可持续性转型研究动态与经济地理学展望

doi:10.11821/dlyj020210442

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

近年来,可持续性转型概念进入经济地理学者视野,用于探究区域绿色技术、消费市场和产业转型的多维因果过程与空间动力机制,已成为演化经济地理学和环境经济地理学新兴议题之一。为掌握该研究动态,本文对2000—2020年来共计2453篇可持续性转型文献进行回顾,重点探讨了转型地理研究进展和理论不足,阐述了经济地理学对可持续性转型研究的理论价值和融入方向。本文发现：① 可持续性转型是创新研究和可持续管理领域热门议题,呈多学科介入特点;其中,转型地理研究正不断崛起,并聚焦区域绿色新兴产业发展的社会-技术共演过程、多尺度动力机制、环境经济和社会效应及其转型地理性等问题。② 经济地理学对转型研究有三个视角优势：时空语境敏感性;转型过程、机制和结果的空间多样性;新产业系统的地方嵌入及其合法化的地理性。③ 经济地理学对可持续性转型研究含三个提升方向：概念内涵深化（含地方、尺度和空间）、多范式互动融合（演化、制度和政治经济地理）、分析框架构建方向（多地理尺度性与多层次视角,区域创新系统与技术创新系统）。④ 中国转型地理研究在三个议题上有广阔前景：基于国家语境敏感的地方转型探索、绿色利基发展与转型空间机制研究、以及区域新产业路径发展与转型研究。

关键词: 可持续性转型, 转型地理, 经济地理学, 文献计量, 研究综述, 展望

Abstract:

In recent years, the concept of sustainability transitions and its related research have increasingly drawn attention from economic geographers. Sustainability transitions studies aim to investigate the multi-scalar causality of mechanisms and spatial dynamics on how regional green technologies, consuming markets and industrial transformations emerge and develop over time. This research strand has become one of the emerging topics in both evolutionary economic geography and environmental economic geography. To better capture the progress of sustainability transitions studies, this paper conducts a bibliometrics-based literature review based on 2453 articles in the field during the past two decades. Besides, through an in-depth critical review on geographies of transitions, this paper identifies several key theoretical problems and shortcomings in the geographies of transitions literature. It has addressed the theoretical merits and value of economic geography for improving sustainability transitions studies. The findings of the paper are: (1) As one of the most promising research themes in innovation studies, sustainability management and environment science, sustainability transition studies have been increasingly disciplinarily pluralistic. The economic geographical research on sustainability transitions, in particular, focuses on three key research topics, including the co-evolution mechanisms between technologies and societies in regional new green industrial path development, multi-scalar driving forces and agency-structure interactive mechanisms of sustainability transitions, the role of transitions in shaping environmental economic and socio-spatial impacts, and the varieties of transition mechanisms. (2) There are in general three perspective advantages of economic geography for transitions studies that can be identified, namely, spatio-temporal sensitivity, spatial varieties of transition mechanisms, processes and impacts/outcomes, and place embeddedness of new socio-technical regimes in industrial systems and its geographies of legitimation. (3) Three orientations for economic geography to enhancing transitions studies are identified: deepening of geographical concepts (including place, scale and space), interactions and integrations with different approaches in economic geography (namely, transitions with evolutionary, institutional, and geographical political economy), and construction avenues for comprehensive analytical frameworks (integration of geographically multi-scalar perspective with multi-level perspectives, and that of regional innovation systems perspective with the approach of technological innovation systems. (4) Three promising research agendas on geographies of transitions in China are proposed, namely, localized transitions research by incorporating the role of Chinese-specific national contexts, green niche development and spatial mechanisms of its transitions, and regional new industrial path development and its related transition studies.

Key words: sustainability transitions, geographies of transitions, economic geography, bibliometrics, literature review, research agenda

胡晓辉, 董柯. 可持续性转型研究动态与经济地理学展望[J]. 地理研究, 2022, 41(1): 18-33.

HU Xiaohui, DONG Ke. A review on sustainability transitions and its research agendas in economic geography[J]. GEOGRAPHICAL RESEARCH, 2022, 41(1): 18-33.

