聚,其中生产生活文化最易受到旅游开发胁迫而表现出空间受胁症状;③ 乡村文化胁迫空间具有多集核分级分布的核心-外围分布模式,且随着旅游开发程度的提高其空间集聚程度显著提升,各维乡村文化胁迫空间集聚特征差异较大,其中聚落景观文化胁迫具有“大聚集、小分散”的空间特征,且与总体最为类似;④ 乡村旅游地文化胁迫产生的原因可以归纳为个体和整体两个层面,个体层面的社会属性和观念认知差异,以及整体层面的基础条件、社会发展和政策宣传共同作用着乡村旅游地文化胁迫的产生和发展。

关键词: 乡村旅游地, 乡村文化, 空间格局, 胁迫机理, 东山镇

Abstract:

Under the background of rapid urbanization, the culture of rural tourism destination is increasingly impacted, and the decline of rural culture has become an indisputable fact. Following the development trend of the rural revitalization strategy and integration of culture and tourism in the new era of China, taking Dongshan Town in Suzhou city as an example, we explored the types, spatial pattern and mechanism of cultural stress in rural tourism destinations by using qualitative research and spatial measurement methods. The results show that: (1) the scale of cultural stress of rural tourism destination constructed by the grounded theory and questionnaire survey contains 23 items and 5 dimensions, namely natural landscape culture stress, settlement landscape culture stress, production and living culture stress, interpersonal culture stress and spiritual ritual culture stress. (2) According to the results of GIS spatial analysis, the rural cultural stress space is mostly distributed along the street and water. Traffic jams are the most common stress symptoms in rural areas at the early stage of tourism development. With the development of tourism, the problems which are closely related to the life of local residents, such as water pollution and price rise, are becoming increasingly prominent. Otherwise, the spatial distribution characteristics of the cultural stress in each dimension are quite different. The general space of rural culture stress shows significant agglomeration, among which the production and living culture is most vulnerable to tourism development and shows symptoms of spatial stress. (3) The rural culture stress space has the core-peripheral pattern with multi-core hierarchical distribution, and its spatial agglomeration degree will be significantly improved with the development of tourism. There is a big difference among the spatial agglomeration characteristics of the cultural stress in each dimension. Among them, the settlement landscape cultural stress has the characteristic of large aggregation and small dispersion. (4) Factors affecting cultural stress of rural tourism destination can be identified into the individual and whole levels. The differences in social attributes and conceptual cognition at the individual level, as well as the basic conditions, social development and policy propaganda at the whole level, play a role in the emergence and development of cultural stress in rural tourism destinations.

Key words: rural tourism destination, rural culture, spatial pattern, stress mechanism, Dongshan town

徐冬, 黄震方, 洪学婷, 李东晔, 沈伟丽. 乡村旅游地文化胁迫类型、格局与机理研究——以苏州东山镇为例[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(10): 2249-2267.

XU Dong, HUANG Zhenfang, HONG Xueting, LI Dongye, SHEN Weili. Types, spatial pattern and mechanism of cultural stress of rural tourism destination: A case study of Dongshan town in Suzhou[J]. GEOGRAPHICAL RESEARCH, 2020, 39(10): 2249-2267.

