环境经济地理学的研究现状与挑战

doi:10.11821/dlyj020210667

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

环境经济地理学是经济地理学反思资源环境在学科内部边缘化的产物,旨在重建经济地理学理论与资源环境之间的联系。历经近20年的发展,环境经济地理学研究片段化、地位边缘化的问题无明显改观。为此,本文回溯了环境经济地理学的发展思路,归纳了以环境经济地理学名义开展的研究工作,探讨了环境经济地理学发展面临的挑战与应对。研究发现：① 环境经济地理学过去20年的发展思路是以经济地理学理论为基础,探讨适应资源环境变化的经济发展与空间布局模式,凝练了环境治理和绿色转型两个研究主题。② 面向环境治理,环境经济地理学应用全球价值链和全球生产网络理论,探讨企业和地方如何实现环境和经济效益的共同提升;同时,借助区位分析评估作为区位因子的环境规制如何影响经济布局,发现了诸多“经典假说”的反例。③ 面向绿色转型,环境经济地理学与演化经济地理学结合,应用区域多样化和路径创造理论,分析了区域绿色转型的条件和过程。④ 环境经济地理学的未来发展需要克服范式差异、加强问题导向、推动理论创新,挖掘中国丰富的环境经济地理问题所蕴含的机遇。

关键词: 区位, 演化, 全球生产网络, 路径创造, 绿色转型

Abstract:

Environmental economic geography emerges as a reflection of the marginalization of the environment within the discipline of economic geography. It seeks to re-establish the linkage between economic geography and the environment. After almost two decades of development, environmental economic geography is still suffering from its poly-vocal, fragmented, and marginalized issues. This study scrutinizes the debates over the research agenda on environmental economic geography and reviews two primary strands of the literature. On this basis, this study discusses challenges for the future development of environmental economic geography. This study comes to four conclusions. Firstly, the development of environmental economic geography follows the theoretical advances in economic geography. It explore how environmental changes modify the spatial patterns of economic development. It also investigate how the spatial configuration of economic activities responds to the rising environmental risks and intensifying resource scarcity. Two research themes emerge, namely environmental governance and green transition. Secondly, environmental economic geography uses the theoretical framework of the Global Value Chain (GVC) and Global Production Network (GPN) to investigate how firms and regions can simultaneously upgrade in environmental and economic terms. It also seeks to establish the linkages between GVC/GPN governance and environmental governance. On the other hand, environmental economic geography identifies environmental regulation as a locational factor and examines its role in the location choice model. The empirical result offers various counter-examples for classical hypotheses, such as the Pollution Haven Hypothesis, the Porter Hypothesis, and the Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis. Thirdly, environmental economic geography combines its theoretical interests with the theoretical advances in evolutionary economic geography. Particularly, the regional diversification theory and the path creation theory are incorporated into the empirical studies of environmental economic geography, which seek to unravel the conditions and processes of green transitions. Based on these theories, recent studies also offer some predictors for the regional green transition. Lastly, this study proposes that environmental economic geography is still suffering from the divergence between natural science and social science on research paradigm. Besides, the theoretical development of environmental economic geography is subject to a late-comer disadvantage. In this regard, it requires environmental economic geography to become more problem-oriented in the future, embracing the opportunities embedded in the issues for China’s sustainable development.

Key words: location, evolution, global production network, path creation, green transition

毛熙彦, 贺灿飞. 环境经济地理学的研究现状与挑战[J]. 地理研究, 2022, 41(1): 4-17.

MAO Xiyan, HE Canfei. Environmental economic geography: Recent advances and future challenges[J]. GEOGRAPHICAL RESEARCH, 2022, 41(1): 4-17.

参考文献 89

[1]	Angel D. Towards an Environmental Economic Geography. In: Bagchi-Sen S, Smith H L (Eds). Economic Geography: Past, Present and Future. London, UK: Routledge, 2006: 126-135.
