中国森林乡村的多尺度分异特征与分区优化

doi:10.11821/dlyj020210627

地理研究 ›› 2022, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (7): 2051-2064.doi: 10.11821/dlyj020210627

• • 上一篇

中国森林乡村的多尺度分异特征与分区优化

孔雪松¹(), 府梦雪¹, 孙建伟²(), 崔家兴³

1.武汉大学资源与环境科学学院,武汉 430079
2.贵州师范大学地理与环境科学学院,贵阳 550025
3.华中师范大学地理过程分析与模拟湖北省重点实验室,武汉 430079

收稿日期:2021-07-19 接受日期:2021-09-18 出版日期:2022-07-10 发布日期:2022-07-07
通讯作者: 孙建伟（1986-）,男,贵州黎平人,博士,副教授,硕士生导师,主要研究方向为乡村地理学、区域发展与城乡空间重构。E-mail: sunjianwei@whu.edu.cn
作者简介:孔雪松（1979-）,男,江苏扬州人,博士,副教授,博士生导师,主要研究方向为农村土地利用与管理。E-mail: xuesongk@whu.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(41871182);国家自然科学基金项目(41961031);国家重点研发计划项目(2018YFD1100801);贵州省科技计划项目(黔科合基础-ZK[2022]一般313)

Multi-scale differentiation characteristics and optimization zones of forest villages in China

KONG Xuesong¹(), FU Mengxue¹, SUN Jianwei²(), CUI Jiaxing³

1. School of Resource and Environmental Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China
2. School of Geographical and Environmental Science, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang 550025, China
3. Hubei Provincial Key Laboratory for Geographical Process Analysis and Simulation, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China

Received:2021-07-19 Accepted:2021-09-18 Published:2022-07-10 Online:2022-07-07

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

国家森林乡村建设是实施乡村振兴战略和改善农村人居环境的重要措施,但森林乡村在不同尺度的分异特征及优化方向尚不明晰。本文综合运用探索性空间数据分析、耦合度模型和Voronoi图分析等研究方法,从全国、区域和行政尺度分析了国家森林乡村空间格局、数量规模和内部分异特征,并基于森林乡村与人口耦合关系及乡村可达类型识别,分析了全国森林乡村的分区格局及其优化方向。结果表明：全国森林乡村密度具有明显的东高西低分异特征,长江三角洲地区是森林乡村高密度集中分布最大的连片区。基于县域单元的省域森林乡村泰尔指数差异较大,东南区域森林乡村分布相对均衡,西南和东北区域内部差异显著。森林乡村空间可达性呈现自东向西的梯度递减,森林乡村与人口密度的耦合类型分布具有较强的内部分异性。文章基于森林乡村可达类型与耦合分区的组合分析,将全国划分为重点发展区、特色挖掘区、集聚提升区、适度引导区和功能转型区五类,明确了不同类型区森林乡村建设的重点方向,将为面向乡村振兴的全国森林乡村建设与分区优化提供决策依据。

关键词: 森林乡村, 空间分异, 耦合分析, Voronoi图, 分区优化

Abstract:

National forest villages construction is an important path to promote the implementation of rural revitalization strategy and the improvement of rural living environment; however, the differentiation characteristics of forest villages at different scales and the optimization directions at the national scale are unclear. This study analyzed the characteristics in spatial pattern, quantitative scale, and internal differentiation of forest villages at national, regional, and administrative scales by using the kernel density estimation, the Lorenz curve, and the Theil index. The coupling degree between forest villages and population, and the spatial accessibility of forest villages were explored based on the coupling model and the Voronoi diagram, which provided important information for optimization zones of forest villages. The results showed that the density of forest villages in China has obvious differentiation characteristics of high density in the east and low density in the west, and the Yangtze River Delta is the largest contiguous area with high density of forest villages. There was a significant difference of provincial Theil index of forest villages based on county units. The distribution of forest villages was relatively balanced in the southeast region, whereas the difference was great in the southwest and northeast regions. Xinjiang, Tibet, Qinghai, and the three provinces of northeast China had high Theil index values, and the forest villages in these regions showed typical characteristics of small agglomeration and large dispersion. The spatial accessibility of forest villages had a high spatial correlation with the Hu Huanyong Line (hereafter Hu Line), presenting a pattern of high in the east and low in the west bounded by the Hu Line. Although the distribution of forest villages and population density showed a similar pattern of high in the east and low in the west, the spatial heterogeneity of the coupling degrees between east and west was obviously stronger. The paper divided the whole country into five types, namely, key development areas, characteristic mining areas, agglomeration and upgrading areas, moderate guidance areas, and functional transformation areas, based on the combination analysis between coupling degree and spatial accessibility. The key optimization directions of different zones were proposed. The results would provide valuable information for the construction of national forest villages and the optimization paths under the rural revitalization strategy in China.