图/表 9

图1

表1

表2

图2

表3

图3

表4

图4

图5

参考文献 53

[1]	Lankford S V. Attitudes and perceptions toward tourism and rural regional development. Journal of Travel Research, 1994,32(3):35-43.
[2]	卢松. 旅游对传统地域文化景观影响的研究进展及展望. 旅游科学, 2014,28(6):13-23.
	[ Lu Song. On progress and prospects of studies on the impacts of tourism on the cultural landscapes in traditional regions. Tourism Science, 2014,28(6):13-23.]
[3]	黄震方, 黄睿. 城镇化与旅游发展背景下的乡村文化研究: 学术争鸣与研究方向. 地理研究, 2018,37(2):233-249. doi: 10.11821/dlyj201802001
	[ Huang Zhenfang, Huang Rui. Research progress on rural culture in the context of rapid urbanization and tourism development: Academic debate and future research prospects. Geographical Research, 2018,37(2):233-249.]
[4]	孙九霞, 吴美玲. 商品化视角下族群内部主体的文化认同研究: 以云南丽江纳西族东巴纸为例. 中南民族大学学报: 人文社会科学版, 2017,37(3):67-73.
	[ Sun Jiuxia, Wu Meiling. Research on cultural identity of ethnic subjects within the perspective of commodity: Taking the Naxi Dongba paper in Lijiang, Yunnan as an example. Journal of South-Central University for Nationalities: Humanities and Social Sciences, 2017,37(3):67-73.]
[5]	黄震方, 陆林, 苏勤, 等. 新型城镇化背景下的乡村旅游发展: 理论反思与困境突破. 地理研究, 2015,34(8):1409-1421. doi: 10.11821/dlyj201508001
	[ Huang Zhenfang, Lu Lin, Su Qin, et al. Research and development of rural tourism under the background of new urbanization: Theoretical reflection and breakthrough of predicament. Geographical Research, 2015,34(8):1409-1421.]
[6]	Lu L, Bao J, Huang J, et al. Recent research progress and prospects in tourism geography of China. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2016,26(8):1197-1222. doi: 10.1007/s11442-016-1322-8
[7]	谢彦君. 呵护“姆庇之家”, 重塑乡村旅游可持续发展新理念. 旅游学刊, 2017,32(1):8-10. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-5006.2017.01.005
	[ Xie Yanjun. Care of "House of Muubi", remodeling the new concept of sustainable development of rural tourism. Tourism Tribune, 2017,32(1):8-10.]
[8]	王建英, 邹利林, 黄远水, 等. 基于胁迫生态理论的旅游度假区用地布局优化: 以武夷山国家旅游度假区为例. 生态学杂志, 2017,36(4):1165-1172.
	[ Wang Jianying, Zou Lilin, Huang Yuanshui, et al. Layout optimization of tourism resort lands based on stress ecology theory: A case study of Wuyishan national tourist resort. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2017,36(4):1165-1172.]
[9]	Steinberg C E W. Stress Ecology: Environmental Stress as Ecological Driving Force and Key Player in Evolution. Heidelberg London New York: Springer, Dordrecht, 2012.
[10]	徐冬, 黄震方, 李东晔, 等. 胁迫视角下乡村旅游地文化影响研究进展与框架构建. 人文地理, 2019,34(6):17-25.
	[ Xu Dong, Huang Zhenfang, Li Dongye, et al. The research progress and framework construction of cultural impacts of rural tourism destinations from the perspective of stress. Human Geography, 2019,34(6):17-25.]
[11]	Creel S, Dantzer B, Goymann W, et al. The ecology of stress: Effects of the social environment. Functional Ecology, 2013,27(1):66-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2012.02029.x
[12]	李存芳, 董梅, 王青, 等. 资源枯竭型企业跨区转移行为外溢效应与胁迫效应的研究进展. 经济地理, 2017,37(3):106-112.
	[ Li Cunfang, Dong Mei, Wang Qing, et al. The research process on spillover effect and intimidation effect of interregional transfer activities of resources-exhausted enterprises. Economic Geography, 2017,37(3):106-112.]
[13]	邹仁爱, 陈俊鸿. 城市胁迫发展理论: 城市可持续发展的生态学视角. 城市问题, 2005, (6):18-22.
	[ Zou Renai, Chen Junhong. Urban stress development theory: An ecological perspective of urban sustainable development. Urban Problems, 2005, (6):18-22.]
[14]	方创琳, 周成虎, 顾朝林, 等. 特大城市群地区城镇化与生态环境交互耦合效应解析的理论框架及技术路径. 地理学报, 2016,71(4):531-550.
	[ Fang Chuanglin, Zhou Chenghu, Gu Chaolin, et al. Theoretical analysis of interactive coupled effects between urbanization and eco-environment in mega-urban agglomerations. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2016,71(4):531-550.]
[15]	保继刚, 张骁鸣. 1978年以来中国旅游地理学的检讨与反思. 地理学报, 2004,59(S1):132-138.
	[ Bao Jigang, Zhang Xiaoming. Tourism geography in China (1978-2003): A review and retrospect. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2004,59(S1):132-138.]
[16]	保继刚, 张捷, 徐红罡, 等. 中国旅游地理研究: 在他乡与故乡之间. 地理研究, 2017,36(5):803-823. doi: 10.11821/dlyj201705001
	[ Bao Jigang, Zhang Jie, Xu Honggang, et al. Tourism geography in China: Between hometown and alien land. Geographical Research, 2017,36(5):803-823.]
[17]	Rasoolimanesh S M, Ringle C M, Jaafar M, et al. Urban vs. rural destinations: Residents' perceptions, community participation and support for tourism development. Tourism Management, 2017,60:147-158. doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2016.11.019
[18]	李卫华, 赵振斌, 李艳花. 古村落旅游地居民综合感知及差异分析: 以陕西韩城党家村为例. 旅游科学, 2006,20(6):52-58.
	[ Li Weihua, Zhao Zhenbin, Li Yanhua. An analysis of comprehensive perception and variations of residents in ancient village tourism areas: A case study of Dangjiacun in Hancheng, Shanxi. Tourism Science, 2006,20(6):52-58.]
[19]	Sharpley R. Host perceptions of tourism: A review of the research. Tourism Management, 2014,42(2):37-49. doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2013.10.007
[20]	Andriotis K. Community groups' perceptions of and preferences for tourism development: Evidence from Crete. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 2005,29(1):67-90.
[21]	Nicholas L N, Thapa B, Ko Y J. Residents' perspectives of a world heritage site: The pitons management area, St. Lucia. Annals of Tourism Research, 2009,36(3):390-412. doi: 10.1016/j.annals.2009.03.005
[22]	王纯阳, 屈海林. 村落遗产地社区居民旅游发展态度的影响因素. 地理学报, 2014,69(2):278-288. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201402011
	[ Wang Chunyang, Qu Hailin. Study on influencing factors of residents' attitudes towards tourism development of village heritage sites. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2014,69(2):278-288.]
[23]	孙九霞, 苏静. 旅游影响下传统社区空间变迁的理论探讨: 基于空间生产理论的反思. 旅游学刊, 2014,29(5):78-86. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-5006.2014.05.0081
	[ Sun Jiuxia, Su Jing. Traditional community space change under the influence of tourism: A reflective study based on space production theory. Tourism Tribune, 2014,29(5):78-86.]
