政治地理学研究中“地理”的重要性——兼论中国政治地理学的范式选择和理论建构

doi:10.11821/dlyj020210455

地理研究 ›› 2022, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (3): 931-944.doi: 10.11821/dlyj020210455

• 学术论评 • 上一篇

政治地理学研究中“地理”的重要性——兼论中国政治地理学的范式选择和理论建构

王雨¹(), 安宁², 胡志丁³, 王丰龙⁴()

1.南方科技大学社会科学中心,深圳 518055
2.华南师范大学地理科学学院/亚洲地理研究中心,广州 510631
3.华东师范大学全球创新与发展研究院,上海 200062
4.华南师范大学地理科学学院/行政区划与空间治理研究中心,广州 510631

收稿日期:2021-05-26 接受日期:2021-10-08 出版日期:2022-03-10 发布日期:2022-05-10
通讯作者: 王丰龙（1988-）,男,内蒙古赤峰人,博士,研究员,主要从事政治地理学、幸福地理学和地理学思想等研究。E-mail: flwang@m.scnu.edu.cn
作者简介:王雨（1984-）,男,河南洛阳人,博士,研究员,博士生导师,主要从事政治地理学和政治生态学研究。E-mail: wangy63@sustech.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(41801132);国家自然科学基金项目(42171225);国家自然科学基金项目(42171226);国家社科重大基金项目(20&ZD138、21&ZD175);教育部人文社会科学研究一般项目(17YJCZH183);华东师范大学科技创新与发展战略研究中心课题(2021-03)

Geography matters in political geography: A discussion on paradigmatic selection and theoretical construction for the development of Chinese political geography

WANG Yu¹(), AN Ning², HU Zhiding³, WANG Fenglong⁴()

1. Center for Social Sciences, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen 518055, Guangdong, China
2. School of Geography & Centre for Asian Geography Studies, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510631, China
3. Institute of Global Innovation and Development, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China
4. School of Geography & The Center of Administrative Division and Spatial Governance, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510631, China

Received:2021-05-26 Accepted:2021-10-08 Published:2022-03-10 Online:2022-05-10

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

在国际形势应对和国内社会治理的需求推动下,目前中国政治地理学的学科发展得到了越来越多的关注,基本形成了外源性研究与内生性研究并行的学科体系。然而与国际关系学、政治经济学、公共管理学等相关学科相比,中国政治地理学研究的影响力仍然有限,相关理论和方法较少被其他学科采纳应用,在国内外地缘战略和社会政策制定中的声音也相对不足。本文一方面直接回应了其他学科对“地理”内涵及其重要性的偏见和误解,另一方面指出了中国政治地理学自身在机理性研究、宏观-微观联系、研究对象整合和理论建构等方面存在的不足。本文还从权力-空间关系出发,明确了政治地理学研究的核心议题,期望有助于整合研究议题、凝聚研究共识、推动知识积累,从而增强政治地理学科的理论生产能力及其在更广泛学科体系中的影响力。

关键词: 政治地理学, 范式选择, 分析框架, 权力-空间关系, 背景效应

Abstract:

Driven by the needs of coping with changing international settings and improving domestic social governance, the development of Chinese political geography has gained increasing scholarly attention and formed a disciplinary framework based on both imported and domestic studies. However, the impact of Chinese political geography remains limited compared with other relevant disciplines such as international relations, political economy and public administration. The theories and methods of political geography have rarely been used by other disciplines. Its influence in the making of geopolitical strategies and social governance policies is also restricted. This paper, on the one hand, responds to other disciplines′ critics and misunderstanding of geography and its significance; on the other hand, points out shortcomings of Chinese political geography in terms of mechanism investigations, macro-micro linkages, integration of research subjects, and the construction of theories. It argues that geographical research has moved beyond the traditional focus on physical environment or geographical distance. Instead, an integrative, dialectical and relational perspective of human-nature relations, combining with the disentanglement of multiple dimensions of space, allows geography to remain a valuable discipline. In the meantime, the development of political geography is subject to two major challenges. One concerns the disconnection between empirical and normative studies which divergently pursue micro mechanisms of case studies and macro patterns of general phenomena. The other is stemmed from the fragmentation of research subjects which focus on biophysical components of the social-ecological system rather than fundamental notions of political geographical study. Against this backdrop, this paper outlines an analytical framework of political geography that includes the core research concepts and subjects of political geography from the perspective of power-space relation. It points out that territory, boundary and scale constitute the foundation upon which both complex power dynamics and diverse spatial processes can be examined. Through this analytical framework, it is expected that political geographers could further integrate research subjects, consolidate common understanding, and accumulate knowledge, so as to enhance the theoretical construction and influence of political geography.

