中国大都市区高新技术产业分叉过程及动力机制——以武汉生物产业为例

doi:10.11821/dlyj201807008

地理研究 ›› 2018, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (7): 1349-1363.doi: 10.11821/dlyj201807008

中国大都市区高新技术产业分叉过程及动力机制——以武汉生物产业为例

刘志高^1,²(), 张薇³

1. 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所,区域可持续发展分析与模拟重点实验室,北京 100101
2. 中国科学院大学资源与环境学院,北京 100049
3. 浙江省发展规划研究院,杭州 310012

收稿日期:2018-01-06 修回日期:2018-05-04 出版日期:2018-07-30 发布日期:2018-07-30
作者简介:
作者简介：刘志高（1974- ）,男,湖北江陵人,博士,副研究员,研究方向为演化经济地理学。E-mail:liuzhigao@igsnrr.ac.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（41471113,41530751）

The process and dynamics of high-tech industrial branching in China's metropolitan areas: A case study of biotechnology industry in Wuhan

Zhigao LIU^1,²(), Wei ZHANG³

1. Key Laboratory of Regional Sustainable Development Modeling, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China
2. School of Natural Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
3. Zhejiang Development Planning Research Institute, Hangzhou 310012

Received:2018-01-06 Revised:2018-05-04 Online:2018-07-30 Published:2018-07-30
About author:
Author: Shi Zhenqin (1988-), PhD, specialized in regional development and land space management in mountain areas. E-mail: kevinszq@163.com

^*Corresponding author: Deng Wei (1957-), Professor, specialized in mountain environment and regional development.

E-mail: dengwei@imde.ac.cn

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

以演化经济地理学为理论基础,综合经济地理学、产业经济学等相关研究成果,认为中国高新技术产业的形成与发展是本地要素与全球力量、历史条件与现实努力、技术创新与制度变革共同作用的结果,并构建了基于多尺度、多要素的中国高新技术产业分叉动力机制分析框架。同时,以武汉市作为案例区,通过梳理武汉市生物产业形成和演化历程,总结影响其生物产业发展的要素和作用形式。研究发现：生物产业与本地光电子产业之间的技术联系、高校和研究所、以及企业本身仅仅是决定生物产业在武汉市形成的一部分因素,地方政府、跨国公司和留学归国人员等主体也是促成生物产业“生根发芽”的重要主体,它们在武汉生物产业发展的各个阶段,作用程度是不同的。这一点是区别于欧美发达国家以技术为核心的产业分叉研究的,也在一定程度上反映出中国目前的高新技术产业发展仍然停留在“量的扩张”阶段,与欧美发达国家以“质的提升”为主的发展本质有所不同。

关键词: 演化经济地理学, 产业分叉, 生物产业, 转型国家, 多尺度

Abstract:

The recent development of evolutionary economic geography, particularly of "regional branching", has provided both theoretical perspective and methodological tools for our understanding of the formation of new industries and the branching of existing industrial structures. The existing research on "regional branching" originated in western and developed countries has been putting "technology relatedness" at the core, focusing on the relationship between emerging industries and local established technologies. It is necessary to examine the applicability of analysis framework to China experiencing marketization and globalization. Based on the core concepts of evolutionary economic geography, combining with other approaches from other economic geographies and industrial economics, this article strongly argues that special attention should be given to the impacts of higher level political, economic and technological factors on regional branching in China's metropolitan areas. This article insists that the emergence and evolution of China's high-tech industry is the combined result of the local and global forces, the historical conditions and concentrated efforts, and technological innovation and institutional changes. And it builds a multi-scale and multi-factor dynamic analysis framework for our understanding of high-tech industrial branching in China's metropolitan areas. This article examines the processes and driving elements of the emergence of new industries in the contexts of transitional and globalizing China, taking the emergence of the biotechnology industry of Wuhan as a case, with an aim to understand the processes and dynamics of high-tech industry in the Chinese metropolitan areas. The methods used in this article include case studies, field research, in-depth interviews, spatial analysis and statistical data analysis. The main research outputs include: the technological relatedness, the universities and research institutes and enterprises are of much importance to the emergence of Wuhan biotechnology industry, local governments, multinationals, and overseas returnees, are also important factors, which are different from those in developed countries where new technology producing institutions are regarded as being critical to industrial branching. To a large extent, high-tech industry development in China is currently still on the factor-intensive and quantity-driven path, rather than an innovation-based one.

Key words: evolutionary economic geography, regional branching, biotechnology industry, transitional countries, multi-scales

刘志高, 张薇. 中国大都市区高新技术产业分叉过程及动力机制——以武汉生物产业为例[J]. 地理研究, 2018, 37(7): 1349-1363.

Zhigao LIU, Wei ZHANG. The process and dynamics of high-tech industrial branching in China's metropolitan areas: A case study of biotechnology industry in Wuhan[J]. GEOGRAPHICAL RESEARCH, 2018, 37(7): 1349-1363.

图/表 6

图1

图2

表1

表2

图3

图4

参考文献 70

[1]	吴翊朏, 李郇. 地方政府管治下城市空间拓展: 以广州市为例. 人文地理, 2014, 29(4): 52-58.
	[Wu Yifei, Li Xun.Urban spatial expansion under the local government's governance: A case study in Guangzhou. Human Geography, 2014, 29(4): 52-58.]
[2]	Tanner A N.Regional Branching Reconsidered: Emergence of the fuel cell industry in European regions. Economic Geography, 2014, 90(4): 403-427. doi: 10.1111/ecge.12055
[3]	Boschma R, Gianelle C.Regional branching and smart specialisation policy. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2014.
[4]	Feldman M P, Lendel I.Under the Lens: The geography of optical science as an emerging industry. Economic Geography, 2010, 86(2): 147-171. doi: 10.1111/j.1944-8287.2010.01068.x
[5]	Bugge M M, øiestad S.The micro-foundations of regional branching: The case of digitization of publishing. European Planning Studies, 2015, 23(4): 764-784. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2014.970131
[6]	刘卫东. 经济地理学与空间治理. 地理学报, 2014, 69(8): 1109-1116. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201408007
	[Liu Weidong.Economic Geography for Spatial Governance. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2014, 69(8): 1109-1116.] doi: 10.11821/dlxb201408007
[7]	张京祥, 殷洁, 罗小龙. 地方政府企业化主导下的城市空间发展与演化研究. 人文地理, 2006, 21(4): 1-6. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-2398.2006.04.001
	[Zhang Jingxiang, Yin Jie, Luo Xiaolong.Research of urban spatial development under the circumstances of local government's entrepreneuralization. Human Geography, 2006, 21(4): 1-6.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-2398.2006.04.001
[8]	Martin R, Sunley P.Towards a developmental turn in evolutionary economic geography?. Regional Studies. 2015, 49(5): 712-732. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2014.899431
[9]	Grabher G.Yet Another Turn? The evolutionary project in economic geography. Economic Geography. 2009, 85(2): 119-127. doi: 10.1111/j.1944-8287.2009.01016.x
[10]	刘志高, 崔岳春. 演化经济地理学: 21世纪的经济地理学. 社会科学战线, 2008, (6): 65-75.
	[Liu Zhigao, Cui Yuechun.Evolutionary Economic Geography: Economic Geography in the 21st century. Social Science Front, 2008, (6): 65-75.]
[11]	刘志高, 尹贻梅. 演化经济地理学评介. 经济学动态, 2005, (12): 91-95.
	[Liu Zhigao, Yin Yimei.A Review of evolutionary Economic Geography. Economics Information, 2005, (12): 91-95.]
[12]	刘志高, 尹贻梅. 演化经济地理学: 当代西方经济地理学发展的新方向. 国外社会科学, 2006, (1): 34-39.
	[Liu Zhigao, Yin Yimei.Evolutionary Economic Geography: A new development of contemporary Western Economic Geography. Social Sciences Abroad, 2006, (1): 34-39.]
[13]	刘志高, 尹贻梅. 经济地理学与经济学关系的历史考察. 经济地理, 2006, 26(3): 353-358. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8462.2006.03.001
	[Liu Zhigao, Yin Yimei.Analysis on the evolution history of relationship between Economic Geography and Economics. Economic Geography, 2006, 26(3): 353-358.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8462.2006.03.001
[14]	Jacobs J.The Economy of Cities. New York: Random House, 1969.
[15]	Frenken K, Van Oort F, Verburg T.Related variety, unrelated variety and regional economic growth. Regional Studies, 2007, 41(5): 685-697. doi: 10.1080/00343400601120296
[16]	Boschma R, Iammarino S.Related variety, trade linkages, and regional growth in Italy. Economic Geography, 2009, 85(3): 289-311. doi: 10.1111/j.1944-8287.2009.01034.x
[17]	Boschma R, Minondo A, Navarro M.Related variety and regional growth in Spain. Papers in Regional Science, 2012, 91(2): 241-256.
[18]	Asheim B T, Boschma R, Cooke P.Constructing regional advantage. Regional Studies, 2011, 45(7): 893-904. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2010.543126
[19]	Fan J P H, Lang L H P. The measurement of relatedness: An application to corporate diversification. Journal of Business, 2000, 73(4): 629-660. doi: 10.1086/209657
[20]	Farjoun, Mosheprofile.Beyond industry boundaries: Human expertise, diversification and resource-related industry groups. Organization Science, 1994, 5(2): 185-199. doi: 10.1287/orsc.5.2.185
[21]	Teece D J, Rumelt R, Dosi G, et al.Understanding corporate coherence: Theory and evidence. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 1994, 23(1): 1-30. doi: 10.1016/0167-2681(94)90094-9
[22]	Bryce D J, Winter S G.A general interindustry relatedness index. Informs, 2009, 55(9): 1570-1585. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.1090.1040
[23]	Neffke F, Henning M.Skill relatedness and firm diversification. Strategic Management Journal, 2013, 34(3): 297-316. doi: 10.1002/smj.2014
[24]	Breschi S, Lissoni F, Malerba F.Knowledge-relatedness in firm technological diversification. Research Policy, 2003, 32(1): 69-87. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00004-5
[25]	刘鑫, 贺灿飞. 技术关联与城市产业增长研究. 地理研究, 2016, 35(4): 717-730.
	[Liu Xin, He Canfei.Relatedness and urban industrial growth. Geographical Research, 2016, 35(4): 717-730.]
[26]	Lee W J, Sohn S Y.Patent analysis to identify shale gas development in China and the United States. Energy Policy, 2014, 74(74): 111-115. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2014.08.009
[27]	Acs Z J, Anselin L, Varga A.Patents and innovation counts as measures of regional production of new knowledge. Research Policy, 2002, 31(7): 1069-1085. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00184-6
[28]	Rizzi F, Eck N J V, Frey M. The production of scientific knowledge on renewable energies: Worldwide trends, dynamics and challenges and implications for management. Renewable Energy, 2014, 62(3): 657-671. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2013.08.030
[29]	Romo-Fernández L M, Guerrero-Bote V P, Moya-Anegón F. World scientific production on renewable energy, sustainability and the environment. Energy for Sustainable Development, 2012, 16(4): 500-508. doi: 10.1016/j.esd.2012.06.005
[30]	Manzano-Agugliaro F, Alcayde A, Montoya F G, et al.Scientific production of renewable energies worldwide: An overview. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2013, 18(2): 134-143. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2012.10.020
[31]	Boschma R, Capone G.Relatedness and diversification in the European Union (EU-27) and European neighbourhood policy countries. Environment & Planning C, 2016, 34(4): 617-637.
[32]	Boschma R, Heimeriks G, Balland P A.Scientific knowledge dynamics and relatedness in biotech cities. Research Policy, 2014, 43(1): 107-114. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2013.07.009
[33]	Boschma R, Capone G.Institutions and diversification: Related versus unrelated diversification in a varieties of capitalism framework. Research Policy, 2015, 44(10): 1902-1914. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2015.06.013
[34]	Howell A, He C, Yang R, et al.Technological relatedness and asymmetrical firm productivity gains under market reforms in China. Social Science Electronic Publishing, 2016, 9(3): 1-45. doi: 10.1093/cjres/rsw024
[35]	Zucker L G, Darby M R, Brewer M B.Intellectual human capital and the birth of U. S. biotechnology enterprises. American Economic Review, 1998, 88(1): 290-306. doi: 10.1515/npf-2012-0016
[36]	Audretsch D B.The role of small firms in U. S. biotechnology clusters. Small Business Economics, 2001, 17(1-2): 3-15. doi: 10.1023/A:1011140014334
[37]	Vallance P.Universities, public research, and evolutionary economic geography. Economic Geography, 2015, 92(4): 355-377. doi: 10.1080/00130095.2016.1146076
[38]	Feldman M P.The entrepreneurial event Revisited: Firm formation in a regional context. Industrial & Corporate Change, 2001, 10(4): 861-891. doi: 10.1093/icc/10.4.861
[39]	Vargas R A, Holbrook J A.Globalization of innovation networks: A model of the process. Picmet Technology Management for Global Economic Growth, 2010, 18(1): 1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.pacfin.2009.09.002
[40]	Tanner A N.The emergence of new technology-based industries: The case of fuel cells and its technological relatedness to regional knowledge bases. Journal of Economic Geography, 2016, 16(3): 611-635. doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbv011
[41]	Klepper S.Employee startups in high-tech industries. Industrial & Corporate Change, 2001, 10(3): 639-674.
[42]	贺灿飞, 黎明. 演化经济地理学. 河南大学学报: 自然科学版, 2016, 46(4): 387-391.
	[He Canfei, Li Ming. Evolutionary Economic Geography. Journal of Henan University: Natural Science, 2016, 46(4): 387-391.]
[43]	颜燕, 贺灿飞, 王俊松. 产业关联、制度环境与区域产业演化. 北京工商大学学报: 社会科学版, 2017, 32(1): 118-126. doi: 10.16299/j.1009-6116.2017.01.012
	[Yan Yan, He Canfei, Wang Junsong.Industrial linkage, institutional environment and regional industrial evolution. Journal of Beijing Technology and Business University: Social Sciences, 2017, 32(1): 118-126.] doi: 10.16299/j.1009-6116.2017.01.012
[44]	Boschma R, Frenken K.Some notes on institutions in evolutionary economic geography. Economic Geography, 2009, 85(2): 151-158. doi: 10.1111/j.1944-8287.2009.01018.x
[45]	殷洁, 张京祥, 罗小龙. 基于制度转型的中国城市空间结构研究初探. 人文地理, 2005, 20(3): 59-62. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-2398.2005.03.013
	[Yin Jie, Zhang Jingxiang, Luo Xiaolong.On urban spatial, structure in China: An institutional transformation perspective. Human Geography, 2005, 20(3): 59-62. ] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-2398.2005.03.013
[46]	贺灿飞, 肖晓俊. 跨国公司功能区位实证研究. 地理学报, 2012, 66(12): 1669-1681. doi: 10.11821/xb201112008
	[He Canfei, Xiao Xiaojun.Geography of multinational corporations in China: An empirical study of fortune global 500 multinational corporations in electronics and medical and chemical industries. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2012, 66(12): 1669-1681.] doi: 10.11821/xb201112008
[47]	Jiang F, Christodoulou C, Wei H C.The determinants of international pharmaceutical firms' FDI in China: A comparison between early (pre-1992) and late (from-1992) entrants. Management Decision, 2001, 39(1): 45-56. doi: 10.1108/EUM0000000005406
[48]	Li S, Angelino A, Yin H, et al.Determinants of FDI Localization in China: A county-level analysis for the pharmaceutical industry. International Journal of Environmental Research & Public Health, 2017, 14(9): 985-1005.
[49]	朱彦刚, 贺灿飞, 刘作丽. 跨国公司的功能区位选择与城市功能专业化研究. 中国软科学, 2010, (11): 98-109. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-9753.2010.11.010
	[Zhu Yangang, He Canfei, Liu Zuoli.An empirical study on TNCs functional location choice and urban function specialization. China Soft Science, 2010, (11): 98-109.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-9753.2010.11.010
[50]	Wei Y H D. Restructuring for growth in urban China: Transitional institutions, urban development, and spatial transformation. Habitat International, 2012, 36(3): 396-405. doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2011.12.023
[51]	Zhu J.A transitional institution for the emerging land market in urban China. Urban Studies, 2005, 42(8): 1369-1390. doi: 10.1080/00420980500150714
[52]	Zhang M, Rasiah R.Institutional change and state-owned enterprises in China's urban housing market. Habitat International, 2014, 41(41): 58-68. doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2013.06.010
[53]	Harvey D.From Managerialism to entrepreneurialism: The transformation in urban governance in late capitalism. Geografiska Annaler, 1989, 71(1): 3-17. doi: 10.1080/04353684.1989.11879583
[54]	Liu Y, Yin G, Ma L J C. Local state and administrative urbanization in post-reform China: A case study of Hebi city, Henan province. Cities, 2012, 29(2): 107-117. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2011.08.003