[24]	沈炳荣. 东山镇志. 南京: 东南大学出版社, 2002.
	[ Shen Bingrong. Historical Records of Dongshan Town. Nanjing: Southeast University Press, 2002.]
[25]	杨维忠, 金本福, 薛利华. 东山历史文化丛书·东山艺文志. 扬州: 广陵书社, 2008.
	[ Yang Weizhong, Jin Benfu, Xue Lihua. History and Culture Series of Dongshan: Art and Literature Records of Dongshan. Yangzhou: Guangling Press, 2008.]
[26]	徐雅雯, 甘巧林. 扎根理论视角下旅游非正式部门成长路径: 以安徽西递古村为例. 人文地理, 2016,31(5):99-105.
	[ Xu Yawen, Gan Qiaolin. The Growth path of tourism informal sector based on grounded theory: A case of Xidi ancient village in Anhui. Human Geography, 2016,31(5):99-105.]
[27]	Glaser B, Strauss A L. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. New York: Aldine de Gruyter, 1967.
[28]	Charmaz K C. Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. London: Sage Publications of London, 2006.
[29]	王劲峰, 廖一兰, 刘鑫. 空间数据分析教程. 北京: 科学出版社, 2010: 76-77.
	[ Wang Jinfeng, Liao Yilan, Liu Xin. Spatial Data Analysis Tutorial. Beijing: Science Press, 2010: 76-77]
[30]	Wang F. Quantitative Methods and Applications in GIS. Abingdon: Taylor & Francis Group, 2006: 36-38.
[31]	郭凌, 杨启智. 乡村旅游开发与乡村文化变迁. 成都: 西南财经大学出版社, 2014.
	[ Guo Ling, Yang Qizhi. Rural Tourism Development and Rural Cultural Changes. Chengdu: Southwestern University of Finance & Economics Press, 2014.]
[32]	张艳, 张勇. 乡村文化与乡村旅游开发. 经济地理, 2007,27(3):509-512.
	[ Zhang Yan, Zhang Yong. Rural culture and development of rural tourism. Economic Geography, 2007,27(3):509-512.]
[33]	吕龙, 黄震方, 陈晓艳. 文化记忆视角下乡村旅游地的文化研究进展及框架构建. 人文地理, 2018,33(2):35-42.
	[ Lv Long, Huang Zhenfang, Chen Xiaoyan. Progress in culture studies of rural tourism destination and research framework from the perspective of cultural memory. Human Geography, 2018,33(2):35-42.]
[34]	吕龙, 黄震方, 陈晓艳. 乡村文化记忆空间的类型、格局及影响因素: 以苏州金庭镇为例. 地理研究, 2018,37(6):1142-1158. doi: 10.11821/dlyj201806007
	[ Lv Long, Huang Zhenfang, Chen Xiaoyan. Type classification, pattern characteristics and influencing factors of rural cultural memory space: A case study of Jinting town in Suzhou. Geographical Research, 2018,37(6):1142-1158.]
[35]	Mason P, Cheyne J. Residents' attitudes to proposed tourism development. Annals of Tourism Research, 2000,27(2):391-411. doi: 10.1016/S0160-7383(99)00084-5
[36]	章锦河. 古村落旅游地居民旅游感知分析: 以黟县西递为例. 地理与地理信息科学, 2003,19(2):105-109.
	[ Zhang Jinhe. Research on ancient village residents' perceptions of tourism impact: A Case of village Yixian-Xidi. Geography and Geo-Information Science, 2003,19(2):105-109.]
[37]	Teye V, Sirakaya E, Sönmez S F. Residents' attitudes toward tourism development. Annals of Tourism Research, 2002,29(3):668-688. doi: 10.1016/S0160-7383(01)00074-3
[38]	Kang S K, Lee J. Support of marijuana tourism in Colorado: A residents' perspective using social exchange theory. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 2018,9:310-319.
[39]	Jurowski C, Uysal M, Williams D R. A theoretical analysis of host community resident reactions to tourism. Journal of Travel Research, 1997,36(2):3-11.
[40]	O'Reilly A M. Tourism carrying capacity: Concepts and issues. Tourism Management, 1986,7(4):254-258. doi: 10.1016/0261-5177(86)90035-X
[41]	卢松, 张捷, 李东和, 等. 旅游地居民对旅游影响感知和态度的比较: 以西递景区与九寨沟景区为例. 地理学报, 2008,63(6):646-656. doi: 10.11821/xb200806009
	[ Lu Song, Zhang Jie, Li Donghe, et al. Comparison of resort residents' perceptions and attitudes: Case studies in Xidi village and Jiuzhaigou. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2008,63(6):646-656.]
[42]	Brunt P, Courtney P. Host perceptions of sociocultural impacts. Annals of Tourism Research, 1999,26(3):493-515. doi: 10.1016/S0160-7383(99)00003-1
[43]	Harrill R, Potts T D. Tourism planning in historic districts: Attitudes toward tourism development in Charleston. Journal of the American Planning Association, 2003,69(3):233-244. doi: 10.1080/01944360308978017
[44]	Wang S, Chen J S. The influence of place identity on perceived tourism impacts. Annals of Tourism Research, 2015,52:16-28. doi: 10.1016/j.annals.2015.02.016
[45]	卢松, 张业臣, 王琳琳. 古村落旅游移民社会融合结构及其影响因素研究: 以世界文化遗产宏村为例. 人文地理, 2017,32(4):138-145.
	[ Lu Song, Zhang Yechen, Wang Linlin. Social integration structure and determinant of tourism migration in ancient villages: A case study of Hongcun villiage. Human Geography, 2017,32(4):138-145.]
[46]	Williams J, Lawson R. Community issues and resident opinions of tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 2001,28(2):269-290. doi: 10.1016/S0160-7383(00)00030-X
[47]	吴丽敏, 黄震方, 谈志娟, 等. 江南文化古镇居民旅游影响感知及其形成机理: 以同里为例. 人文地理, 2015,30(4):143-148.
	[ Wu Limin, Huang Zhenfang, Tan Zhijuan, et al. Tourism impact perception of residents in Jiangnan ancient town and its formation mechanism: A case study of Tongli. Human Geography, 2015,30(4):143-148.]
[48]	Akis S, Peristianis N, Warner J. Residents' attitudes to tourism development: The case of Cyprus. Tourism Management, 1996,17(7):481-494. doi: 10.1016/S0261-5177(96)00066-0
[49]	Tosun C. Host perceptions of impacts: A comparative tourism study. Annals of Tourism Research, 2002,29(1):231-253. doi: 10.1016/S0160-7383(01)00039-1
[50]	Gursoy D, Rutherford D G. Host attitudes toward tourism: An improved structural model. Annals of Tourism Research, 2004,31(3):495-516. doi: 10.1016/j.annals.2003.08.008
[51]	龚伟. 基于空间视角的乡村旅游社区演化研究. 北京: 经济科学出版社, 2016.
	[ Gong Wei. Research on Rural Tourism Community Evolution in Spatial Perspective: Taking Village Q and Village Y in The Suburbs of Shanghai as an Example. Beijing: Economic Science Press, 2016.]
[52]	Rasoolimanesh S M, Roldán J L, Jaafar M, et al. Factors influencing residents' perceptions toward tourism development: Differences across rural and urban World Heritage Sites. Journal of Travel Research, 2017,56(6):760-775. doi: 10.1177/0047287516662354
[53]	黄震方, 黄睿. 基于人地关系的旅游地理学理论透视与学术创新. 地理研究, 2015,34(1):15-26. doi: 10.11821/dlyj201501002
	[ Huang Zhenfang, Huang Rui. The theoretical perspective and academic innovation of tourism geography based on human-environment interactions. Geographical Research, 2015,34(1):15-26.]