Key words: political geography, paradigm selection, analytical framework, power-space relation, contextual effects

王雨, 安宁, 胡志丁, 王丰龙. 政治地理学研究中“地理”的重要性——兼论中国政治地理学的范式选择和理论建构[J]. 地理研究, 2022, 41(3): 931-944.

WANG Yu, AN Ning, HU Zhiding, WANG Fenglong. Geography matters in political geography: A discussion on paradigmatic selection and theoretical construction for the development of Chinese political geography[J]. GEOGRAPHICAL RESEARCH, 2022, 41(3): 931-944.

图/表 1

参考文献 111

[1]	Storey D. Political geography. In: Kitchin Rob, Thrift Nigel. International Encyclopedia of Human Geography (Volume 8). Oxford: Elsevier, 2009: 243-253.
[2]	刘云刚, 安宁, 王丰龙. 中国政治地理学的学术谱系. 地理学报, 2018, 73(12): 2269-2281. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201812001
	[Liu Yungang, An Ning, Wang Fenglong. The outline and genealogy of Chinese pilitical geography. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2018, 73(12): 2269-2281.]. DOI: 10.11821/dlxb201812001. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201812001
[3]	Agnew J. Political geography. In: Richardson Douglas, Castree Noel, Goodchild Michael F, et al. The International Encyclopedia of Geography. New York: Wiley-Blackwell, 2019: 5183-5201.
[4]	陆大道, 杜德斌. 关于加强地缘政治地缘经济研究的思考. 地理学报, 2013, 68(6): 723-727.
	Lu Dadao, Du Debin. Some thoughts on the strengthening of geopolitical and geo-economic studies. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2013, 68(6): 723-727.]. DOI: http://www.geog.com.cn/CN/Y2013/V68/I6/723. doi: http://www.geog.com.cn/CN/Y2013/V68/I6/723
[5]	Liu Y, Wang F, An N. The duality of political geography in China: Integration and challenges. Geopolitics, 2020, 25(4): 968-988. DOI: 10.1080/14650045.2018.1465042. doi: 10.1080/14650045.2018.1465042
[6]	刘云刚, 王丰龙. 政治地理学中的领域概念辨析. 人文地理, 2019, 34(1): 14-19.
	[Liu Yungang, Wang Fenglong. Decomposing the concept of territory in political geography. Human Geography, 2019, 34(1): 14-19.]. DOI: 10.13959/j.issn1003-2398.2019.01.003. doi: 10.13959/j.issn1003-2398.2019.01.003
[7]	刘云刚, 叶清露, 许晓霞. 空间、权力与领域:领域的政治地理研究综述与展望. 人文地理, 2015, 30(3): 1-6.
	[Liu Yungang, Ye Qinglu, Xu Xiaoxia. Space, power and territory: A review on territory in political geography. Human Geography, 2015, 30(3): 1-6.]. DOI: 10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2015.03.001. doi: 10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2015.03.001
[8]	宋涛, 陆大道, 梁宜, 等. 近20年国际地缘政治学的研究进展. 地理学报, 2016, 71(4): 551-563. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201604002
	[Song Tao, Lu Dadao, Liang Yi, et al. Research progress of international geopolitics, 1996-2015. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2016, 71(4): 551-563.]. DOI: 10.11821/dlxb201604002. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201604002
[9]	胡志丁, 王丰龙, 安宁, 等. 洋能否为中用?西方政治地理与地缘政治发展的借鉴与反思. 地理研究, 2020, 39(2): 217-231. doi: 10.11821/dlyj020190921
	[Hu Zhiding, Wang Fenglong, An Ning, et al. Can foreign theories be used in China? Reflections and references on the development of western political geography and geopolitics. Geographical Research, 2020, 39(2): 217-231.]. DOI: 10.11821/dlyj020190921. doi: 10.11821/dlyj020190921
[10]	安宁, 钱俊希, 陈晓亮, 等. 国际上的政治地理学研究进展与启示: 对《Political Geography》杂志2005-2015年载文的分析. 地理学报, 2016, 71(2): 217-235. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201602004
	[An Ning, Qian Junxi, Chen Xiaoliang, et al. Progress in recent international political geography research: Towards an analysis of journal papers in political geography. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2016, 71(2): 217-235.]. DOI: 10.11821/dlxb201602004. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201602004
[11]	王丰龙, 刘云刚. 尺度概念的演化与尺度的本质:基于二次抽象的尺度认识论. 人文地理, 2015, 30(1): 9-15.
	[Wang Fenglong, Liu Yungang. An analytical framework of scale based on second abstraction. Human Geography, 2015, 30(1): 9-15.]. DOI: 10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2015.01.002. doi: 10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2015.01.002
[12]	刘云刚, 王丰龙. 尺度的人文地理内涵与尺度政治: 基于1980年代以来英语圈人文地理学的尺度研究. 人文地理, 2011, 26(3): 1-6.
	[Liu Yungang, Wang Fenglong. Concept of scale in human geography and politics of scale: Based on anglophone human geography since 1980s. Human Geography, 2011, 26(3): 1-6.]. DOI: 10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2011.03.028. doi: 10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2011.03.028
[13]	王丰龙, 刘云刚. 尺度政治理论框架. 地理科学进展, 2017, 36(12): 1500-1509. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2017.12.005
	[Wang Fenglong, Liu Yungang. Towards a theoretical framework of 'politics of scale'. Progress in Geography, 2017, 36(12): 1500-1509.]. DOI: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2017.12.005. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2017.12.005
