天津地区表土中蒽和芘的频率分布特征

doi:10.11821/yj2005040010

地理研究 ›› 2005, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (4): 559-564.doi: 10.11821/yj2005040010

天津地区表土中蒽和芘的频率分布特征

段永红, 李本纲, 陶澍, 王学军, 徐福留, 曹军, 刘文新

北京大学环境学院, 地表过程分析与模拟教育部重点实验室, 北京 100871

收稿日期:2004-07-14 修回日期:2004-10-15 出版日期:2005-08-15 发布日期:2005-08-15
通讯作者: 陶澍,教授,博士生导师。E-mail:taos@urban1pku.edu.cn,Tel:010-62751938
作者简介:段永红(1967-),男,山西榆社人,副教授。主要从事环境科学及相关领域的研究。E-mail:yhduan- pku@sina.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(40332015,40021101);国家重点基础研究发展计划(2003CB415004)资助项目

Frequency distributions of anthracene and pyrene in the topsoil of Tianjin

DUAN Yong-hong, LI Ben-gang, TAO Shu, WANG Xue-jun, XU Fu-liu, CAO Jun, LIU Wen-xin

Laboratory for Earth Surface Processes, College of Environmental Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China

Received:2004-07-14 Revised:2004-10-15 Online:2005-08-15 Published:2005-08-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

用频率分析、逐步聚类和最小二乘拟合等方法研究了天津地区表土中蒽和芘含量的频率分布特征。结果表明,两者都呈双峰分布,其中蒽的双峰特征尤为典型。可以用双高斯密度函数很好地拟合经对数变换的实际观测数据,证明天津地区蒽和芘都包括两个相对独立的对数正态分布总体。根据拟合频率密度函数求得的蒽的两个子总体几何均值分别为2.73±2.17ng/g和26.52±1.55ng/g,芘则为11.05±2.11ng/g和82.52±3.24ng/g。芘的两个总体在空间上的分异比蒽更明显,其高值总体主要集中在城区、近郊区和开发区,而蒽的高值总体仅有局部聚集的一般趋势。芘与芘/苯并[a]芘之比的空间分布特征十分相似,表明两个芘含量总体并存的原因与排放源特征有关。

关键词: 土壤, 多环芳烃, 蒽, 芘, 多态分布

Abstract:

Frequency distributions of contaminants in special medium can reflect from one profile its macroscopic statistic characteristics, and can also supply necessary basic information for the classical, multivariate and spacial statistic analysis, so as to ensure basic needs to all kinds of methods for statistic analytical data.So for special studies on statistic distribution characteristics of PAH content with large numbers of specimen in a vast region have been rarely seen. Characteristics of frequency distributions of anthracene and pyrene in the topsoil of Tianjin, China, which was polluted seriously by PAHs, were studied based on frequency analysis, K-Means clustering and least-square fitting. It was demonstrated that both anthracene and pyrene, especially the former, are bimodally distributed. Double gaussian function can be used to fit the empirical distribution well after log-transformation, suggesting the presence of two independent lognormally distributed populations for either anthracene or pyrene. The geometric means of the two populations were 2.73±2.17 ng/g and 26.52±1.55ng/g for anthracene and 11.05±2.11ng/g and 82.52±3.24ng/g for pyrene. Hereby, the research which adopts two-division-methods and three-division-methods indicates: that the spatial separation of the two pyrene populations is explicitely illustrated by symbol mapping, showing that the indiviudals of the high value population clustered in urban, near-suburb, and newly developed industrial areas.For anthracene, there is a tendency of local clustering. Besides, the similarity between the spatial distribution patterns of pyrene and pyrene/benzo\pyrene ratio suggests that the dual-modal distribution of pyrene was emission-source related. Fitting and separating methods of multi-modal distributions mentioned above provided methodological grounds for deep probing into their differences and origins of the distributive characteristics of different PAHs.

Key words: soil, PAH, anthracene, pyrene, multi-modal distributions

段永红, 李本纲, 陶澍, 王学军, 徐福留, 曹军, 刘文新. 天津地区表土中蒽和芘的频率分布特征[J]. 地理研究, 2005, 24(4): 559-564.

DUAN Yong-hong, LI Ben-gang, TAO Shu, WANG Xue-jun, XU Fu-liu, CAO Jun, LIU Wen-xin. Frequency distributions of anthracene and pyrene in the topsoil of Tianjin[J]. GEOGRAPHICAL RESEARCH, 2005, 24(4): 559-564.

