Please wait a minute...
 首页  期刊介绍 期刊订阅 广告合作 联系我们 English
 
最新录用  |  当期目录  |  过刊浏览  |  热点文章  |  阅读排行  |  下载排行  |  引用排行
地理研究  2014, Vol. 33 Issue (2): 358-371    DOI: 10.11821/dlyj201402014
  区域发展 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
城市居民使用市内公共自行车的满意度影响因素分析——以苏州市为例
钱佳, 汪德根, 牛玉
苏州大学旅游系, 江苏苏州 215123
Analysis of the influencing factors of urban residents to use urban public bikes:A case study of Suzhou
QIAN Jia, WANG Degen, NIU Yu
Tourism Department of Soochow University, Suzhou 215123, Jiangsu, China
全文: PDF(1441 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 城市公共自行车因其零排放、灵活性强和可达性高等优点,成为城市公交和地铁之间转换和衔接的重要市内交通工具,也是短距离出行的重要交通方式。基于探索性因子分析,构建了影响使用公共自行车满意度的结构方程假设模型,并以苏州公共自行车为研究对象,通过验证性因子分析,实证研究城市居民使用公共自行车满意度的影响因素。结果显示:①灵活便捷、设计布局、舒适环保和安全是居民使用公共自行车满意度的关键因素,经济成本和运营服务是重要因素。②灵活便捷对满意度影响程度最大,其影响路径系数为0.40,其次为设计布局和舒适环保,路径系数分别为0.39和0.36,安全、经济成本和运营服务影响程度相对较小。③灵活便捷、设计布局、舒适环保、安全和运营服务与满意度表现为正相关,而经济成本与满意度表现为负相关。最后,提出了完善城市公共自行车建设和发展的相关对策,以期为提高公共自行车利用率,真正实现节能环保绿色出行的目标。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
钱佳
汪德根
牛玉
关键词 城市公共自行车满意度影响因素苏州市    
Abstract:Because of the advantages of zero-emission, strong flexibility and high accessibility, urban public bikes have become an important urban vehicle for conversion and connection between bus and subway, and is also a crucial mode of transportation for short distance travel. By taking Suzhou's public bikes as a study object, this paper builds a hypothetical structural equation model of the influence on the satisfaction of using public-bike based on exploratory factor analysis(EFA) and empirically studies the satisfaction and its impact mechanism of urban residents to use public-bike based on confirmatory factor analysis(CFA). The results are shown as follows.(1) Convenience and flexibility, design and layout,comfortability and environmental friendliness, as well as safety are the key factors of residents' satisfaction of using public-bike and economic costs and operational services are important ones.(2) Convenience and flexibility has the greatest influence on satisfaction with the path coefficient of 0.40, followed by design and layout, comfortability and environmental friendliness, with the path coefficients of 0.39 and 0.36, respectively. The influences of safety,economic costs and operational services are relatively small.(3) Convenience and flexibility,design and layout, comfortability and environmental friendliness, safety, as well as operational services show positive correlations with satisfaction, while economic costs show a negative one. Finally, countermeasures of improving the construction and the development of urban public-bike are proposed in order to improve the utilization and to achieve the goal of energy conservation, environmental friendliness and green travel.
Key wordsurban public bike    satisfaction    influencing factor    Suzhou
收稿日期: 2013-07-15     
:  F299.24  
  F572  
基金资助:国家自然科学基金项目(41271134);教育部人文社会科学研究基金项目(10YJC790245);江苏省普通高校研究生科研创新工程项目(CXLX13-846)
通讯作者: 汪德根(1973- ),男,安徽黄山人,博士,副教授,硕士生导师,主要研究高铁旅游和城市旅游。E-mail:wdg713@163.com     E-mail: wdg713@163.com
作者简介: 钱佳(1990- ),女,江苏苏州人,硕士,主要研究城市旅游和高铁旅游。E-mail:qj2115@163.com
引用本文:   
钱佳, 汪德根, 牛玉. 城市居民使用市内公共自行车的满意度影响因素分析——以苏州市为例[J]. 地理研究, 2014, 33(2): 358-371.
QIAN Jia, WANG Degen, NIU Yu. Analysis of the influencing factors of urban residents to use urban public bikes:A case study of Suzhou. GEOGRAPHICAL RESEARCH, 2014, 33(2): 358-371.