图/表 3

参考文献 76

[1]	贺灿飞. 高级经济地理学. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2021.
	[ He Canfei. Advanced Economic Geography. Beijing: The Commercial Press, 2021.]
[2]	贺灿飞, 李伟. 演化经济地理学与区域发展. 区域经济评论, 2020, (1):39-54.
	[ He Canfei, Li Wei. Evolutionary economic geography and regional development. Regional Economic Review, 2020, (1):39-54.]. DOI: 10.14017/j.cnki.2095-5766.2020.0006. doi: 10.14017/j.cnki.2095-5766.2020.0006
[3]	胡晓辉, 张文忠. 制度演化与区域经济弹性: 两个资源枯竭型城市的比较. 地理研究, 2018, 37(7):1308-1319. doi: 10.11821/dlyj201807005
	[ Hu Xiaohui, Zhang Wenzhong. Institutional evolution and regional economic resilience: A comparison of two resource-exhausted cities in China. Geographical Research, 2018, 37(7):1308-1319.]. DOI: 10.11821/dlyj201807005. doi: 10.11821/dlyj201807005
[4]	Asheim B T. Smart specialization, innovation policy and regional innovation systems: What about new path development in less innovative regions? The European Journal of Social Science Research, 2019, 32(1):8-25. DOI: 10.1080/13511610. 2018.1491001. doi: 10.1080/13511610. 2018.1491001
[5]	Zhu S, Li Z, He C. Who leads regional industrial dynamics? "New industry creators" in Chinese regions. Growth and Change, 2019, 50(1):69-89. DOI: 10.1111/grow.12279. doi: 10.1111/grow.12279
[6]	高菠阳, 刘卫东. 政府空间治理与地方产业发展响应: 以重庆市电子信息产业为例. 人文地理, 2016, 149(3):1-8.
	[ Gao Boyang, Liu Weidong. Spatial governance and local response of industrial development: The rise of the computer industry in Chongqing. Human Geography, 2016, 149(3):1-8.]. DOI: 10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2016.03.001. doi: 10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2016.03.001
[7]	赵建吉, 王艳华, 苗长虹. 区域新产业形成机理: 演化经济地理学的视角. 经济地理, 2019, 39(6):36-45.
	[ Zhao Jianji, Wang Yanhua, Miao Changhong. Formation mechanism of new emerging industry: From the perspective of evolutionary economic geography. Economic Geography, 2019, 39(6):36-45.]. DOI: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2019.06.005. doi: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2019.06.005
[8]	Lachman D A. A survey and review of approaches to study transitions. Energy Policy, 2013, 58(7):269-276. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.03.013. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.03.013
[9]	Markard J, Raven R, Truffer B. Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects. Research Policy, 2012, 41(6):955-967. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.03.013. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.03.013
[10]	Matschoss K, Repo P. Forward-looking network analysis of ongoing sustainability transitions. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2020, 161:120288. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120288. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120288
[11]	Köhler J, Geels F W, Kern F, et al. An agenda for sustainability transitions research: State of the art and future directions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 2019, 31:1-32. DOI: 10.1016/j.eist.2019.01.004. doi: 10.1016/j.eist.2019.01.004
[12]	Murphy J. Human geography and socio-technical transition studies: Promising intersections. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 2015, 17(12):73-91. DOI: 10.1016/j.eist.2015.03.002. doi: 10.1016/j.eist.2015.03.002
[13]	Boschma R, Coenen L, Frenken K, et al. Towards a theory of regional diversification: Combining insights from evolutionary economic geography and transition studies. Regional Studies, 2017, 51(1):31-45. DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2016. 1258460. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2016. 1258460
[14]	Coenen L, Truffer B. Places and spaces of sustainability transitions: Geographical contributions to an emerging research and policy field. European Planning Studies, 2012, 20(3):367-374. DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2012.651802. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2012.651802
[15]	Hansen T, Coenen L. The geography of sustainability transitions: Review, synthesis and reflections on an emergent research field. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 2015, 17(12):92-109. DOI: 10.1016/j.eist.2014.11.001. doi: 10.1016/j.eist.2014.11.001
[16]	Truffer B, Murphy J, Raven R. The geography of sustainability transitions: Contours of an emerging theme. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 2015, 17:63-72. DOI: 10.1016/j.eist.2014.11.001. doi: 10.1016/j.eist.2014.11.001