参考文献

[1] Wang X L,Tao S,Xu F L,et al1 Modeling t he fate of benzo
[a]pyrene in t he wastewater-irrigated areas of Tianjinwit h a f ugacit y model1- Journal of Environmental Quality,2002,31(3):896～903.
[2] 郑一,王学军,李本纲,等.天津地区表层土壤多环芳烃含量的中尺度空间结构特征.环境科学学报,2003,23(3):311～316.
[3] 王学军,任丽然,戴永宁,等.天津市不同土地利用类型土壤中多环芳烃的含量特征.地理研究,2003,22(3):360～366.
[4] 孙韧,朱坦.天津局部地区大气颗粒物上多环芳烃分布状态.环境科学研究,2000,13(4):14～17.
[5] 崔艳红.土壤中多环芳烃对植物的生物有效性.北京:北京大学环境学院,2003.
[6] Ames M,Gullu G,Olmez I. At mosp heric mercury in t he vapor p hase,and in fine and coarse particulate mat ter atPerch River,New York. At mospheric Environment,1998,32(5):865～872.
[7] Beier R. Calculation of expected air qualit y parameters based on monitoring result s and modelling of planned additional sources. Gefahrstoffe Reinhal Tung Der Luft,1999,59(4):143～149.
[8] Kishne A S,Bringmark E,Bringmark L,et al1 Co mparison of ordinary and lognormal kriging on skewed data oftotal cadmium in forest soils of Sweden1 Environmental Monitoring and Assessment,2003,84(3):243～263.
[9] Welp G,Liebe F,Helf rich H P,et al. Inorganic toxicant s in soils of Nort h Rhine Westp halia1 I1 Evaluation ofmulti-modal frequency distributions1 Zeit schrift fur Pflanzenernahrung und Bodenkunde,1998,161(3):205～210.
[10] Wolf gang Wilcke1 Polycyclic aro matic hydrocarbons(PA Hs)in soil-a review. Journal of Plant Nut rition and SoilScience,2000,163(3):229～248.
[11] Cousins I T,Gevao B,Jones K C1 Measuring and modelling t he vertical dist ribution of semivolatile organic compounds in soils. I:PCB and PA H soil core data. Chemosphere,1999,39(14):2507～2518.
[12] Brandt C A,Becker J M,Porta A. Dist ribution of polycyclic aro matic hydrocarbons in soils and terrest rial biota after a spill of crude oil in Trecate,Italy1 Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry,2002,21(8):1638～1643.
[13] Muller S,Wilcke W,Kanchanakool N,Zech W. Polycyclic aro matic hydrocarbons(PA HS)and polychlorinatedbip henyls(PCBS)in particle2size separates of urban soils in Bangko k,Thailand1 Soil Science,2000,165(5):412～419.
[14] Nam J J,Song B H,Eo m K C,et al1 Dist ribution of polycyclic aro matic hydrocarbons in agricult ural soils in Sout hKorea. Chemosphere,2003,50:1281～1289.
[15] Wang X J,Zheng Y,Liu R M,et al1 Kriging and PA H pollution assessment in t he top soil of Tianjin area1Bulletinof Environmental Contamination and Toxicology,2003,71(1):189～195.
[16] 赵振华,等.多环芳烃的环境健康化学.北京:中国科学技术出版社,19931 13～17.

天津地区表土中蒽和芘的频率分布特征

Frequency distributions of anthracene and pyrene in the topsoil of Tianjin

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	张兆彤, 李源, 刘国宏, 朱倩倩, 许咏梅. 新疆昌吉州耕地土壤有机质空间变异动态研究[J]. 地理研究, 2021, 40(3): 643-656.
[2]	许咏梅, 周黎明, 张兆彤. 新疆昌吉州耕地开垦轨迹对土壤肥力变化的影响[J]. 地理研究, 2021, 40(3): 657-672.
[3]	李晓强, 董炜华, 宋扬. 路域农田大型土壤动物对公路运营过程重金属累积的响应[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(12): 2842-2854.
[4]	车存伟, 张明军, 王圣杰, 杜勤勤, 马转转, 孟鸿飞, 瞿德业. 基于氢氧稳定同位素的兰州市南北两山土壤蒸发时空变化及影响因素研究[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(11): 2537-2551.
[5]	徐国良, 文雅, 蔡少燕, 罗小凤. 城市表层土壤对生态健康影响研究述评[J]. 地理研究, 2019, 38(12): 2941-2956.
[6]	赵海鹏, 宋宏权, 刘鹏飞, 李霄阳, 王团徽. 1980—2015年风蚀影响下中国北方土壤有机质与养分流失时空特征[J]. 地理研究, 2019, 38(11): 2778-2789.
[7]	史静静, 杨琳, 曾灿英, 朱阿兴, 秦承志, 梁朋. 土壤制图中多目标属性的环境因子及其尺度选择——以黑龙江鹤山农场为例[J]. 地理研究, 2018, 37(3): 635-646.
[8]	赵明松, 李德成, 张甘霖, 王世航. 1980-2010年安徽省土壤有机碳密度及储量时空变化分析[J]. 地理研究, 2018, 37(11): 2206-2217.
[9]	周建, 张凤荣, 徐艳, 高阳, 张佰林, 李超. 基于降水量与土壤类型的北方农牧交错区土地利用/覆被格局及变化分析——以科尔沁左翼后旗为例[J]. 地理研究, 2017, 36(7): 1210-1222.
[10]	安雪丽, 武建军, 周洪奎, 李小涵, 刘雷震, 杨建华. 土壤相对湿度在东北地区农业干旱监测中的适用性分析[J]. 地理研究, 2017, 36(5): 837-849.
[11]	解雪峰, 濮励杰, 朱明, 许艳, 王小涵, 徐彩瑶, 陈新建. 基于典范对应分析的滨海滩涂围垦区景观格局与土壤盐渍化关系[J]. 地理研究, 2017, 36(3): 495-505.
[12]	郝梦雅, 任志远, 孙艺杰, 赵胜男. 关中盆地生态系统服务的权衡与协同关系动态分析[J]. 地理研究, 2017, 36(3): 592-602.
[13]	董立宽, 方斌. 茶园土壤重金属乡镇尺度下空间异质性分析——以江浙优质名茶种植园为例[J]. 地理研究, 2017, 36(2): 391-404.
[14]	祁威, 张镱锂, 刘林山, 王兆锋, 丁明军, 赵志龙. 羌塘高原核心区2013-2014年土壤温度变化特征[J]. 地理研究, 2017, 36(11): 2075-2087.
[15]	王兆锋, 张镱锂, 刘林山, 赵志龙, 祁威. 羌塘高原高寒湖盆区土壤属性分异特征研究——以查日那足山麓至湖滨地区为例[J]. 地理研究, 2017, 36(11): 2088-2100.