[2]	Dicken P. Geographers and "globalization": (Yet) Another missed boat? Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 2004, 29(1):5-26. DOI: 10.1111/j.0020-2754.2004.00111.x. doi: 10.1111/j.0020-2754.2004.00111.x
[3]	Soyez D, Schulz C. Facets of an emerging Environmental Economic Geography (EEG). Geoforum, 2004, 39(1):17-19. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2007.03.004. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2007.03.004
[4]	Hanink D M. The economic geography in environmental issues: A spatial-analytic approach. Progress in Human Geography, 1995, 19(3):372-387. DOI: 10.1177/030913259501900304. doi: 10.1177/030913259501900304
[5]	Castree N. Environmental issues: From policy to political economy. Progress in Human Geography, 2002, 26(3):357-365. DOI: 10.1191/0309132502ph374pr. doi: 10.1191/0309132502ph374pr
[6]	Hayter R. Environmental economic geography. Geography Compass, 2008, 2(3):831-850. DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-8198.2000115.x. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-8198.2000115.x.
[7]	Bridge G. Environmental economic geography: A sympathetic critique. Geoforum, 2008, 39(1):76-81. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2007.06.005. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2007.06.005
[8]	Aoyama Y, Berndt C, Glückler J, et al. Emerging themes in economic geography: Outcomes of the economic geography 2010 workshop. Economic Geography, 2011, 87(2):111-126. DOI: 10.1111/j.1944-8287.2011.01114.x. doi: 10.1111/j.1944-8287.2011.01114.x
[9]	Clark G L, Feldman M P, Gertler M S, et al. The New Oxford Handbook of Economic Geography. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2018.
[10]	Soyez D. Environmental knowledge, the power of framing and industrial change. In: Hayter R, Le Heron R (Eds). Knowledge, Industry and Environment. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate, 2002: 187-208.
[11]	Gibbs D. Prospects for an environmental economic geography: Linking ecological modernization and regulationist approaches. Economic Geography, 2006, 82(2):193-215. DOI: 10.1111/j.1944-8287.2006.tb00296.x. doi: 10.1111/j.1944-8287.2006.tb00296.x
[12]	Patchell J, Hayter R. Environmental and evolutionary economic geography: Time for EEG2? Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 2013, 95(2):111-130. DOI: 10.1111/geob.12012. doi: 10.1111/geob.12012
[13]	Braun B, Oßenbrügge J, Schulz C. Environmental economic geography and environmental inequality: Challenges and new research prospects. Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsgeographie, 2018, 62(2):120-134. DOI: 10.1515/zfw-2018-0001. doi: 10.1515/zfw-2018-0001
[14]	Ponte S. Green capital accumulation: Business and sustainability management in a world of global value chains. New Political Economy, 2020, 25(1):72-84. DOI: 10.1080/13563467.2019.1581152. doi: 10.1080/13563467.2019.1581152
[15]	Havice E, Campling L. Where chain governance and environmental governance meet: Interfirm strategies in the canned tuna global value chain. Economic Geography, 2017, 93(3):292-313. DOI: 10.1080/00130095.2017.1292848. doi: 10.1080/00130095.2017.1292848
[16]	McCarthy J. Privatizing conditions of production: Trade agreements as neoliberal environmental governance. Geoforum, 2004, 35(3):327-341. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2003.07.002. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2003.07.002
[17]	Goger A. The making of a 'business case' for environmental upgrading: Sri Lanka′s eco-factories. Geoforum, 2013, 47:73-83. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.03.006. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.03.006
[18]	Ponte S. Business, Power and Sustainability in a World of Global Value Chains. London: Zed Books, 2019.
