广州市产业生态化时空演变特征及驱动因素

doi:10.11821/dlyj201806002

地理研究 ›› 2018, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (6): 1070-1086.doi: 10.11821/dlyj201806002

广州市产业生态化时空演变特征及驱动因素

张国俊¹(), 王珏晗², 庄大昌¹()

1. 广东财经大学公共管理学院,广州 510320
2. 中山大学地理科学与规划学院,广州 510275

收稿日期:2018-01-07 修回日期:2018-04-02 出版日期:2018-06-10 发布日期:2018-06-10
作者简介:
作者简介：张国俊（1977- ）,女,湖北公安人,博士,讲师,研究方向为区域发展与城乡规划。E-mail: guojunz@gdufe.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（41601161）;广东省自然科学基金项目（2017A030313224）;2017年度广州市哲学社会科学“十三五”规划课题（2017GZZK16）

The characteristics and driving forces of spatial and temporal evolution of industrial ecology in Guangzhou

Guojun ZHANG¹(), Juehan WANG², Dachang ZHUANG¹()

1. School of Public Policy and Management, Guangdong University of Finance and Economics, Guangzhou 510320, China
2. School of Geography and Planning, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China

Received:2018-01-07 Revised:2018-04-02 Online:2018-06-10 Published:2018-06-10
About author:
Author: Shi Zhenqin (1988-), PhD, specialized in regional development and land space management in mountain areas. E-mail: kevinszq@163.com

^*Corresponding author: Deng Wei (1957-), Professor, specialized in mountain environment and regional development.

E-mail: dengwei@imde.ac.cn

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

从产业效率和生态效率两个维度构建广州市产业生态化综合评价指标体系,采用熵值法与耦合评价模型,探究2005-2015年广州市产业生态化总体水平的时空演变特征、剖析了产业与生态效率协调关系的演变,并就其驱动因素进行了分析。结果表明：从时间演变特征看,广州市产业生态化发展总体水平在波动中持续提升,其中生态效率较产业效率的提升幅度更大;从空间分布特征看,总体呈现由核心区向主城区和外围区递减的分布格局;从空间演化看,区域间的总体水平差异变小,分布格局保持相对稳定;广州市产业与生态效率的总体协调程度稳步上升,协调类型的层次在空间上总体呈现从外围向核心区逐步提升趋势,协调类型的演变可分为协调深化发展、协调发展和专业化发展三种模式。产业发展策略、城市空间发展战略、环境监管、技术创新与应用以及企业节能减排的意识是广州市产业生态化发展的重要驱动因素。

关键词: 产业生态化, 时空演变, 协调, 驱动因素, 广州市

Abstract:

By using the entropy method and the coupling assessment model, this paper constructs the comprehensive evaluation index system of industrial ecology in Guangzhou from two dimensions, i.e., the economic efficiency and ecological efficiency. Then it explores the spatial and temporal evolution of the industrial ecology in Guangzhou from 2005 to 2015, and analyzes the coordinative evolution of the economic efficiency and ecological efficiency, as well as its driving forces. The results show that: (1) According to the temporal evolution characteristics, the industrial ecological development in Guangzhou continues to improve on the whole despite of some fluctuations, with the improvement rate of ecological efficiency higher than that of economic efficiency. (2) In terms of spatial distribution, the industrial ecological development presents the distribution pattern featured by the decreasing level from the core area to the main urban area and further to the peripheral area. From the perspective of spatial evolution, the overall level difference among regions has become smaller, which remained a relatively stable distribution pattern. (3) The overall coordination degree between economic efficiency and ecological efficiency in Guangzhou is rising steadily. The level of the coordination type shows the trend of gradual improvement from the peripheral area to the core area. The evolution mode of coordination type can be divided into three types: coordinated deepening development, coordinated development and professional development. (4) Industrial development strategy, urban spatial development strategy, environmental supervision, technological innovation and application, as well as enterprises' awareness of energy conservation and emission reduction, are the important driving forces for the development of industrial ecology in Guangzhou.

Key words: industrial ecology, spatial and temporal evolution, coordination, driving forces, Guangzhou city

张国俊, 王珏晗, 庄大昌. 广州市产业生态化时空演变特征及驱动因素[J]. 地理研究, 2018, 37(6): 1070-1086.

Guojun ZHANG, Juehan WANG, Dachang ZHUANG. The characteristics and driving forces of spatial and temporal evolution of industrial ecology in Guangzhou[J]. GEOGRAPHICAL RESEARCH, 2018, 37(6): 1070-1086.