Key words: forest villages, spatial heterogeneity, coupling analysis, Voronoi diagram, zoning optimization

孔雪松, 府梦雪, 孙建伟, 崔家兴. 中国森林乡村的多尺度分异特征与分区优化[J]. 地理研究, 2022, 41(7): 2051-2064.

KONG Xuesong, FU Mengxue, SUN Jianwei, CUI Jiaxing. Multi-scale differentiation characteristics and optimization zones of forest villages in China[J]. GEOGRAPHICAL RESEARCH, 2022, 41(7): 2051-2064.

图/表 7

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

图7

参考文献 45

[1]	Wood S, Jones S, Johnson J, et al. Distilling the role of ecosystem services in the sustainable development goals. Ecosystem Services, 2018, 29(Part A): 70-82. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.10.010. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.10.010
[2]	Escobedo F J, Giannico V, Jim C Y, et al. Urban forests, ecosystem services, green infrastructure and nature-based solutions: Nexus or evolving metaphors? Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2019, 37: 3-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.ufug.2018.02.011. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2018.02.011
[3]	Zermeno-Hernandez I, Mendez-Toribio M, Siebe C, et al. Ecological disturbance regimes caused by agricultural land uses and their effects on tropical forest regeneration. Applied Vegetation Science, 2015, 18(3): 443-455. DOI: 10.1111/avsc.12161. doi: 10.1111/avsc.12161
[4]	Song X, Hansen M C, Stehman S V, et al. Global land change from 1982 to 2016. Nature, 2018, 560(7720): 639-643. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-018-0411-9. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0411-9
[5]	Liu Xiaoping, Pei Fengsong, Wen Youyue, et al. Global urban expansion offsets climate-driven increases in terrestrial net primary productivity. Nature Communications, 2019, 10: 5558. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-13462-1. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-13462-1 pmid: 31804470
[6]	Liu Yansui, Li Yuheng. Revitalize the world's countryside. Nature, 2017, 548(7667): 275-277. DOI: 10.1038/548275a. doi: 10.1038/548275a
[7]	黄贤金. 美丽中国与国土空间用途管制. 中国地质大学学报(社会科学版), 2018, 18(6): 1-7.
	[Huang Xianjin. Beautial China and the land space use control. Journal of China University of Geosciences (Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 18(6): 1-7.]. DOI: 10.16493/j.cnki.42-1627/c.2018.06.001. doi: 10.16493/j.cnki.42-1627/c.2018.06.001
[8]	邓小玲. 生态文明建设是我国乡村振兴的题中之义. 人民论坛, 2018, (26): 74-75.
	[Deng Xiaoling. Construction of ecological civilization is the main meaning of rural revitalization in China. People's Tribune, 2018, (26): 74-75.]
[9]	王会, 姜雪梅, 陈建成, 等. “绿水青山”与“金山银山”关系的经济理论解析. 中国农村经济, 2017, (4): 2-12.
	[Wang Hui, Jiang Xuemei, Chen Jiancheng, et al. A theoretical explanation for the relationships between "Green Hills" and "Golden Hills". Chinese Rural Economy, 2017, (4): 2-12.]
[10]	迈克尔·伍兹. 农村, 王鹏飞, 鲁奇, 龙花楼译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2019.
	[Michael Woods. Rural. Translated by Wang Pengfei, Lu Qi, Long Hualou. Beijing: The Commercial Press, 2019.]
[11]	刘彦随. 中国新时代城乡融合与乡村振兴. 地理学报, 2018, 73(4): 637-650. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201804004
	[Liu Yansui. Research on the urban-rural integration and rural revitalization in the new era in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2018, 73(4): 637-650.]. DOI: 10.11821/dlxb201804004. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201804004
[12]	戈大专, 龙花楼. 论乡村空间治理与城乡融合发展. 地理学报, 2020, 75(6): 1272-1286. doi: 10.11821/dlxb202006013
	[Ge Dazhuan, Long Hualou. Rural spatial governance and urban-rural integration development. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2020, 75(6): 1272-1286.]. DOI: 10.11821/dlxb202006013. doi: 10.11821/dlxb202006013