[14]	王丰龙, 刘云刚. 治理术与地理学:研究述评与展望. 人文地理, 2015, 30(5): 1-8.
	[Wang Fenglong, Liu Yungang. Governmentality and geography: Review and prospect. Human Geography, 2015, 30(5): 1-8.]. DOI: 10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2015.05.001. doi: 10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2015.05.001
[15]	胡志丁, 曹原, 刘玉立, 等. 我国政治地理学研究的新发展: 地缘环境探索. 人文地理, 2013, 28(5): 123-128.
	[Hu Zhiding, Cao Yuan, Liu Yuli, et al. A new development of political geography research in china: Geo-setting. Human Geography, 2013, 28(5): 123-128.]. DOI: 10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2013.05.025. doi: 10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2013.05.025
[16]	胡志丁, 陆大道. 基于批判地缘政治学视角解读经典地缘政治理论. 地理学报, 2015, 70(6): 851-863. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201506001
	[Hu Zhiding, Lu Dadao. The re-interpretation of the classical geopolitical theories from a critical geopolitical perspective. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2015, 70(6): 851-863.]. DOI: 10.11821/dlxb201506001. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201506001
[17]	王丰龙, 胡志丁, 刘承良, 等. 中国政治地理与地缘政治理论研究展望:青年学者笔谈. 世界地理研究, 2020, 29(2): 232-251.
	[Wang Fenglong, Hu Zhiding, Liu Chengliang, et al. A prospect on the theoretical studies of political geography and geopolitics in China: Viewpoints from some young scholars. World Regional Studies, 2020, 29(2): 232-251.]. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9479.2020.02.2019810. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9479.2020.02.2019810
[18]	安宁, 朱竑. 后人文主义视角下的中国地缘政治话语研究. 地理科学, 2018, 38(6): 838-848. doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2018.06.002
	[An Ning, Zhu Hong. Examining Chinese geopolitical discourses under the theoretical framework of posthumanism. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2018, 38(6): 838-848.]. DOI: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2018.06.002. doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2018.06.002
[19]	Du D, Duan D, Liu C, et al. Twenty-five years of progress in geopolitics research: Efforts from China's geographers. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2016, 26(8): 1223-1242. DOI: 10.1007/s11442-016-1323-y. doi: 10.1007/s11442-016-1323-y
[20]	宋长青, 葛岳静, 刘云刚, 等. 从地缘关系视角解析“一带一路”的行动路径. 地理研究, 2018, 37(1): 3-19. doi: 10.11821/dlyj201801001
	[Song Changqing, Ge Yuejing, Liu Yungang, et al. Undertaking research on Belt and Road Initiative from the geo-relation perspective. Geographical Research, 2018, 37(1): 2-19.]. DOI: 10.11821/dlyj201801001. doi: 10.11821/dlyj201801001
[21]	程利莎, 王士君, 杨冉. 中国东北地区地缘关系演化过程及区域效应. 地理科学, 2019, 39(8): 1284-1292. doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2019.08.010
	[Cheng Lisha, Wang Shijun, Yang Ran. Evolution process and regional effect of geo-relations in Northeast China. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2019, 39(8): 1284-1292.]. DOI: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2019.08.010. doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2019.08.010
[22]	胡志丁, 葛岳静, 骆华松, 等. 地缘环境解析:理论与方法笔谈. 世界地理研究, 2019, 28(2): 2-12.
	[Hu Zhiding, Ge Yuejing, Luo Huasong, et al. Analysis of geo-setting: Theory and method. World Regional Studies, 2019, 28(2): 2-12.]. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9479.201902.2018800. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9479.201902.2018800
[23]	胡志丁, 杜德斌. 日本德川幕府时期的地缘环境分析: 兼论国别地缘环境分析框架. 地理学报, 2020, 75(10): 2047-2060. doi: 10.11821/dlxb202010002
	[Hu Zhiding, Du Debin. An investigation of Japanese geo-setting during the period of Tokugawa Bakufu: A tentative examination of the analytical framework for geo-setting research. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2020, 75(10): 2047-2060.]. DOI: 10.11821/dlxb202010002. doi: 10.11821/dlxb202010002
[24]	王雨. 一国两制下的跨境水资源治理. 热带地理, 2017, 37(2): 154-162.
	[Wang Yu. Trans-boundary water governance under the framework of "One Country, Two Systems". Tropical Geography, 2017, 37(2): 154-162.]. DOI: 10.13284/j.cnki.rddl.002928. doi: 10.13284/j.cnki.rddl.002928
[25]	Laponce J A. Political science: An import-export analysis of journals and footnotes. Political Studies, 1980, 28(3): 401-419. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.1980.tb00477.x. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.1980.tb00477.x
[26]	Morgenthau H. J. Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace (3rd Edition). New York: Alfred A Knopf, 1963: 1-630.
[27]	阎学通. 超越地缘战略思维. 国际政治科学, 2019, 4(4): 4-7.
	[Yan Xuetong. Go beyond the geoplitical thinking. Quarterly Journal of International Politics, 2019, 4(4): 4-7.]. DOI: 10.16513/j.cnki.qjip.2019.0022. doi: 10.16513/j.cnki.qjip.2019.0022
[28]	王辑思. “西进”, 中国地缘战略的再平衡. 环球时报, 2012-10-17.
	[Wang Jisi. Going West: Re-balance of China's Geopolitical Strategy. Global Times, 2012-10-17.]
