Please wait a minute...
 首页  期刊介绍 期刊订阅 广告合作 联系我们 English
 
最新录用  |  当期目录  |  过刊浏览  |  热点文章  |  阅读排行  |  下载排行  |  引用排行
地理研究  2014, Vol. 33 Issue (9): 1694-1705    DOI: 10.11821/dlyj201409010
  论文 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
限制开发区域农户薪柴消费的影响因素分析——以云南省怒江州为例
孙威1, 2, 胡望舒1, 3, 闫梅1, 3, 吕晨4
1.中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所,北京 100101; 2.中国科学院区域可持续发展分析与模拟重点实验室,北京 100101; 3.中国科学院大学,北京 100049; 4.中国科学院大学科技管理学院,北京 100049
Influencing factors of firewood consumption of rural household in restricted development zones: a case study of the Nujiang Prefecture in Yunnan Province
SUN Wei1, 2, HU Wangshu1, 3, YAN Mei1, 3, LV Chen4
1. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Regional Sustainable Development Modeling, CAS, Beijing 100101, China; 3. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100049; 4. College of Technology Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100049
全文: PDF(3944 KB)   HTML
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 本文以位于国家限制开发区域的云南省怒江州为例,利用654份农户调查问卷和logistic回归模型对农户薪柴消费的影响因素进行了实证分析。研究结果表明,农户薪柴消费与家庭总人口、是否外出打工、所在行政村是否在自然保护区、所在行政村海拔是否大于2000米、所在行政村到县城的距离正相关,与上年现金支出、是否有现金补贴、住房条件负相关。在保持其他变量不变的前提下,所在行政村海拔大于2000米的农户使用薪柴的概率比海拔在2000米以下的农户高64.70%;在自然保护区的农户消费薪柴的概率是自然保护区外农户的3.26倍;所在行政村到最近县城的距离每增加1公里,农户使用薪柴的概率增加6.12%;对农户进行现金补贴会使薪柴消费概率下降38.39%。在此基础上,对限制开发区域的环保政策、财政政策、人口政策、产业政策、投资政策提出了有针对性的调整建议。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
孙威
胡望舒
闫梅
吕晨
关键词 农户薪柴消费影响因素主体功能区    
Abstract:The promotion of the development of major function oriented zones by 2020 is a major strategic plan in China and requires collaboration between the government and the public. The solicitation of public support for the development of major function oriented zones remains a great unmet need that has not been addressed by academics. This study used the Nujiang prefecture in Yunnan province as an example in performing empirical analyses of the influencing factors that affect firewood consumption based on 654 rural household questionnaires and a logistic regression model. Our results indicated positive correlations of rural household firewood consumption with household size, the existence of migrant workers in a rural household, location of an administrative village in a natural reserve, the location of an administrative village above an altitude of 2000 meters, and the distance from the administrative village to its county town. The probability of rural household firewood consumption increased by 24.20% with each additional person in a household, and the probability of firewood consumption was 67.18% greater in households with migrant workers than in those without migrant workers. The probability of rural household firewood consumption in nature reserves was 3.26-fold higher than that of rural households outside nature reserves. In addition, the probability of rural household firewood consumption was 64.70% greater in administrative villages 2000 meters above sea level than in those at altitudes less than 2000 meters. The probability of rural household firewood consumption increased by 6.12% with each increase of one kilometer in the distance between an administrative village to the nearest county town. Both of these two variables reflected the accessibility of energy sources other than firewood to rural households. Higher altitude and longer distance from the county town led to lower accessibility to alternative energy sources and an increased probability of firewood usage. Our data showed a negative correlation with cash expenses in the previous year, housing conditions, and cash subsidies. The probability of firewood consumption was reduced by 2.28% with each additional 1000 CNY in cash expenditures in the previous year, whereas the probability was reduced by 45.73% for each increase of level in the housing condition. Cash subsidies for rural households reduced the probability of firewood consumption by 38.39%. According to the quantitative research on the firewood consumption, the article discovered various factors which had positive or negative effects on Nujiang prefecture, these are useful enlightenments on Restricted Development Zones from reducing the firewood consumption, curbing the ecological damages and forest degradation caused by excessive firewood consumption. The article puts forward some practical policy recommendations from environmental protection, finance, population, investment and industrial policy, and hope to improve energy consumption structure and consuming behavior and alleviate antinomies between household energy consumption and ecological protection, and advance the strategy implementations in this region.