[55]	Yu L, Zhu L.Chinese local state entrepreneurialism: A case study of Changchun. International Development Planning Review, 2009, 31(2): 199-220. doi: 10.3828/idpr.31.2.5
[56]	Qian Z.Post-reform urban restructuring in China: The case of Hangzhou 1990-2010. Town Planning Review, 2012, 83(4): 431-455. doi: 10.2307/41509862
[57]	宋凌云, 王贤彬. 政府补贴与产业结构变动. 中国工业经济, 2013, (4): 94-106.
	[Song Lingyun, Wang Xianbin.Government Subsidy and Industrial Structural Change. China Industrial Economics, 2013, (4): 94-106.]
[58]	Kong Z, Yuan Q.Studies on spillover of scientific and technological knowledge in high-tech industry clusters: Taking Jinan high-tech development zone for example. International Business Research, 2009, 1(4): 123-126.
[59]	Zhou Y, Xin T.An innovative region in China: Interaction between multinational corporations and local firms in a high-tech cluster in Beijing. Economic Geography, 2003, 79(2): 129-152.
[60]	周元, 王维才. 中国高新区阶段发展的理论框架: 兼论高新区 “二次创业” 的能力评价. 经济地理, 2003, 23(4): 451-456.
	[Zhou Yuan, Wang Weicai.Theory framework of the phasic development of China's high -tech industrial development zones: And evaluating methodology for capability on second -time pioneer of China's high -tech industrial development zones. Economic Geography, 2003, 23(4): 451-456.]
[61]	张晓平, 刘卫东. 开发区与中国城市空间结构演进及其动力机制. 地理科学, 2003, 23(2): 142-149. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0690.2003.02.003
	[Zhang Xiaoping, Liu Weidong.Role of development areas in urban spatial changes in China: Types and dynamics. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2003, 23(2): 142-149.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0690.2003.02.003
[62]	Li J.Land sale venue and economic growth path: Evidence from China's urban land market. Habitat International, 2014, 41: 307-313. doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2013.10.001
[63]	Tian L, Ma W.Government intervention in city development of China: A tool of land supply. Land Use Policy, 2009, 26(3): 599-609. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2008.08.012
[64]	贺灿飞, 肖晓俊. 跨国公司功能区位实证研究. 地理学报, 2011, 66(12): 1669-1681. doi: 10.11821/xb201112008
	[He Canfei, Xiao Xiaojun.Geography of multinational corporations in China: An empirical study of fortune global 500 multinational corporations in electronics and medical and chemical industries. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2011, 66(12): 1669-1681.] doi: 10.11821/xb201112008
[65]	张瑜. 跨国公司R&D在华行业及地区分布的影响因素分析. 上海: 东华大学硕士学位论文, 2014.
	[Zhang Yu.The Analysis of Influence Factors Based on the Industries and Regions of MNCs R&D Organizations in China. Shanghai: Master Dissertation of Donghua University, 2014.]
[66]	魏才. 跨国公司研发中心为何而来? 企业管理, 2006, (2): 6-7. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-2320.2006.02.002
	[Wei Cai.Where do R&D centers of MNCs come from?. Enterprise Management, 2006, (2): 6-7.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-2320.2006.02.002
[67]	王俊松, 潘峰华, 田明茂. 跨国公司总部在城市内部的空间分异及影响因素: 以上海为例. 地理研究, 2017, 36(9): 1667-1679.
	[Wang Junsong, Pan Fenghua, Tian Mingmao.Spatial pattern of headquarters of multinational enterprises in Shanghai. Geographical Research, 2017, 36(9): 1667-1679.]
[68]	王缉慈. 超越集群:中国产业集群的理论探索. 北京: 科学出版社, 2010.
	[Wang Jici.Beyond the Clusters:Theoretical Exploration of China 's Industrial Clusters. Beijing: Science Press, 2010.]
[69]	Saxenian A, Hsu J Y.The silicon valley-hsinchu connection:Technical communities and industrial upgrading. Social Science Electronic Publishing, 2001, 10(4): 893-920. doi: 10.1093/icc/10.4.893
[70]	朱华晟, 赵雪平, 吴骏毅, 等. 大学与城市创意产业空间—网络构建: 以北京市规划设计业为例. 经济地理, 2013, 33(3): 84-92.
	[Zhu Huasheng, Zhao Xueping, Wu Junyi, et al.Universities, urban creative space and network: A case study of planning & design industry in Beijing. Economic Geography, 2013, 33(3): 84-92.]