[29]	Kaplan R D. The Revenge of Geography: What the Map Tells Us About Coming Conflicts and the Battle Against Fate. New York: Random House, 2013: 1-448.
[30]	Marshall T. Prisoners of Geography: Ten Maps That Tell You Everything You Need To Know About Global Politics. London: Elliott & Thompson, 2015: 1-256.
[31]	Muir R. Political Geography: A New Introduction. Hampshire: Macmillan, 1997: 1-347.
[32]	Muir R. Political geography and the political scientist. The Indian Journal of Political Science, 1979, 40(1): 18-25.
[33]	O'Loughlin J. Geography as space and geography as place: The divide between political science and political geography continues. Geopolitics, 2000, 5(3): 126-137. DOI: 10.1080/14650040008407695. doi: 10.1080/14650040008407695
[34]	O'Loughlin J. Thirty-five years of political geography and Political Geography: The good, the bad and the ugly. Political Geography, 2018, 65: 143-151. DOI: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2018.05.004. doi: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2018.05.004
[35]	Toal G. Muted impact: Is political geography still a backwater? Political Geography, 2018, 65: 152-153. DOI: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2018.05.007. doi: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2018.05.007
[36]	Jones A, Clark J. Political geography and political science: Common territory? Geopolitics, 2020, 25(2): 472-478. DOI: 10.1080/14650045.2019.1643161. doi: 10.1080/14650045.2019.1643161
[37]	Johnston R. Political geographers and geographical political scientists: Crisis, what crisis? Political Geography, 2019, 70: 148-151. DOI: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2018.08.010. doi: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2018.08.010
[38]	Hartshorne R. The functional approach in political geography. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 1950, 40(2): 95-130. doi: 10.1080/00045605009352027
[39]	Brian J J L. B. Review on international regions and the international system: A study in political ecology by Bruce M. Russett. Geographical Review, 1969, 59(3): 450-451. DOI: 10.2307/213490. doi: 10.2307/213490
[40]	Johnston R. Out of the 'moribund backwater': Territory and territoriality in political geography. Political Geography, 2001, 20(6): 677-693. DOI: 10.1016/S0962-6298(01)00032-4. doi: 10.1016/S0962-6298(01)00032-4
[41]	Antonsich M, Minghi J, Johnston R, et al. Interventions on the 'moribund backwater' forty years on. Political Geography, 2009, 28(7): 388-394. DOI: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2009.10.007. doi: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2009.10.007
[42]	Agnew J. The territorial trap: The geographical assumptions of international relations theory. Review of International Political Economy, 1994, 1(1): 53-80. DOI: 10.1080/09692299408434268. doi: 10.1080/09692299408434268
[43]	Gray C S. Inescapable geography. Journal of Strategic Studies, 1999, 22(2-3): 161-177. DOI: 10.1080/01402399908437759. doi: 10.1080/01402399908437759
[44]	King G. Why context should not count. Political Geography, 1996, 15: 159-164. DOI: 10.1016/0962-6298(95)00079-8. doi: 10.1016/0962-6298(95)00079-8
[45]	Pickering S. Understanding Geography and War: Misperceptions, Foundations, and Prospects. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017: 1-198.
[46]	Newman D. Comments on Daniel Elazar, political geography and political science. Political Geography, 1999, 18(8): 905-911. DOI: 10.1016/S0962-6298(99)00043-8. doi: 10.1016/S0962-6298(99)00043-8
[47]	Lapid Y. Where should we begin? Political geography and international relations. Political Geography, 1999, 18(8): 895-900. DOI: 10.1016/S0962-6298(99)00041-4. doi: 10.1016/S0962-6298(99)00041-4
[48]	Elazat D J. Political science, geography, and the spatial dimension of politics. Political Geography, 1999, 18(8): 875-886. DOI: 10.1016/S0962-6298(99)00039-6. doi: 10.1016/S0962-6298(99)00039-6
[49]	Lustick I S. Geography and political science. Political Geography, 1999, 18(8): 901-904. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0962-6298(99)00042-6. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0962-6298(99)00042-6
[50]	Taylor P J. Places, spaces and Macy's: Place-space tensions in the political geography of modernities. Progress in Human Geography, 1999, 23(1): 7-26. DOI: 10.1191/030913299674657991. doi: 10.1191/030913299674657991
[51]	Taylor P J. Political Geography: World-economy, Nation-state and Locality. London: Longman, 1993.
[52]	钟飞腾. 超越地缘政治的迷思:中国的新亚洲战略. 外交评论(外交学院学报), 2014, 31(6): 16-39.
	[Zhong Feiteng. Beyond geopolitical myths: China's new Asia strategy. Foreign Affairs Review, 2014, (6): 16-39.]. DOI: 10.13569/j.cnki.far.2014.06.016. doi: 10.13569/j.cnki.far.2014.06.016