[19]	Henriksen L F, Ponte S. Public orchestration, social networks, and transnational environmental governance: Lessons from the aviation industry. Regulation & Governance, 2018, 12(1):23-45. DOI: 10.1111/rego.12151. doi: 10.1111/rego.12151
[20]	Irarrázaval F, Bustos-Gallardo B. Global salmon networks: Unpacking ecological contradictions at the production stage. Economic Geography, 2019, 95(2):159-179. DOI: 10.1080/00130095.2018.1506700. doi: 10.1080/00130095.2018.1506700
[21]	Baglioni E, Campling L. Natural resource industries as global value chains: Frontiers, fetishism, labour and the state. Environment and Planning A, 2017, 49(11):2437-2456. DOI: 10.1177/0308518X17728517. doi: 10.1177/0308518X17728517
[22]	Bridge G. Global production networks and the extractive sector: Governing resource-based development. Journal of Economic Geography, 2008, 8(3):389-419. DOI: 10.1093/jeg/lbn009. doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbn009
[23]	Havice E, Campling L. Articulating upgrading: Island developing states and canned tuna production. Environment and Planning A, 2013, 45(11):2610-2627. DOI: 10.1068/a45697. doi: 10.1068/a45697
[24]	Bridge G, Bradshaw M. Making a global gas market: Territoriality and production networks in liquefied natural gas. Economic Geography, 2017, 93(3):215-240. DOI: 10.1080/00130095.2017.1283212. doi: 10.1080/00130095.2017.1283212
[25]	Gibson C, Warren A. Resource-sensitive global production networks: Reconfigured geographies of timber and acoustic guitar manufacturing. Economic Geography, 2016, 92(4):430-454. DOI: 10.1080/00130095.2016.1178569. doi: 10.1080/00130095.2016.1178569
[26]	Bolwig S, Ponte S, Du A, et al. Integrating poverty and environmental concerns into value-chain analysis: A conceptual framework. Development Policy Review, 2010, 28(2):173-194. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7679.2010.00480.x. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7679.2010.00480.x
[27]	De Marchi V, Di Maria E, Micelli S. Environmental strategies, upgrading and competitive advantage in global value chains. Business Strategy and the Environment, 2013, 22(1):62-72. DOI: 10.1002/bse.1738. doi: 10.1002/bse.1738
[28]	Costantini V, Crespi F, Marin G, et al. Eco-innovation, sustainable supply chains and environmental performance in European industries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 155:141-154. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.038. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.038
[29]	Poulsen R T, Ponte S, Sornn-Friese H. Environmental upgrading in global value chains: The potential and limitations of ports in the greening of maritime transport. Geoforum, 2018, 89:83-95. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.01.011. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.01.011
[30]	Humphrey J, Schmitz H. How does insertion in global value chains affect upgrading industrial clusters? Regional Studies, 2002, 36(9):1017-1027. DOI: 10.1080/0034340022000022198. doi: 10.1080/0034340022000022198
[31]	Mao X, He C. Export upgrading and environmental performance: Evidence from China. Geoforum, 2017, 86:150-159. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.09.010. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.09.010
[32]	Landesmann M A, Stollinger R. Structural change, trade and global production networks: An 'appropriate industrial policy' for peripheral and catching-up economies. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 2019, 48:7-23. DOI: 10.1016/j.strueco.2018.04.001. doi: 10.1016/j.strueco.2018.04.001
[33]	Navarrete S D S, Borini F M, Avrichir I. Environmental upgrading and the United Nations sustainable development goals. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 264:121563. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121563. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121563
[34]	Liu H, Li J, Long H, et al. Promoting energy and environmental efficiency within a positive feedback loop: Insights from global value chain. Energy Policy, 2018, 121:175-184. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2018.06.024. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2018.06.024
[35]	Urzedo D I, Neilson J, Fisher R, et al. A global production network for ecosystem services: The emergent governance of landscape restoration in the Brazilian Amazon. Global Environmental Change, 2020, 61:102059. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102059. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102059
[36]	Ambec S, Cohen M A, Elgie S, et al. The Porter Hypothesis at 20: Can environmental regulation enhance innovation and competitiveness? Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 2013, 7(1):2-22. DOI: 10.1093/reep/res016. doi: 10.1093/reep/res016
[37]	Cai H, Chen Y, Gong Q. Polluting thy neighbor: Unintended consequences of China's pollution reduction mandates. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2016, 76:86-104. DOI: 10.1016/j.jeem.2015.01.002. doi: 10.1016/j.jeem.2015.01.002
[38]	薄文广, 徐玮, 王军锋. 地方政府竞争与环境规制异质性: 逐底竞争还是逐顶竞争? 中国软科学, 2018, (11):76-93.