[13]	龙花楼, 胡智超, 邹健. 英国乡村发展政策演变及启示. 地理研究, 2010, 29(8): 1369-1378. doi: 10.11821/yj2010080003
	[Long Hualou, Hu Zhichao, Zou Jian. The evolution of rural policy in Britain and its policy implications for rural development in China. Geographical Research, 2010, 29(8): 1369-1378.]. DOI: 10.11821/yj2010080003. doi: 10.11821/yj2010080003
[14]	孟广文, Hans Gebhardt. 二战以来联邦德国乡村地区的发展与演变. 地理学报, 2011, 66(12): 1644-1656.
	[Meng Guangwen, Hans Gebhardt. Rural development and transformation in the Federal Republic of Germany since the 1950s. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2011, 66(12): 1644-1656.]. DOI: 10.11821/xb201112006. doi: 10.11821/xb201112006
[15]	王磊, 刘圆圆, 任宗悦, 等. 村镇建设与资源环境协调的国外经验及其对中国村镇发展的启示. 资源科学, 2020, 42(7): 1223-1235.
	[Wang Lei, Liu Yuanyuan, Ren Zongyue, et al. Coordinating village and town construction and corresponding resources and environment development: International experiences and implications for China. Resources Science, 2020, 42(7): 1223-1235.]. DOI: 10.18402/resci.2020.07.01. doi: 10.18402/resci.2020.07.01
[16]	Hanaeus J, Hellstrom D, Johansson E. A study of a urine separation in an ecological village in northern Sweden. Water Science and Technology, 1997, 35(9): 153-160. DOI: 10.2166/wst.1997.0339. doi: 10.2166/wst.1997.0339
[17]	Ovedt G. Towards green villages: A strategy for environmentally-sound and participatory rural-development. Economic and Political Weekly, 1990, 25(17): 939-941. DOI: 10.1177/095624789200400106. doi: 10.1177/095624789200400106
[18]	Chen B, Yuei N, Takakazu U. Planted forest and diverse cultures in ecological village planning: A case study in Tarama Island, Okinawa Prefecture, Japan. Small-scale Forestry, 2014, 13(3): 333-347. DOI: 10.1007/s11842-013-9257-z. doi: 10.1007/s11842-013-9257-z
[19]	Long Hualou, Liu Yansui. Rural restructuring in China. Journal of Rural Studies, 2016, 47: 387-391. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.07.028. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.07.028
[20]	Tu Shuangshuang, Long Hualou. Rural restructuring in China: Theory, approaches and research prospect. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2017, 27(10): ‏1169-1184. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.07.028. doi: 10.1007/s11442-017-1429-x
[21]	刘彦随, 周扬, 李玉恒. 中国乡村地域系统与乡村振兴战略. 地理学报, 2019, 74 (12): 2511-2528. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201912007
	[Liu Yansui, Zhou Yang, Li Yuheng. Rural regional system and rural revitalization strategy in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019, 74(12): 2511-2528.]. DOI: 10.11821/dlxb201912007. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201912007
[22]	陶玉霞. 乡村旅游根性意涵的社会调试与价值重建研究. 人文地理, 2015, 30(5): 117-125.
	[Tao Yuxia. Study on the social adjustment and reconstruction of original implications in rural tourism. Human Geography, 2015, 30(5): 117-125.]. DOI: 10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2015.05.018. doi: 10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2015.05.018
[23]	陆林, 任以胜, 朱道才, 等. 乡村旅游引导乡村振兴的研究框架与展望. 地理研究, 2019, 38(1): 102-118. doi: 10.11821/dlyj020180454
	[Lu Lin, Ren Yisheng, Zhu Daocai, et al. Geographical Research, 2019, 38(1): 102-118.]. DOI: 10.11821/dlyj020180454. doi: 10.11821/dlyj020180454
[24]	王淑曼, 康达西, 程金龙. “两山论”谱写乡村旅游新篇章. 旅游学刊, 2020, 35(10): 9-11.
	[Wang Shuman, Kang Daxi, Cheng Jinlong. "Two Mountains theory": A new chapter of rural tourism. Tourism Tribune, 2020, 35(10): 9-11.]. DOI: 10.19765/j.cnki.1002-5006.2020.10.005. doi: 10.19765/j.cnki.1002-5006.2020.10.005