Key wordsrural household    firewood consumption    influencing factor    major function oriented zones
收稿日期: 2013-12-26      出版日期: 2014-11-10
基金资助:国家自然科学基金项目(41271146); 中国科学院重点部署项目(KZZD-EW-06)
通讯作者: 通讯作者:吕晨(1982-),女,黑龙江勃利人,博士,讲师,主要从事区域规划和战略环境影响评价研究。E-mail:lvchen@ucas.ac.cn     E-mail: lvchen@ucas.ac.cn
作者简介: 作者简介:孙威(1975-),男,河南开封人,博士,副研究员,主要从事区域发展和空间规划研究。E-mail:
引用本文:   
孙威, 胡望舒, 闫梅, 吕晨. 限制开发区域农户薪柴消费的影响因素分析——以云南省怒江州为例[J]. 地理研究, 2014, 33(9): 1694-1705.
SUN Wei, HU Wangshu, YAN Mei, LV Chen. Influencing factors of firewood consumption of rural household in restricted development zones: a case study of the Nujiang Prefecture in Yunnan Province. GEOGRAPHICAL RESEARCH, 2014, 33(9): 1694-1705.
链接本文:  
http://www.dlyj.ac.cn/CN/10.11821/dlyj201409010      或      http://www.dlyj.ac.cn/CN/Y2014/V33/I9/1694
  案例区区位
  农户薪柴消费的影响因素分析框架
  行政村距最近县城的距离(左)和距最近乡镇的距离(右)
  主体功能区建设与农户薪柴消费的关系
[1] 国务院. 全国主体功能区规划, 2010. http://www.gov.cn/zwgk/2011-06/08/content_1879180.htm. The State of Council of the People’s Republic of China. The Planning of Major Function oriented zone, 2010. http://www.gov.cn/zwgk/2011-06/08/content_1879180.htm.
[2] Jie F, Wei S, Kan Z, et al., Major function oriented zone: new method of spatial regulation for reshaping regional development pattern in China. Chinese Geographical Science, 2012, 22(2): 196-209.
[3] Jie F, Yutian L, Anjun T, et al., Energy policies for sustainable livelihoods and sustainable development of poor areas in China. Energy Policy, 2011, (39): 1200-1212.
[4] Cooke P, Kohlin G, Hyde W F. Fuelwood, forests and community management: evidence from household studies. Environment and development economics, 2008, 13(1): 103-135.
[5] Adeoti O, Idowu D.O.O, Falegan T. Could fuelwood use contribute to household poverty in Nigeria? Biomass and Bioenergy, 2001, (21): 205-210.
[6] Sushenjit B, Priya S, Alessandro B. Forests, biomass use and poverty in Malawi. Ecological Economics, 2011,(70): 2461-2471.
[7] 丁士军, 陈传波. 贫困农户的能源使用及其对缓解贫困的影响. 中国农村经济, 2002, (12): 27-32. [Ding Shijun, Chen Chuanbo. Energy consumption of poor rural househoulds and its impact on poverty alleviation. Chinese Rural Economy, 2002, (12): 27-32.]
[8] Bluffstone R A. The effect of labor market performance on deforestation in developing countries under open accesss: an example from rural Nepal. Journal of environmental economics and management, 1995, 29(1): 42-63.
[9] Chen L, Heerink N, Vanden B M. Energy consumption in rural China: A household model for three villages in Jiangxi Province. Ecological economics, 2006, 58(2): 407-420.