链接本文:  
http://www.dlyj.ac.cn/CN/10.11821/dlyj201402014      或      http://www.dlyj.ac.cn/CN/Y2014/V33/I2/358
[1] 高菠阳, 刘卫东. 道路交通节能减排途径与潜力分析. 地理研究, 2013, 32(4): 767-775. [Gao Boyang, Liu Weidong. Emissions reduction potential analysis of road transportation. Geographical Research, 2013, 32(4): 767-775.]
[2] 王志高, 孔喆, 谢建华. 欧洲第三代公共自行车系统案例及启示. 城市交通, 2009, 7(4): 7-12. [Wang Zhigao, Kong Zhe, Xie Jianhua. The 3rd Generation of Bike Sharing Systems in Europe: Programs and Implications. Urban Transport of China, 2009, 7(4): 7-12.]
[3] Netherlands Ministry of Transport. The Dutch Bicycle Master Plan. Hague: Ministry of Transport, Public Works, and Water Management, 1999.
[4] Danish Ministry of Transport. Promoting Safer Cycling: A Strategy. Copenhagen: Danish. Ministry of Transport, 2000.
[5] German Federal Ministry of Transport. FahrRad Ride Your Bike! National Bicycle Plan. Berlin: German Federal Ministry of Transport, 2002.
[6] City of Amsterdam. The Amsterdam Bicycle Policy. Amsterdam: Dienst Infrastructuur Verkeer en Vervoer, 2003.
[7] City of Copenhagen. Bicycle Account. Copenhagen: City of Copenhagen, 2004.
[8] Fahrradverkehr. Bicycling Transportation in Berlin. Berlin: Senatsverwaltung fuer Stadtentwicklung, 2007.
[9] Herrstedt L. Traffic calming design: A speed management method: Danish experiences on environmentally adapted through roads. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 1992, 24: 3-16.
[10] Webster D C, Mackie A M. Review of Traf fic Calming Schemes in 20 mph Zones: TRL Report 215. Crowthorne: Transport Research Laboratory, 1996.
[11] Morrison D, Thomson H, Petticrew M. An evaluation of the health effects of a neighbourhood traffic calming scheme. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 2004, 58: 837-840.
[12] Rietveld P, Daniel V. Determinants of bicycle use: Do municipal policies matter? Transportation Research A, 2004, 38: 531-550.
[13] 周宏, 韩良峰. 城市交通: 走绿色环保发展之路: 荷兰城市自行车交通建设的经验和启示. 经济问题探索, 2011, (9): 176-180. [Zhou Hong, Han Liangfeng. City traffic: to go a green development road: The experience and inspiration of Holland city bicycle traffic construction. Inquiry into Economic Issues, 2011, (9): 176-180.]
[14] 北京交通发展研究中心, 北京交通大学. 2003-2007 年疏堵工程实施项目总结分析报告. 2008. [Beijing Transportation Research Center, Beijing Jiaotong University. The summary and analysis report of dredging project from 2003 to 2007. 2008.]
[15] 公共自行车已遍布我国61 个城市. http: //www.stdaily.com/kjrb/content/2012-10/11/content_526728.htm, 2012-10-11. [Public bicycle has spread all over the 61 cities of China. http: //www.stdaily.com/kjrb/content/2012-10/11/ content_526728.htm, 2012-10-11.]
[16] 李敏洁. 国内外公交自行车的对比研究: 以哥本哈根和杭州为例. 经营管理者, 2010, (8): 49-50. [Li Minjie. Comparison of domestic and foreign public bicycle: Taking Copenhagen and Hangzhou as an example. Manager' Journal, 2010, (8): 49-50.]
[17] 叶天池. 城市道路设计中对公共自行车服务点的思考. 科技创新导报, 2012, (4): 229-230. [Ye Tianchi. Thinking of the public bicycle service sites in the design of City Road. Science and Technology Innovation Herald, 2012, (4): 229-230.]
[18] 杨波霞, 邓卫, 胡启洲. 大城市自行车交通发展的理性引导及对策研究. 现代交通技术, 2006, (4): 50-53. [Yang Boxia, Deng Wei, Hu Qizhou. Research on Rational Guidance and Strategy of Bicycle Traffic in Big Cities. Modern Transportation Technology, 2006, (4): 50-53.]