[25]	胡钰, 付饶, 金书秦. 脱贫攻坚与乡村振兴有机衔接中的生态环境关切. 改革, 2019, (10): 141-148.
	[Hu Yu, Fu Rao, Jin Shuqin. Eco-environmental concerns in the organic connection between poverty alleviation and rural revitalization. Reform, 2019, (10): 141-148.]
[26]	尹怀斌. 从“余村现象”看“两山”重要思想及其实践. 自然辨证法研究, 2017, 33(7): 65-69.
	[Yin Huaibin, Research on the important thought of "Two Mountains" and its practice from "Yucun Phenomena". Studies in Dialectics of Nature, 2017, 33(7): 65-69.]. DOI: 10.19484/j.cnki.1000-8934.2017.07.013. doi: 10.19484/j.cnki.1000-8934.2017.07.013
[27]	马斌斌, 陈兴鹏, 马凯凯, 等. 中国乡村旅游重点村空间分布、类型结构及影响因素. 经济地理, 2020, 40(7): 190-199.
	[Ma Binbin, Chen Xingpeng, Ma Kaikai, et al. Spatial distribution, type structure and influencing factors of key rural tourism villages in China. Economic Geography, 2020, 40(7): 190-199.]. DOI: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2020.07.022. doi: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2020.07.022
[28]	吴吉林, 刘帅, 刘水良, 等. 张家界农户乡村旅游脆弱性评价与影响因素. 地理科学, 2020, 40(8): 1336-1344. doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2020.08.013
	[Wu Jilin, Liu Shuai, Liu Shuiliang, et al. Vulnerability assessment and influencing factors of farmers towards rural tourism in Zhangjiajie. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2020, 40(8): 1336-1344.]. DOI: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2020.08.013. doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2020.08.013
[29]	张树民, 钟林生, 王灵恩. 基于旅游系统理论的中国乡村旅游发展模式探讨. 地理研究, 2012, 31(11): 2094-2103.
	[Zhang Shumin, Zhong Linsheng, Wang Lingen. Research on development model of China's rural tourism based on tourism system theory. Geographical Research, 2012, 31(11): 2094-2103.]. DOI: 10.11821/yj2012110016. doi: 10.11821/yj2012110016
[30]	郁琦, 李山. 上海市乡村旅游景点空间格局及可达性研究. 旅游科学, 2018, 32(3): 51-62.
	[Yu Qi, Li Shan. A research on the spatial pattern and accessibility of rural and leisure tourist destinations: A case study of rural destinations in Shanghai. Tourism Science, 2018, 32(3): 51-62.]. DOI: 10.16323/j.cnki.lykx.2018.03.006. doi: 10.16323/j.cnki.lykx.2018.03.006
[31]	于法稳, 黄鑫, 岳会. 乡村旅游高质量发展: 内涵特征、关键问题及对策建议. 中国农村经济, 2020, (8): 27-39.
	[Yu Fawen, Huang Xin, Yue Hui. The high-quality development of rural tourism: Connotative features, key issues and countermeasures. Chinese Rural Economy, 2020, (8): 27-39.]
[32]	刘红辉, 江东, 杨小唤, 等. 基于遥感的全国GDP 1 km格网的空间化表达. 地球信息科学, 2005, 7(2): 120-123.
	[Liu Honghui, Jiang Dong, Yang Xiaohuan, et al. Spatialization approach to 1 km grid GDP supported by remote sensing. Geo-information Science, 2005, 7(2): 120-123.]
[33]	孔雪松, 朱芷晴, 刘殿锋. 江苏省乡村聚落演化的多尺度特征与空间关联性分析. 农业工程学报, 2020, 36(12): 247-256.
	[Kong Xuesong, Zhu Zhiqing, Liu Dianfeng. Multi-scale evolution characteristics of rural settlements and spatial correlation in Jiangsu Province, China. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2020, 36(12): 247-256.]. DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2020.12.030. doi: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2020.12.030
[34]	彭立, 邓伟, 谭静, 等. 横断山区水土资源利用与经济增长的匹配关系. 地理学报, 2020, 75(9): 1996-2008. doi: 10.11821/dlxb202009013
	[Peng Li, Deng Wei, Tan Jing, et al. Restriction of economic development in the Hengduan Mountains Area by land and water resources. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2020, 75(9): 1996-2008.]. DOI: 10.11821/dlxb202009013. doi: 10.11821/dlxb202009013
[35]	Li Yajing, Kong Xusesong, Zhu Zhiqing. Multiscale analysis of the correlation patterns between the urban population and construction land in China. Sustainable Cities and Society, 2020, 61: 102326. DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102326. doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102326