项目	类型	人数(人)	百分比(%)	项目	类型	人数(人)	百分比(%)
性别	男	19	48.72	家庭所在地	陆巷	21	53.85
性别	女	20	51.28		杨湾	9	23.08
出生年份	1930—1949	4	10.26		翁巷	9	23.08
	1950—1959	8	20.51	受教育程度	初中及以下	19	48.72
	1960—1978	16	41.03		高中(含中专)	9	23.08
	1979—1989	6	15.38		大专及本科	10	25.64
	1990—2000	5	12.82		硕士及以上	1	2.56
职业	学生	2	5.13	本地居住年限(年)	≤10	2	5.13
	公司职员	8	20.51		10~20	2	5.13
	农民	8	20.51		20~30	7	17.95
	私营业主	14	35.90		>30	28	71.79
	公务员	2	5.13	是否参与旅游	是	15	38.46
	退休工人	5	12.82	是否参与旅游	否	21	53.85
家庭年收入(元)	≤10000	2	5.13	收入来源 (多选)	务农	30	76.92
	10001~50000	10	25.64		旅游相关服务业	16	41.03
	50001~10000	12	30.77		其他(外出打工、单位上班)	7	17.95
	>100000	13	33.33		其他(外出打工、单位上班)	7	17.95
	不清楚或未填	2	5.13	参与旅游年收入	平均收入(元)	95444