[17]	胡晓辉, 朱晟君, Robert Hassink. 超越“演化”: 老工业区重构研究进展与范式反思. 地理研究, 2020, 39(5):1028-1044. doi: 10.11821/dlyj020190993
	[ Hu Xiaohui, Zhu Shengjun, Robert Hassink. Beyond the "evolutionary approach": A critical review and paradigmatic reflections on the restructuring of old industrial areas. Geographical Research, 2020, 39(5):1028-1044.]. DOI: 10.11821/dlyj020190993. doi: 10.11821/dlyj020190993
[18]	Hassink R, Isaksen A, Trippl M. Towards a comprehensive understanding of new regional industrial path development. Regional Studies, 2019, 53(11):1636-1645. DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2019.1566704. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2019.1566704
[19]	He C, Mao X. Environmental Economic Geography in China. Singapore: Springer nature Singapore Pte Ltd, 2020: 17-55. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-15-8991-12. doi: 10.1007/978-981-15-8991-12
[20]	余振, 龚惠文, 胡晓辉. 可持续性转型地理研究综述与展望. 地理科学进展, 2021, 40(3):1-16.
	[ Yu Zhen, Gong Huiwen, Hu Xiaohui. The geography of sustainability transitions: A sympathetic critique and research agenda. Progress in Geography, 2021, 40(3):498-510.]. DOI: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2021.03.013. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2021.03.013
[21]	刘卫东, 金凤君, 张文忠. 中国经济地理学研究进展与展望. 地理科学进展, 2011, 30(12):1479-1487.
	[ Liu Weidong, Jin Fengjun, Zhang Wenzhong. Progress in economic geography (2006-2011). Progress in Geography, 2011, 30(12):1479-1487.]. DOI: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2011.12.003. doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2011.12.003
[22]	贺灿飞, 周沂. 环境经济地理研究. 北京: 科学出版社, 2016: 30.
	[ He Canfei, Zhou Yi. Studies on Environmental Economic Geography. Beijing: Science Press, 2016: 30.]
[23]	贺灿飞, 郭琪, 马妍, 等. 西方经济地理学研究进展. 地理学报, 2014, 69(8):1207-1223. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201408014
	[ He Canfei, Guo Qi, Ma Yan, et al. Progress of economic geography in the west: A literature review. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2014, 69(8):1207-1223.]. DOI: 10.11821/dlxb201408014. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201408014
[24]	Rohe S. The regional facet of a global innovation system: Exploring the spatiality of resource formation in the value chain for onshore wind energy. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 2020, 36(9):331-344. DOI: 10.1016/j.eist.2020.02.002. doi: 10.1016/j.eist.2020.02.002
[25]	Mura M, Longo M, Toschi L, et al. The role of geographical scales in sustainability transitions: An empirical investigation of the European industrial context. Ecological Economics, 2021, 183:1-15. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.106968. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.106968
[26]	沈静, 向澄, 柳意云. 广东省污染密集型产业转移机制: 基于2000-2009年面板数据模型的实证. 地理研究, 2012, 31(2):357-368.
	[ Shen Jing, Xiang Cheng, Liu Yiyun. The mechanism of pollution-intensive industry relocation in Guangdong province, 2000-2009. Geographical Research, 2012, 31(2):357-368.]. DOI: 10.11821/yj2012020015. doi: 10.11821/yj2012020015
[27]	Geels F W. Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: A multi-level perspective and a case-study. Research Policy, 2002, 31(8):1257-1274. DOI: 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00062-8. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00062-8
[28]	Kemp R, Schot J, Hoogma R. Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation: The approach of strategic niche management. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 1998, 10(2):175-198. DOI: 10.1080/09537329808524310. doi: 10.1080/09537329808524310
[29]	Geels F W. The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: Responses to seven criticisms. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 2011, 1(1):24-40. DOI: 10.1016/j.eist.2011.02.002. doi: 10.1016/j.eist.2011.02.002
[30]	Kanger L. Rethinking the multi-level perspective for energy transitions: From regime life-cycle to explanatory typology of transition pathways. Energy Research & Social Science, 2020, 71:1-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2020.101829. doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2020.101829
[31]	Raven R, Schot J, Berkhout F. Space and scale in socio-technical transitions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 2012, 4:63-78. DOI: 10.1016/j.eist.2012.08.001. doi: 10.1016/j.eist.2012.08.001
[32]	Mirzania P, Balta-Ozkan N, Marais L. One technology, two pathways? Strategic niche management and the diverging diffusion of concentrated solar power in South Africa and the United States. Energy Research & Social Science, 2020, 69(11):331-344. DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2020. 101729. doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2020. 101729
[33]	Bergek A, Jacobsson S, Carlsson B, et al. Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: A scheme of analysis. Research Policy, 2008, 37(3):407-429. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2007.12.003. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2007.12.003
[34]	Hekkert M P, Suurs R A, Negro S O, et al. Functions of innovation systems: A new approach for analysing technological change. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2007, 74(4):413-432. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2006.03.002. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2006.03.002
[35]	Kivimaa P, Virkamäki V. Policy mixes: Policy interplay and low carbon transitions: The case of passenger transport in Finland. Environmental Policy and Governance, 2014, 24(1):28-41. DOI: 10.1002/eet.1629. doi: 10.1002/eet.1629
[36]	Binz C, Coenen L, Murphy J, et al. Geographies of transition from topical concerns to theoretical engagement: A comment on the transitions research agenda. Environment Innovation and Societal Transitions, 2020, 34(3):1-3. DOI: 10.1016/j.eist.2019.11.002. doi: 10.1016/j.eist.2019.11.002
[37]	Truffer B, Coenen L. Environmental innovation and sustainability transitions in regional studies. Regional Studies, 2012, 46(1):1-21. DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2012.646164. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2012.646164
[38]	Lawhon M, Murphy J. Socio-technical regimes and sustainability transitions: Insights from political ecology. Progress in Human Geography, 2012, 36(3):354-378. DOI: 0.1177/0309132511427960. doi: 0.1177/0309132511427960
[39]	Raven R, Kern F, Verhees B, et al. Niche construction and empowerment through socio-political work: A meta-analysis of six low-carbon technology cases. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 2016, 18(3):164-180. DOI: 10.1016/j.eist.2015.02.002. doi: 10.1016/j.eist.2015.02.002
[40]	Bridge G, Gailing L. New energy spaces: Towards a geographical political economy of energy transition. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 2020, 52(6):1037-1050. DOI: 10.1177/0308518X20939570. doi: 10.1177/0308518X20939570
[41]	Mans U. Tracking geographies of sustainability transitions: Relational and territorial aspects of urban policies in Casablanca and Cape Town. Geoforum, 2014, 57(11):150-161. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2014.08.018. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2014.08.018
[42]	Horbach J. Determinants of environmental innovation: New evidence from German panel data sources. Research Policy, 2008, 37(1):163-173. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2007.08.006. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2007.08.006
[43]	Cooke P. Transition regions: Regional-national eco-innovation systems and strategies. Progress in Planning, 2011, 76(3):105-146. DOI: 10.1016/j.progress.2011.08.002. doi: 10.1016/j.progress.2011.08.002
[44]	Geels F W. Reconceptualising the co-evolution of firms-in-industries and their environments: Developing an inter-disciplinary triple embeddedness framework. Research Policy, 2014, 43(2):261-277. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2013.10.006. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2013.10.006
[45]	Smith A, Stirling A. Innovation, sustainability and democracy: An analysis of grassroots contributions. Journal of Self-Governance and Management Economics, 2018, 6(1):64-97. DOI: 10.22381/jsme6120183. doi: 10.22381/jsme6120183
[46]	MacKinnon D, Karlsen A, Dawley S, et al. Legitimation, institutional path and regional path creation: A cross-national study of offshore wind. Regional Studies, 2021: 1-12. DOI: 10.18080/00343404.2020.1861239. doi: 10.18080/00343404.2020.1861239
[47]	沈静, 周楚平. 国外环境公正研究综述. 热带地理, 2019, 39(2):298-308.
