闽台建设用地变化与工业化耦合的对比分析

doi:10.11821/yj2006010011

地理研究 ›› 2006, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (1): 87-95.doi: 10.11821/yj2006010011

闽台建设用地变化与工业化耦合的对比分析

韦素琼¹, 陈健飞²

1. 福建师范大学自然资源研究中心,福州350007;
2. 广州大学地理科学学院,广州510405

收稿日期:2005-05-12 修回日期:2005-09-28 出版日期:2006-02-15 发布日期:2006-02-15
通讯作者: 陈健飞,教授。E-mail:cjf@gzhu.edu.cn
作者简介:韦素琼(1965-),女,福建屏南人,副教授,博士。主要从事经济地理、土地资源与规划等教学、科研工作。E-mail:suqiongwei@126.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(40371054);福建省科技厅重大攻关项目(2003I002);福建省自然科学基金项目(D0510014);海峡西岸资源环境创新能力建设项目

A comparative research of coupled construction land change and industrialization between Fujian and Taiwan provinces

WEI Su-qiong¹, CHEN Jian-fei²

1. Research Center of Natural Resources,Fujian Normal University,Fuzhou 350007,China;
2. College of Geographical Sciences,Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510405,China

Received:2005-05-12 Revised:2005-09-28 Online:2006-02-15 Published:2006-02-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

闽台因其区域自然背景及历史文化的相似性和经济发展时序递差性成为区域对比研究的理想对象之一。利用闽台相关统计资料对比显示,闽台建设用地增长速度均体现出加速发展的态势,并集中分布于台湾海峡两岸,与两岸的经济布局成东西呼应格局。从福建不同工业化区域以及台湾工业化阶段对比,闽台建设用地综合变动系数均经历了由工业化初期的稳定型或相对稳定型发展到工业化中期的剧变型,并于工业化后期步入缓变型的过程,但福建工业化初期及后期的综合变动系数值略低于台湾。相关指标对比研究结果显示:相对于台湾而言福建产业结构变动率快于建设用地变化率,但福建工业化中期及后期区域的建设用地效率还明显低于台湾。通径分析的结果说明闽台建设用地变化的差异与两地经济发展阶段及产业结构密切相关。文章最后提出福建建设用地实现可持续利用的发展对策。

关键词: 建设用地, 工业化, 耦合, 闽台

Abstract:

Comparative study of LUCC between Fujian and Taiwan could be a good case for study because of their geographical proximities and historical,cultural similarities.Fujian and Taiwan had gone through and were in different economic development phases.Taiwan is in the stage of post-industrialization and Fujian is in the middle stage of industrialization. By using the official statistics,changes of construction land in Fujian and Taiwan were analyzed.The results showed that these two provinces seemed to have the same characteristics of constructionland changes,i.e.,accelerating development,and concentrated distribution on both sides of the Taiwan Straits,forming a pattern with the economic layout of two sides acting in cooperation with each other.From the contrast of different industrialized areas in Fujian with Taiwan industrialized stages,it is clear that these two provinces seemed to have the same characteristics of synthesized index of construction land change(Lc),i.e.,from stabilization or comparative stabilization at the initial stages of industrialization to high expansion at the middle stages of industrialization,then followed by low expansion at later stages of industrialization,but the Lc of the initial and the later stages of industrialization in Taiwan was slightly higher than that in Fujian.Relevant indexes are compared with the result of the study and shown: The industrial structure change rate of Fujian is faster than that of the construction land in Taiwan,but the construction land efficiency of the area is also obviously lower than Taiwan in the middle and later stages of industrialization in Fujian.The major driving forces of the constructionland changes in both provinces were analyzed in Causal Models of Path Analysis,the result indicates that the difference in construction land change of the two provinces is closely related to their economic development stage and industrial structure.Countermeasure for the realization of sustainable utilization of construction land in Fujian put forward in this article is to strengthen intension and tap the latent power.

Key words: constraction land, industrialization, coupling, Fujian and Taiwan

韦素琼, 陈健飞. 闽台建设用地变化与工业化耦合的对比分析[J]. 地理研究, 2006, 25(1): 87-95.

WEI Su-qiong, CHEN Jian-fei. A comparative research of coupled construction land change and industrialization between Fujian and Taiwan provinces[J]. GEOGRAPHICAL RESEARCH, 2006, 25(1): 87-95.

参考文献

[1] 　L pez E,Bocco G,Mendoza M,Duhau E. Prediciting land-cover and land-use change in t he urban:a case in More-lia cit y,Mexico. Landscape and Urban Planning,2001,55:271～285.

[2] 　Pontius J r Robert Gilmore,Huffaker Diana,Denman Kevin. U sef ul techniques of validation for spatially explicitland2change models. Ecological Modelling,2004,179:445～461.

[3] 　胡序威,周一星,顾朝林.中国沿海城镇密集地区空间集聚与扩散研究.北京:科学出版社,2000.

[4] 　刘纪远,张增祥,庄大方.20世纪90年代中国土地利用变化时空特征及其成因分析.地理研究,2003,22(1):1～12.

[5] 　余庆年,赵登辉.我国各级城市用地规模和理性的比较研究.中国人口·资源与环境,2001,11(2):39～42.

[6] 　吴健平,邓悦,等.城市土地利用演变信息的数据挖掘———以上海市为例.地理研究,2002,21(6):675～682.

