地理研究

地理研究 ›› 2005, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (6): 982-991.doi: 10.11821/yj2005060018

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

杭州城区“最具出游力”人群休闲旅游障碍性因素的实证分析

陈世斌   

  1. 1. 陕西师范大学旅游与环境学院, 西安 710062;
    2. 浙江财经学院工商管理学院, 杭州 310012
  • 收稿日期:2005-04-08 修回日期:2005-08-01 出版日期:2005-12-15 发布日期:2005-12-15
  • 作者简介:陈世斌(1960-),男,哈尔滨人,浙江财经学院工商管理学院教授,陕西师范大学旅游与环境学院博 士生。研究方向:自然地理、旅游管理、区域经济等。E-mail:Steven1960@zj.com
  • 基金资助:

    浙江省自然科学基金项目(402032);浙江省哲学社会科学规划课题(N04YJ08)联合资助

Demonstrative research onthe impeditive factors of leisure tourism forthe maximal emissivenes residents in Hangzhou

CHEN Shi-bin   

  1. 1. Tourism and Environment School, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an, 710062, China;
    2. Business Administration College, Zhejiang University of Finance &|Economics, Hangzhou 310012, China
  • Received:2005-04-08 Revised:2005-08-01 Online:2005-12-15 Published:2005-12-15

PDF (PC)

赞

摘要：

休闲旅游作为一种旅游方式和休闲活动内容越来越受到重视，通过对杭州市“最具出游力”人群调查，运用旅游地理学分析方法发现，影响他们进行休闲旅游的因素最重要的是时间因素、交通因素和学习因素，传统观点中的经济因素地位明显下降；同时分析了不同职业、性别和年龄人员中各因素作用的差异。这种实证性的调查分析方法和结论对于休闲旅游理论和杭州市休闲产业的发展都有一定意义。

关键词: 杭州城区, “最具出游力”, 休闲旅游, 障碍性因素, 实证研究

Abstract:

The study was carried out based on the method of combining theoretical analysis with demonstrative research. In demonstrative research, questionnaires were designed and distributed. The subjects of the study mainly belonged to the wealthy class people of the maximal emissivenes in the urban district of Hangzhou, who hadn't been involved in leisure tourism for 3 or 4 weeks on end. The major content of the questionnaire included 32 items under, 7 sections-they were financial factor, factor of time, transportation factor, psychological factor, safety factor, learning factor and other factors. Of all the questionnaires, 551 copies were effective. Based on the analysis, the following conclusion was made:The impeditive factors influencing leisure tourism of the maximal emissivenes residents in the city of Hangzhou were mainly the factor of time and traffic factor, the latter was closely related to the former factor, and next to them came the learning factor. As to the specific factors, the chief of all was that the interviewees had jobs, indicating that they were under great pressure. Most of the interviewees preferred traveling by bus, but such factors as the limited number and no direct bus constituted the most important barrier. To the people of different professions, factors were complicated, but among them time, transportation and learning pressure were considered first. In the aspect of sex, men were restricted by time, transportation and study pressure, while women, besides time which was similar with men, gave more concern to transportation and safety factors. The influence of impeditive factors on people of different age groups was relatively complicated. Students had more study pressure, middle-aged people had limited time, and the elderly might worry more about transportation. As to education, the most impeditive factors were that of time, transportation and safety.

Key words: urban district in Hangzhou, maximal emissivenes, leisure tourism, impeditive factors, demonstrative research