地理研究 ›› 2017, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (8): 1531-1542.doi: 10.11821/dlyj201708011

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

多中心城市就业—居住的非完全结构匹配模型

赵渺希1,2()   

  1. 1. 华南理工大学建筑学院,广州 510640
    2. 亚热带建筑科学国家重点实验室,广州 510640
  • 收稿日期:2017-03-24 修回日期:2017-07-03 出版日期:2017-08-10 发布日期:2017-08-10
  • 作者简介:

    作者介绍:赵渺希(1979- ),男,湖南湘潭人,博士,副教授,主要从事城市规划与设计研究。E-mail: arzhao@scut.edu.cn

  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(51478189);广东省科技计划项目(2016A040403041);广东省自然科学基金项目(2014A030313260)

Hypothesis of incomplete-structural matching job-housing in a polycentric city

Miaoxi ZHAO1,2()   

  1. 1. Architecture School, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China
    2. State Key Laboratory of Subtropical Building Science, Guangzhou 510640, China
  • Received:2017-03-24 Revised:2017-07-03 Online:2017-08-10 Published:2017-08-10

摘要:

多中心城市被认为是缓解大都市地区职住通勤问题的一种空间模式。但在规划实践中,往往片面强调“田园城市”的分散理念,自足性的职住议题也仅关注就业、居住的总量平衡,忽视了规模集聚的正向外部性、职住空间匹配的结构性问题。基于就业门类的结构性问题,对多中心城市的功能和交通组织进行理论梳理,辨析多中心职住空间的组合模式。研究发现,职住完全匹配的多中心(组团)模式存在明显的理论冲突,无法付诸规划实践,进而提出了非完全结构匹配的多中心职住假说模型:在就业多中心均衡性的前提下,保障通勤距离受限群体的职住邻近性、满足本地居民的就业设施的类型完善,通过就业中心的专门化集聚实现“整体大于局部之和”的多中心优势。并以广州为例,运用假说模型进行了多中心职住匹配的实证探索。

关键词: 多中心城市, 就业—居住, 空间匹配, 非完全结构匹配模型

Abstract:

It is assumed that polycentricity is a spatial model that deals with the problem of job housing commuting in metropolitan areas. Most urban planners usually pay attention to the dispersed spatial pattern of the Garden City but always ignore the externalities of an agglomeration economy. They also tend to focus on the quantitative balance between job and housing and do not notice the importance of structural matching between them. Based on the concept of structural matching job-housing, this research explores the related theory from the aspects of urban function and transportation for a polycentric city, for which possible models of matching job and housing are analyzed. The key finding is that the exact structural matching between job and housing in a polycentric city is impossible because of the requirement of the externalities of a specialized agglomeration economy. In regards to urban function, pursuing the exact quantity of job and housing in each sector among different sub-centers is not as realistic as the idea that the same ratio of employment will lead to a lack of specialized agglomeration benefits for the polycentricity. That is to say, spatial structure with similar employment components in sub-centers will do harm to agglomeration economy in a functional polycentricity. In regards to commuting, complete self-sufficiency in job and housing in each sub-center means a pattern of urban villages instead of the polycentricity version with its random movements. According to the reality of frequent relocation of working places and different locations of couples' jobs, random movements will always take place among different employment centers. According to the original theory of the mismatching of job- housing, vulnerable groups have always had difficulties finding a job for the extra trips. This means that proximity of job and housing for those vulnerable groups is necessary in this conceptual model of structural matching job-housing in a polycentric city. Hence this research proposed a hypothesis of incomplete-structural matching job- housing in a polycentric city with four dimensions: spatial balance in a less hierarchical system of employment centers, specialized function of agglomeration economy in each employment center, adequate public service facilities for the local residents and proximity of job and housing for those vulnerable groups requiring short-distance commuting. Based on an empirical study of Guangzhou, the research explored the spatial matching of job- housing through the lens of this model from these four aspects.

Key words: polycentric city, job-housing, spatial matching, incomplete-structural matching job-housing