图/表 9

表1

表2

图1

图2

图3

表3

图4

图5

图6

参考文献 35

[1]	Frosch R A, Gallopoulos N. Strategies for manufacturing. Scientific American, 1989, 261(3): 144-152.
[2]	Allenby B R, Richards D J. The Greening of Industrial Ecosystems. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1994.
[3]	Erkman S. Industrial ecology: An historical view. Journal of Cleaner Production, 1997, 5(1/2): 1-10. doi: 10.1016/S0959-6526(97)00003-6
[4]	樊海林, 程远. 产业生态:一个企业竞争的视角. 中国工业经济, 2004, (3): 29-36.
	[Fan Hailin, Cheng Yuan. Industry ecology: A perspective on enterprise competition. China Industrial Economy, 2004, (3): 29-36.]
[5]	陆根尧, 盛龙, 唐辰华. 中国产业生态化水平的静态与动态分析: 基于省际数据的实证研究. 中国工业经济, 2012, (3): 147-159.
	[Lu Genyao, Sheng Long, Tang Chenhua. Static and dynamic analysis of China's industrial ecologization level: Empirical study based on provincial data. China Industrial Economics, 2012, (3): 147-159.]
[6]	Lowenthal M D, Kastenberg W E. Industrial ecology and energy systems: A first step. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 1998, 24(1): 51-63. doi: 10.1016/S0921-3449(98)00028-7
[7]	Anderberg S. Industrial metabolism and the linkages between economics, ethics and the environment. Ecological Economics, 1998, 24(2/3): 311-320. doi: 10.1016/S0921-8009(97)00151-1
[8]	史亚琪, 朱晓东, 孙翔, 等. 区域经济—环境复合生态系统协调发展动态评价: 以连云港为例. 生态学报, 2010, 30(15): 4119-4128.
	[Shi Yaqi, Zhu Xiaodong, Sun Xiang, et al.A dynamic assessment for the coordination between economic development and the environment: A case study of Lianyungang, China. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2010, 30(15): 4119-4128.]
[9]	高迎春, 佟连军, 马延吉, 等. 清洁生产和末端治理环境绩效对比分析. 地理研究, 2011, 30(3): 505-512.
	[Gao Yingchun, Tong Lianjun, Ma Yanji, et al.Environmental performance analysis of clean production and end-pipe treatment. Geographical Research, 2011, 30(3): 505-512.]
[10]	韩良, 宋涛, 佟连军. 汽车产业园区生态化模式研究与应用: 以长春市汽车产业开发区为例. 地理研究, 2006, 25(4): 692-700. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0585.2006.04.016
	[Han Liang, Song Tao, Tong Lianjun. Ecological industrial model research and application to the automobile industrial park: A case of Changchun Automobile Industrial Development Zone. Geographical Research, 2006, 25(4): 692-700.] doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0585.2006.04.016
[11]	Despeisse M, Ball P D, Evans S, et al.Industrial ecology at factory level: A conceptual model. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2012, 31: 30-39. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.02.027
[12]	杨洁, 毕军, 周鲸波, 等. 推进循环经济的工业生态化企业模式研究初探: 以水泥企业为例. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2005, 15(1): 69-73. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2104.2005.01.016
	[Yang Jie, Bi Jun, Zhou Jingbo, et al.Eco-enterprise as model of circular economy: Case study on cement enterprise. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2005, 15(1): 69-73.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2104.2005.01.016
[13]	郭付友, 佟连军, 魏强, 等. 松花江流域(吉林省段)产业系统生态效率时空分异特征与影响因素. 地理研究, 2016, 35(8): 1483-1494. doi: 10.11821/dlyj201608007
	[Guo Fuyou, Tong Lianjun, Wei Qiang, et al.Spatial-temporal differentiation and influencing factors of industrial system eco-efficiency in the Songhua River Basin of Jilin province. Geographical Research, 2016, 35(8): 1483-1494.] doi: 10.11821/dlyj201608007
[14]	王恩旭, 武春友. 基于超效率DEA模型的中国省际生态效率时空差异研究. 管理学报, 2011, 8(3): 443-450. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-884X.2011.03.018
