对机构改革背景下空间规划体系构建的思考

doi:10.11821/dlyj201810005

地理研究 ›› 2018, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (10): 1938-1946.doi: 10.11821/dlyj201810005

对机构改革背景下空间规划体系构建的思考

郝庆^1,^2,³()

1. 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所,北京 100101
2. 中国国土资源经济研究院,北京 101149
3. 中国科学院大学资源与环境学院,北京 100049

收稿日期:2018-04-24 出版日期:2018-10-20 发布日期:2018-10-20
作者简介:
作者简介：郝庆（1982- ）,男,河北邢台人,副研究员,博士研究生,研究方向为空间规划与资源环境承载力。E-mail: haoq.16b@igsnrr.ac.cn
基金资助:
中国科学院战略性先导科技专项（XDA20010201）

The construction of spatial planning system under the background of institutional reform

Qing HAO^1,^2,³()

1. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China
2. Chinese Academy of Land and Resource Economics, Beijing 101149, China
3. College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China

Received:2018-04-24 Online:2018-10-20 Published:2018-10-20
About author:
Author: Shi Zhenqin (1988-), PhD, specialized in regional development and land space management in mountain areas. E-mail: kevinszq@163.com

^*Corresponding author: Deng Wei (1957-), Professor, specialized in mountain environment and regional development.

E-mail: dengwei@imde.ac.cn

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

“建立空间规划体系”是自然资源部的一项重要职能,也是整合空间规划、保障空间治理机制有效运行的必然要求。在借鉴国外空间规划体系的基础上,按照适应中国政治体制和法律基础、适应未来空间开发和空间治理变化的需求,提出构建层层传导的空间规划体系确保国家重大战略部署得以落实;提出在微观尺度空间规划进行空间开发权与土地利用权的分配,作为实施空间用途管制的法律依据,保障地方多样化、灵活化的发展;通过构建“宏观政策性/指导性规划—中观衔接性规划—微观实施性规划”的空间规划体系,为国家建立和完善空间规划体系、提升空间治理能力提供参考。

关键词: 空间规划, 空间规划体系, 空间治理, 空间开发权, 自然资源部

Abstract:

In March 2018, China's state institutions were reformed and the Ministry of Natural Resources of the People's Republic of China was established to implement unified management of natural resources and spatial planning. Establishing spatial planning system is an important responsibility of the Ministry of Natural Resources, which is also the prerequisite for the integration of various types of spatial planning and effective operation of spatial governance mechanism. The focus of "establishing a unified spatial planning system" is not to unify the external forms of various spatial planning, but to ensure the rational division and effective transmission of the spatial development rights at different levels and different types of spatial planning, so as to improve comprehensively China's spatial governance capacity. To conduct a comprehensive and in- depth study on the international spatial planning systems, literature review method and comparative analysis method are employed in this paper. Based on the results, it is suggested that the new spatial planning system of China should be consisitent with political system and legal basis as well as the changing trend of future spatial development and governance patterns. A spatial planning system has been constructed, covering policy/guidance planning, bridging planning, and implementation planning respectively from the macro, medium and micro perspectives. It proposes that macro and medium spatial planning only have constraints on the next level of spatial planning and special spatial planning and do not involve the allocation of specific land use and spatial development rights, while micro scale land use planning, urban planning, and village planning provide legal basis for land use and spatial development. The system defines the hierarchical relationships, which would further promote the implementation of major national strategies. Moreover, the allocation of rights of spatial planning at the micro scale can give more autonomy to the local government and market. It is also suggested that spatial planning should strengthen the connection with national economic and social development plan, especially at the city and county level. The rules for the preparation and implementation of spatial planning should be established to improve the scientific rationality of the plans. It is also necessary to establish a use of territorial space system, which plays an important role in the implementation of spatial planning system.

Key words: spatial planning, spatial planning system, spatial governance, spatial development rights, Ministry of Natural Resources

郝庆. 对机构改革背景下空间规划体系构建的思考[J]. 地理研究, 2018, 37(10): 1938-1946.

Qing HAO. The construction of spatial planning system under the background of institutional reform[J]. GEOGRAPHICAL RESEARCH, 2018, 37(10): 1938-1946.