[7] 　李晓文,方精云,朴世龙1上海及周边主要城镇城市用地扩展空间特征及其比较1地理研究,2003,22(6):699～779.

[8] 　福建省统计局.福建统计年鉴.北京:中国统计出版社,1996～2003.

[9] 　韦素琼,陈健飞.闽台耕地非农化及关联因子的比较研究1自然资源学报,2004,19(5):568～576.

[10] 　刘登翰.中华文化与闽台社会———闽台文化关系论纲.福州:福建人民出版社,2002. 162～169.

[11] 　韦素琼,陈健飞.闽台经济发展阶段辨析.福建师范大学学报(哲社版),2004,129(6):41～45.

[12] 　刘再兴主编.区域经济理论与方法.北京:中国物价出版社,1996.

[13] 　Ro stow W W1 The stages of economic growt h:a non2co mmunist manifesto1 Cambridge,1960.

[14] 　刘迎秋,王光伟,谷书堂,等.经济和谐论———社会主义市场经济持续协调稳定发展研究.北京:中国经济出版社,1993.

[15] 　Chenery H B,Elkington H,Sims C. A uniform analysis of develop ment pattern. Harvard Universit y Center forInternational Affairs. Economic Development Report,Cambridge,Mass,1970. 148.

[16] 　Syrquin M,Chenery H B. Three decades of indust rialization. The World Bank Economic Reviews,1989,13:152～153.

[17] 　张文忠,王传胜,吕昕,等.珠江三角洲土地利用变化与工业化和城市化的耦合关系.地理学报,2003,58(5):677～685.

[18] 　郭志刚主编.社会统计分析方法———SPSS软件应用.北京:中国人民大学出版社,1999:1452.75.

[19] 　Alden Speare,J r. Paul K C Liu,Ching-L ung Tsay. Urbanization and Develop ment-The Rural2Urban Transitionin Taiwan. Westview Press,1988.

[20] 　Zhai Guofang,Saburo Ikeda1 An empirical model of land use change in China1 The Appilied Regional Science Con-ference,2000,12(1):36～53.

[21] 　Graham E Jo hnson,Yuen-fong Woon. Rural develop ment patterns in post2reform China:The Pearl River Delta re2gion in t he 1990s. Development and Change,1997,28:731～751.

[22] 　Zhu Yu. In sit u urbanization in rural China:case st udies f rom Fujian Province. Develop ment and Change,2000,31:413～434.

闽台建设用地变化与工业化耦合的对比分析

A comparative research of coupled construction land change and industrialization between Fujian and Taiwan provinces

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	游猎, 王睿. 特大城市郊区建设用地效益比较研究——以天津市11个市郊区县为例[J]. 地理研究, 2021, 40(3): 793-807.
[2]	刘焱序, 傅伯杰, 王帅, 李琰, 赵文武, 李长嘉. 旱区人地耦合系统水-粮食-生态关联研究述评[J]. 地理研究, 2021, 40(2): 541-555.
[3]	冯锐, 高菠阳, 陈钰淳, 张婷婷. 粤港澳大湾区科技金融耦合度及其影响因素研究[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(9): 1972-1986.
[4]	刘逸, 纪捷韩, 张一帆, 杨宇. 粤港澳大湾区经济韧性的特征与空间差异研究[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(9): 2029-2043.
[5]	李琼, 赵阳, 李松林, 李湘玲. 中国社会保障与经济发展耦合的时空特征及驱动力分析[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(6): 1401-1417.
[6]	邓伟, 张少尧, 张昊, 彭立, 刘颖. 人文自然耦合视角下过渡性地理空间概念、内涵与属性和研究框架[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(4): 761-771.
[7]	李正, 武友德, 廖亚辉, 胡平平. 中日韩在东盟制造业价值链的参与特征及耦合关系——基于TiVA数据库的实证[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(3): 539-553.
[8]	张改素, 魏建飞, 丁志伟. 中国镇域工业化和城镇化综合水平的空间格局特征及其影响因素[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(3): 627-650.
[9]	范擎宇, 杨山, 胡信. 耦合视角下长三角地区城镇化协调度的时空特征及交互机制[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(2): 289-302.
[10]	马海涛, 卢硕, 张文忠. 京津冀城市群城镇化与创新的耦合过程与机理[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(2): 303-318.
[11]	刘清, 杨永春, 蒋小荣. 全球价值生产的空间组织：以苹果手机供应链为例[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(12): 2743-2762.
[12]	李建豹,黄贤金,孙树臣,揣小伟. 长三角地区城市土地与能源消费CO₂排放的时空耦合分析[J]. 地理研究, 2019, 38(9): 2188-2201.
[13]	郭向阳, 穆学青, 明庆忠, 丁正山, 胡美娟. 旅游地快速交通优势度与旅游流强度的空间耦合分析[J]. 地理研究, 2019, 38(5): 1119-1135.
[14]	李志龙. 乡村振兴-乡村旅游系统耦合机制与协调发展研究——以湖南凤凰县为例[J]. 地理研究, 2019, 38(3): 643-654.
[15]	杨忍, 陈燕纯, 龚建周. 转型视阈下珠三角地区乡村发展过程及地域模式梳理[J]. 地理研究, 2019, 38(3): 725-740.