	[Wang Enxu, Wu Chunyou. Spatial-temporal differences of provincial eco-efficiency in China based on super efficiency DEA model. Chinese Journal of Management, 2011, 8(3): 443-450.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-884X.2011.03.018
[15]	李兆前. 地方政府推进循环经济发展的局限性及对策研究: 以山东省日照市为例. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2006, 16(6): 182-187. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2104.2006.06.035
	[Li Zhaoqian. Limitation and solutions for the local government to promot the development of circular economy in Rizhao, Shandong. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2006, 16(6): 182-187.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2104.2006.06.035
[16]	戴铁军, 刘瑞, 王婉君. 物质流分析视角下北京市物质代谢研究. 环境科学学报, 2017, 37(8): 3220-3228.
	[Dai Tiejun, Liu Rui, Wang Wanjun. Material metabolism in Beijing by material flow analysis. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2017, 37(8): 3220-3228.]
[17]	晁博, 杨忠直. 循环经济视角下的区域经济系统物质流分析: 以陕西省为例. 生态经济, 2017, 33(1): 43-46.
	[Chao Bo, Yang Zhongzhi. Material flow analysis of regional economic system based on the perspective of circular economy: A case study of Shaanxi province. Ecological Economy, 2017, 33(1): 43-46.]
[18]	施晓清, 李笑诺, 杨建新. 基于生命周期视角的产业资源生态管理效益分析: 以拟共生网络系统为例. 生态学报, 2013, 33(19): 6398-6410. doi: 10.5846/stxb201304180738
	[Shi Xiaoqing, Li Xiaonuo, Yang Jianxin. Eco-management benefit analysis of industrial resources from life cycle perspective: A case study of a virtual symbiosis network. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2013, 33(19): 6398-6410.] doi: 10.5846/stxb201304180738
[19]	仇方道, 佟连军, 姜萌. 东北地区矿业城市产业生态系统适应性评价. 地理研究, 2011, 30(2): 243-255.
	[Qiu Fangdao, Tong Lianjun, Jiang Meng. Adaptability assessment of industrial ecological system of mining cities in Northeast China. Geographical Research, 2011, 30(2): 243-255.]
[20]	颜建军, 徐雷, 李扬. 资源、环境双重约束下的湖南省产业生态化发展路径. 经济地理, 2017, 37(6): 183-189.
	[Yan Jianjun, Xu Lei, Li Yang. The development path of hunan's eco-industrial system under restrictions of resource and environment. Economic Geography, 2017, 37(6): 183-189.]
[21]	刘传江, 吴晗晗, 胡威. 中国产业生态化转型的IOOE模型分析: 基于工业部门2003-2012年数据的实证. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2016, 26(2): 119-128. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2104.2016.02.015
	[Liu Chuanjiang, Wu Hanhan, Hu Wei. Analysis on the transformation of china's industrial ecology using the IOOE model: Eempirical analysis based on the industrial sector's data in 2003-2012. China Population,Resources and Environment, 2016, 26(2): 119-128.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2104.2016.02.015
[22]	陈黎明, 王文平, 王斌. 中国产业系统生态化发展效率研究. 统计与决策, 2016, (4): 127-130. doi: 10.13546/j.cnki.tjyjc.2016.04.034
	[Chen Liming, Wang Wenping, Wang Bin. Efficiency of ecological development of China's industrial system. Statistics and Decision, 2016, (4): 127-130.] doi: 10.13546/j.cnki.tjyjc.2016.04.034
[23]	王长建, 张小雷, 张虹鸥, 等. 基于IO-SDA模型的新疆能源消费碳排放影响机理分析. 地理学报, 2016, 71(7): 1105-1118.
	[Wang Changjian, Zhang Xiaolei, Zhang Hongou, et al.Influencing mechanism of energy-related carbon emissions in Xinjiang based on IO-SDA model. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2016, 71(7): 1105-1118.]
[24]	余斌, 揭毅, 罗静, 等. 武汉城市圈产业发展的生态转型与空间优化. 地理研究, 2010, 29(2): 313-326.
	[Yu Bin, Jie Yi, Luo Jing, et al.Study on the ecological transition and spatial optimization of industrial development in Wuhan settlement groups. Geographical Research, 2010, 29(2): 313-326.]
