不同石漠化程度岩溶峰丛洼地系统景观格局的比较

doi:10.11821/yj2005030005

地理研究 ›› 2005, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (3): 371-378.doi: 10.11821/yj2005030005

不同石漠化程度岩溶峰丛洼地系统景观格局的比较

李阳兵^1,2, 王世杰¹, 容丽^1,2

1. 中国科学院地球化学研究所环境地球化学国家重点实验室, 贵阳 550002;
2. 贵州师范大学资源与环境科学系, 贵阳 550001

收稿日期:2004-03-10 修回日期:2004-09-30 出版日期:2005-06-15 发布日期:2005-06-15
作者简介:李阳兵(1968-),重庆潼南人,博士后,副教授。主要研究方向为土地资源与生态环境治理,发表论文30余篇。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(90202003);中国科学院地球化学研究所领域前沿A类资助项目

A comparative researches on landscape pattern changesin different rock desertification peak cluster-depressions

LI Yang-bing^1,2, WANG Shi-jie¹, RONG Li^1,2

1. National Key Laboratory of Environmental Geochemistry, Institute of Geochemistry, CAS, Guiyang 550002, China;
2. Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang 550001, China

Received:2004-03-10 Revised:2004-09-30 Online:2005-06-15 Published:2005-06-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

利用花江岩溶峡谷区南坡不同石漠化程度的5个独立的岩溶峰丛洼地系统景观要素的实测数据,分析了多样性、优势度、破碎度、分离度等景观格局指标的变化规律及其所指示的生态学意义。结果表明,这些指标在不同峰丛洼地系统都能较好地评价石漠化过程中景观格局的动态变化规律,对分析石漠化土地的发展趋势具有较好的指示意义。但多样性指数、优势度指数、均匀度指数也与各峰丛洼地系统的景观基质有关,在不同石漠化程度的峰丛洼地系统中,反映的景观生态意义是不一样的。景观格局分析不仅强调面积,而且还考虑所研究石漠化土地的空间分布特征(格局)、景观组成特点与石漠化过程的关系和对石漠化的影响,在石漠化程度判定和石漠化指标的研究中景观格局是一个不可忽视的问题。

关键词: 景观格局, 石漠化, 花江峡谷区

Abstract:

Karst rocky desertification is a kind of land degradation which has happened in fragile karst mountain ecosystem in Southwest China. The unsuited matching at vertical direction and unreasonable special distribution at horizontal direction of landscape use make the landscape degradation a major problem in karst mountain areas. But little is being understood about the interrelation between the spatial distribution of rocky desertified land and the rocky desertification processes. This paper analyzes the ecological conditions of 5 special peak cluster-depressions which are at different desertification degrees on the southern slope of Huajiang karst gorge based on field investigation, the change of landscape pattern indexes and their ecological significance, in order to understand the ecological spatial character and evolving procedure of karst mountains from landscape ecological viewpoint. Results indicate that the diversity index, dominance index and evenness index relate closely to the landscape matrix of peak cluster-depressions, and show different ecological significance in different rocky desertified peak cluster-depressions. With the increase of rocky desertification intensity, the diversity index is in a decreasing trend while dominance index in an increasing trend significantly, the evenness index decreases firstly and then increases when rocky desertification develops further, the isolation and patch area of naked rock increase gradually but isolation of grasslands, shrub and woodlands increases while their patches area in a reduction. The landscape of potential rocky desertified peak cluster-depressions is even more seriously fragmentized than light and moderate rocky desertified peak cluster-depressions, and fragmentation is most in all peak cluster-depressions. The landscape patterns and development modes of potential rocky desertified and strong rocky desertified peak cluster-depressions represent two typical types of rocky desertification in southwest karst mountain areas. This paper shows that the processes of karst ecosystem rocky desertification depends on the distribution, fragmentation and conjunction, not merely the absolute quantity scale of naked rocks and vegetation. The analysis of landscape pattern emphasizes not only area, but also the relations and influence among rocky desertification processes, the spacial pattern of rocky desertification and landscape element character, therefore, landscape should not be neglected in the studies of rocky desertification degree and indexes, landscape patterns, landscape diversity and patches closely correlating with rocky desertification process must be taken into account in the assessment of the karst rock desertification degrees.

Key words: landscape pattern, rocky desertification, Huajiang karst gorge

李阳兵, 王世杰, 容丽. 不同石漠化程度岩溶峰丛洼地系统景观格局的比较[J]. 地理研究, 2005, 24(3): 371-378.

LI Yang-bing, WANG Shi-jie, RONG Li. A comparative researches on landscape pattern changesin different rock desertification peak cluster-depressions[J]. GEOGRAPHICAL RESEARCH, 2005, 24(3): 371-378.

参考文献

[1] 常学礼,等景观格局在沙漠化研究中的作用中国沙漠,1998,18(3):210～214.
[2] 李锋两个典型荒漠化地区景观多样性变化的比较?景观基质的影响生态学报,2002,22(9):1507～1511.
[3] 陈玉福,等鄂尔多斯高原沙地草地荒漠化景观现状的定量分析环境科学,2002,23(1):87～91.
[4] 张明榆林地区脆弱生态环境的景观格局与演化研究地理研究,2000,19(1):30～36.
[5] A hern J Int eg rat ion of l ands cape ecology and l ands cape design:An evolut ionary pr oces s In:W iens I A,M os s MR(eds)Issues in Landscape E cology Sn owm as s V il lage:Int ernat ional A ssoci at ion for Lan dscape Ecology,1999 119～123.
[6] 赵文智科尔沁沙地人工植被对土壤水分异质性的影响土壤学报,2002,39(1):113～119.
[7] 兰安军,等黔西南脆弱喀斯特生态环境空间格局分析地理研究,2003,22(6):733～741
[8] 肖笃宁,李秀珍景观生态学的学科前沿与发展战略生态学报,2003,23(8):1615～1621
[9] 关文彬,等景观生态恢复与重建是区域生态安全格局构建的关键途径生态学报,2003,23(1):64～73
[10] 卢远,等基于RS和G IS的喀斯特山区景观生态格局山地学报,2002,20(6):727～731.
[11] 张惠远,蔡运龙,等基于TM影像的喀斯特山地景观变化研究山地学报,2000,18(1):18～25.
[12] 张惠远,王仰麟山地景观生态规划?以西南喀斯特地区为例山地学报,2000,18(5):445～452.
[13] 熊康宁,等喀斯特石漠化的遥感-G IS典型研究-以贵州省为例北京:地质出版社,2002.
[14] T urn er M G,Ru cher C Chan ges in landscape patt erns i n G eorgia,U S A Land scape E cology,1988,1(4):241～251.
[15] 肖笃宁景观空间结构的指标体系和研究方法见:肖笃宁主编景观生态学理论、方法及应用北京:中国林业出版社,1991 92～98.
[16] 傅伯杰,等景观生态学原理及应用北京:科学出版社,2002.
[17] 邬建国景观生态学???格局、过程、尺度与等级北京:高等教育出版社,2000.
[18] 肖寒,欧阳志云海南岛景观空间结构分析生态学报,2001,21(1):20～27.
[19] Rao K S,R ek ha Pant Land use dynamics and lan dscape change pat t ern in a ty pical micr o w at ers hed i n t he mid el evati on zon e of cen t ral H imalaya,Indi a A gricul tu re,Ecosys t ems and E nvironment,2001,86:113～123
[20] 兰安军基于GIS R S的贵州喀斯特石漠化空间格局与演化机制研究贵州师范大学硕士学位论文,2003.
[21] 王瑞江,等贵州六盘水石漠化的特点、成因与防治中国岩溶,2001,20(3):211～216.
[22] 吕涛3S技术在贵州喀斯特山区土地石漠化现状调查中的应用中国水土保持,2002,6:26～27.
[23] W ang S hijie,D ianf a Zhang,Li R uiling M echanism of rocky desert if icat ion in t he karst m ount ain areas of Gu izhoup rovin ce,sout hw est C hina Int ernat ional Review f or Environment al S trat egies,2002,3(1):123～135.
[24] M os he Sh achak,M enachem S achs,It shak M oshe Ecosyst em managem ent of des ert if ied shru blands in Israel Ecos yst em s,1998(1):475～483.

不同石漠化程度岩溶峰丛洼地系统景观格局的比较

A comparative researches on landscape pattern changesin different rock desertification peak cluster-depressions

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	吴健生, 罗可雨, 赵宇豪. 深圳市近20年城市景观格局演变及其驱动因素[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(8): 1725-1738.
[2]	李杨帆, 林静玉, 孙翔. 城市区域生态风险预警方法及其在景观生态安全格局调控中的应用[J]. 地理研究, 2017, 36(3): 485-494.
[3]	解雪峰, 濮励杰, 朱明, 许艳, 王小涵, 徐彩瑶, 陈新建. 基于典范对应分析的滨海滩涂围垦区景观格局与土壤盐渍化关系[J]. 地理研究, 2017, 36(3): 495-505.
[4]	欧定华, 夏建国. 基于粒子群算法的大城市近郊区景观格局优化研究——以成都市龙泉驿区为例[J]. 地理研究, 2017, 36(3): 553-572.
[5]	师满江, 颉耀文, 曹琦. 干旱区绿洲农村居民点景观格局演变及机制分析[J]. 地理研究, 2016, 35(4): 692-702.
[6]	欧定华, 夏建国. 城市近郊区景观格局变化特征,潜力与模拟----以成都市龙泉驿区为例[J]. 地理研究, 2016, 35(3): 534-550.
[7]	刘宇. 土壤侵蚀研究中的景观连通度：概念、作用及定量[J]. 地理研究, 2016, 35(1): 195-202.
[8]	哈凯, 丁庆龙, 门明新, 许皞. 山地丘陵区土地利用分布及其与地形因子关系——以河北省怀来县为例[J]. 地理研究, 2015, 34(5): 909-921.
[9]	焦胜, 杨娜, 彭楷, 郭谌达, 李振民, 周怀宇. 沩水流域土地景观格局对河流水质的影响[J]. 地理研究, 2014, 33(12): 2263-2274.
[10]	白军红, 房静思, 黄来斌, 邓伟, 李爱农, 孔博. 白洋淀湖沼湿地系统景观格局演变及驱动力分析[J]. 地理研究, 2013, 32(9): 1634-1644.
[11]	李阳兵, 罗光杰, 程安云, 邵景安, 白晓永, 王世杰. 黔中高原面石漠化演变典型案例研究——以普定后寨河地区为例[J]. 地理研究, 2013, 32(5): 828-838.
[12]	戴君虎, 王红丽, 王焕炯, 刘亚辰, 邵力阳. 六盘山景观格局及与主要气候因子的关系[J]. 地理研究, 2013, 32(12): 2222-2232.
[13]	潘竟虎, 苏有才, 黄永生, 刘晓. 近30年玉门市土地利用与景观格局变化及其驱动力[J]. 地理研究, 2012, 31(9): 1631-1639.
[14]	周年兴, 黄震方, 蒋铭萍, 梁艳艳. 庐山森林景观美学质量与景观格局指数的关系[J]. 地理研究, 2012, 31(7): 1224-1232.
[15]	苗建青, 谢世友, 袁道先, 蒋勇军. 基于农户—生态经济模型的耕地石漠化人文成因研究——以重庆市南川区为例[J]. 地理研究, 2012, 31(6): 967-979.