	[ Shen Jing, Zhou Chuping. A review of foreign research on environmental justice. Tropical Geography, 2019, 39(2):298-308.]. DOI: 10.13284/j.cnki.rddl.003113. doi: 10.13284/j.cnki.rddl.003113
[48]	Eck N J, Waltman L, Dekker R, et al. A comparison of two techniques for bibliometric mapping: Multidimensional scaling and VOS. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2010, 61(12):2405-2416. DOI: 10.1002/asi.21421. doi: 10.1002/asi.21421
[49]	Chen C M. Science mapping: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Data and Information Science, 2017, 2(2):1-40. DOI: 10.1515/jdis-2017-0006. doi: 10.1515/jdis-2017-0006
[50]	Hölscher K, Frantzeskaki N, McPhearson T, et al. Tales of transforming cities: Transformative climate governance capacities in New York city, U.S. and Rotterdam, Netherlands. Journal of Environmental Management, 2019, 231(1):843-857. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.10.043. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.10.043
[51]	Raven R, Walrave B. Overcoming transformational failures through policy mixes in the dynamics of technological innovation systems. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 2020, 153:1-11. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2018.05.008. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2018.05.008
[52]	Monstadt J. Urban governance and the transition of energy systems: Institutional change and shifting energy and climate policies in Berlin. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 2007, 31(2):326-343. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2007.00725.x doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2007.00725.x
[53]	Kear M. Spaces of transition spaces of tomorrow: Making a sustainable future in Southeast False Creek, Vancouver. Cities, 2007, 24(3):24-334. DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2007.01.005. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2007.01.005
[54]	Augenstein K. Analysing the potential for sustainable e-mobility: The case of Germany. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 2015, 14:101-115. DOI: 10.1016/j.eist.2014.05.002. doi: 10.1016/j.eist.2014.05.002
[55]	Argyriou I. Urban energy transitions in ordinary cities: Philadelphia's place-based policy innovations for socio-technical energy change in the commercial sector. Urban Research & Practice, 2018, 13(3):243-275. DOI: 10.1080/17535069.2018. 1540654. doi: 10.1080/17535069.2018. 1540654
[56]	Yu Z, Gibbs D. Sustainability transitions and leapfrogging in latecomer cities: The development of solar thermal energy in Dezhou, China. Regional Studies, 2018a, 52(1):68-79. DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2016.1260706. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2016.1260706
[57]	Huang P, Westman L, Broto V C. A culture-led approach to understanding energy transitions in China: The correlative epistemology. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 2021, 46(4):900-916. DOI: 10.1111/tran.12453. doi: 10.1111/tran.12453
[58]	Yu Z. Gibbs D. Social ties, homophily and heterophily in urban sustainability transitions: User practices and solar water heater diffusion in China. Energy Research & Social Science, 2018b, 46(12):236-244. DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2018.07.029. doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2018.07.029
[59]	Lagendijk A. Learning from conceptual flow in regional studies: Framing present debates, unbracketing past debates. Regional Studies, 2006, 40(4):385-399. DOI: 10.1080/00343400600725202. doi: 10.1080/00343400600725202
[60]	Dawley S, MacKinnon D, Pollock R. Creating strategic couplings in global production networks: Regional institutions and lead firm investment in the Humber region, UK. Journal of Economic Geography, 2019, 19(4):853-872. DOI: 10.1093/jeg/lbz004. doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbz004
[61]	Veldhuizen C. Smart specialisation as a transition management framework: Driving sustainability-focused regional innovation policy? Research Policy, 2020, 49(6):103982. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2020.103982Get. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2020.103982Get
[62]	Hu X, Xu W, Miao J T. Think locally, act locally: A critique of China's specialty town program in practice. Geographical Review, 2021, 111(3):393-414. DOI: 10.1080/00167428.2020.1793337. doi: 10.1080/00167428.2020.1793337