[53]	Holdar S. The ideal state and the power of geography the life-work of Rudolf Kjellén. Political Geography, 1992, 11(3): 307-323. DOI: 10.1016/0962-6298(92)90031-N. doi: 10.1016/0962-6298(92)90031-N
[54]	Mackinder H J. The geographical pivot of history (1904). The Geographical Journal, 2004, 170(4): 298-321. DOI: 10.1111/j.0016-7398.2004.00132.x. doi: 10.1111/j.0016-7398.2004.00132.x
[55]	Parker G. Political Geography: Western Geopolitical Thought in the Twentieth Century. London: Routledge, 2014: 1-212.
[56]	杰弗里·帕克. 二十世纪的西方地理政治思想. 北京: 解放军出版社, 1992: 53-89.
	[Park J (auth), [Li Yiming (trans). Western Geopolitical Thought in the Twentieth Century. Beijing: PLA Press, 1992.]
[57]	Hartshorne R. Perspective on the Nature of Geograplay. Chicago: Rand McNally & Company for the Association, 1959: 1-201.
[58]	Mamadouh V D. Geopolitics in the nineties: One flag, many meanings. GeoJournal, 1998, 46(4): 237-253. DOI: 10.1023/A:1006950931650. doi: 10.1023/A:1006950931650
[59]	Flint C., Taylor P. J. Political Geography: World-Economy, Nation-State and Locality (7th Edition). New York: Routledge, 2018: 1-370.
[60]	Parker G. Geopolitics: Past, Present, and Future. London: Pinter Press, 1998: 1-199.
[61]	胡志丁, 葛岳静, 徐建伟, 等. 空间与经济地理学理论构建. 地理科学进展, 2012, 31(6): 676-685.
	[Hu Zhiding, Ge Yuejing, Xu Jianwei, et al. Space and the theoretical construction of economic geography. Progress in Geography, 2012, 31(6): 676-685.]. DOI: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2012.06.002. doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2012.06.002
[62]	王丰龙, 刘云刚. 空间的生产研究综述与展望. 人文地理, 2011, 26(2): 13-19.
	[Wang Fenglong, Liu Yungang. A review of researches on the production of space. Human Geography, 2011, 26(2): 13-19.]. DOI: 10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2011.02.004. doi: 10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2011.02.004
[63]	安宁, 冯秋怡, 朱竑. 基于报业话语的广州非裔社区的空间想象分析. 地理学报, 2019, 74(8): 1650-1662. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201908012
	[An Ning, Feng Qiuyi, Zhu Hong. The spatial imagination of Guangzhou's African community: Analysis based on newspaper discourses. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019, 74(8): 1650-1662.]. DOI: 10.11821/dlxb201908012. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201908012
[64]	Dalby S. Writing critical geopolitics: Campbell, Ó Tuathail, Reynolds and dissident skepticism. Political Geography, 1996, 15(6): 655-660. DOI: 10.1016/0962-6298(96)00035-2. doi: 10.1016/0962-6298(96)00035-2
[65]	Pinkerton A, Dodds K. Radio geopolitics: Broadcasting, listening and the struggle for acoustic spaces. Progress in Human Geography, 2009, 33(1): 10-27. DOI: 10.1177/0309132508090978. doi: 10.1177/0309132508090978
[66]	Hartshorne R. The nature of geography: A critical survey of current thought in the light of the past. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 1939, 29(3): 173-412. DOI: 10.2307/2561063. doi: 10.2307/2561063
[67]	Johnston R. One world, millions of places: The end of history and the ascendancy of geography. Political Geography, 1994, 13(2): 111-121. DOI: 10.1016/0962-6298(94)90016-7. doi: 10.1016/0962-6298(94)90016-7
[68]	Openshaw S. The Modifiable Areal Unit Problem (Concepts and Techniques in Modern Geography). Norwich: GeoBooks, 1984: 1-41.
[69]	刘玄宇, 刘云刚, 王丰龙. 美国选区划分的研究进展. 世界地理研究, 2020, 29(2): 284-295.
	[Liu Xuanyu, Liu Yungang, Wang Fenglong. A review of studies on redistricting in the US. World Regional Studies, 2020, 29(2): 284-295.]. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9479.2020.02.2019419. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9479.2020.02.2019419
[70]	王丰龙. 幸福地理学研究中的时空间尺度陷阱. 人文地理, 2021, 36(2): 11-19.
	[Wang Fenglong. Spatio-temporal scalar traps in geographical studies of subjective well-being. Human Geography, 2021, 36(2): 11-19.]. DOI: 10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2021.02.003. doi: 10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2021.02.003
[71]	Gray C S. Inescapable geography. In: Gray Colin S., Sloan Geoffrey. Geopolitics, Geography and Strategy. London: Routledge, 2013: 161-177.
[72]	Dodds K. Geopolitics: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007: 1-182.
[73]	Arzheimer K, Evans J. Geolocation and voting: Candidate-voter distance effects on party choice in the 2010 UK general election in England. Political Geography, 2012, 31(5): 301-310. DOI: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2012.04.006. doi: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2012.04.006
[74]	David Q, Van Hamme G. Pillars and electoral behavior in Belgium: The neighborhood effect revisited. Political Geography, 2011, 30(5): 250-262. DOI: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2011.04.009. doi: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2011.04.009