[25]	王帅, 陈忠暖. 近10年广州市产业结构及经济职能变动分析. 华南师范大学学报: 自然科学版, 2014, 46(6): 114-120. doi: 10.6054/j.jscnun.2014.06.125
	[Wang Shuai, Chen Zhongnuan. Changes in the industrial structure and economic function of Guangzhou (2003-2012). Journal of South China Normal University: Natural Science Edition, 2014, 46(6): 114-120.] doi: 10.6054/j.jscnun.2014.06.125
[26]	陈佳贵, 黄群慧, 钟宏武, 等. 中国工业化进程报告. 北京: 社会科学文献出版社, 2007.
	[Chen Jiagui, Huang Qunhui, Zhong Hongwu, et al.The Report on China's Industrialization. Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press, 2007.]
[27]	刘思华. 当代中国的绿色道路: 市场经济条件下生态经济协调发展论. 武汉: 湖北人民出版社, 1994.
	[Liu Sihua. The Green Road of Contemporary China: On the Coordinated Development of Ecological Economy Under the Market Economy. Wuhan: Hubei People's Publishing House, 1994.]
[28]	赵丹阳, 佟连军, 郭付友, 等. 基于结构调整视角的吉林省产业生态化发展. 应用生态学报, 2016, 27(9): 2933-2940. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201609.007
	[Zhao Danyang, Tong Lianjun, Guo Fuyou, et al.Industrial ecological development of Jilin province, Northeast China based on structure optimization vision. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2016, 27(9): 2933-2940.] doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201609.007
[29]	陈成忠, 林振山. 中国人均生态足迹和生物承载力构成的变动规律. 地理研究, 2009, 28(1): 129-142.
	[Chen Chengzhong, Lin Zhenshan. Study on the components of ecological footprint and biocapacity in China 1949-2006 based on entropy method. Geographical Research, 2009, 28(1): 129-142.]
[30]	刘军胜, 马耀峰. 基于发生学与系统论的旅游流与目的地供需耦合成长演化与驱动机制研究: 以西安市为例. 地理研究, 2017, 36(8): 1583-1600.
	[Liu Junsheng, Ma Yaofeng. The evolution and driving mechanism of the supply and demand coupling about tourism flow and destination system based on the genesis and system theory: Taking Xi'an as an example. Geographical Research, 2017, 36(8): 1583-1600.]
[31]	马丽, 金凤君, 刘毅. 中国经济与环境污染耦合度格局及工业结构解析. 地理学报, 2012, 67(10): 1299-1307. doi: 10.11821/xb201210001
	[Ma Li, Jin Fengjun, Liu Yi. Spatial pattern and industrial sector structure analysis on the coupling and coordinating degree of regional economic development and environmental pollution in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2012, 67(10): 1299-1307.] doi: 10.11821/xb201210001
[32]	余菲菲, 胡文海, 荣慧芳. 中小城市旅游经济与交通耦合协调发展研究: 以池州市为例. 地理科学, 2015, 35(9): 1116-1122. doi: 10.1364/JOSA.52.001209
	[Yu Feifei, Hu Wenhai, Rong Huifang. Coordinated development about tourism economy and transportation in medium and small cities: Chizhou as example. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2015, 35(9): 1116-1122.] doi: 10.1364/JOSA.52.001209
[33]	王毅, 丁正山, 余茂军, 等. 基于耦合模型的现代服务业与城市化协调关系量化分析: 以江苏省常熟市为例. 地理研究, 2015, 34(1): 97-108. doi: 10.11821/dlyj201501009
	[Wang Yi, Ding Zhengshan, Yu Maojun, et al.Quantitative analysis of the coordination relation between modern service industry and urbanization based on coupling model: A case study of Changshu. Geographical Research, 2015, 34(1): 97-108.] doi: 10.11821/dlyj201501009
[34]	陈诚, 陈雯, 赵海霞. 江苏沿江地区生态保护与产业分布空间匹配格局分析. 地理研究, 2011, 30(2): 269-277. doi: 10.11821/yj2011020007
	[Chen Cheng, Chen Wen, Zhao Haixia. Spatial matching pattern between industrial space and ecological protection in areas along the Yangtze River in Jiangsu province. Geographical Research, 2011, 30(2): 269-277.] doi: 10.11821/yj2011020007
[35]	叶昌东, 周春山, 刘艳艳. 近10年来广州工业空间分异及其演进机制研究. 经济地理, 2010, 30(10): 1664-1669.
	[Ye Changdong, Zhou Chunshan, Liu Yanyan. The industrial spatial differentiation and its evolution mechanism of Guangzhou in recent ten years. Economic Geography, 2010, 30(10): 1664-1669.]