访谈录音片段	编码
DS-01：现在河里的水质真的很差,农家乐开多了就会产生很多污水,洗洁精那种化工的东西都留在河里了。以前小的时候,我们的井水都可以喝的,现在井水不能喝啦,整个太湖的污染都很重。还有就是整个村子的格局都已经变掉了,从我小学的时候开始变化的。	河;农家乐;井水;太湖;村落格局
DS-14：这个路（紫石街）不好,十个人十个都说这个路不行,农民出去不方便,车子开起来太颠簸了,用车子把农副产品像杨梅、枇杷运出去全颠坏了,现在都是农民肩挑着山上采下来的杨梅和琵琶挑出去,原来的路都是铺砖路,都是我们自己铺出来的,现在这个路是不行的。	紫石街;杨梅;枇杷
DS-03：我们这里游客多了以后,比如说你发了财,邻居他们就会眼红,有竞争关系了,大家都在做农家乐、开餐馆这些生意,就是旅游带来的。	农家乐;餐馆;邻里关系
DS-05：家庭和邻里关系以前也没有太好,然后旅游发展之后变得更不好。他们的思想就停留在那里,人的格局不一样,邻里关系就发生了变化,家庭关系也好不到哪去,你看这边干活的都是老人,年轻人是不干活的,到我们80后这一代可能还会干一干,炒茶和采枇杷,我觉得以后也是没有人做了。	家庭关系;邻里关系;炒茶;采枇杷