[75]	Morrill R, Knopp L, Brown M. Anomalies in Red and Blue II: Towards an understanding of the roles of setting, values, and demography in the 2004 and 2008 U.S. presidential elections. Political Geography, 2011, 30(3): 153-168. DOI: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2011.03.006. doi: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2011.03.006
[76]	Robinson T, Noriega S. Voter migration as a source of electoral change in the Rocky Mountain West. Political Geography, 2010, 29(1): 28-39. DOI: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2009.12.012. doi: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2009.12.012
[77]	Fieldhouse E, Cutts D. Diversity, density and turnout: The effect of neighbourhood ethno-religious composition on voter turnout in Britain. Political Geography, 2008, 27(5): 530-548. DOI: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2008.04.002. doi: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2008.04.002
[78]	Senol F. Women running for neighborhood offices in a Turkish city: Motivations and resources for electoral candidacy. Political Geography, 2009, 28(6): 362-372. DOI: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2009.09.004. doi: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2009.09.004
[79]	O'Tuathail G. Critical Geopolitics: The Politics of Writing Global Space. London: Routledge 1996: 1-328.
[80]	Dittmer J, Gray N. Popular geopolitics 2.0: Towards new methodologies of the everyday. Geography Compass, 2010, 4(11): 1664-1677. DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00399.x. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00399.x
[81]	Massaro V A, Williams J. Feminist geopolitics. Geography Compass, 2013, 7(8): 567-577. DOI: 10.1111/gec3.12054. doi: 10.1111/gec3.12054
[82]	Tuathail G. Ó. "Just Out Looking for a Fight": American affect and the invasion of Iraq. Antipode, 2003, 35(5): 856-870. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8330.2003.00361.x. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8330.2003.00361.x
[83]	刘云刚. 地理学的政治. 地理研究, 2013, 32(11): 2170-2175. doi: 10.11821/dlyj201311018
	[Liu Yungang. The politics of Chinese geography. Geographical Research, 2013, 32(11): 2170-2175.]. DOI: 10.11821/dlyj201311018. doi: 10.11821/dlyj201311018
[84]	沈石, 宋长青, 程昌秀, 等. GDELT:感知全球社会动态的事件大数据. 世界地理研究, 2020, 29(1): 71-76.
	[Shen Shi, Song Changqing, Cheng Changxiu, et al. GDELT: Big event data for sensing global social dynamics. World Regional Studies, 2020, 29(1): 71-76.]. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9479.2020.01.2019800. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9479.2020.01.2019800
[85]	Coleman J S. Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge: The Belnap Press, 1990: 1-993.
[86]	安宁, 梁邦兴. 中国政治地理学研究进展: 基于国家科学基金资助的分析. 地理科学进展, 2017, 36(12): 1463-1474. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2017.12.002
	[An Ning, Liang Bangxing. Progress in Chinese political geographical research: A perspective based on projects supported by the National Science Foundation of China. Progress in Geography, 2017, 36(12): 1463-1474.]. DOI: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2017.12.002. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2017.12.002
[87]	孔翔, 钟业喜, 申悦. 人文地理学及野外实习教程. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2021.
	[Kong Xiang, Zhong Yexi, Shen Yue. Human Geography and Field Practice Course. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2021.]
[88]	张京祥, 陈浩. 空间治理: 中国城乡规划转型的政治经济学. 城市规划, 2014, 38(11): 9-15.
	[Zhang Jingxiang, Chen Hao. Spatial governance: Political economy of China's urban and rural planning transformation. City Planning Review, 2014, 38(11): 9-15.]. DOI: 10.11819/cpr20141103a. doi: 10.11819/cpr20141103a
[89]	Luo X, Shen J. Urban governance in cross-border coalitions: The case of the Jiangyin economic development zone in Jingjiang, China. International Development Planning Review, 2007, 29(3): 353-377. DOI: 10.3828/idpr.29.3.4. doi: 10.3828/idpr.29.3.4
[90]	He S, Wu F. China's emerging neoliberal urbanism: Perspectives from urban redevelopment. Antipode, 2009, 41(2): 282-304. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8330.2009.00673.x. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8330.2009.00673.x
[91]	He S. Two waves of gentrification and emerging rights issues in Guangzhou, China. Environment and Planning A, 2012, 44(12): 2817-2833. DOI: 10.1068/a44254. doi: 10.1068/a44254
[92]	保继刚, 左冰. 旅游招商引资中的制度性机会主义行为解析: 西部A地旅游招商引资个案研究. 人文地理, 2008, 23(3): 1-6.
	[Bao Jigang, Zuo Bing. Institutional opportunistic behavior in tourism investment promotion: A case from western China. Human Geography, 2008, 23(3): 1-6.]. DOI: 10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2008.03.019. doi: 10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2008.03.019
