地理研究 ›› 2021, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (8): 2292-2313.doi: 10.11821/dlyj020201070

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

流动与想象:西藏地方意义的多元互构研究

张兴泰1,2(), 陈志钢1(), 张骁鸣2, 金红燕1   

  1. 1. 陕西师范大学地理科学与旅游学院,西安 710119
    2. 中山大学旅游学院,珠海 519082
  • 收稿日期:2020-11-04 接受日期:2021-04-12 出版日期:2021-08-10 发布日期:2021-10-10
  • 通讯作者: 陈志钢(1979-),男,湖南石门人,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事遗产地土地利用与旅游商业化、旅游移民与消费空间建构研究。E-mail: zsuczg@163.com
  • 作者简介:张兴泰(1994-),男,吉林延吉人,博士研究生,主要从事文化地理学、组织行为与酒店人力资源管理研究。E-mail: xthy0105@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(41671134)

Liquidity and imagination: A study of multiple mutual-construction of Tibetan place meaning

ZHANG Xingtai1,2(), CHEN Zhigang1(), ZHANG Xiaoming2, JIN Hongyan1   

  1. 1. School of Geography and Tourism, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an 710119, China
    2. School of Tourism Management, Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai 519082, Guangdong, China
  • Received:2020-11-04 Accepted:2021-04-12 Published:2021-08-10 Online:2021-10-10

摘要:

研究聚焦于“地理想象”这一典型的文化地理现象,借助鲍曼的“流动的现代性”概念工具,分析了两种多元空间在同一时空进程中的混杂状态,尝试从流动性的视角重新阐释西藏地方意义的多元互构方式。以西藏为例,研究初步验证了如下两个理论猜想:① 未到西藏之前,人们的惯常思维是以经历过或正在经历的现实空间来对未经历的西藏空间加以想象,因为这种现实“在场”与想象“不在场”的时刻混杂,从而引发了一些改变人地关系的流动,如“我要去西藏亲眼看看”和“我想去真实地感受那里”等;② 真实到达西藏以后,“身体触摸”下的陌生西藏空间却不同于原本接近于诗意化表达下的那个想象空间,多元空间在同一时空进程下的混杂使得旅游者这一典型的现代人群体产生某种错觉,仿佛又置身于另一个新的现代性进程,于是在一个新的“第三空间”中通过与地方联结开始反思现代性之于个体的生命价值与存在意义。研究结论揭示了西藏地方意义的构成背后所隐藏的现代人对于流体化现代性生活的反身性思考,同时从学理上赋予地理想象概念以新的流动性解释。

关键词: 地理想象, 流动的现代性, 多元空间, 时空进程, 混杂, 第三空间, 地方意义

Abstract:

With the help of Zygmunt Bauman's analytical conceptual tool of “liquid modernity”, the research focuses on “geographical imagination”, a typical cultural geographical phenomenon, to analyze the two mixed states of multiple spaces in the same space-time context, trying to reinterpret the multiple mutual-construction of Tibetan place meaning from the perspective of liquidity. Taking Tibet as an example, this research preliminarily verifies the following two theoretical conjectures: (1) The first hybrid state of geographical imagination: before arriving in Tibet, individuals tend to imagine the unexplored Tibet space on the basis of the real space. It is precisely because the “presence” of reality is always mixed with the “absence” of imaginary space, which leads to some flows that change the relationship between man and land, such as “I want to go to Tibet to see in the flesh” or “I want to feel and touch there closely”. (2) As for the second hybrid state: after arriving in Tibet, individuals see a cruel fact that Tibet space under the real “physical contact” is unfamiliar and different from the imaginary space under the poetic description. Therefore, the hybrid state of the multiple spaces in the same space-time context makes tourists, a typical modern group of mankind, generate a certain geographical illusion, as if they were “trapped” in another new modernity process again. Therefore, modern people begin to reflect the life value and life meaning of the modernity in a new “third space” by connecting themselves with places. In particular, this research focuses on the multiple mutual-construction of Tibetan place meaning, that is, how individuals transform the “cold” Tibetan space into the “warm” Tibetan space. Specifically, at the beginning of the second hybrid state, although modern people can effectively separate Tibet from other spaces to a certain extent, the Tibetan space at this moment is not essentially “the center of the meaning constructed by personal experience” as Tuan believes. Furthermore, the transformation from the original Tibetan space to the meaningful Tibetan place is required to be carried out through the personal poetic expression. Hence, the imagination serves as a kind of complete power, embedding personal experience and self-narration into Tibet. In other words, due to the dual intervention of “liquidity and imagination”, the connection between individual and the place helps the modern groups to reinterpret themselves as the self-historical narratives of themselves, and answer “what does this place mean to me”. Finally, a Tibet marked with geographical location and personal identity is internalized into the place meaning of those modern people. The research conclusion reveals modern people's reflection on liquidized modern life hidden behind the meaning composition of the Tibetan place, which makes a new interpretation of the concept of geographical imagination from an academic point of view.

Key words: geographical imagination, liquid modernity, multiple spaces, space-time context, hybrid, third space, place meaning