[63]	Grillitsch M, Sutarauta M. Trinity of change agency, regional development paths and opportunities spaces. Progress in Human Geography, 2020, 44(4):704-723. DOI: 10.1177/0309132519853870. doi: 10.1177/0309132519853870
[64]	Grillitsch M, Asheim B, Nielsen H. Temporality of agency in regional development. European Urban and Regional Studies, 2021, 29(1):107-125. DOI: 10.1177/09697764211028884. doi: 10.1177/09697764211028884
[65]	Heiberg J, Binz C, Truffer B. The geography of technology legitimation: How multiscalar institutional dynamics matter for path creation in emerging industries. Economic Geography, 2020, 96(5):470-498. DOI: 10.1080/00130095.2020.1842189. doi: 10.1080/00130095.2020.1842189
[66]	Njøs R, Sjøtun S G, Jakobsen S E, et al. Expanding analyses of path creation: Interconnections between territory and technology. Economic Geography, 2020, 96(3):266-288, DOI: 10.1080/00130095.2020.1756768. doi: 10.1080/00130095.2020.1756768
[67]	Henderson D. Institutional work in the maintenance of regional innovation policy instruments: Evidence from Wales. Regional Studies, 2020, 54(3):429-439. DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2019.1634251. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2019.1634251
[68]	Sjøtun S G. The role of engineers in the greening of the south-western Norwegian maritime industry: Practices, agency and social fields. Geoforum, 2020, 113:111-120. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.05.001. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.05.001
[69]	Sotarauta M, Suvinen N, Jolly S, et al. The many roles of change agency in the game of green path development in the North. European Urban and Regional Studies, 2021, 28(2):92-110. DOI: 10.1177/0969776420944995. doi: 10.1177/0969776420944995
[70]	Hu X, Hassink R. Place leadership with Chinese characteristics? A case study of the Zaozhuang coal-mining region in transition. Regional Studies, 2017, 51(2):224-234. DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2016.1200189. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2016.1200189
[71]	Hu X, Yang C. Institutional change and divergent economic resilience: Path development of two resource-depleted cities in China. Urban Studies, 2019, 56(16):3466-3485. DOI: 10.1177/0042098018817223. doi: 10.1177/0042098018817223
[72]	Chen H, Li X, Frank M, et al. Automation impacts on China's polarized job market. Journal of Computational Social Science, 2021: 1-19. DOI: 10.1007/s42001-021-00134-8. doi: 10.1007/s42001-021-00134-8
[73]	Huang P, Negro S O, Hekkert M, et al. How China became a leader in solar PV: An innovation system analysis. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2016, 64(10):777-789. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.06.061. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.06.061
[74]	胡晓辉, 梁陈岑. 国际区域友好关系和企业全球化的知识管道构建: 以浙江省和德国石荷州为例. 世界地理研究, 2021, 30(4):685-695.
	[ Hu Xiaohui, Liang Chencen. International sister-region relations and the construction of knowledge pipelines for firm internationalization: The case of the Zhejiang and Schleswig-Holstein partnership. World Regional Studies, 2021, 30(4):685-695.]. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9479.2021.04.2020223. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9479.2021.04.2020223
[75]	沈静, 曹媛媛. 全球价值链绿色化的概念性认知及其研究框架. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(10):1462-1472. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2019.10.002
	[ Shen Jing, Cao Yuanyuan. Concept and research framework of greening global value. Progress in Geography, 2019, 38(10):1462-1472.]. DOI: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2019.10.002. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2019.10.002
[76]	Huang P, Liu Y. Toward just energy transitions in authoritarian regimes: Indirect participation and adaptive governance. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 2021, 64(1):1-21. DOI: 10.1080/09640568.2020.1743245. doi: 10.1080/09640568.2020.1743245

话题（频数）	2000—2004年关键词	2005—2007年关键词	2008—2010年关键词	2011—2013年关键词	2014—2016年关键词	2017—2020年关键词
转型（545）	管理	低碳城市	创新系统	韧性	战略	循环经济
可持续性（352）	政策	消费	创新系统	适应能力	空间	地理
政策（217）	国家政府	权力	动态性	政治	空间	再生能源
治理（204）	管理	创新	复杂性	空间	社会-技术转型	社区参与
管理（196）	公私合作	城市	创新系统	效果	多层次视角	水资源管理
创新（169）	可持续性	管理	系统性	多层次视角	制度	城市转型