[36]	阎晓, 涂建军. 黄河流域资源型城市生态效率时空演变及驱动因素. 自然资源学报, 2021, 36(1): 223-239.
	[Yuan Xiao, Tu Jianjun. The spatio-temporal evolution and driving factors of eco-efficiency of resource-based cities in the Yellow River Basin. Journal of Natural Resources, 2021, 36(1): 223-239.]. DOI: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20210115. doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20210115
[37]	Tian Yasi, Kong Xuesong, Liu Yaolin. Combining weighted daily life circles and land suitability for rural settlement reconstruction. Habitat International, 2018, 76: 1-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2018.05.005. doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2018.05.005
[38]	孔雪松, 谢世娇, 朱思阳, 等. 湖北省人口-土地-产业城镇化的时空分异与动态耦合分析. 经济地理, 2019, 39(4): 93-100.
	[Kong Xuesong, Xie Shijiao, Zhu Siyang, et al. Spatiotemporal differentiation and dynamic coupling of urbanization of population, land and industry in Hubei Province. Economic Geography, 2019, 39(4): 93-100.]. DOI: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2019.04.012. doi: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2019.04.012
[39]	张梅, 黄贤金, 揣小伟, 等. 胡焕庸线两侧城镇建设用地变化及其碳排放差异. 资源科学, 2019, 41(7): 1262-1273.
	[Zhang Mei, Huang Xianjin, Chuai Xiaowei, et al. Urban construction lands and their carbon emission differences east and west of the Hu Huanyong Line. Resources Science, 2019, 41(7): 1262-1273.]. DOI: 10.18402/resci.2019.07.07. doi: 10.18402/resci.2019.07.07
[40]	陆大道, 王铮, 封志明, 等. 关于“胡焕庸线能否突破”的学术争鸣. 地理研究, 2016, 35(5): 805-824. doi: 10.11821/dlyj201605001
	[Lu Dadao, Wang Zheng, Feng Zhiming, et al. Academic debates on Hu Huanyong population line. Geographical Research, 2016, 35(5): 805-824.]. DOI: 10.11821/dlyj201605001. doi: 10.11821/dlyj201605001
[41]	荣慧芳, 陶卓民, 李涛, 等. 基于网络数据的苏南乡村旅游客源市场时空特征及影响因素分析. 地理与地理信息科学, 2020, 36(3): 71-77.
	[Rong Huifang, Tao Zhuomin, Li Tao, et al. Spatial-Temporal evolution and influencing factors of rural tourist market in southern Jiangsu based on network data. Geography and Geo-Information Science, 2020, 36(3): 71-77.]. DOI: 10.396/j.issn.1672-0504.2020.06.011. doi: 10.396/j.issn.1672-0504.2020.06.011
[42]	吴必虎, 黄琢玮, 马小萌. 中国城市周边乡村旅游地空间结构. 地理科学, 2004, 24(6): 757-763.
	[Wu Bihu, Huang Zhuowei, Ma Xiaomeng. Spatial structure of rural tourism attractions in suburban areas of China. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2004, 24(6): 757-763.]. DOI: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2004.06.757. doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2004.06.757
[43]	刘彦随. 中国乡村振兴规划的基础理论与方法论. 地理学报, 2020, 75(6), 1120-1133. doi: 10.11821/dlxb202006002
	[Liu Yansui. The basic theory and methodology of rural revitalization planning in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2020, 75(6): 1120-1133.]. DOI: 10.11821/dlxb202006002. doi: 10.11821/dlxb202006002
[44]	佟玉权. 基于GIS的中国传统村落空间分异研究. 人文地理, 2014, 29(4): 44-51.
	[Tong Yuquan. Research on the spatial differentiation of Chinese traditional village based on GIS. Human Geography, 2014, 29(4): 44-51.]. DOI: 10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2014.04.037. doi: 10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2014.04.037
[45]	陈国磊, 罗静, 曾菊新, 等. 中国“一村一品”示范村镇的空间分异格局. 经济地理, 2019, 39(6): 163-171.
	[Chen Guolei, Luo Jing, Zeng Juxin, et al. Spatial differentiation patterns of "one village one product" demonstration villages and towns in China. Economic Geography, 2019, 39(6): 163-171.]. DOI: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2019.06.018. doi: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2019.06.018