[93]	孙九霞. 赋权理论与旅游发展中的社区能力建设. 旅游学刊, 2008, 23(9): 22-27.
	[Sun Jiuxia. Empowerment theory and the construction of community capability in the development of tourism. Tourism Tribune, 2008, 23(9): 22-27.]
[94]	左冰, 保继刚. 制度增权:社区参与旅游发展之土地权利变革. 旅游学刊, 2012, 27(2): 23-31.
	[Zuo Bing, Bao Jigang. Institutional empowerment: Community participation and changes of land property pights in tourism development. Tourism Tribune, 2012, 27(2): 23-31.]
[95]	Zhu H, Qian J, Feng L. Negotiating place and identity after change of administrative division. Social & Cultural Geography, 2011, 12(2): 143-158. DOI: 10.1080/14649365.2011.545140. doi: 10.1080/14649365.2011.545140
[96]	周尚意, 吴莉萍, 苑伟超. 景观表征权力与地方文化演替的关系: 以北京前门-大栅栏商业区景观改造为例. 人文地理, 2010, 25(5): 1-5.
	[Zhou Shangyi, Wu Liping, Yuan Weichao. The relation of landscape representation power and local culture succession: A case study of landscape changing in an old commercial district of Beijing. Human Geography, 2010, 25(5): 1-5.]. DOI: 10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2010.05.003. doi: 10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2010.05.003
[97]	Murphy A B. Geography: Why It Matters. Cambridge: Polity, 2018: 1-140.
[98]	Jones M, Jones R, Woods M, et al. An Introduction to Political Geography: Space, Place and Politics. Abingdon: Routledge, 2015: 1-249.
[99]	王丰龙, 刘云刚. 政治地理课程体系设计研究: 中外主流教材和课纲比较视角. 世界地理研究, 2021, 30(4): 867-877.
	[Wang Fenglong, Liu Yungang. Research on the design of political geography course: Comparison of Chinese and foreign mainstream textbooks and syllabuses. World Regional Studies, 2021, 30(4): 867-877.]. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9479.2021.04.2021299. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9479.2021.04.2021299
[100]	Ostrom E. A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science, 2009, 325(5939): 419-422. DOI: 10.1126/science.1172133. doi: 10.1126/science.1172133
[101]	Cox K R. Political geography and the territorial. Political Geography, 2003, 22(6): 607-610. DOI: 10.1016/S0962-6298(03)00064-7. doi: 10.1016/S0962-6298(03)00064-7
[102]	Agnew J, Mitchell K, Toal G. A Companion to Political Geography. Maiden: Blackwell, 2003: 1-482.
[103]	Potts S. Law as geopolitics: Judicial territory, transnational economic governance, and American power. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 2020, 110(4): 1192-1207. DOI: 10.1080/24694452.2019.1670041. doi: 10.1080/24694452.2019.1670041
[104]	Newman D. The lines that continue to separate us: Borders in our 'borderless' world. Progress in Human Geography, 2006, 30(2): 143-161. DOI: 10.1191/0309132506ph599xx. doi: 10.1191/0309132506ph599xx
[105]	Crow-Miller B, Webber M. Of maps and eating bitterness: The politics of scaling in China's South-North Water Transfer Project. Political Geography, 2017, 61: 19-30. DOI: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2017.06.002. doi: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2017.06.002
[106]	Lee S O, Wainwright J, Glassman J. Geopolitical economy and the production of territory: The case of US-China geopolitical-economic competition in Asia. Environment and Planning A, 2018, 50(2): 416-436. DOI: 10.1177/0308518x17701727. doi: 10.1177/0308518x17701727
[107]	Hüesker F, Moss T. The politics of multi-scalar action in river basin management: Implementing the EU Water Framework Directive (WFD). Land Use Policy, 2015, 42: 38-47. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.07.003. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.07.003
[108]	Cobarrubias S. Scale in motion? Rethinking scalar production and border externalization. Political Geography, 2020, 80: 102184. DOI: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2020.102184. doi: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2020.102184
[109]	王雨, 彭颖, 党和苹. 环保组织的社区领域建构策略及其环境治理影响. 世界地理研究, 2021, 30(2), 308-318.
	[Wang Yu, Peng Ying, Dang Heping. Environmental groups' community-based strategies for territorial construction and their implications for environmental governance. World Regional Studies, 2021, 30(2): 308-318.]. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9479.2021.02.2020888. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9479.2021.02.2020888
[110]	刘晓凤, 张文雅, 程小兰, 等. 跨域水治理中的尺度重构: 以东江为例. 世界地理研究, 2021, 30(2), 297-307.
	[Liu Xiaofeng, Zhang Wenya, Cheng Xiaolan, et al. Rescaling of inter-jurisdictional water governance: A case study of the Dongjiang River. World Regional Studies, 2021, 30(2): 297-307.]. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9479.2021.02.2019461. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9479.2021.02.2019461
[111]	Wang R Y, Lam W F, Wang J X. Irrigation management in East Asia: Institutions, socio-economic transformation and adaptations. Water Alternatives, 2021, 14(2), 319-331.