题项	自然景观文化胁迫	聚落景观文化胁迫	生产生活文化胁迫	人际交往文化胁迫	精神仪式文化胁迫
破坏了山地的生态环境（Z1）	0.624
加重了河井湖泊的环境污染（Z2）	0.776
游客采摘花果破坏了果树林木（Z3）	0.759
使当地噪音增多了（Z6）	0.425
带来大量垃圾并使村落卫生环境变差（Z7）	0.541
导致村落的地理区位优势下降（J1）		0.513
加速了村落格局的破坏（J2）		0.781
损坏了村落的古街古巷（J3）		0.794
挤压了村中居民休闲的公共空间（S2）			0.699
导致了交通拥堵和出行不便（S3）			0.639
侵犯了个人隐私并扰乱了居民的正常生活（S4）			0.565
提高了农副产品和生活用品的价格（S5）			0.661
导致家庭和亲戚关系冷淡和疏离（R1）				0.653
导致邻里之间交流变少且关系逐渐淡漠（R2）				0.819
加速了方言、谚语、民谣等的流失（R4）				0.488
导致地方民俗风情等节庆活动的商业化（Y1）					0.733
促使地方婚丧嫁娶等传统文化发生变异（Y2）					0.845
促使宗教祭祀活动氛围下降或低俗化（Y3）					0.857
导致乡约家法等规制的忽视遗忘或形同虚设（Y4）					0.825
伤害或异化了本地居民的精神信仰（W1）					0.767
居民道德素质和乡村风气下降（如W2）					0.689
降低或沦丧了居民的文化自信和文化认同（W3）					0.770
淡化或忘却了家乡的历史人物和诗文传说（W4）					0.752
特征值	2.401	1.668	2.353	1.577	5.636
解释变异量（%）	10.439	7.251	10.232	6.858	24.504
累计解释变异量（%）	10.439	17.690	27.922	34.780	59.285

案例地	类目	平均最近邻距离(m)	期望平均最近邻距(m)	NNI	Z得分	P值	空间分布类型
陆巷	乡村文化	12.07	17.18	0.70	-8.06	0.00	显著集聚
	自然景观文化	29.65	27.37	0.92	-1.08	0.28	不显著
	聚落景观文化	29.48	29.06	0.99	-0.19	0.85	不显著
	生产生活文化	35.45	27.70	0.80	-2.46	0.01	显著集聚
	人际交往文化	19.61	25.00	1.28	0.01	0.01	显著离散
	精神仪式文化	18.26	29.32	0.62	-4.15	0.00	显著集聚
翁巷	乡村文化	29.37	34.64	0.85	-3.81	0.00	显著集聚
	自然景观文化	56.60	64.54	0.88	-1.49	0.14	不显著
	聚落景观文化	38.41	40.43	0.95	-0.79	0.43	不显著
	生产生活文化	43.69	71.23	0.61	-4.25	0.00	显著集聚
	人际交往文化	53.43	58.17	0.92	-0.52	0.60	不显著
	精神仪式文化	58.41	63.43	0.92	-0.64	0.52	不显著
杨湾	乡村文化	28.58	42.00	0.68	-7.43	0.00	显著集聚
	自然景观文化	111.32	102.23	1.09	0.82	0.41	不显著
	聚落景观文化	25.33	51.31	0.49	-8.44	0.00	显著集聚
	生产生活文化	40.23	58.93	0.68	-3.38	0.00	显著集聚
	人际交往文化	69.72	61.55	1.13	0.84	0.40	不显著
	精神仪式文化	96.74	33.06	2.93	9.75	0.00	显著离散