[10] Filmer D, Pritchett L H. Environmental degradation and the demand for children: searching for the vicious circle in Pakistan. Environment and development economics, 2002, 7(1): 123-146.
[11] Shi X, Heerink N, Qu F. The role of off-farm employment in the rural energy consumption transition: a village-level analysis in Jiangxi Province, China. China economic review, 2009, 20(2): 350-359.
[12] 梁育填, 樊杰, 孙威, 等. 西南山区农村生活能源消费结构的影响因素分析:以云南省昭通市为例. 地理学报, 2012, 67(2): 221-229. Liang Yutian, Fan Jie, Sun Wei, et al. The influencing factors of rural household energy consumption structure in mountainous areas of Southwest China: a case study of Zhaotong city of Yunnan province, Acta Geographica Sinica, 2012, 67(2): 221-229.
[13] Foley. G. Photovoltaic applications in rural areas of the developing world. World Bank Publications, 1995.
[14] Leach G. The energy transition. Energy Policy, 1992, 20(2): 116-123.
[15] 葛之葳, 邢玮, 李俊清, 等. 保护区周边居民薪柴采集对乔木分布的影响:以四川王朗大熊猫自然保护区为例. 生态学报, 2006, 26(1): 97-103. Ge Zhiwei, Xing Wei, Li Junqing, et al. The impact of firewood collection by local people on the distributing of arbors around the nature reserves: a case study in Wanglang Nature Reserve for Giant Panda(Sichuan), Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2006, 26(1): 97-103.
[16] Donald B R. Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. New York: John Wiley & Sons inc.1987:75-112.
[17] Sheinbaum C, Martinez M, Rodriguez L. Trends and prospects in Mexican residential energy use. Energy, 1996, 21(6): 493-504.
[18] Tonooka Y, Jiaping L, Kondou Y, et al. A survey on energy consumption in rural households in the fringes of Xi'an city. Energy and Buildings, 2006, 38(11): 1335-1342.
[19] Le C, Nico H, Marrit B. Energy consumption in rural China: A household model for three villages in Jiangxi Province. Ecological Economics, 2006, 58(4): 407-420.
[20] 王效华, 冯帧民, 包信峰, 等. 江苏扬中农村家庭生活用能和能源消费的研究. 农业工程学报, 1998,(1): 142-147. Wang Xiaohua, Feng Zhenmin, Bao Xinfeng, et al. Rural household energy consumption in Yangzhou County. Transactions of the CSAE, 1998, (1): 142-147.
[21] 周曙东, 崔奇峰, 王翠翠. 农牧区农村家庭能源消费数量结构及影响因素分析:以内蒙古为例. 资源科学, 2009, 31(4): 696-702. Zhou Shudong, Cui Qifeng, Wang Cuicui. Study on the quantity, structure and influencing factors of rural household energy consumption: A case study in Inner Mongolia. Resources Science, 2009, 31(4): 696-702
[22] Leach G. The energy transition. Energy Policy, 1992, 20(2): 116-123.
[23] 孙凤莲, 王雅鹏, 叶慧. 影响农户参与生物质能源林建设意愿因素的实证分析:基于湖北省182个农户的问卷调查. 中国农村经济, 2011, (10): 86-96. Sun Fenglian, Wang Yapeng, Ye Hui. The empirical analysis of influencing factors of rural household involving in biomass energy forest construction: basing on questionnaire survey of 182 households in Hubei Province. Chinese Rural Economy, 2011, (10): 86-96.
[24] Jiang L, O'Neill B C. The energy transition in rural China. Int. J. Global Energy Issues, 2004, 21: 2-26.
[25] 王济川. Logistic回归模型. 北京: 高等教育出版社,2001.124-125. Wang Jichuan. Logistic regression model. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2001. 124-125.
