地理研究

地理研究 ›› 2003, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (5): 609-617.doi: 10.11821/yj2003050009

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

中国区域可持续发展状态及类型划分

贾若祥1,2, 刘毅1   

  1. 1. 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所, 北京 100101;
    2. 中国科学院研究生院, 北京 100039
  • 收稿日期:2002-12-08 修回日期:2003-03-28 发布日期:2011-02-25
  • 作者简介:贾若祥(1975-),男,山东梁山人,博士研究生。主要从事区域可持续发展和区域经济方面的研究, Email:jiarx@igsnrr.ac.cn。
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金资助项目(40171028);中国科学院知识创新工程资助项目(KZCX2307);中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所知识创新工程前沿领域项目(CX10GB0202)

China’s regional sustainable development status quo and its classification

JIA Ruo xiang1,2, LIU Yi1   

  1. 1. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China;
    2. Graduate School, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100039, China
  • Received:2002-12-08 Revised:2003-03-28 Published:2011-02-25

PDF (PC)

赞

被引次数

160 | 7

摘要：

可持续发展的内涵就是人口、资源和环境的相互协调,目的是谋求社会和经济的持续发展。区域作为可持续发展的载体,在实施可持续发展战略中占据重要地位,它具有明显的区域性、复杂性和相对性等特征。影响区域可持续发展的主要因素有经济发展状况、社会发展状况、资源环境状况和可持续发展能力,据此,本文建立了区域可持续发展状态评价指标体系,对中国31个省市区的可持续发展状态进行了评价,按照评价结果,全国共分为6种不同类型,并得出中国区域可持续发展状态大体呈从沿海→沿边→中部→中西部递减的结论

关键词: 区域可持续发展, 影响因素, 评价指标体系, 类型划分

Abstract:

The essential of sustainable development is the harmonization between population, resources and environment in order to gain the aim of social and economic sustainable development The region, especially at the provincial level, plays a very important role in the implementation of sustainable development strategy China's various provinces (regions) differ greatly both in terms of their natural resources endowment and in terms of their social and economic development To evaluate the sustainable status quo of each province and region properly is of great help to understand China's progress in sustainable development With the reference to various sustainable evaluation systems, a new synthesized sustainable evaluation system, which tries to assess the sustainable development status quo from the facet of economic development, social development, resources endowment & environmental status quo and sustainability is constructed in this article In the process of assigning weight to each factor, an Improved Analysis of Hierarchical Process (IAHP) is adopted, which can both reduce the objectivity of evaluation and simplify the calculation process According to this synthesized sustainable evaluation system, the sustainable status quo of China's 31 provinces (municipalities,autonomous regions) are assessed respectively Then, according to their evaluation score in sustainable development, these provinces (municipalities,autonomous regions) are divided into 6 different types: very high level type, including Shanghai, Beijing, Tianjin, Guangdong; high level type, including Zhejiang, Fujian, Heilongjiang, Liaoning, Jiangsu, Jilin and Shandong; upper middle level type, including Yunnan, Chongqing, Inner Mongolia, Hubei, Guangxi, Shanxi, Xinjiang, Hunan and Hainan; lower middle level type, including Sichuan, Qinghai, Hebei, Ningxia and Gansu; low level type, including Anhui, Henan, Shaanxi and Jiangxi; and very low level type, including Tibet and Guizhou The status quo of China's sustainable development unfold the degression trend of coastal area→along the border→middle part→middle→western part

Key words: regional sustainable development, affecting factors, evaluation system, type classification

PACS: 

  • F127