图/表 4

参考文献 19

[1]	顾朝林. 论中国“多规”分立及其演化与融合问题. 地理研究, 2015, 34(4): 601-613. doi: 10.11821/dlyj201504001
	[Gu Chaolin.On the separation of China's spatial plans and their evolution and integration. Geographical Research, 2015, 34(4): 601-613.] doi: 10.11821/dlyj201504001
[2]	许景权, 沈迟, 胡天新, 等. 构建我国空间规划体系的总体思路和主要任务. 规划师, 2017, 33(2): 5-11.
	[Xu Jingquan, Shen Chi, Hu Tianxin, et al.General concept and main tasks of building spatial planning system in China. Planners, 2017, 33(2): 5-11.]
[3]	郝庆, 孟旭光, 强真. 新时期国土规划编制环境分析及开展建议. 经济地理, 2010, 30(7): 1181-1184.
	[Hao Qing, Meng Xuguang, Qiang Zheng.The originalities of territorial planning in new period. Economic Geography, 2010, 30(7): 1181-1184.]
[4]	陈雯, 孙伟, 陈江龙. 我国市县规划体系矛盾解析与“多规合一”路径探究. 地理研究, 2017, 36(9): 1603-1612.
	[Chen Wen, Sun Wei, Chen Jianglong.Decoding the conflicts within the planning system and approaches to multi-plan integration at the county and municipal level in China. Geographical Research, 2017, 36( 9): 1603-1612.]
[5]	樊杰. 我国空间治理体系现代化在“十九大”后的新态势. 中国科学院院刊, 2017, 32(4): 396-404.
	[Fan Jie.Perspective of China's spatial governance system after 19th CPC national congress. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2017, 32(4): 396-404.]
[6]	Shaw D, Lord A.From land-use to 'spatial planning': Reflections on the reform of the english planning system. Town Planning Review, 2009, 80(4/5): 415-435. doi: 10.3828/tpr.2009.5
[7]	Min J K, Chung C W.An anatomy of spatial planning: Coming to terms with the spatial element in UK planning. European Planning Studies, 2010, 18(2): 239-257. doi: 10.1080/09654310903491572
[8]	CEC. Luxembourg: Official publications of the European Communities: Office for official publications of the European Communities Associates, 1997.
[9]	Munteanu M, Servillo L.Romanian spatial planning system: Post-communist dynamics of change and Europeanization processes. European Planning Studies, 2014, 22(11): 2248-2267. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2013.830696
[10]	Rivolin U J.Planning systems as institutional technologies: A proposed conceptualization and the implications for comparison. Planning Practice & Research, 2012, 27(1): 63-85. doi: 10.1080/02697459.2012.661181
[11]	Booth P.The control of discretion: Planning and the common-law tradition. Planning Theory, 2007, 6(2): 127-145. doi: 10.1177/1473095207077585
[12]	Tewdwr-Jones M.Discretion, flexibility, and certainty in British planning: Emerging ideological conflicts and inherent political tensions. Journal of Planning Education & Research, 1999, 18(3): 244-256.
[13]	Haughton G, Allmendinger P.Spatial planning and the new localism. Planning Practice & Research, 2013, 28(1): 1-5. doi: 10.1080/02697459.2012.699706
[14]	Rivolin U J.Global crisis and the systems of spatial governance and planning: A European comparison. European Planning Studies, 2017, 25(6): 994-1012. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2017.1296110
[15]	蔡玉梅, 高延利, 易凡平. 发达国家空间规划的经验和启示. 中国土地, 2017, (6): 36-39.
	[Cai Yumei, Gao Yanli, Yi Fanping.The experience and implications of spatial planning in developed countries. China Land, 2017, (6): 36-39.]
[16]	周静, 沈迟. 荷兰空间规划体系的改革及启示. 国际城市规划, 2017, 32(3): 113-121.
	[Zhou Jing, Shen Chi.The reform of Dutch spatial planning system and its inspirations. Urban Planning International, 2017, 32(3): 113-121.]
[17]	陈明星, 周素红, 何深静, 等. 人文与经济地理学的传承与创新: 青年学者的责任. 地理研究, 2018, 37(3): 449-472.
	[Chen Mingxing, Zhou Suhong, He Shenjing, et al.Inheritance and innovation of human and economic geography: Responsibilities of young scholars. Geographical Research, 2018, 37(3): 449-472.]
[18]	马琪, 刘康, 刘文宗, 等. 干旱半干旱区生态保护红线划分研究: 以“多规合一”试点榆林市为例. 地理研究, 2018, 37(1): 158-170.
	[Ma Qi, Liu Kang, Liu Wenzong, et al.Zoning the ecological redline in arid and semiarid regions: Taking Yulin city as an example in the context of an integrated multi-planning. Geographical Research, 2018, 37(1): 158-170.]
[19]	刘彦随, 王介勇. 转型发展期“多规合一”理论认知与技术方法. 地理科学进展, 2016, 35(5): 529-536. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2016.05.001
	[Liu Yansui, Wang Jieyong.Theoretical analysis and technical methods of "multiple planning integration" in the rural to urban transition period in China. Progress in Geography, 2016, 35(5): 529-536.] doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2016.05.001

	宏观	中观	微观
政策工具	愿景（Vision）/战略（Strategy）/政策（Policy）/规划指引（Guidance）
		规划（plan）/控规（control）
			许可（permission）
属性	指导性/政策性	衔接性	实施性

分权模式	法律基础	理论基础	分权环节	规划尺度	典型国家
一致性	大陆法系	空间结构理论	规划（plan）	多层次	法国、德国、荷兰
描述性	普通法系	土地适宜性评价	许可（permission）	地方	英国、爱尔兰

对机构改革背景下空间规划体系构建的思考

The construction of spatial planning system under the background of institutional reform

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 4

参考文献 19

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	唐晓峰. 北京传统城市空间治理：遗产与挑战[J]. 地理研究, 2019, 38(6): 1290-1298.
[2]	翁时秀, 卢建鸣. 空间治理的社区实践与正当性建构——以浙江省永嘉县芙蓉村传统村落保护为例[J]. 地理研究, 2019, 38(6): 1322-1332.
[3]	周尚意, 苏娴, 陈海明. 地方性知识与空间治理——以苏州东山内圩治理为例[J]. 地理研究, 2019, 38(6): 1333-1342.
[4]	孙九霞. 新时代背景下基于文化自信的文化传承与空间治理——“文化传承与空间治理”专栏解读[J]. 地理研究, 2019, 38(6): 1283-1289.
[5]	王开泳, 陈田, 刘毅. “行政区划本身也是一种重要资源”的理论创新与应用[J]. 地理研究, 2019, 38(2): 195-206.
[6]	樊杰. 地域功能-结构的空间组织途径——对国土空间规划实施主体功能区战略的讨论[J]. 地理研究, 2019, 38(10): 2373-2387.
[7]	徐勇,赵燊,段健. 国土空间规划的土地利用分类方案研究[J]. 地理研究, 2019, 38(10): 2388-2401.
[8]	段健,徐勇,赵燊. 国土空间规划的用海分类体系探讨[J]. 地理研究, 2019, 38(10): 2402-2414.
[9]	张雪飞,王传胜,李萌. 国土空间规划中生态空间和生态保护红线的划定[J]. 地理研究, 2019, 38(10): 2430-2446.
[10]	李萌,王传胜,张雪飞. 国土空间规划中水源涵养功能生态保护红线备选区的识别[J]. 地理研究, 2019, 38(10): 2447-2457.
[11]	王姣娥,陈卓,景悦,黄洁,金凤君. 国土空间规划：基础设施与公共服务设施单幅总图的研制[J]. 地理研究, 2019, 38(10): 2496-2505.
[12]	李九一,李丽娟,王传胜. 国土空间规划：生态环境类单幅总图的研制[J]. 地理研究, 2019, 38(10): 2506-2517.
[13]	郭锐,陈东,樊杰. 国土空间规划体系与不同层级规划间的衔接[J]. 地理研究, 2019, 38(10): 2518-2526.
[14]	王开泳,陈田. 新时代的国土空间规划体系重建与制度环境改革[J]. 地理研究, 2019, 38(10): 2541-2551.
[15]	孔维锋,陈东. 话语权结构对国土空间规划方案的影响机理与优化策略[J]. 地理研究, 2019, 38(10): 2552-2562.