[19] 王树盛.“公共自行车热”带来的思考. 江苏城市综合交通专栏, 2010, (7): 41-42. [Wang Shushen. Thinking brought from public bicycle craze. Jiangsu Urban Planning, 2010, (7): 41-42.]
[20] 阚宇衡, 邱欣. 杭州公共自行车交通系统发展优化建议与思考. 西部交通科技, 2012, (3): 76-79. [Kan Yuheng, Qiu Xin. Optimization recommendations and thinking of Hangzhou public bicycle transportation system development. Western China Communications Science & Technology, 2012, (3): 76-79.]
[21] 谷丛, 王菲. 城市公共自行车的“公共性”功能设计研究: 以杭州为例. 装饰, 2011, (5): 110-111. [Gu Cong, Wang Fei. Study on the “Publicness” function of city's public bicycle: Take Hangzhou for example. Art & Design, 2011, (5): 110-111.]
[22] 刘璐, 李杨, 徐国虎. 武汉市公共自行车服务满意度实证研究. 物流工程与管理, 2011, 33(5): 116-117. [Liu Lu, Li Yang, Xu Guohu. Empirical study of bike sharing service satisfactions in Wuhan City. Logistics Engineering and Management, 2011, 33(5): 116-117.]
[23] 胡喜含. 杭州公共自行车景区游客体验研究. 经济研究导刊, 2010, (35): 87-91. [Hu Xihan. Research on the visitor's experience of the public bicycle scenic in Hangzhou. Economic Research Guide, 2010, (35): 87-91.]
[24] 何博, 卢青. 城市公共自行车系统运营模式浅析. 交通企业管理, 2012, (4): 49-51. [He Bo, Lu Qing. Study on the operation mode of city public-bike system. Transportation Enterprise Management, 2012, (4): 49-51.]
[25] 汪侠, 吴小根, 章锦河, 等. 基于结构方程模型的旅游消费券效用影响因素研究: 以杭州市为例. 地理研究, 2012, 31 (31): 543-554. [Wang Xia, Wu Xiaogen, Zhang Jinhe, et al. Investigating influencing factors of tourism consumption coupon effect based on structural equation model approach: A case study of Hangzhou. Geographical Research, 2012, 31(3): 543-554.]
[26] 周玮, 黄震方, 殷红卫, 等. 城市公园免费开放对游客感知价值维度的影响及效应分析: 以南京中山陵为例. 地理研 究, 2012, 31(5): 873-884. [Zhou Wei, Huang Zhenfang, Yin Hongwei, et al. Analysis of impact and effect of tourists' perceived value dimensions of a free urban park: Based on study of Dr.Sun Yat-sen's Mausoleum in Nanjing. Geographical Research, 2012,31(5): 873-884.]
[27] 汪德根, 陈田, 刘昌雪, 等. 发达地区居民对节假日调整影响休闲旅游的感知分析. 地理研究, 2009, 28(5): 1414-1426. [Wang Degen, Chen Tian, Liu Changxue, et al. Analysis on the residents' perception of the impacts of holiday revision on leisure travel in the developed regions: Cases of Shanghai, Hangzhou and Suzhou. Geographical Research, 2009, 28(5): 1414-1426.]
[28] 吴明隆. 结构方程模型: AMOS 的操作与应用. 重庆: 重庆大学出版社, 2009. 8-15. [Wu Minglong. Structural Equation Model: Operation and Application of AMOS. Chongqing: Chongqing University Press, 2009. 8-15.]
[29] Nunally J. Psychometric Theory. 2nd ed. NY: McGrawHill, 1978.
[30] 卢韶婧, 张捷, 张宏磊. 旅游地映象、游客满意度及行为意向关系研究: 以桂林七星公园为例. 人文地理, 2011, 补卷 (4): 121-126. [Lu Shaojing, Zhang Jie, Zhang Honglei, et al. A study on the relationship between tourism destination image, tourist satisfaction and behavioral intentions: A case study of Guilin Seven Star Park. Human Geography, 2011, 26(4): 121-126.]
[31] 王山河, 陈烈. 基于结构方程式模型的广州城市形象元素分析评价. 经济地理, 2010, 30(1): 69-74. [Wang Shanhe, Chen Lie. Evaluation of city image elements of Guangzhou based on structural equation model. Economic Geography, 2010, 30(1): 69-74.]