政治地理学研究中“地理”的重要性——兼论中国政治地理学的范式选择和理论建构

Geography matters in political geography: A discussion on paradigmatic selection and theoretical construction for the development of Chinese political geography

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 1

参考文献 111

相关文章 7

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	彭飞, 富宁宁, 韩增林, 刘天宝, 杨鑫. 中西方海洋地缘政治思想演化解构——基于人海关系分析框架[J]. 地理研究, 2021, 40(2): 556-570.
[2]	胡志丁, 王丰龙, 安宁, 王雨, 宋涛, 彭飞, 何光强, 马腾, 秦奇, 熊琛然. 洋能否为中用?西方政治地理与地缘政治发展的借鉴与反思[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(2): 217-231.
[3]	侯璐璐, 刘云刚. 中国的“领域-地盘”双层权力空间秩序——以广州市番禺区坑头村为案例[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(11): 2466-2478.
[4]	汤茂林. 政治地理学教材写作的创新与接力——商务版刘云刚译《政治地理学》述评[J]. 地理研究, 2018, 37(9): 1673-1682.
[5]	宋长青, 葛岳静, 刘云刚, 周尚意, 吴相利, 胡志丁, 程昌秀, 高剑波, 方创琳, 韩增林, 武友德, 吉力力·阿不都外力, 彭飞, 刘建忠, 董锁成, 王国梁, 熊理然, 潘峰华. 从地缘关系视角解析“一带一路”的行动路径[J]. 地理研究, 2018, 37(1): 3-19.
[6]	胡志丁, 葛岳静, 徐建伟. 尺度政治视角下的地缘能源安全评价方法及应用[J]. 地理研究, 2014, 33(5): 853-862.
[7]	胡志丁, 葛岳静. 理解新经济地理学[J]. 地理研究, 2013, 32(4): 731-743.