乡村旅游地文化胁迫类型、格局与机理研究——以苏州东山镇为例

Types, spatial pattern and mechanism of cultural stress of rural tourism destination: A case study of Dongshan town in Suzhou

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 9

参考文献 53

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	姜海宁, 张文忠, 张建珍, 段健. 21世纪以来非洲跨国移民空间格局及其对FDI影响[J]. 地理研究, 2021, 40(3): 725-742.
[2]	汪洋, 杨丹, 闵婕, 翟非同, 王雨, 吴晓娇, 张洪睿. 山地高密度城市热岛效应的多约束因子格局分析与定量探测——重庆都市区案例研究[J]. 地理研究, 2021, 40(3): 856-868.
[3]	朱佩娟, 郎泽慧, 贺清云, 张美芳, 吴国权. 长沙城市空间破碎化的格局特征及其影响因素[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(8): 1739-1754.
[4]	王成金, 陈沛然, 王姣娥, 李娜. 中国-丝路国家基础设施连通性评估方法与格局[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(12): 2685-2704.
[5]	徐宁, 李仙德, 李卫江. 中国新创汽车企业退出的空间格局及其影响因素[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(10): 2295-2312.
[6]	刘鹏飞, 孙斌栋. 中国城市生产、生活、生态空间质量水平格局与相关因素分析[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(1): 13-24.
[7]	陈沛然,王成金. 长江流域港口煤炭运输的空间演化及其影响因素[J]. 地理研究, 2019, 38(9): 2254-2272.
[8]	侯纯光,杜德斌,刘承良,翟晨阳. 全球人才流动网络复杂性的时空演化——基于全球高校留学生流动数据[J]. 地理研究, 2019, 38(8): 1862-1876.
[9]	吴威, 曹有挥, 梁双波, 张璐璐, 刘玮辰. 民用机场区域服务能力的结构与空间格局——以长江经济带民用机场体系为例[J]. 地理研究, 2019, 38(6): 1512-1526.
[10]	覃丽君, 金晓斌, 蒋宇超, 薛樵风, 成一农, 龙瀛, 杨绪红, 周寅康. 近六百年来长江三角洲地区城镇空间与城镇体系格局演变分析[J]. 地理研究, 2019, 38(5): 1045-1062.
[11]	李维维, 陈田, 马晓龙. 城市旅游综合体土地利用空间格局演变及驱动机制——以西安曲江为例[J]. 地理研究, 2019, 38(5): 1103-1118.
[12]	邹辉, 段学军. 长江沿江地区化工产业空间格局演化及影响因素[J]. 地理研究, 2019, 38(4): 884-897.
[13]	乔伟峰, 戈大专, 高金龙, 卢诚, 黄璐莹. 江苏省乡村地域功能与振兴路径选择研究[J]. 地理研究, 2019, 38(3): 522-534.
[14]	汪凡, 白永平, 周亮, 纪学朋, 徐智邦, 乔富伟. 中国基础教育公共服务均等化空间格局及其影响因素[J]. 地理研究, 2019, 38(2): 285-296.
[15]	范业婷, 金晓斌, 项晓敏, 刘晶, 杨绪红, 周寅康. 江苏省土地利用功能变化及其空间格局特征[J]. 地理研究, 2019, 38(2): 383-398.