从地缘关系视角解析“一带一路”的行动路径

doi:10.11821/dlyj201801001

地理研究 ›› 2018, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (1): 3-19.doi: 10.11821/dlyj201801001

• 观点与争鸣 • 下一篇

从地缘关系视角解析“一带一路”的行动路径

宋长青¹(), 葛岳静¹, 刘云刚², 周尚意¹, 吴相利³, 胡志丁⁴, 程昌秀¹, 高剑波⁵, 方创琳⁶, 韩增林⁷, 武友德⁸, 吉力力·阿不都外力⁹, 彭飞¹⁰, 刘建忠¹¹, 董锁成⁶, 王国梁¹², 熊理然^4,¹³, 潘峰华¹

1. 地表过程与资源生态国家重点实验室,北京师范大学地理科学学部,北京 100875
2. 中山大学地理科学与规划学院,广州 510275
3. 哈尔滨师范大学地理科学学院,哈尔滨 150025
4. 云南师范大学旅游与地理科学学院,昆明 650500
5. 广西大学复杂性科学与大数据技术研究所,南宁 530004
6. 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所,北京 100101
7. 辽宁师范大学,大连116029
8. 云南师范大学,昆明 650500
9. 中国科学院新疆生态与地理研究所,乌鲁木齐 830011
10. 辽宁师范大学海洋经济与可持续发展研究中心,大连 116029
11. 战略支援部队信息工程大学地理空间信息学院,郑州 450001
12. 山西师范大学,临汾 041004
13. 云南师范大学中国西南对外开放与边疆安全研究中心,昆明 650500

收稿日期:2017-12-04 修回日期:2017-12-13 发布日期:2018-01-30
作者简介:
作者简介：宋长青（1961- ）,男,黑龙江哈尔滨人,教授,博士生导师,主要从事全球化与地缘关系研究。E-mail：songcq@bnu.edu.cn。其他作者共同为第二作者
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（41771537）;国家重点研发项目（2017YFB0504102）

Undertaking research on Belt and Road Initiative from the geo-relation perspective

Changqing SONG¹(), Yuejing GE¹, Yungang LIU², Shangyi ZHOU¹, Xiangli WU³, Zhiding HU⁴, Changxiu CHENG¹, Jianbo GAO⁵, Chuanglin FANG⁶, Zenglin HAN⁷, Youde WU⁸, Lili·Abuduwaili JI⁹, Fei PENG¹⁰, Jianzhong LIU¹¹, Suocheng DONG⁶, Guoliang WANG¹², Liran XIONG^4,¹³, Fenghua PAN¹

1. State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
2. School of Geography and Planning, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China
3. School of Geographical Science, Harbin Normal University, Harbin 150025, China
4. School of Tourism and Geographical Science, Yunnan Normal University, Kunming 650500, China
5. Institute of Complexity Science & Big Data Technology, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China;
6. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China
7. Liaoning Normal University, Dalian 116029, Liaoning, China
8. Yunnan Normal University, Kunming 650500, China
9. Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, CAS, Urumqi 830011, China
10. Research Center for Marine Economy and Sustainable Development, Liaoning Normal University, Dalian 116029, Liaoning, China
11. Geospatial Information Institute, Information Engineering University, Zhengzhou 450001, China
12. Shanxi Normal University, Linfen 041004, Shanxi, China
13. Research Center for Southwest China's Opening-up and Borderland Security, Yunnan Normal University, Kunming 650500, China

Received:2017-12-04 Revised:2017-12-13 Published:2018-01-30
About author:
Author: Shi Zhenqin (1988-), PhD, specialized in regional development and land space management in mountain areas. E-mail: kevinszq@163.com

^*Corresponding author: Deng Wei (1957-), Professor, specialized in mountain environment and regional development.

E-mail: dengwei@imde.ac.cn

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

“一带一路”倡议是人类历史上最伟大的全球治理工程,开辟了政治地理学研究的新纪元,为地缘关系研究提供了大舞台。地理学是从时间、空间和自然—社会系统三个维度理解陆地表层过程的科学,对地缘关系研究具有独特的功能和作用。因此,从地理学视角研究地缘关系具有其他学科无法比拟的优势。“一带一路”是当前最具挑战的科学和政策命题,从地缘关系视角研究“一带一路”,需要加强四个方面的结合：① 在科学思维上,需要还原论与系统论思维相结合;② 在科学数据建设上,需要社会人文与自然环境数据相结合;③ 在科学问题选择上,需要社会过程、人文过程、政治过程和自然过程相结合;④ 在研究方法上,需要经验方法、实证方法、系统方法与大数据研究方法相结合。中国地理学者应兼顾政治地理学科建设、地缘关系的学科交叉研究和“一带一路”全球实践开展研究。