调研机构	主要调研内容
政府	生物产业培育和发展背景（包括政府层面、学术界及企业界）
	生物产业对经济的带动作用
	生物产业与光谷的主导产业光电子信息产业之间的关系如何
	武汉光谷的扩容过程,以及生物产业基地的设立背景和扩容过程
	武汉光谷企业名单,及相关资料
大学和研究机构	产业孵化、技术合作的背景和重点领域
	生物产业与其他产业的关系
	与武汉光谷生物产业合作的方式和效果
	相关科研团队与全球其他区域的合作方式和效果
	科研人员创业的相关政策
	大学科技园的主导产业、规模及扩容过程
	大学科技园的产业孵化情况,包括孵化企业数量、规模,培养生物产业相关人员的数量,提供的设施和服务类型等
企业	企业创始人的经历
	企业的发展历程
	企业的区位变化过程
	生物技术的最初来源
	企业转向生物产业的主要原因
	企业员工的学历结构和毕业院校结构
	企业与大学和研究所联系的方式、频率及效果
	企业的国际化程度,包括何时开拓国际市场,与国外哪些园区、大学和科研机构有合作关系

企业名称	法人	毕业院校	创始时间（年）
武汉兰丁医学高科技有限公司	孙小蓉	美国纽约Sloan肿瘤研究中心、洛克菲勒大学	2000
武汉华丽生物材料有限公司	刘剑	美国加州大学洛杉矶分校	2002
武汉昊博科技有限公司			2005
武汉禾元生物科技有限公司	杨代常	菲律宾国际水稻所	2006
武汉益承生物科技股份有限公司	夏献民	德国海德堡大学	2009
湖北谷瑞特生物技术有限公司	杜进平	英国剑桥大学	2009
武汉杨森生物技术有限公司	欧阳晨曦	德国汉诺威医科大学	2009
安翰光电技术（武汉）有限公司	肖国华	美国中弗罗里达大学	2009
武汉友芝友生物制药有限公司	周鹏飞	加拿大麦克马斯特大学	2010
中美华世通生物医药科技（武汉）有限公司	张发明	美国印第安纳大学	2010
武汉海吉力生物科技有限公司			2010
武汉格蓝丽富科技有限公司	邓亚光	美国斯坦福大学医学院	2010
武汉中帜生物科技有限公司	李先强	美国俄亥俄州托莱多医学院	2011
益基（武汉）生物科技有限公司	周慧君	美国康奈尔大学	2011
武汉普莱特生物医药技术有限公司			2012