	[ Bo Wenguang, Xu Wei, Wang Junfeng. Local government competition and environmental regulation heterogeneity: Race to the bottom or race to the top? China Soft Science, 2018, (11):76-93.]
[39]	Naughton H T. To shut down or to shift: Multinationals and environmental regulation. Ecological Economics, 2014, 102:113-117. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.03.013. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.03.013
[40]	Zhu S, He C, Liu Y. Going green or going away: Environmental regulation, economic geography and firms' strategies in China's pollution-intensive industries. Geoforum, 2014, 55:53-65. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2014.05.004. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2014.05.004
[41]	Zhu J, Ruth M. Relocation or reallocation: impacts of differentiated energy saving regulation on manufacturing industries in China. Ecological Economics, 2015, 110:119-133. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.12.020. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.12.020
[42]	戴其文, 杨婧云, 张晓奇, 等. 污染企业/产业转移的特征、模式与动力机制. 地理研究, 2020, 39(7):1511-1533. doi: 10.11821/dlyj020190637
	[ Dai Qiwen, Yang Jingyun, Zhang Xiaoqi, et al. Transfer characteristics, patterns and mechanisms of polluting enterprises and industries. Geographical Research, 2020, 39(7):1511-1533.]. DOI: 10.11821/dlyj020190637. doi: 10.11821/dlyj020190637
[43]	Mulatu A, Gerlagh R, Rigby D, et al. Environmental regulation and industry location in Europe. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2010, 45:459-479. DOI: 10.1007/s10640-009-9323-3. doi: 10.1007/s10640-009-9323-3
[44]	Wu Y, Yu S, Duan X. The impact of environmental regulation on the location of pollution-intensive industries in China under agglomeration effect. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2021, 18(8):4045. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18084045. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18084045
[45]	Wu Y, Miao C, Miao J, et al. How does environmental regulation affect the location of new polluting firms? Exploring the agglomeration threshold of effective environmental regulation. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2020, 17(4):1279. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17041279. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17041279
[46]	Lu J, Li H. The impact of government environmental information disclosure on enterprise location choices: Heterogeneity and threshold effect test. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 277:124055. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124055. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124055
[47]	朱向东, 贺灿飞, 毛熙彦, 等. 贸易保护背景下中国光伏产业空间格局及其影响因素. 经济地理, 2018, 38(3):98-105.
