GIS支持下的澜沧江流域云南段土壤侵蚀空间分析

doi:10.11821/yj2006030007

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

利用ArcView3.2和ARC/INF08.1软件,通过图层叠加、统计分析和缓冲区分析等,提取西南纵向岭谷区澜沧江流域云南段的不同类型和强度的土壤侵蚀与地形坡度、土地利用/土地覆盖现状、土壤类型和分布、大雨日数以及河流、道路两侧的缓冲区等的相应数据,计算出土壤侵蚀综合度。结果表明,研究区不同坡度等级中,15°²5°坡度上的土壤侵蚀最强,其次为8°¹5°坡地和4°⁸°坡地;>25°坡地上则较小;不同用地类型的土壤侵蚀程度不同,总体上,旱耕坡地的土壤侵蚀较草地严重,而草地又较林地严重;在各种土壤类型中,黄壤和石灰土的土壤侵蚀最为突出,其次为红壤、黄棕壤和南方水稻土等;河流两侧和道路两侧的土壤侵蚀都较整个流域要严重,而河流两侧又略重于道路两侧;当多年平均大雨日数小于20日时,土壤侵蚀程度基本上随大雨日数的增加而增加;当大雨日数大于20日时,土壤侵蚀程度反而较小,原因在于前期大雨冲刷侵蚀,带走了地表的疏松物质。研究结果可为有针对性地防治水土流失、减少河流泥沙和水库淤积提供依据。

关键词: 纵向岭谷区, 澜沧江流域云南段, 土壤侵蚀综合度, 空间分析

Abstract:

By map overlapping,statistic analysis and buffer analytical methods,data of soil erosion and terrain slope,land use/land cover situation,soil type and distribution,annual average downfall days, buffer zone of a river and buffer zone of a road in Lancang River drainage area of Yunnan in Southwest China′s longitudinal mountain range were obtained under the support of Arcview 3.2 and Arc/Info 8.1;then the corresponding soil erosion synthesized indexes of each factor were calculated.The results indicated that: a) In the case of different slope gradients,soil erosion at 15°²5° is the strongest,at 8°¹5° and 4°⁸° is intermediate and >25° is the weakest. b) The order of the descending degrees of soil erosion of different land use types is steep dryland,hilly dryland,middle coverage grassland,mountainous dryland,high cover age grassland,mountainous paddy field,sparse woodland,shrub land,woodland;and in general,erosion on sloping dryland is more serious than that on grassland,and grassland is more serious than woodland.c)Among various soil types,erosion on yellow soil and lime soil is most prominent,besides them are red soil,yellow brown soil,paddy soil,brown soil,dark brown forest soil,laterite soil,brown soil,lateritic red soil and black clay soil.d)Erosion in river buffer and road buffer areas is more serious than that of the entire region,and is a little stronger in river buffer than in road buffer.e) When the number of downfall days is less than 20 annually,soil erosion degree increases along with the increase of downfall days.Whereas when downfall days exceed 20 annually,erosion degree is relatively low because the antecedent rain wash has swept off loose materials on the earth's surface.Overall,the result can provide scientific basis for preventing soil and water loss and of reducing river and reservoir sediment.

Key words: longitudinal range-gorge region, Lancang River Drainage Area in Yunnan Province, soil erosion synthesized index, spatial analysis

姚华荣, 杨志峰, 崔保山. GIS支持下的澜沧江流域云南段土壤侵蚀空间分析[J]. 地理研究, 2006, 25(3): 421-429.

YAO Hua-rong, YANG Zhi-feng, CUI Bao-shan. Spatial analysis on soil erosion of Lancang River Watershed in Yunnan Province under the support of GIS[J]. GEOGRAPHICAL RESEARCH, 2006, 25(3): 421-429.

参考文献

[1] 　王占礼,彭珂珊.我国土壤侵蚀状况与主要影响因素研究.生态经济,1999,(5):48～51.

[2] 　Navas A,Machin J,Soto J. Assessing soil erosion in a Pyrenean Mountain catchment using GIS and fallout .37 Cs.Agricult ure,Eco systems and Environment,2005,105:493～506.