中国森林乡村的多尺度分异特征与分区优化

Multi-scale differentiation characteristics and optimization zones of forest villages in China

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 7

参考文献 45

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	蒋凌霄, 安悦, 谭雪兰, 余航菱, 王振凯, 陈园. 基于村域视角的脱贫成效空间格局及影响机制研究——以湖南省新晃侗族自治县84个出列村为例[J]. 地理研究, 2022, 41(4): 1136-1151.
[2]	王洋, 岳晓丽, 张虹鸥. 广州都市区租房户的空间分异与居住选择倾向[J]. 地理研究, 2022, 41(2): 480-493.
[3]	陈艳如, 谷跃, 宋伟轩. 中国城市房价、收入与房价收入比的时空分异格局[J]. 地理研究, 2021, 40(9): 2442-2458.
[4]	谷跃, 王捷凯, 黄琴诗, 宋伟轩. 南京商铺租金时空格局及影响因素分析[J]. 地理研究, 2021, 40(9): 2459-2475.
[5]	陈晓萍, 周素红, 李秋萍, 詹文. 广州城市道路网的社会分异——基于轨迹大数据的出行分布性别差异[J]. 地理研究, 2021, 40(6): 1652-1666.
[6]	许红梅, 郭炎, 李志刚, 赵宁宁, 林赛南. 资本循环视角下农地流转的空间格局与机制——以武汉市蔡甸区为例[J]. 地理研究, 2021, 40(4): 994-1007.
[7]	王甫园, 王开泳, 虞虎, 陈田. 珠三角城市群生态游憩空间分异特征及关联性因素[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(9): 2148-2164.
[8]	张改素, 魏建飞, 丁志伟. 中国镇域工业化和城镇化综合水平的空间格局特征及其影响因素[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(3): 627-650.
[9]	马斌斌, 陈兴鹏, 陈芳婷, 陈艳碧, 丁博文鹏. 中华老字号企业空间分异及影响因素研究[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(10): 2313-2329.
[10]	涂心萌, 杨绪红, 张景源, 栾心晨, 宁可心. 2014—2019年中国秸秆焚烧火点的地理特征分析[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(10): 2379-2390.
[11]	陈万旭,李江风,曾杰,冉端,杨斌. 中国土地利用变化生态环境效应的空间分异性与形成机理[J]. 地理研究, 2019, 38(9): 2173-2187.
[12]	余国良,李建华,孙嘉欣,沈培培,杨春白雪. 基于地理探测器的中国城市男性青少年BMI影响因子探究[J]. 地理研究, 2019, 38(9): 2288-2301.
[13]	古恒宇,覃小玲,沈体雁. 中国城市流动人口回流意愿的空间分异及影响因素[J]. 地理研究, 2019, 38(8): 1877-1890.
[14]	荣培君, 张丽君, 秦耀辰, 李阳, 郑智成. 建成环境对城市居民日常出行碳排放的影响——以开封市248个居住区为例[J]. 地理研究, 2019, 38(6): 1464-1480.
[15]	崔娜娜, 古恒宇, 沈体雁. 北京市住房价格和租金的空间分异与相互关系[J]. 地理研究, 2019, 38(6): 1420-1434.