	[ Zhu Xiangdong, He Canfei, Mao Xiyan, et al. The spatial pattern of China PV industry under the background of trade protectionism. Economic Geography, 2018, 38(3):98-105.]. DOI: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2018.03.012. doi: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2018.03.012
[48]	Grant C A, Hicks A L. Effect of manufacturing and installation location on environmental impact payback time of solar power. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 2020, 22:187-196. DOI: 10.1007/s10098-019-01776-z. doi: 10.1007/s10098-019-01776-z
[49]	Falkowska A. The impact of environmental policy on location patterns in the waste management industry. Economia Politica, 2020, 37:167-195. DOI: 10.1007/s40888-020-00174-9. doi: 10.1007/s40888-020-00174-9
[50]	Kheder S B, Zugravu N. Environmental regulation and French firms location abroad: An economic geography model in an international comparative study. Ecological Economics, 2012, 77:48-61. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.10.005. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.10.005
[51]	Mao X, He C. A trade-related pollution trap for economies in transition? Evidence from China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 200:781-790. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.328. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.328
[52]	Wang X, Zhang C, Zhang Z. Pollution haven or porter? The impact of environmental regulation on location choices of pollution-intensive firms in China. Journal of Environmental Management, 2019, 248:109248. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman. 2019.07.019. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman. 2019.07.019
[53]	Yang X, He C. Do polluting plants locate in the borders of jurisdictions: Evidence from China? Habitat International, 2015, 50:140-148. DOI: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.08.007. doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.08.007
[54]	Tole L, Koop G. Do environmental regulations affect the location decisions of multinational gold mining firms? Journal of Economic Geography, 2011, 11(1):151-177. DOI: 10.1093/jeg/lbp064. doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbp064
[55]	刘颖, 周沂, 贺灿飞. 污染企业迁移意愿的影响因素研究: 以浙江省上虞市为例. 经济地理, 2014, 34(10):150-156.
	[ Liu Ying, Zhou Yi, He Canfei. Influence factors of polluting firms′ propensity to relocate: A case of study of Shangyu city in Zhejiang. Economic Geography, 2014, 34(10):150-156.]. DOI: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2014.10.054. doi: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2014.10.054
[56]	黄永源, 朱晟君. 公众环境关注、环境规制与中国能源密集型产业动态. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(11):2744-2758.
	[ Huang Yongyuan, Zhu Shengjun. Public environmental concerns, environmental regulations and energy-intensive industrial dynamics in China. Journal of Natural Resources, 2020, 35(11):2744-2758.]. DOI: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20201114. doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20201114
[57]	Corradini C. Location determinants of green technological entry: Evidence from European regions. Small Business Economics, 2017, 52(4):845-858. DOI: 10.1007/s11187-017-9938-7. doi: 10.1007/s11187-017-9938-7
[58]	Tanner A N. Regional branching reconsidered: Emergence of the fuel cell industry in European regions. Economic Geography, 2014, 90(4):403-427. DOI: 10.1111/ecge.12055. doi: 10.1111/ecge.12055
[59]	Montresor S, Quatraro F. Regional branching and key enabling technologies: Evidence from European patent data. Economic Geography, 2017, 93(4):367-396. DOI: 10.1080/00130095.2017.1326810. doi: 10.1080/00130095.2017.1326810
[60]	Castaldi C, Frenken K, Los B. Related variety, unrelated variety and technological breakthroughs: An analysis of US state-level patenting. Regional Studies, 2015, 49(5):767-781. DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2014.940305. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2014.940305
[61]	Vona F, Marin G, Consoli D, et al. Environmental regulation and green skills: An empirical exploration. Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, 2018, 5(4):713-753. DOI: 10.1086/698859. doi: 10.1086/698859
[62]	Barbieri N, Perruchas F, Consoli D. Specialization, diversification, and environmental technology life cycle. Economic Geography, 2020, 96(2):161-186. DOI: 10.1080/00130095.2020.1721279. doi: 10.1080/00130095.2020.1721279
[63]	Ying L, Li M, Yang J. Agglomeration and driving factors of regional innovation space based on intelligent manufacturing and green economy. Environmental Technology & Innovation, 2021, 22:101398. DOI: 10.1016/j.eti.2021.101398. doi: 10.1016/j.eti.2021.101398
[64]	李涛, 刘国燕. 时空压缩下研发要素流动是否提升了区域绿色创新效率. 科技进步与对策, 2021, 38(19):37-46.
	[ Li Tao, Liu Guoyan. Does the flow of R&D elements under the compression of time and space improve the efficiency of regional green innovation. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 2021, 38(19):37-46.]. DOI: 10.6049/kjjbydc.2020120414. doi: 10.6049/kjjbydc.2020120414.