[3] 　Bewket W,Sterk G1 Assessment of soil erosion in cultivated fields using a survey met hodology for rills in t he Che2moga Watershed,Et hiopia1 Agriculture,Ecosystems and Environment,2003,97:81～93.

[4] 　Fulajtar E. Assessment of soil erosion on arable land using .37 Cs measurement s:a case st udy f ro m J aslovske Bohu2nice,Slovakia. Soil&Tillage Research,2003,69:139～152.

[5] 　Zhang Bin,Yang Yansheng,Zepp H1 Effect of vegetation restoration on soil and water ero sion and nut rient lo ssesof a severely eroded clayey Plint hudult in sout heastern China1 Catena,2004,57:77～90.

[6] 　Barton A P,Fullen M A,Mitchell D J,et al. Effect s of soil conservation measures on erosion rates and crop p ro2ductivit y on subt ropical ultisols in Yunnan Province. China Agriculture,Ecosystems and Environment,2004,(104):343～357.

[7] 　Hartanto H,Prabhu R,Anggoro S E,et al1 Factors affecting runoff and soil ero sion:plot2level soil lo ss monito2ring for assessing sustainabilit y of forest management1 Forest Ecology and Management,2003,180:361～374.

[8] 　L undekvam H E,Ro mstad E,Oygarden L. Agricult ural policies in Norway and effect s on soil erosion. Environ2mental Science&Policy,2003,6:57～67.

[9] 　Silva J R M D,Soares J M C N,Karlen D L1 Implement and soil condition effect s on tillage2induced ero sion1 Soil&Tillage Research,2004,78:207～216.

[10] 　朱连奇,许叔明,陈沛云.山区土地利用/土地覆被变化对土壤侵蚀的影响.地理研究,2003,22(4):432～438.

[11] 　王文龙,雷阿林,李占斌,等1黄土丘陵区坡面薄层水流侵蚀动力机制实验研究1水利学报,2003,(9):66～70.

[12] 　夏艳华,张平仓.基于侵蚀力学机制的流域土壤侵蚀模型研究———以长江三峡库区王家桥流域为例.水土保持学报,2003,17(1):152～154,172.

[13] 　张平仓,杨勤科.长江中上游地区土壤侵蚀机制及过程试验研究.长江流域资源与环境,2002,11(4):376～382.

[14] 　唐克丽.土壤侵蚀环境演变与全球变化及防灾减灾的机制.土壤与环境,1999,8(2):81～86.

[15] 　付炜.土壤侵蚀成因机制分析与模拟.干旱区研究,1997,14(4):44～51.

[16] 　马力,杨新民.不同土地利用模式下土壤侵蚀空间演化模拟.水土保持通报,2003,23(1):49～51.

[17] 　张丽萍,朱大奎,杨达源.黄河中游土壤侵蚀与下游古河道三角洲演化的过程响应.地理科学,2001,21(1):52～56.

[18] 　王玉玺,刘凤飞.黑龙江省土壤侵蚀的垂直分布规律研究.水土保持科技情报,2004,(3):3～4.

[19] 　许峰,郭索彦. 20世纪末中国土壤侵蚀的空间分布特征.地理学报,2003,58(1):139～146.

[20] 　田光进,张增祥.中国耕地土壤侵蚀空间分布特征及生态背景.生态学报,2002,22(1):10～16.

[21] 　张汉雄.晋陕黄土丘陵区土地利用与土壤侵蚀动态机制仿真研究.生态学报,1997,42(7):743～746.

[22] 　王思远,刘纪远,张增祥,等.不同土地利用背景下土壤侵蚀空间分布规律研究.水土保持学报,2001,15(3):48～51.

[23] 　张宗祜.黄土高原土壤侵蚀基本规律.第四纪研究,1993,(1):34～40.

[24] 　杨武德,王兆骞,眭国平,等.红壤坡地不同土地利用方式土壤侵蚀的时空分布规律研究.应用生态学报,1998,9(2):155～158.