关键词: 地缘关系, “一带一路”, 倡议, 地缘政治, 地缘环境, 政治地理学

Abstract:

The Belt and Road Initiative is the greatest project aimed to improve global governance in human history ever before. It opens a new era for the research of political geography, and in particular it provides great opportunities for geo-relation research. Geography is a science that explores the surface of earth from three perspectives including the time, space and nature-society system, which equips it to undertake geo-relation research with unique tools and advantages. The Belt and Road Initiative is one of the most challenging scientific and policy issues in the world. To better study the Belt and Road Initiative from the geo-relation perspective, geographers need to make combinations in the following four ways: (1) combining reductionism and system theory in scientific thoughts; (2) combining data of both human-society and nature-environment; (3) combining research questions based on social, human, political and natural processes; (4) combining research methods on empirical, positivism, systematic, and big data. Chinese Geographers need to give considerations to balance the development of political geography, multi-discipline oriented research on geo-relations and the implementation of the Belt and Road Initiative globally.

Key words: geo-relation, Belt and Road Initiative, geopolitics, geo-environment, political geography

宋长青, 葛岳静, 刘云刚, 周尚意, 吴相利, 胡志丁, 程昌秀, 高剑波, 方创琳, 韩增林, 武友德, 吉力力·阿不都外力, 彭飞, 刘建忠, 董锁成, 王国梁, 熊理然, 潘峰华. 从地缘关系视角解析“一带一路”的行动路径[J]. 地理研究, 2018, 37(1): 3-19.

Changqing SONG, Yuejing GE, Yungang LIU, Shangyi ZHOU, Xiangli WU, Zhiding HU, Changxiu CHENG, Jianbo GAO, Chuanglin FANG, Zenglin HAN, Youde WU, Lili·Abuduwaili JI, Fei PENG, Jianzhong LIU, Suocheng DONG, Guoliang WANG, Liran XIONG, Fenghua PAN. Undertaking research on Belt and Road Initiative from the geo-relation perspective[J]. GEOGRAPHICAL RESEARCH, 2018, 37(1): 3-19.

参考文献 13

[1]	索尔·科恩. 地缘政治学: 国际关系的地理学. 上海: 社会科学院出版社, 2014.
	[Cohen B S.Geopolitics: The Geography of International Relations. Shanghai: Shanghai Academy of Social Sciences Press, 2014.]
[2]	刘卫东. “一带一路”战略的科学内涵与科学问题. 地理科学进展, 2015, 34(5): 538-544. doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2015.05.001
	[Liu Weidong.Scientific understanding of the Belt and Road Initiative of China and related research themes. Progress in Geography, 2015, 34(5): 538-544.] doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2015.05.001
[3]	陆大道, 杜德斌. 关于加强地缘政治地缘经济研究的思考. 地理学报, 2013, 68(6): 723-727.
	[Lu Dadao, Du Debin.Some thoughts on the strengthening of geopolitical and geoeconomic studies. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2013, 68(6): 723-727.]
[4]	杜德斌, 马亚华. “一带一路”带中华民族复兴的地缘大战略. 地理研究, 2015, 34(6): 1005-1014.
	[Du Debin, Ma Yahua.One Belt and One Road: The grand geo-strategy of China's rise. Geographical Research, 2015, 34(6): 1005-1014.]
[5]	杜德斌, 马亚华. “一带一路”: 全球治理模式的新探索. 地理研究, 2017, 36(7): 1203-1209. doi: 10.11821/dlyj201707001
	[Du Debin, Ma Yahua.One Belt and One Road: A new way of global governance. Geographical Research, 2017, 36(7): 1203-1209.] doi: 10.11821/dlyj201707001
[6]	Tobler W R.A Computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit region. Economic Geography, 1970, 46(S1): 234-240. doi: 10.2307/143141
[7]	Pepper S C.World Hypotheses: A study of evidence, Los Angeles and London. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1942.
[8]	安·布蒂默. 周尚意,吴莉萍,张镱宸译. 多元视角下的人地关系研究. 地理科学进展, 2013, 32(3): 1-9.
	[Buttimer, Anne.Translated by Zhou Shangyi, Wu Liping, Zhang Yicheng. Diverse perspectives on society and environment. Progress in Geography, 2013, 32(3): 1-9.]
[9]	Agnew J.Money games: Currencies and power in the contemporary world economy. Antipode, 2009, 41: 214-238. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8330.2008.00666.x
[10]	McNally A C, Gruin J. A novel pathway to power? Contestation and adaptation in China's internationalization of the RMB. Review of International Political Economy, 2017, 24(4): 599-628. doi: 10.1080/09692290.2017.1319400
[11]	Hall S.Rethinking international financial centres through the politics of territory: Renminbi internationalisation in London's financial district. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 2017, 42(4): 489-502. doi: 10.1111/tran.2017.42.issue-4
[12]	Töpfer L M, Hall S.London's rise as an offshore RMB financial centre: State-finance relations and selective institutional adaptation. Regional Studies, 2017, .
[13]	赵亚博, 葛岳静, 潘峰华, 等. 人民币国际化及其对币缘政治的影响. 人文地理, 2017, 32(1): 132-137.
	[Zhao Yabo, Ge Yuejing, Pan Fenghua, et al.The Internationalization of Renminbi and its impacts on the currency politics. Human Geography, 2017, 32(1): 132-137.]

[1]	彭飞, 富宁宁, 韩增林, 刘天宝, 杨鑫. 中西方海洋地缘政治思想演化解构——基于人海关系分析框架[J]. 地理研究, 2021, 40(2): 556-570.
[2]	胡志丁, 李钰华, 王学文, 廉成. 西方流行地缘政治研究进展与展望[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(7): 1463-1477.
[3]	顾伟男, 刘慧, 王亮. “一带一路”沿线国家科研合作网络的多元结构及形成机制[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(5): 1070-1087.
[4]	胡志丁, 王丰龙, 安宁, 王雨, 宋涛, 彭飞, 何光强, 马腾, 秦奇, 熊琛然. 洋能否为中用?西方政治地理与地缘政治发展的借鉴与反思[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(2): 217-231.
[5]	郑智, 刘卫东, 宋周莺, 黄梦娜. “一带一路”生产网络演化及中国经济贡献分析[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(12): 2653-2668.
[6]	高菠阳, 刘卫东, 宋涛, 冯锐, 计启迪. 社会变革和制度文化制约下的“多尺度嵌入”——以缅甸莱比塘铜矿项目为例[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(12): 2718-2730.
[7]	侯璐璐, 刘云刚. 中国的“领域-地盘”双层权力空间秩序——以广州市番禺区坑头村为案例[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(11): 2466-2478.
[8]	李鲁奇, 孔翔, 李一曼, 许杨博文. “一带一路”倡议下中国与中亚合作的战略支点选择[J]. 地理研究, 2019, 38(7): 1705-1719.
[9]	陈明星, 隋昱文, 郭莎莎. 中国新型城镇化在“十九大”后发展的新态势[J]. 地理研究, 2019, 38(1): 181-192.
[10]	汤茂林. 政治地理学教材写作的创新与接力——商务版刘云刚译《政治地理学》述评[J]. 地理研究, 2018, 37(9): 1673-1682.
[11]	刘大庆, 白玲, 张宏, 郗笃刚, 焦昆, 吴斌. 全球地缘政治格局演变的动力机制——基于变量与变量关系的解析[J]. 地理研究, 2018, 37(2): 391-403.
[12]	陆梦秋, 陈娱, 陆玉麒. “一带一路”倡议下中国陆海运输的空间竞合格局[J]. 地理研究, 2018, 37(2): 404-418.
[13]	杨文龙, 杜德斌, 马亚华, 焦美琪. “一带一路”沿线国家贸易网络空间结构与邻近性[J]. 地理研究, 2018, 37(11): 2218-2235.
[14]	杨宇, 王礼茂, 江东, 陈俊华, 崔守军, 郝丽莎, 王强, 王少剑, 王长建, 刘立涛, 胡敏. 美国对伊朗石油禁运与全球能源安全[J]. 地理研究, 2018, 37(10): 1879-1898.
[15]	宋涛, 陆大道, 梁宜. 大国崛起的地缘政治战略演化——以美国为例[J]. 地理研究, 2017, 36(2): 215-225.

从地缘关系视角解析“一带一路”的行动路径

Undertaking research on Belt and Road Initiative from the geo-relation perspective

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 13

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0