[26] 邰秀军. 西部山区农户薪柴消费的影响因素分析. 中国农村经济, 2011, (7): 85-96. Tai Xiujun. The influencing factors of household’s firewood consumption in southwest China. Chinese Rural Economy, 2011, (7): 85-96.
[27] 闫丽珍, 闵庆文, 成升魁. 中国农村生活能源利用与生物质能开发. 资源科学, 2005, 27(1): 8-13. Yan Lizhen, Min Qingwen, Cheng Shengkui. Energy consumption and bio-energy development in rural areas of China. Resources Sciences, 2005, 27(1): 8-13.
[28] 杨国安, 徐勇, 郭腾云. 基于脆弱性和可持续生计视角的黄土高原生态环境治理研究. 水土保持研究, 2010, 17(2): 64-69. Yang Guo’an, Xu Yong, Guo Tengyun. Eco-environmental construction on the Loess Plateau based on the perspective of the vulnerability and sustainable livelihoods approaches. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2010, 17(2): 64-69.
[1] 张海军. 河南省火灾影响因素的空间分析[J]. 地理科学进展, 2014, 33(7): 958-968.
[2] 张开洲, 陈楠. 1990-2010年福建省县域人口老龄化时空演变特征及其驱动机制[J]. 地理科学进展, 2014, 33(5): 605-615.
[3] 龙冬平, 李同昇, 苗园园, 刘超, 李晓越, 孟欢欢. 中国农村人口非农化时空演变特征及影响因素[J]. 地理科学进展, 2014, 33(4): 517-530.
[4] 李赞红, 阎建忠, 花晓波, 辛良杰, 李秀彬. 不同类型农户撂荒及其影响因素研究——以重庆市12 个典型村为例[J]. 地理研究, 2014, 33(4): 721-734.
[5] 李楠楠, 李同昇, 于正松, 芮旸, 苗园园, 李永胜. 基于Logistic-ISM模型的农户采用新技术影响因素——以甘肃省定西市马铃薯种植技术为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2014, 33(4): 542-551.
[6] 王洋, 李强, 王少剑, 秦静. 扬州市住宅价格空间分异的影响因素与驱动机制[J]. 地理科学进展, 2014, 33(3): 375-388.
[7] 闫丽英, 李伟, 杨成凤, 宋金平. 北京市住宿业空间结构时空演化及影响因素[J]. 地理科学进展, 2014, 33(3): 432-440.
[8] 程婧瑶, 樊杰, 陈东. 中国省级尺度不同类型主体功能区资金来源结构差异[J]. 地理科学进展, 2014, 33(3): 347-355.
[9] 席广亮, 甄峰, 汪侠, 秦萧. 南京市居民网络消费的影响因素及空间特征[J]. 地理研究, 2014, 33(2): 284-295.
[10] 叶尔肯·吾扎提, 刘慧, 刘卫东. 1992-2011年哈萨克斯坦城镇化过程及其影响因素[J]. 地理科学进展, 2014, 33(2): 181-193.
[11] 林锦耀, 黎夏. 基于空间自相关的东莞市主体功能区划分[J]. 地理研究, 2014, 33(2): 349-357.
[12] 钱佳, 汪德根, 牛玉. 城市居民使用市内公共自行车的满意度影响因素分析——以苏州市为例[J]. 地理研究, 2014, 33(2): 358-371.
[13] 高金龙, 陈江龙, 苏曦. 2001-2010年南京市区土地出让价格的影响因素[J]. 地理科学进展, 2014, 33(2): 211-221.
[14] 张艳. 生活方式对开封城市家庭采暖碳排放的影响[J]. 地理科学进展, 2013, 32(7): 1072-1081.
[15] 李晓庆, 王成, 王利平, 蒋伟, 熊川铭. 农户对农村居民点整合的意愿及其驱动机制——以重庆市沙坪坝区曾家镇白林村为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2013, 32(4): 671-680.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《地理研究》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn