地理研究

地理研究 ›› 2018, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (11): 2318-2330.doi: 10.11821/dlyj201811015

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

传承与嬗变：广州市小洲村的空间转换

方远平1(), 易颖2, 毕斗斗3   

  1. 1. 华南师范大学旅游管理学院,广州 510006
    2. 容桂职业技术学校,佛山 528305
    3. 华南理工大学经济与贸易学院,广州 510006
  • 收稿日期:2018-03-27 修回日期:2018-09-28 出版日期:2018-11-20 发布日期:2018-11-20
  • 作者简介:

    作者简介：方远平（1974- ）,男,湖南桂东人,博士,教授,研究方向为领域为信息化与服务业创新空间、城乡转型与休闲空间生产等。E-mail: fyp@scnu.edu

  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目（41471106）;广东省哲学社会科学十二五规划项目（GD13CYJ07）

Inheritance and transmutation: Space transformation of Xiaozhou village, Guangzhou

Yuanping FANG1(), Ying YI2, Doudou BI3   

  1. 1. School of Tourism Management, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510006, China
    2. Ronggui Vocational and Technical School, Foshan 528305, Guangdong, China
    3. School of Economics and Commerce, South China University of Techology, Guangzhou 510006, China
  • Received:2018-03-27 Revised:2018-09-28 Online:2018-11-20 Published:2018-11-20
  • About author:

    Author: Shi Zhenqin (1988-), PhD, specialized in regional development and land space management in mountain areas. E-mail: kevinszq@163.com

    *Corresponding author: Deng Wei (1957-), Professor, specialized in mountain environment and regional development.

    E-mail: dengwei@imde.ac.cn

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

被引次数

1

摘要：

在快速城市化进程影响下,广州市小洲村因从典型的岭南水乡古村逐步演化为创意艺术与旅游空间而成为关注热点。空间生产理论为揭示小洲村的空间转换与重构提供了理论工具。运用实地考察法、访谈法、文本分析法等质性研究方法,围绕“空间转换的过程”“空间生产主体及作用”“空间生产的结果及机制”等问题,探讨不同发展阶段各空间主体对小洲村的建构过程以及结果,构建“时间—空间主体—空间”的分析框架。研究发现：① 小洲村经历了岭南水乡古村落的自然发育阶段、艺术精英自发集聚阶段、乡村旅游与文化创意产业融合发展阶段三个空间转换阶段,并分别形成了对应水乡古寨的生产生活空间、艺术创意空间、创意旅游商业空间三种空间形态。② 创意阶层、政府、资本、游客等空间主体的加入,使小洲村由单一空间主体（村民）转变为多元主体。③ 在资本城乡不平衡发展机制下,创意阶层、政府、资本、村民、游客等空间主体为实现各自的利益诉求,在小洲村的空间转换中产生了不同的影响,其中当地村民、创意阶层和游客发挥着自下而上的能动作用;政府起到自上而下的管治作用,但在村民的空间抵抗下效果甚微。

关键词: 乡村空间转换, 空间生产, 生产主体, 小洲村

Abstract:

Under the background of rapid urbanization in the past few decades in China, rural areas have been experiencing a dramatic transformation process. Rural transformation reflects the urban-rural development and transformation of economic development mode. Based on the theory of "the production of space", by integrating the research methods of literature review, field observation and interview, this paper explores the process of rural space transition with the influence by different subjects of production. The main conclusions are as follows: (1) Xiaozhou village has experienced a dramatic change and become a creative tourism destination from a typical ancient village mainly in three phases, i.e. the organic development of an ancient village; spontaneous agglomeration of artistic elites; rural and cultural creative tourism develop simultaneously, which are one-to-one correlation between the space of the water village, the space of artistic creativity and the space of creative tourism. (2) With the participation of creative class, local government, capital, and tourists, the space production subjects have been oriented towards multiple villagers from the single villager previously in Xiaozhou village. (3) Under the impact of capital imbalance, multi-stakeholders including local villagers, creative class, tourists, government and developers all play an important role in Xiaozhou village's space transition. Local villagers, creative class and tourists fully act as the bottom-up active function. The government exerts the top-down control effect, despite of the ineffectiveness when local villagers' spatial resistance occurs. Against the uneven promotion of capital, this paper mainly analyzes the transition from the three dimensions: How the space transformation process goes on, who are the subjects, and what are the results and mechanism of spatial production. This paper explores the dynamic mechanism of the rural transformation and provides the suggestions and references for the urbanization drive.

Key words: rural space transformation, the production of space, subjects of production, Xiaozhou village