不同视角下InVEST模型的土壤保持功能对比

doi:10.11821/dlyj201412016

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

土壤保持是生态系统的重要服务功能之一。黄土高原是世界上水土流失最严重的地区,黄河中游地区是黄河泥沙的主要来源,继续开展黄河中游地区土壤保持研究,对于当地的水土保持、土地利用结构调整、退耕还林、生态补偿以及水库管理具有重大意义。以黄河一级支流无定河的源头(营盘山库区)为研究区,采用生态系统服务和交易的综合评估模型InVEST(Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Trade-offs),从水文和土地利用两个角度出发,对研究区地块截留能力、输出能力和保持能力进行对比研究,重点探讨哪种角度的结果更科学合理,并进一步研究清淤情境下2010年营盘山库区的土壤保持能力及其空间格局特征。结果表明：① 基于子流域边界和土地利用边界的计算结果差异悬殊,水文学意义的子流域边界可以保证沉积物沿水文路径迁移过程的完整性,评价结果更科学合理;InVEST沉积物模型应该采用水文意义上的自然流域边界,而不宜将土地利用边界作为子流域单元进行评价。② 2010年营盘山库区在清淤情境下的沉积物截留总量为586482.60 t,输出总量为129868.61 t,平均输出量为12.93 t/hm²,保留总量为1559198.40 t,平均保留量为151.57 t/hm²。③ 地块的沉积物截留能力从上游至下游逐渐增强,而沉积物输出能力却刚好相反。无定河西侧支流的土壤保持能力比东侧支流偏高,两大支流平均土壤保持量低值区均出现在河流上游地区。

关键词: InVEST模型, 土壤保持, 黄土高原, 营盘山库区

Abstract:

Soil conservation is one of the important service functions of ecosystem. The Loess Plateau is the most serious soil erosion area in the world, and the middle reaches of the Yellow River Basin is the main source of silt. Therefore, it is of great significance to conduct further studies on the soil conservation in the middle reaches of the Yellow River, especially in the aspects of soil and water conservation, land use structure adjustment, conversion of farmland to forests, eco-compensation as well as reservoir management.By taking the Yingpanshan Reservoir region, the source of Wuding River which is the primary tributary of the Yellow River, as an example, this paper uses the Sediment Retention Model of InVEST to compare the capacity of trapping sediment of land parcel, sediment output and sediment retention from the perspective of hydrology and land use, and try to figure out which result is more scientific, and to reveal the ability of soil conservation for Yingpanshan Reservoir region and its spatial pattern in 2010. The results are shown as follows: (1) The boundary of subwatershed in hydrological perspective can ensure the integrity of the removal of sediment by vegetation along hydrologic flowpaths, which makes the evaluation result more scientific and reasonable, since the evaluation results are significantly different under different perspectives. Therefore, the Sediment Retention Model of InVEST should choose natural basin boundary in the sense of hydrology as the sub-basin unit to evaluate the soil conservation function, instead of choosing the inputting boundary of land use. (2) When dredging for reservoir is considered, the total sediment retained, the total sediment export, the mean sediment export the total amount of sediment retained from sediment originating upstream, and the mean amount of sediment retained are 586482.60 t, 129868.61 t, 12.93t/hm², 1559198.40t, and 151.57 t/hm², respectively. (3) The sediment retention capacity of land parcel increases gradually from upstream to downstream, while the capability of sediment output has a contrary tendency. The sediment retention ability of west tributary of the Wuding River is more stronger than that of the east tributary. In addition, the low-value areas of soil conservation in the two major tributaries are both observed in the upstream.

Key words: InVEST, soil conservation, Loess Plateau, Yingpanshan Reservoir region

胡胜, 曹明明, 刘琪, 张天琪, 邱海军, 刘闻, 宋进喜. 不同视角下InVEST模型的土壤保持功能对比[J]. 地理研究, 2014, 33(12): 2393-2406.

Sheng HU, Mingming CAO, Qi LIU, Tianqi ZHANG, Haijun QIU, Wen LIU, Jinxi SONG. Comparative study on the soil conservation function of InVEST model under different perspectives[J]. GEOGRAPHICAL RESEARCH, 2014, 33(12): 2393-2406.

图/表 8

图1

表1

图5

表2

图2

表3

图3

图4

参考文献 40

[1]	Costanza R, d'Arge R, Groot R, et al. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 1997, 387(6630): 253-260.
[2]	张宗祜. 黄土高原土壤侵蚀基本规律. 第四纪研究, 1993, 13(1): 34-40.
	[Zhang Zonghu.The basic features of soil erosion in Loess Plateau. Quaternary Sciences, 1993, 13(1): 34-40.]
[3]	李勋贵, 魏霞. 区域土壤侵蚀演化风险分析:以泾河流域为例. 地理研究, 2011, 30(8): 1361-1369.
	[Li Xungui, Wei Xia.Evolution risk analysis of regional soil erosion: A case study of Jinghe River Basin. Geographical Research, 2011, 30(8): 1361-1369.]
[4]	高鹏, 穆兴民, 李锐, 等. 黄河支流无定河水沙变化趋势及其驱动因素. 泥沙研究, 2009, (5): 22-28.
	[Gao Peng, Mu Xingmin, Li Rui, et al.Analyses on trend and driving force of runoff and sediment load in the Wuding River. Journal of Sediment Research, 2009, (5): 22-28.]
[5]	洪业汤, 朴河春, 姜洪波. 黄河沙量记录与黄土高原侵蚀. 第四纪研究, 1990, 10(1): 10-20.
	[Hong Yetang, Piao Hechun, Jiang Hongbo.Erosion of the Loess Plateau with special reference to the records of silt discharged by the Huang He(Yellow River). Quaternary Sciences, 1990, 10(1): 10-20.]
[6]	肖玉, 谢高地, 安凯. 青藏高原生态系统土壤保持功能及其价值. 生态学报, 2003, 23(11): 2367-2378.
	[Xiao Yu, Xie Gaodi, An Kai.The function and economic value of soil conservation of ecosystems in Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2003, 23(11): 2367-2378.]
[7]	许月卿, 邵晓梅. 基于GIS和RUSLE的土壤侵蚀量计算:以贵州省猫跳河流域为例. 北京林业大学学报, 2006, 28(4): 67-71.
	[Xu Yueqing, Shao Xiaomei.Estimation of soil erosion supported by GIS and RUSLE: A case study of Maotiaohe Watershed, Guizhou province. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2006, 28(4): 67-71.]
[8]	周湘山, 孙保平, 李锦荣, 等. 基于GIS和USLE的土壤侵蚀定量分析研究:以四川省洪雅县为例. 水土保持研究, 2011, 18(4): 5-10.
	[Zhou Xiangshan, Sun Baoping, Li Jinrong, et al.Quantitative analysis of soil erosion based on GIS and USLE: Taking Hongya county of Sichuan province as a case study. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2011, 18(4): 5-10.]
[9]	周彬, 余新晓, 陈丽华, 等. 基于InVEST模型的北京山区土壤侵蚀模拟. 水土保持研究, 2010, 17(6): 9-13.
	[Zhou Bin, Yu Xinxiao, Chen Lihua, et al.Soil erosion simulation in mountain areas of Beijing based on InVEST model. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2010, 17(6): 9-13.]
[10]	任志远, 刘焱序. 西北地区植被保持土壤效应评估. 资源科学, 2013, 35(3): 610-617.
	[Ren Zhiyuan, Liu Yanxu.Estimating the ecological effect of soil conservation by vegetation in Northwest China. Resources Science, 2013, 35(3): 610-617.]
[11]	吴岚. 水土保持生态服务功能及其价值研究. 北京: 北京林业大学博士学位论文, 2007.
	[Wu Lan.Function and value of soil & water conservation ecological services. Beijing: Doctoral Dissertation of Beijing Forestry University, 2007.]
[12]	余新晓, 吴岚, 饶良懿, 等. 水土保持生态服务功能价值估算. 中国水土保持科学, 2008, 6(1): 83-86.
	[Yu Xinxiao, Wu lan, Rao Liangyi, et al. Assessment on the ecological services value of soil and water conservation. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2008, 6(1): 83-86.]
[13]	盛莉, 金艳, 黄敬峰. 中国水土保持生态服务功能价值估算及其空间分布. 自然资源学报, 2010, 25(7): 1105-1113.
	[Sheng Li, Jin Yan, Huang Jingfeng.Value estmiation of conserving water and soil of ecosystem in China. Journal of Natural Resources,2010, 25(7): 1105-1113.]
[14]	吴楠, 高吉喜, 苏德毕力格, 等. 不同土地利用/覆被情景下生态系统减轻水库泥沙淤积的服务能力与经济价值模拟. 生态学报, 2009, 29(11): 5912-5922.
	[Wu Nan, Gao Jixi, Sudebilige, et al. Evaluation on ecosystem service of avoided reservoir sedimentation and its econom ic value under different land use/cover scenarios. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2009, 29(11): 5912-5922.]
[15]	周毅, 魏天兴, 解建强, 等. 黄土高原不同林地类型水土保持效益分析. 水土保持学报, 2011, 25(3): 12-16.
	[Zhou Yi, Wei Tianxing, Xie Jianqiang, et al.Different types of vegetation cover and water conservation benfits. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2011, 25(3): 12-16.]
[16]	卞鸿雁, 庞奖励, 任志远, 等. 基于土地利用变化的土壤保持效益时空动态: 以黄土高原南部为例. 生态学杂志, 2012, 31(9): 2391-2396.
	[Bian Hongyan, Pang Jiangli, Ren Zhiyuan, et al.Effects of land use change on soil conservation value in southern Loess Plateau of Northwest China. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2012, 31(9): 2391-2396.]
[17]	白杨, 郑华, 庄长伟, 等. 白洋淀流域生态系统服务评估及其调控. 生态学报, 2013, 33(3): 711-717.
	[Bai Yang, Zheng Hua, Zhuang Changwei, et al.Ecosystem services valuation and its regulation in Baiyangdian basin: Based on InVEST model. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2013, 33(3): 711-717.]
[18]	杨园园, 戴尔阜, 付华. 基于InVEST模型的生态系统服务功能价值评估研究框架. 首都师范大学学报:自然科学版, 2012, 33(3): 41-47.
	[Yang Yuanyuan, Dai Erfu, Fu Hua.The assessment framework of ecosystem service value based on InVEST model. Journal of Capital Normal University: Nature Science Edition, 2012, 33(3): 41-47.]
[19]	余新晓, 周彬, 吕锡芝, 等. 基于InVEST模型的北京山区森林水源涵养功能评估. 林业科学, 2012, 48(10): 1-5.
	[Yu Xinxiao, Zhou Bin, Lv Xizhi, et al.Evaluation of water conservation function in mountain forest areas of Beijing based on InVEST model. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2012, 48(10): 1-5.]
[20]	傅斌, 徐佩, 王玉宽, 等. 都江堰市水源涵养功能空间格局. 生态学报, 2013, 33(3): 789-797.
	[Fu Bin, Xu Pei, Wang Yukuan, et al.Spatial pattern of water retetnion in Dujiangyan county. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2013, 33(3): 789-797.]
[21]	潘韬, 吴绍洪, 戴尔阜, 等. 基于InVEST模型的三江源区生态系统水源供给服务时空变化. 应用生态学报, 2013, 24(1): 183-189.
	[Pan Tao, Wu Shaohong, Dai Erfu, et al.Spatiotemporal variation of water source supply service in Three Rivers Source Area of China based on InVEST model. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2013, 24(1): 183-189.]
[22]	Zhang C Q, Li W H, Zhang B, et al. Water yield of Xitiaoxi River Basin based on InVEST modeling. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2012, 3(1): 50-54.
[23]	徐佩, 王玉宽, 杨金凤, 等. 汶川地震灾区生物多样性热点地区分析. 生态学报, 2013, 33(3): 718-725.
	[Xu Pei, Wang Yukuan, Yang Jinfeng, et al.Identification of hotspots for biodiversity conservation in the Wenchuan earthquake-hit area. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2013, 33(3): 718-725.]
[24]	彭怡, 王玉宽, 傅斌, 等. 汶川地震重灾区生态系统碳储存功能空间格局与地震破坏评估. 生态学报, 2013, 33(3): 798-808.
	[Peng Yi, Wang Yukuan, Fu Bin, et al.Spatial distribution of carbon storage function and seismic damage in Wenchuan earthquake stricken areas. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2013, 33(3): 798-808.]
[25]	彭怡. InVEST模型在生态系统服务功能评估中的应用研究:以四川汶川地震灾区为例. 北京: 中国科学院大学硕士学位论文, 2010.
	[Peng Yi.Application of InVEST model in ecosystem services assessment: A case study from Wenchuan earthquake area. Beijing: Master Dissertation of Institute of University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2010.]
[26]	饶恩明, 肖燚, 欧阳志云, 等. 海南岛生态系统土壤保持功能空间特征及影响因素. 生态学报, 2013, 33(3): 746-755.
	[Rao Enming, Xiao Yi, Ouyang Zhiyun, et al.Spatial characteristics of soil conservation service and its impact factors in Hainan Island. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2013, 33(3): 746-755.]
[27]	和瑞莉, 李静, 张石娃. 黄河流域泥沙密度试验研究. 人民黄河, 1999, 21(3): 5-8.
	[He Ruili, Li Jing, Zhang Shiwa.Experimental study of sediment density in the Yellow River Basin. Yellow River, 1999, 21(3): 5-8.]
[28]	高海东, 李占斌, 李鹏, 等. 梯田建设和淤地坝淤积对土壤侵蚀影响的定量分析. 地理学报, 2012, 67(5): 599-608.
	[Gao Haidong, Li Zhanbin, Li Peng, et al.Influences of terrace construction and check dam silting-up on soil erosion. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2012, 67(5): 599-608.]
[29]	Diodato N, Bellocchi G.MedREM, a rainfall erosivity model for the Mediterranean region. Journal of Hydrology, 2010, 387(1): 119-127.
[30]	Diodato N, Bellocchi G.Estimating monthly (R) USLE climate input in a Mediterranean region using limited data. Journal of Hydrology, 2007, 345(3): 224-236.
[31]	Wischmeier W H, Smith D D.Rainfall erosion losses from cropland east of the Rocky Mountains: Guide for selection of practices for soil and water conservation. In: US Department of Agriculture. Agricultural Handbook. Washington: US Department of Agriculture, 1965: 282.
[32]	Wischmeier W H, Smith D D.Predicting rainfall erosion losses: A guide to conservation planning. In: US Department of Agriculture. Agricultural Handbook. Washington: US Department of Agriculture, 1978: 58.
[33]	刘昌明, 郑红星, 王中根, 等. 流域水循环分布式模拟. 郑州: 黄河水利出版社,2006.
	[Liu Changming, Zheng Hongxing, Wang Zhonggen, et al.Distributed Simulation of Water Cycle in Basin. Zhengzhou: The Yellow River Water Conservancy Press, 2006.]
[34]	潘美慧, 伍永秋, 任斐鹏, 等. 基于USLE的东江流域土壤侵蚀量估算. 自然资源学报, 2010, 25(12): 2154-2164.
	[Pan Meihui, Wu Yongqiu, Ren Peipeng, et al.Estimating soil erosion in the Dongjiang River basin based on USLE. Journal of Natural Resources, 2010, 25(12): 2154-2164.]
[35]	王万忠, 焦菊英. 中国的土壤侵蚀因子定量评价研究. 水土保持通报, 1996, 16(5): 1-20.
	[Wang Wanzhong, Jiao Juying.Qutantitative evaluation on factors infulencing soil erosion in China. Bulletion of Soil and Water Conservation, 1996, 16(5): 1-20.]
[36]	程琳, 杨勤科, 谢红霞, 等. 基于GIS和CSLE的陕西省土壤侵蚀定量评价方法研究. 水土保持学报, 2009, 23(5): 61-66.
	[Cheng Lin, Yang Qinke, Xie Hongxia, et al.GIS and CSLE based quantitative assessment of soil erosion in Shaanxi, China. Journal of Soil and Water Conserv ation, 2009, 23(5): 61-66.]
[37]	张岩, 袁建平, 刘宝元. 土壤侵蚀预报模型中的植被覆盖与管理因子研究进展. 应用生态学报, 2002, 13(8): 1033-1036.
	[Zhang Yan, Yuan Jianping, Liu Baoyuan.Advance in researches on vegetation cover and management factor in the soil erosion prediction model. Chinese Journal of Applied Econolgy, 2002, 13(8): 1033-1036.]
[38]	韦杰, 贺秀斌. 流域侵蚀产沙人类活动影响指数研究: 以长江上游为例. 地理研究, 2012, 31(12): 2259-2269.
	[Wei Jie, He Xiubin.The impacts of human activities on riverine sediment load: A case study of the Upper Yangtze River Basin. Geographical Research, 2012, 31(12): 2259-2269.]
[39]	王随继. 黄河中游多沙粗沙区侵蚀产沙与植被相互作用的临界现象. 水土保持学报, 2004, 18(4): 20-23.
	[Wang Suiji.Interaction threshold between soil erosion and vegetation cover at coarse sediment source area with high concentration, Middle Yellow River Basin. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2004, 18(4): 20-23.]
[40]	冉大川. 黄河中游水土保持措施的减水减沙作用研究. 资源科学, 2006, 28(1): 93-100.
	[Ran Dachuan.Water and sediment variation and ecological protection measures in the Middle Reach of the Yellow River. Resources Science, 2006, 28(1): 93-100.]

地块	截留率	USLE	地块截留量	地块输出量(G_i=1-E_i)
1	E₁	USLE₁	0	USLE₁
2	E₂	USLE₂	USLE₁×E₂	USLE₁×G₂+USLE₂
3	E₃	USLE₃	(USLE₁×G₂+USLE₂) × E₃	(USLE₁×G₂+USLE₂) × G₃+USLE₃
4	E₄	USLE₄	USLE₁×G₂×G₃×E₄+USLE₂×G₃×E₄+USLE₃×E₄	USLE₁×G₂×G₃×G₄+USLE₂×G₃×G₄+USLE₃×G₄+USLE₄

土地利用类型	稀疏草地	旱地	居民地	裸地	水域	稀疏灌木林	落叶阔叶林
C值	0.3	0.228	0	1	0	0.1	0.005
P值	1	1	0	1	0	1	1

子流域编码	子流域边界统计结果		土地利用边界统计结果		Sum₁/Sum₂
子流域编码	Sum₁(t)	像元Max₁(t)		Sum₂(t)	像元Max₂(t)
sub1	54403.30	1025.67	1009.02	63.60	53.92
sub 2	31548.50	475.53	738.18	112.71	42.74
sub 3	59612.20	1361.22	861.31	61.34	69.21
sub 4	48764.50	1394.38	673.26	65.66	72.43
sub 5	40848.50	469.58	1435.45	105.04	28.46
sub 6	45544.90	401.87	1355.16	49.06	33.61
sub 7	28476.90	587.33	1324.13	120.22	21.51
sub 8	23228.30	721.08	93.96	12.32	247.21
sub 9	41701.40	1438.28	934.82	303.30	44.61
sub 10	21991.90	400.96	353.52	44.80	62.21
sub 11	35803.70	887.37	2387.84	89.80	14.99
sub 12	43259.50	893.20	2065.08	189.62	20.95
sub 13	15862.30	832.49	207.73	37.50	76.36
sub 14	48680.00	1079.46	825.59	169.87	58.96
sub 15	32182.50	1530.09	387.63	43.16	83.02
sub 16	14574.20	458.43	369.18	41.98	39.48
库区	586482.60	1530.09	15021.87	303.30	39.04