地理研究 ›› 2007, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (1): 141-148.doi: 10.11821/yj2007010018

• 城市与乡村 • 上一篇    下一篇

从事旅游业者对旅游影响认知水平的测量

程占红1,2,3, 吴必虎3, 牛莉芹4   

  1. 1. 山西财经大学旅游管理学院,太原 030012;
    2. 山西大学黄土高原研究所,太原 030006;
    3. 北京大学旅游研究与规划中心,北京 100871;
    4. 山西财经大学环境经济系,太原 030006
  • 收稿日期:2005-11-18 修回日期:2006-04-23 出版日期:2007-01-25 发布日期:2007-01-25
  • 作者简介:程占红 (1972-),男,山西新绛人,博士,副教授。从事生态旅游研究。E-mail :chengzh@sxu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金资助项目 (40371036)

Measurement and analysis on the perception of the residents engaging in tourism industry and its impact

CHENG Zhan-hong1,2,3, WU Bi-hu3, NIU Li-qin4   

  1. 1. College of Tourism Management,Shanxi University of Finance and Economy,Taiyuan 030012, China;
    2. Institute of Loess Plateau, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, China;
    3. Center for Recreation and Tourism Research, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China;
    4. Department of Environment Economy,Shanxi University of Finance and Economy,Taiyuan 030006, China
  • Received:2005-11-18 Revised:2006-04-23 Online:2007-01-25 Published:2007-01-25
  • Supported by:

    国家自然科学基金资助项目 (40371036)

摘要: 本文以芦芽山自然保护区为例,采用TWINSPAN和DCA对从事旅游业者对旅游影响程度的认知水平进行了分析。结果表明: (1)TWINSPAN是一种较好的数量分类方法,将32个样本分为成熟积极型、非成熟积极型、退却型和冷漠型4组; (2)DCA第一轴主要反映了样本的性别和收入特征,第二轴反映了样本的受教育程度; (3)优势因子的分布格局在很大程度上决定着样本类型的分布格局; (4)TWINSPAN分类的结果与DCA排序的结果基本一致,具有良好的可比性。它们都客观地反映出从事旅游业者对旅游影响认知水平的生态关系。

关键词: 从事旅游业者, 旅游影响, TWINSPAN, DCA, 芦芽山

Abstract: To study residents’ perception toward tourism impact is of practical significance for developing tourism industry.Taking Luya Mountains Nature Reserve as a case, the background characteristics of the residents engaging in tourism industry and the perception toward 27 indices about tourism impact are investigated on the spot, and the relationship between their characteristics and the perception level is analyzed by two-way indicator species analysis (TWINSPAN) and detrended correspondence analysis (DCA) in the paper.The results show that: (1) TWINSPAN is a kind of better classifying way, and can divide 32 samples into mature and active group, immature and active group, retreating group and apathy group. (2) Each group has its own distribution area and borderline on the DCA ordination figure. Axis 1 of DCA reflects the samples' sex and income mainly, and Axis 2 shows their education level. (3) The distribution pattern of dominant factors decides on the distribution pattern of the samples' groups to a great extent. (4) The classification of TWINSPAN needs to combine with actual fact, and DCA can eliminate "arch effects" obviously. The result of TWINSPAN is consistent with that of DCA, and both are comparable. Both can show the ecological relationship between the residents engaging in tourism industry and their perception toward its impact objectively. However, it still needs farther studies on how to express their interrelationship more directly.

Key words: the residents engaging in tourism industry, tourism impact, TWINSPAN, DCA, Luya Mountain