目标层	维度层	要素层	指标层	指标解释及关系
产业生态化水平	A 产业效率	A1 产业发展基础	A11 人均GDP	地区经济发展水平（正向）
			A12 第三产业占GDP比重	产业结构高级化程度（正向）
			A13 工业企业高新技术产品增加值占工业增加值比重	地区工业技术水平,一定程度上体现创新水平（正向）
		A2 产业发展速度	A21 GDP增长率	产业发展活力（正向）
	B 生态效率	B1 资源消耗	B11 单位GDP能耗	产业发展的节能降耗状况（反向）
			B12 单位GDP电耗
			B13 单位GDP水耗
		B2 污染排放	B21 单位工业增加值废水排放量	产业发展引起的常见环境污染情况（反向）
			B22 单位工业增加值废气排放量
			B23 单位工业增加值二氧化硫排放量
			B24 单位工业增加值烟（粉）尘排放量
		B3 循环利用	B31 工业重复用水比例	循环利用能力（正向）
		B3 循环利用	B32 工业固体废物综合利用率	循环利用能力（正向）

序号	协调度	协调等级	序号	协调度	协调等级
1	0.00~0.09	极度失调	6	0.50~0.59	勉强协调
2	0.10~0.19	严重失调	7	0.60~0.69	初级协调
3	0.20~0.29	中度失调	8	0.70~0.79	中级协调
4	0.30~0.39	轻度失调	9	0.80~0.89	良好协调
5	0.40~0.49	濒临失调	10	0.90~1.00	优质协调

年份	产业效率	生态效率	耦合度C	协调度D	协调等级
2005	0.2074	0.1320	0.4875	0.2876	中度失调
2006	0.3129	0.2358	0.4950	0.3685	轻度失调
2007	0.3492	0.3934	0.4991	0.4305	濒临失调
2008	0.3755	0.2620	0.4920	0.3960	轻度失调
2009	0.3145	0.4441	0.4927	0.4323	濒临失调
2010	0.6143	0.5709	0.4997	0.5441	勉强协调
2011	0.6189	0.5531	0.4992	0.5409	勉强协调
2012	0.5114	0.7988	0.4878	0.5653	勉强协调
2013	0.7030	0.8301	0.4983	0.6180	初级协调
2014	0.6387	0.8937	0.4930	0.6146	初级协调
2015	0.7363	0.9218	0.4969	0.6418	初级协调

广州市产业生态化时空演变特征及驱动因素

The characteristics and driving forces of spatial and temporal evolution of industrial ecology in Guangzhou

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 9

参考文献 35

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	冯锐, 高菠阳, 陈钰淳, 张婷婷. 粤港澳大湾区科技金融耦合度及其影响因素研究[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(9): 1972-1986.
[2]	吴健生, 罗可雨, 赵宇豪. 深圳市近20年城市景观格局演变及其驱动因素[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(8): 1725-1738.
[3]	李琼, 赵阳, 李松林, 李湘玲. 中国社会保障与经济发展耦合的时空特征及驱动力分析[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(6): 1401-1417.
[4]	刘晓琼, 孙曦亮, 刘彦随, 张健, 赵新正, 芮旸. 基于REOF-EEMD的西南地区气候变化区域分异特征[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(5): 1215-1232.
[5]	石磊, 陈乐一, 李玉双. 区域经济增长的同群效应——来自中国城市数据的经验证据[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(4): 853-864.
[6]	王亚辉, 李秀彬, 辛良杰. 近30年来耕地养老保障功能的时空演变及政策启示[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(4): 956-969.
[7]	王泽东, 张小林, 孙东琪, 孙海燕. 渤海海峡跨海通道建设前后区际城市群物流网络结构的时空演变[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(3): 585-600.
[8]	张国俊, 王珏晗, 吴坤津, 许志桦. 中国三大城市群经济与环境协调度时空特征及影响因素[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(2): 272-288.
[9]	范擎宇, 杨山, 胡信. 耦合视角下长三角地区城镇化协调度的时空特征及交互机制[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(2): 289-302.
[10]	马海涛, 卢硕, 张文忠. 京津冀城市群城镇化与创新的耦合过程与机理[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(2): 303-318.
[11]	尹上岗, 杨山, 陈艳如, 白彩全. 长三角房价收入比时空演变格局及收敛性研究[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(11): 2521-2536.
[12]	李建豹,黄贤金,孙树臣,揣小伟. 长三角地区城市土地与能源消费CO₂排放的时空耦合分析[J]. 地理研究, 2019, 38(9): 2188-2201.
[13]	郭付友, 佟连军, 刘志刚, 赵海杰, 侯爱玲. 山东省产业生态化时空分异特征与影响因素——基于17地市时空面板数据[J]. 地理研究, 2019, 38(9): 2226-2238.
[14]	苏康传, 杨庆媛, 张佰林, 张忠训. 山区农村土地利用转型与小农经济变迁耦合机理[J]. 地理研究, 2019, 38(2): 399-413.
[15]	高枫, 李少英, 吴志峰, 吕帝江, 黄冠平, 刘小平. 广州市主城区共享单车骑行目的地时空特征与影响因素[J]. 地理研究, 2019, 38(12): 2859-2872.