[32] 吴明隆. 结构方程模型: AMOS的操作与应用. 重庆: 重庆大学出版社, 2009. 14. [Wu Minglong. Structural Equation Model: Operation and Application of AMOS. Chongqing: Chongqing University Press, 2009. 14.]
[33] Steiger J H. Structure model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1990, 25: 173-180.
[34] 黄颖华, 黄福才. 旅游者感知价值模型、测度与实证研究. 旅游学刊, 2007, 22(8): 42-47. [Huang Yinghua, Huang Fucai. Tourists' perceived value model and its measurement: An empirical study. Tourism Tribune, 2007, 22(8): 42-47.]
[35] 李琼星, 汤照照. 大城市自行车交通发展的利弊与方向. 中南公路工程, 2003, 28(l): 111-113. [Li Qiongxing, Tang Zhaozhao. Advantages, disadvantages, and prospects of bicycle transportation in metropolises. Central South Highway Engineering, 2003, 28(l): 111-113.]
[36] 苏勤, 钱树伟. 世界遗产地旅游者地方感影响关系及机理分析: 以苏州古典园林为例. 地理学报, 2012, 67(8): 1137-1148. [Su Qin, Qian Shuwei. Influence relationship and mechanism of tourists' sense of place in world heritage sites: A case study of the Classical Gardens of Suzhou. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2012, 67(8): 1137-1148.]
[1] 王兆峰. 张家界旅游城市游客公共交通感知、满意度与行为[J]. 地理研究, 2014, 33(5): 978-987.
[2] 李赞红, 阎建忠, 花晓波, 辛良杰, 李秀彬. 不同类型农户撂荒及其影响因素研究——以重庆市12 个典型村为例[J]. 地理研究, 2014, 33(4): 721-734.
[3] 史春云, 孙勇, 张宏磊, 刘泽华, 林杰. 基于结构方程模型的自驾游客满意度研究[J]. 地理研究, 2014, 33(4): 751-761.
[4] 湛东升, 孟斌, 张文忠. 北京市居民居住满意度感知与行为意向研究[J]. 地理研究, 2014, 33(2): 336-348.
[5] 席广亮, 甄峰, 汪侠, 秦萧. 南京市居民网络消费的影响因素及空间特征[J]. 地理研究, 2014, 33(2): 284-295.
[6] 乔伟峰, 盛业华, 方斌, 王亚华. 基于转移矩阵的高度城市化区域土地利用演变信息挖掘——以江苏省苏州市为例[J]. 地理研究, 2013, 32(8): 1497-1507.
[7] 颜秉秋, 高晓路. 城市老年人居家养老满意度的影响因子与社区差异[J]. 地理研究, 2013, 32(7): 1269-1279.
[8] 万绪才, 王厚廷, 傅朝霞, 马红专. 中国城市入境旅游发展差异及其影响因素——以重点旅游城市为例[J]. 地理研究, 2013, 32(2): 337-346.
[9] 宋周莺, 刘卫东. 中国工业中小企业省区分布及其影响因素[J]. 地理研究, 2013, 32(12): 2233-2243.
[10] 李玏, 刘家明, 王润, 伍宇明. 北京市高尔夫旅游资源空间分布特征及影响因素[J]. 地理研究, 2013, 32(10): 1937-1947.
[11] 毛小岗, 宋金平, 冯徽徽, 赵倩. 基于结构方程模型的城市公园居民游憩满意度[J]. 地理研究, 2013, 32(1): 166-178.
[12] 申玉铭, 邓秀丽, 任旺兵, 黄霖. 我国创意产业发展的支撑条件评价及空间发展战略[J]. 地理研究, 2012, 31(7): 1269-1279.
[13] 张剑明, 廖玉芳, 段丽洁, 曾向红. 湖南近50年极端连续降水的气候变化趋势[J]. 地理研究, 2012, 31(6): 1004-1015.
[14] 周应恒, 吕超, 周德. 我国蔬菜主产地形成的影响因素——以山东寿光为例[J]. 地理研究, 2012, 31(4): 687-700.
[15] 汪侠, 吴小根, 章锦河, 任黎秀, 刘泽华, 张洪. 基于结构方程模型的旅游消费券效用影响因素研究——以杭州市为例[J]. 地理研究, 2012, 31(3): 543-554.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《地理研究》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn