区域分部门贸易的隐含碳排放——以北京为例

doi:10.11821/dlyj201505012

地理研究 ›› 2015, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (5): 933-943.doi: 10.11821/dlyj201505012

区域分部门贸易的隐含碳排放——以北京为例

黄蕊^1,^2,³, 钟章奇², 孙翊⁴(), 刘昌新⁴, 刘丽⁵

1. 南京师范大学地理科学学院,南京 210023
2. 华东师范大学地理信息科学教育部重点实验室,上海 200062
3. 江苏省地理信息资源开发与利用协同创新中心,南京 210023
4. 中国科学院科技政策与管理科学研究所, 北京 100080
5. 中国农业大学经济管理学院, 北京 100083

收稿日期:2014-11-14 修回日期:2015-02-03 出版日期:2015-06-12 发布日期:2015-06-12
作者简介:
作者简介：黄蕊（1987- ）,女,河南焦作人,博士,讲师,研究方向为经济计算和地理计算。E-mail:huangrui4420@163.com
基金资助:
国家重点基础研究发展计划（973）项目(2012CB955803);国家自然科学基金项目（41271551);中国科学院战略性先导科技专项项目（XDA05150500）

Measurements of regional sectoral embodied CO₂ emissions: A case study of Beijing

Rui HUANG^1,^2,³, Zhangqi ZHONG², Yi SUN⁴(), Changxin LIU⁴, Li LIU⁵

1. School of Geography Science, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210023, China
2. East China Normal University, Key Laboratory of Geographical Information Science, Ministry of State Education of China, Shanghai 200062, China
3. Jiangsu Center for Collaborative Innovation in Geographical Information Resource Development and Application, Nanjing 210023, China
4. Institute of Policy and Management Science, CAS, Beijing 100080, China
5. College of Economics and Management, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China

Received:2014-11-14 Revised:2015-02-03 Online:2015-06-12 Published:2015-06-12

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

碳排放增多带来的气候变化已成为各国政府共同面对的问题,碳减排责任的划分是各国争论的焦点,而国际贸易造成的"碳泄露"问题更是不可忽视。中国的碳减排责任最终要落实到省市区域尺度上,区域间贸易引起的"碳泄露"同样值得考虑。使用多区域投入产出分析法,分别从生产者和消费者的角度对北京各部门碳排放进行分析,并估算各部门进出口贸易中隐含的碳排放量。结果表明北京是一个碳排放净流入区域。基于生产者和消费者的角度,北京的碳排放总量分别是142.79 Mt和116.80 Mt。输出贸易中隐含的碳排放量为28.15 Mt,包括区域间调出和国际出口。输出贸易中隐含碳排放最大的部门是石油加工、炼焦及核燃料加工业。输入贸易中隐含的碳排放量为54.15 Mt,包括区域间调入和国际进口。输入贸易中隐含的碳排放最大的部门是建筑业。

关键词: 多区域投入产出模型, 隐含碳排放, 碳泄露, 北京

Abstract:

Climate change caused by increasing CO₂ emissions has been a common problem faced by governments, among which, "carbon leakage" created in international trades cannot be ignored. The phenomenon also exists in domestic regional trades. In this paper we use Multi-Regional Input-Output Analysis (MIOA) to estimate CO₂ emissions of Beijing, both as producer and consumer, and to calculate the embodied CO₂ emissions of each sector. Based on location quotient theory, we construct the embodied CO₂ emissions location quotient and analyze the export embodied CO₂ emissions location quotient. We found that, Beijing′s total CO₂ emissions in consumption and production activities are 142.79 Mt and 116.80Mt, respectively. The embodied CO₂ emissions in export and import are 28.15 Mt and 54.15 Mt, respectively. Therefore, Beijing is a net CO₂ emissions importer. The three sectors with the largest embodied CO₂ emissions in import are construction, electric power and heat power production and supply, and petroleum processing, coking and nuclear fuel processing. The three sectors with the largest embodied CO₂ emissions in export are petroleum processing, coking and nuclear fuel processing, metals smelting and pressing, and transport, storage and post. The construction sector′s embodied CO₂ emissions in import are mainly from Hebei while the embodied CO₂ emissions in import of electric power and heat power production and supply are mainly from Shanxi and Inner Mongolia. The embodied CO₂ emissions in import of petroleum processing, coking and nuclear fuel processing are mainly from abroad.

Key words: MIOA, embodied CO2 emissions, carbon leakage, Beijing

黄蕊, 钟章奇, 孙翊, 刘昌新, 刘丽. 区域分部门贸易的隐含碳排放——以北京为例[J]. 地理研究, 2015, 34(5): 933-943.

Rui HUANG, Zhangqi ZHONG, Yi SUN, Changxin LIU, Li LIU. Measurements of regional sectoral embodied CO₂ emissions: A case study of Beijing[J]. GEOGRAPHICAL RESEARCH, 2015, 34(5): 933-943.

图/表 8

表1

图1

表2

2007年北京各部门的隐含碳（Mt）"

	EEP	EEC	EEI	EEE	EEB	$ρ$
1	0.582	1.598	1.080	0.064	1.016	1.666
2	0.744	0.921	0.212	0.035	0.177	6.238
3	0.033	0.044	0.030	0.019	0.011	0.463
4	0.002	0.007	0.006	0.000	0.006	0.000
5	0.001	0.009	0.009	0.000	0.008	0.119
6	0.628	1.580	1.093	0.142	0.951	1.517
7	0.067	0.114	0.119	0.072	0.047	1.138
8	0.018	0.075	0.068	0.012	0.057	0.479
9	0.011	0.090	0.083	0.004	0.079	0.260
10	0.285	0.558	0.324	0.051	0.273	1.681
11	12.708	13.246	6.928	6.389	0.539	8.411
12	8.746	8.429	3.867	4.185	-0.318	4.032
13	1.972	2.252	1.009	0.729	0.280	8.145
14	12.495	11.227	4.003	5.271	-1.268	6.290
15	0.048	1.518	1.476	0.005	1.470	0.129
16	0.646	1.985	1.738	0.400	1.339	0.417
17	0.442	1.345	1.088	0.185	0.903	0.739
18	0.037	0.587	0.562	0.013	0.549	0.101
19	0.305	1.014	0.879	0.171	0.709	0.457
20	0.004	0.053	0.052	0.003	0.050	0.092
21	0.010	0.266	0.263	0.008	0.255	0.041
22	52.038	60.276	8.244	0.006	8.239	11.559
23	0.032	0.092	0.061	0.000	0.061	0.646
24	1.163	10.587	9.424	0.000	9.424	0.000
25	10.536	10.080	4.498	4.953	-0.456	2.806
26	0.746	0.805	0.428	0.370	0.059	0.615
27	0.357	0.577	0.339	0.119	0.219	0.803
28	5.320	3.223	1.001	3.098	-2.098	2.237
29	0.347	0.726	0.434	0.056	0.379	0.862
30	6.472	9.506	4.829	1.796	3.033	0.608

表2

图2

图3

图4

图5

表3

参考文献 44

[1]	Ferng J.Allocating the responsibility of CO2 over-emissions from the perspectives of benefit principle and ecological deficit. Ecological Economics, 2003, 46(1): 121-141.
[2]	Whalley J, Walsw S.Bringing the Copenhagen global climate change negotiations to conclusion. CESifo Economic Studies, 2009, 55(2): 255-285.
[3]	刘红光, 刘卫东, 范晓梅. 贸易对中国产业能源活动碳排放的影响. 地理研究, 2011, 30(4): 590-600.
	[Liu Hongguang, Liu Weidong, Fan Xiaomei.The impact of foreign trade on CO2 emissions induced by industrial activities in China. Geographical Research, 2011, 30(4): 590-600.]
[4]	Wyckoff A W, Roop J M.The embodiment of carbon in imports of manufactured products: Implications for international agreements on greenhouse gas emissions. Energy Policy, 1994, 22(3): 187-194.
[5]	Lenzen M, Pade L L, Munksgaard J.CO2 multipliers in multiregion input-output models. Economic Systems Research. 2004, 16(4): 391-412.
[6]	Mongelli I, Tassielli G, Notarnicola B.Global warming agreements, international trade and energy/carbon embodiments: An input-output approach to the Italian case. Energy Policy, 2006, 34(1): 88-100.
[7]	Cole M A.Trade, the pollution haven hypothesis and the environmental Kuznets curve. Examining the linkages. Ecological Economics, 2004, 48(1): 71-81.
[8]	Dietzenbacher E, Mukhopadhyay K.An empirical examination of the pollution haven hypothesis for India: Towards a green Leontief paradox. Environmental & Resource Economics, 2007, 36(4): 427-449.
[9]	Lin B, Sun C.Evaluating carbon dioxide emissions in international trade of China. Energy Policy, 2010, 38(1): 613-621.
[10]	Liu H, Xi Y, Guo J, et al.Energy embodied in the international trade of China: An energy input-output analysis. Energy Policy, 2010, 38(8): 3957-3964.
[11]	Li H, Zhang P D, He C Y, et al.Evaluating the effects of embodied energy in international trade on ecological footprint in China. Ecological Economics, 2007, 62(1): 136-148.
[12]	魏本勇, 方修琦, 王媛, 等. 基于最终需求的中国出口贸易碳排放研究. 地理科学, 2009, 29(5): 634-640.
	[Wei Benyong, Fang Xiuqi, Wang Yuan, et al.Estimation of carbon emissions embodied in export in the view of final demands for China. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2009, 29(5): 634-640.]
[13]	Peters G P, Hertwich E G.Pollution embodied in trade: The Norwegian case. Global Environmental Change, 2006, 16(4): 379-387.
[14]	Sanchez-Choliz J, Duarte R.CO2 emissions embodied in international trade: evidence for Spain. Energy Policy, 2004, 32(18): 1999-2005.
[15]	Cadarso M A, López L A, Gómez N, et al.International trade and shared environmental responsibility by sector. An application to the Spanish economy. Ecological Economics, 2012, 83: 221-235.
[16]	Tolmasquim M T, Machado G.Energy and carbon embodied in the international trade of Brazil. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 2003, 8(2): 139-155.
[17]	Machado G, Schaeffer R, Worrell E.Energy and carbon embodied in the international trade of Brazil: An input-output approach. Ecological Economics, 2001, 39(3): 409-424.
[18]	Stahls M, Saikku L, Mattila T.Impacts of international trade on carbon flows of forest industry in Finland. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2011, 19(16): 1842-1848.
[19]	Minx J, Scott K, Peters G, et al.An analysis of Sweden′s carbon footprint. WWF Report 2008, .
[20]	Lenzen M.Primary energy and greenhouse gases embodied in Australian final consumption: An input-output analysis. Energy Policy, 1998, 26(6): 495-506.
[21]	Kondo Y, Moriguchi Y, Shimizu H.CO2 emissions in Japan: influences of import and export. Applied Energy, 1998, 59(2-3): 163-174.
[22]	Weber C L, Matthews H S.Embodied environmental emissions in U. S. international trade, 1997-2004. Environmental Science & Technology, 2007, 41(14): 4875-4881.
[23]	Ackerman F, Ishikawa M, Suga M.The carbon content of Japan-US trade. Energy Policy, 2007, 35(9): 4455-4462.
[24]	Guo J, Zou L, Wei Y M.Impact of inter-sectoral trade on national and global CO2 emissions: An empirical analysis of China and US. Energy Policy, 2010, 38(3): 1389-1397.
[25]	Du H, Guo J, Mao G, et al.CO2 emissions embodied in China-US trade: Input-output analysis based on the emergy/dollar ratio. Energy Policy, 2011, 39(10): 5980-5987.
[26]	Shui B, Harriss R C.The role of CO2 embodiment in US-China trade. Energy Policy, 2006, 34(18): 4063-4068.
[27]	Li Y, Hewitt C N.The effect of trade between China and the UK on national and global dioxide emissions. Energy Policy, 2008, 36(6): 1907-1914.
[28]	Xu M, Allenby B, Chen W Q.Energy and air emissions embodied in China-US trade: Eastbound assessment using adjusted bilateral trade data. Environmental Science & Technology, 2009, 43(9): 3378-3384.
[29]	Norman J, Charpentier A D, Maclean H L.Economic input-output life-cycle assessment of trade between Canada and the United States. Environmental Science & Technology, 2007, 41(5): 1523-1532.
[30]	Peters G P, Hertwich E G.CO2 embodied in international trade with implications for global climate policy. Environmental Science &Technology, 2008, 42(5): 1401-1407.
[31]	Hertwich E G, Peters G P.Carbon footprint of nations: A global, trade-linked analysis. Environmental Science & Technology, 2009, 43(16): 6414-6420.
[32]	Tian X, Chang M, Tanikawa H, et al.Structural decomposition analysis of the carbonization process in Beijing: A regional explanation of rapid increasing carbon dioxide emission in China. Energy Policy, 2013, 53: 279-286.
[33]	Du L, Wei C, Cai S.Economic development and carbon dioxide emissions in China: Provincial panel data analysis. China Economic Review, 2012, 23(2): 371-384.
[34]	Wang Y, Ma W, Tu W, et al.A study on carbon emissions in Shanghai 2000-2008, China. Environmental Science & Policy, 2013, (27): 151-161.
[35]	Wiedmann T, Lenzen M, Turner K, et al.Examining the global environmental impact of regional consumption activities-Part 2: Review of input-output models for the assessment of environmental impacts embodied in trade. Ecological Economics, 2007, 61(1): 15-26.
[36]	Peters G P.From production-based to consumption-based national emission inventories. Ecological Economics, 2008, 65(1): 13-23.
[37]	Wiedmann T.A review of recent multi-region input-output models used for consumption-based emission and resource accounting. Ecological Economics, 2009, 69(2): 211-222.
[38]	Larsen H N, Hertwich E G.The case for consumption-based accounting of greenhouse gas emissions to promote local climate action. Environmental Science & Policy, 2009, 12(7): 791-798.
[39]	湛东升, 孟斌, 张文忠. 北京市居民居住满意度感知与行为意向研究. 地理研究, 2014, 33(2): 336-348.
	[Zhan Dongsheng, Meng Bin, Zhang Wenzhong.A study on residential satisfaction and its behavioral intention in Beijing. Geographical Research, 2014, 33(2): 336-348.]
[40]	Leontief W.The Structure of American Economy, 1919-1929: An Empirical Application of Equilibrium Analysis. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1941.
[41]	Weber C L, Peters G P, Guan D B, et al.The contribution of Chinese exports to climate change. Energy Policy, 2008, 36(9): 3572-3577.
[42]	刘卫东, 陈杰, 唐志鹏, 等. 中国2007年30省区市区域间投入产出表编制理论与实践. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2012.
	[Liu Weidong, Chen Jie, Tang Zhipeng, et al.Theory and Practice for Building Multi-regional Input-output Table for 30 Provinces in China in 2007. Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2012.]
[43]	Zhong Z Q, Huang R, Tang Q N, et al.China′s provincial CO2 emissions embodied in trade with implications for regional climate policy. Frontiers of Earth Science. 2015, 9(1): 77-90.
[44]	王铮, 刘晓, 黄蕊, 等. 平稳增长条件下中国各省市自治区的排放需求估算. 中国科学院院刊, 2013, 28(1): 85-93.
	[Wang Zheng, Liu Xiao, Huang Rui, et al.Estimation of carbon emission requirements under balance growth in the Chinese provinces. Bulletin of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2013, 28(1): 85-93.]

编号	部门
1	农林牧渔业
2	煤炭开采和洗选业
3	石油和天然气开采业
4	金属矿采选业
5	非金属矿及其他矿采选业
6	食品制造及烟草加工业
7	纺织业
8	纺织服装鞋帽皮革羽绒及其制品业
9	木材加工及家具制造业
10	造纸印刷及文教体育用品制造业
11	石油加工、炼焦及核燃料加工业
12	化学工业
13	非金属矿物制品业
14	金属冶炼及压延加工业
15	金属制品业
16	通用、专用设备制造业
17	交通运输设备制造业
18	电气机械及器材制造业
19	通信设备、计算机及其他电子设备制造业
20	仪器仪表及文化办公用机械制造业
21	其他制造业
22	电力、热力的生产和供应业
23	燃气及水的生产与供应业
24	建筑业
25	交通运输及仓储业
26	批发零售业
27	住宿餐饮业
28	租赁和商业服务业
29	研究与试验发展业
30	其他服务业

编号	各部门EEB比重（%）	各部门产值区位商
1	0.039	0.102
2	0.007	0.356
3	0.000	0.073
4	0.000	0.058
5	0.000	0.029
6	0.037	0.300
7	0.002	0.117
8	0.002	0.273
9	0.003	0.135
10	0.010	0.405
11	0.021	0.463
12	-0.012	0.620
13	0.011	0.257
14	-0.049	0.223
15	0.057	0.313
16	0.051	0.761
17	0.035	0.700
18	0.021	0.367
19	0.027	1.241
20	0.002	1.284
21	0.010	0.113
22	0.317	0.799
23	0.002	0.817
24	0.363	0.917
25	-0.018	1.068
26	0.002	1.198
27	0.008	1.546
28	-0.081	2.311
29	0.015	7.915
30	0.117	2.165

区域分部门贸易的隐含碳排放——以北京为例

Measurements of regional sectoral embodied CO₂ emissions: A case study of Beijing

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 8

参考文献 44

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	杨振山, 苏锦华, 杨航, 赵永宏. 基于多源数据的城市功能区精细化研究——以北京为例[J]. 地理研究, 2021, 40(2): 477-494.
[2]	杨成凤, 韩会然, 宋金平. 非首都功能疏解背景下批发市场商户的搬迁意愿及区位再选择因素——以北京市动物园服装批发市场为例[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(8): 1755-1768.
[3]	党艺, 余建辉, 张文忠. 环境类邻避设施对北京市住宅价格影响研究——以大型垃圾处理设施为例[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(8): 1769-1781.
[4]	湛东升, 张文忠, 张娟锋, 李佳洺, 谌丽, 党云晓. 北京市公共服务设施集聚中心识别分析[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(3): 554-569.
[5]	焦毅蒙, 赵娜, 岳天祥, 邓佳音. 城市化对北京市极端气候的影响研究[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(2): 461-472.
[6]	黄姣, 马冰滢, 李双成. 农业多功能性与都市区土地利用管理——框架和案例分析[J]. 地理研究, 2019, 38(7): 1791-1806.
[7]	唐晓峰. 北京传统城市空间治理：遗产与挑战[J]. 地理研究, 2019, 38(6): 1290-1298.
[8]	朱莎, 姜珊, 陶犁. 外围赌注和社区居民旅游承诺行为影响机制——以京郊市级民俗户为例[J]. 地理研究, 2019, 38(5): 1208-1221.
[9]	刘霄泉, 孙铁山, 李国平. 北京市域制造业的空间演化特征[J]. 地理研究, 2018, 37(8): 1575-1586.
[10]	赵美风, 刘盛和, 戚伟. 社区尺度下流动人口聚居区空间识别与尺度效应——以北京市为例[J]. 地理研究, 2018, 37(6): 1208-1222.
[11]	高新月, 戴君虎, 张明庆. 1965-2014年北京西郊地区植物观赏期对气候变化的响应[J]. 地理研究, 2018, 37(12): 2420-2432.
[12]	李佳洺, 孙威, 张文忠. 北京典型行业微区位选址比较研究——以北京企业管理服务业和汽车制造业为例[J]. 地理研究, 2018, 37(12): 2541-2553.
[13]	高斯瑶, 程杨. 北京市老年人口迁移意愿及影响因素研究[J]. 地理研究, 2018, 37(1): 119-132.
[14]	王芳, 牛方曲, 王志强. 微观尺度下基于商圈的北京市商业空间结构优化[J]. 地理研究, 2017, 36(9): 1697-1708.
[15]	吕永强, 郑新奇, 周麟. 路网中心性与城市功能用地空间分布相关性研究——以北京城市中心区为例[J]. 地理研究, 2017, 36(7): 1353-1363.

区域分部门贸易的隐含碳排放——以北京为例

Measurements of regional sectoral embodied CO2 emissions: A case study of Beijing

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 8

参考文献 44

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

Measurements of regional sectoral embodied CO₂ emissions: A case study of Beijing