中国大都市区高新技术产业分叉过程及动力机制——以武汉生物产业为例

The process and dynamics of high-tech industrial branching in China's metropolitan areas: A case study of biotechnology industry in Wuhan

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 6

参考文献 70

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	宓泽锋, 周灿, 尚勇敏, 马双, 曾刚. 本地知识基础对新兴产业创新集群形成的影响——以中国燃料电池产业为例[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(7): 1478-1489.
[2]	符文颖, 杨家蕊. 创新地理学的批判性思考——基于中国情境的理论创新[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(5): 1018-1027.
[3]	胡晓辉, 朱晟君, RobertHassink. 超越“演化”:老工业区重构研究进展与范式反思[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(5): 1028-1044.
[4]	朱晟君, 金文纨, 胡晓辉. 关联视角下的区域产业动态研究进展与反思[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(5): 1045-1055.
[5]	高菠阳, 刘卫东, 宋涛, 冯锐, 计启迪. 社会变革和制度文化制约下的“多尺度嵌入”——以缅甸莱比塘铜矿项目为例[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(12): 2718-2730.
[6]	刘君洋, 朱晟君. 多尺度知识溢出研究——以进出口互动效应为例[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(11): 2493-2507.
[7]	李花,赵雪雁,王伟军,薛冰. 基于多尺度的中国城市工业污染时空分异及影响因素[J]. 地理研究, 2019, 38(8): 1993-2007.
[8]	黄姣, 马冰滢, 李双成. 农业多功能性与都市区土地利用管理——框架和案例分析[J]. 地理研究, 2019, 38(7): 1791-1806.
[9]	孙艺杰, 刘宪锋, 任志远, 李双双. 1960—2016年黄土高原多尺度干旱特征及影响因素[J]. 地理研究, 2019, 38(7): 1820-1832.
[10]	周侃,樊杰,盛科荣. 国土空间管控的方法与途径[J]. 地理研究, 2019, 38(10): 2527-2540.
[11]	党云晓, 张文忠, 谌丽, 湛东升. 居民幸福感的城际差异及其影响因素探析——基于多尺度模型的研究[J]. 地理研究, 2018, 37(3): 539-550.
[12]	史静静, 杨琳, 曾灿英, 朱阿兴, 秦承志, 梁朋. 土壤制图中多目标属性的环境因子及其尺度选择——以黑龙江鹤山农场为例[J]. 地理研究, 2018, 37(3): 635-646.
[13]	柳林, 姜超, 周素红, 刘凯, 徐冲, 曹晶晶. 城市入室盗窃犯罪的多尺度时空格局分析——基于中国H市DP半岛的案例研究[J]. 地理研究, 2017, 36(12): 2451-2464.
[14]	康鑫, 王彦文, 秦承志, 程维明, 赵尚民, 朱阿兴, 张文诗. 多分析尺度下综合判别的地形元素分类方法[J]. 地理研究, 2016, 35(9): 1637-1646.
[15]	李少英, 吴志峰, 李碧莹, 刘轶伦, 陈晓越. 基于互联网房产数据的住宅容积率多尺度时空特征——以广州市为例[J]. 地理研究, 2016, 35(4): 770-780.