[65]	张鹏, 陈雯, 袁丰, 等. 区域一体化与绿色化视角下江苏沿江地区的制造业空间重构研究. 长江流域资源与环境. 2021, 30(2):257-268.
	[ Zhang Peng, Chen Wen, Yuan Feng, et al. Spatial restructuring of manufacturing in Jiangsu along the Yangtze River through the perspective of regional integration and greenization. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2021, 30(2):257-268.]. DOI: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202102001. doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202102001
[66]	Trippl M, Grillitsch M, Isaksen A. Exogenous sources of regional industrial change: Attraction and absorption of non-local knowledge for new path development. Progress in Human Geography, 2018, 42(5):687-705. DOI: 10.1177/0309132517700982. doi: 10.1177/0309132517700982
[67]	Hassink R, Isaksen A, Trippl M. Towards a comprehensive understanding of new regional industrial path development. Regional Studies, 2019, 53(11):1636-1645. DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2019.1566704. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2019.1566704
[68]	Noseleit F. Renewable energy innovations and sustainability transition: How relevant are spatial spillovers? Journal of Regional Science, 2018, 58(1):259-275. DOI: 10.1111/jors.12340. doi: 10.1111/jors.12340
[69]	Strambach S. Combining knowledge bases in transnational sustainability innovation: Microdynamics and institutional change. Economic Geography, 2017, 93(5):500-526. DOI: 10.1080/00130095.2017.1366268. doi: 10.1080/00130095.2017.1366268
[70]	MacKinnon D, Dawley S, Steen M, et al. Path creation, global production networks and regional development: A comparative international analysis of the offshore wind sector. Progress in Planning, 2019, 130:1-32. DOI: 10.1016/j.progress.2018.01.001. doi: 10.1016/j.progress.2018.01.001
[71]	Binz C, Truffer B, Coenen L. Path creation as a process of resource alignment and anchoring: Industry formation for on-site water recycling in Beijing. Economic Geography, 2016, 92(2):172-200. DOI: 10.1080/00130095.2015.1103177. doi: 10.1080/00130095.2015.1103177
[72]	Steen M, Hansen G H. Barriers to path creation: The case of offshore wind power in Norway. Economic Geography, 2018, 94(2):188-210. DOI: 10.1080/00130095.2017.1416953. doi: 10.1080/00130095.2017.1416953
[73]	Trippl M, Baumgartinger-Seiringer S, Frangenheim A, et al. Unravelling green regional industrial path development: Regional preconditions, asset modification and agency. Geoforum, 2020, 111:189-197. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.02.016. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.02.016
[74]	Wang J, Wang K, Wei Y. How to balance China's sustainable development goals through industrial restructuring: A multi-regional input-output optimization of the employment-energy-water-emissions nexus. Environmental Research Letters, 2020, 15(3):034018. DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/ab666a. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/ab666a
[75]	He C, Pan F, Yan Y. Is economic transition harmful to China's urban environment? Evidence from industrial air pollution in Chinese cities. Urban Studies, 2012, 49(8):1767-1790. DOI: 10.1177/0042098011415719. doi: 10.1177/0042098011415719
[76]	Gao J, Wei Y, Chen W, et al. Economic transition and urban land expansion in provincial China. Habitat International, 2014, 44:461-473. DOI: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2014.09.002. doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2014.09.002
[77]	余振, 龚惠文, 胡晓辉. 可持续性转型地理研究综述与展望. 地理科学进展, 2021, 40(3):498-510. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2021.03.013
	[ Yu Zhen, Gong Huiwen, Hu Xiaohui. Geography of sustainability transitions: A sympathetic critique and research agenda. Progress in Geography, 2021, 40(3):498-510.]. DOI: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2021.03.013. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2021.03.013
[78]	Hansen T, Connen L. The geography of sustainability transitions: Review, synthesis and reflections on an emergent research field. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 2015, 17:92-109. DOI: 10.1016/j.eist.2014.11.001. doi: 10.1016/j.eist.2014.11.001
[79]	Patchell J, Hayter R. Environmental and evolutionary economic geography: Time for EEG2? Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 2013, 95(2):111-130. DOI: 10.1111/geob.12012. doi: 10.1111/geob.12012
[80]	Fastenrath S, Braun B. Lost in transition? Directions for an economic geography of urban sustainability transitions. Sustainability, 2018, 10:2434. DOI: 10.3390/su10072434. doi: 10.3390/su10072434
[81]	胡志强, 苗长虹, 袁丰. 集聚空间组织型式对中国地市尺度工业SO₂排放的影响. 地理学报, 2019, 74(10):2045-2061. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201910007
	[ Hu Zhiqiang, Miao Changhong, Yuan Feng. Impact of industrial spatial and organizational agglomeration patterns on industrial SO₂ emissions of prefecture-level cities in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019, 74(10):2045-2061.]. DOI: 10.11821/dlxb201910007. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201910007
[82]	刘华军, 杜广杰. 中国城市大气污染的空间格局与分布动态演进: 基于161个城市AQI及6种分项污染物的实证. 经济地理, 2016, 36(10):33-38.