[25] 　Angima S D,Stott D E,O’Neill M K,et al1 Soil erosion p rediction using RU SL E for Cent ral Kenyan HighlandConditions1 Agriculture,Ecosystems and Environment,2003,97:295～308.

[26] 　L ufafa A,Tenywa M M,Isabirye M,et al. Prediction of soil erosion in a Lake Victoria Basin Catchment using aGIS2based Universal Soil Loss Model. Agricultural Systems,2003,76:883～894.

[29] 　贾媛媛,郑粉莉1黄土丘陵沟壑区小流域水蚀预报模型构建1水土保持通报,2004,24(2):5～7.

[30] 　张岩,袁建平.土壤侵蚀预报模型中的植被覆盖与管理因子研究进展.应用生态学报,2002,3(8):1033～1036.

[31] 　郑粉莉,刘峰.土壤侵蚀预报模型研究进展.水土保持通报,2001,21(6):16～18.

[32] 　刘宝元,张科利.土壤可蚀性及其在侵蚀预报中的应用.自然资源学报,1999,14(4):345～350.

[33] 　吴发启,赵晓光1黄土高原南部坡耕地土壤侵蚀预报1土壤侵蚀与水土保持学报,1998,4(2):72～76.

[34] 　刘前进,蔡强国.黄土区不同空间尺度土壤侵蚀预报模型研究.中国水土保持,2004,(7):3～15.

[35] 　卫海燕,张科利1分布式侵蚀预报模型中网格面积的选定—以黄土高原丘陵沟壑区为例1地理研究,2002,21(5):578～584.

[36] 　李友.尼尔斯水利枢纽工程土壤侵蚀分区及控制.水土保持研究,1999,6(2):114～116.

[37] 　尤联元.澜沧江流域河流泥沙发展趋势初步研究.地理学报,1999,54(增刊):93～100.

[38] 　杨存建,刘纪远,张增祥.重庆市土壤侵蚀及其背景的空间分析.水土保持学报,2000,14(3):84～87.

[39] 　水利部天津水利水电勘测设计研究院.云南土壤侵蚀遥感图. 1999.

[40] 　王秀英,曹文洪,陈东.土壤侵蚀与地表坡度关系研究.泥沙研究,1998,(2):36～41.

[41] 　胡世雄,靳长兴.坡面土壤侵蚀临界坡度问题的理论与实验研究.地理学报,1999,54(4):347～356.

[42] 　刘纪远1中国资源环境遥感调查与动态研究.北京:气象出版社,1996.

[43] 　唐川,朱静等.云南滑坡泥石流研究.北京:商务印书馆,2003.

[44] 　卢金发,黄秀华.土地覆被对黄河中游流域泥沙产生的影响.地理研究,2003,22(5):171～178.

[45] 　肖寒,欧阳志云,王效科,等. GIS支持下的海南岛土壤侵蚀空间分布特征.土壤侵蚀与水土保持学报,1999,5(4):75～80.

[46] 　杨武德,王兆骞,眭国平,等.红壤坡地不同土地利用方式土壤侵蚀的时空分布规律研究.应用生态学报,1998,9(2):155～158.

[47] 　卢金发.黄河中游流域地貌形态对流域产沙量的影响.地理研究,2002,21(2):171～178.

[48] 　陈浩,周金星,陆中臣,等.黄河中游流域环境要素对水沙变异的影响.地理研究,2002,21(2):179～187.

[49] 　Renschler C S,Harbor J. Soil ero sion assessment tools f rom point to regional scales:t he role of geomorp hologist sin land management research and implementation. Geomorphology,2002,47:189～209.

[50] 　Shi W Z,Ehlers M. Determining uncertainties and t heir p ropagation in dynamic change detection bases on classifiedremote sensed images. Int.J. Remote Sensing,#1996,17(4):1100～1117.

[51] 　靳长兴.坡度在坡面侵蚀中的作用.地理研究,1996,15(3):57～63.

[52] 　陈浩,王开章.黄河中游小流域坡沟侵蚀关系研究.地理研究,.999,.8(4):363～372.