	[ Liu Huajun, Du Guangjie. Spatial pattern and distributional dynamics of urban air pollution in China: An empirical study based on AQI and six sub-pollutants of 161 cities. Economic Geography, 2016, 36(10):33-38.]. DOI: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2016.10.005. doi: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2016.10.005
[83]	刘满凤, 陈华脉, 徐野. 环境规制对工业污染空间溢出的效应研究: 来自全国285个城市的经验证据. 经济地理, 2021, 41(2):194-202.
	[ Liu Manfeng, Chen Huamai, Xu Ye. Study on the effect of environmental regulation on industrial pollution spillover: Empirical evidence from 285 cities nationwide. Economic Geography, 2021, 41(2):194-202.]. DOI: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2021.02.021. doi: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2021.02.021
[84]	李连刚, 张平宇, 谭俊涛, 等. 韧性概念演变与区域经济韧性研究进展. 人文地理, 2019, 34(2):1-7, 151.
	[ Li Liangang, Zhang Pingyu, Tan Juntao, et al. Review on the evolution of resilience concept and research progress on regional economic resilience. Human Geography, 2019, 34(2):1-7,151.]. DOI: 10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2019.02.001. doi: 10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2019.02.001
[85]	苗长虹, 张佰发. 黄河流域高质量发展分区分级分类调控策略研究. 经济地理, 2021, 41(10):143-153.
	[ Miao Changhong, Zhang Baifa. Regulation strategy of zoning-gradation-classification for high-quality development in the Yellow River Basin. Economic Geography, 2021, 41(10):143-153.]. DOI: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2021.10.016. doi: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2021.10.016
[86]	杨宇, 何则. 能源地缘政治与能源权力研究. 地理科学进展, 2021, 40(3):524-540. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2021.03.015
	[ Yang Yu, He Ze. Energy geopolitics and power. Progress in Geography, 2021, 40(3):524-540.]. DOI: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2021.03.015. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2021.03.015
[87]	Franz M, Schlitz N, Schumacher K P. Globalization and the water-energy-food nexus: Using the global production network approach to analyze society-environment relations. Environmental Science & Policy, 2018, 90:201-212. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2017.12.004. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2017.12.004
[88]	谈明洪, 李秀彬. 从本土到全球网络化的人地关系思维范式转型. 地理学报, 2021, 76(10):2333-2342. doi: 10.11821/dlxb202110001
	[ Tan Minghong, Li Xiubin. Paradigm transformation in the study of man-land relations: From local thinking to global network thinking modes. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(10):2333-2342.]. DOI: 10.11821/dlxb202110001. doi: 10.11821/dlxb202110001
[89]	Kates R W. What kind of a science is sustainability science? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2011, 108:19449-19450. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1116097108. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1116097108