旅游流流量位序—规模分布变化及其机理——以四川省为例

doi:10.11821/yj2007040003

地理研究 ›› 2007, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (4): 662-672.doi: 10.11821/yj2007040003

旅游流流量位序—规模分布变化及其机理——以四川省为例

杨国良^1,2,3, 张捷¹, 刘波⁴, 李敏², 万全友²

1. 南京大学国土资源与旅游学系,南京 210093;
2. 四川师范大学城乡规划与景观设计研究所,成都 610068;
3. 四川师范大学地理与资源科学学院,成都 610068;
4. 江苏省镇江市规划局,镇江 212001

收稿日期:2006-10-21 修回日期:2007-03-26 出版日期:2007-07-25 发布日期:2007-07-25
作者简介:杨国良(1965-),男,重庆市大足人,副教授,博士,硕士生导师。主要从事旅游规划、旅游地理方面研究,发表论文近40篇。E-mail:geoygl@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(40371030);四川省科技厅重点项目(05ZR025-111)

Study on tourists flow rank-size distribution variation andthe mechanism: Taking Sichuan Province as an example

YANG Guo-liang^1,2,3, ZHANG Jie¹, LIU Bo⁴, LI Min², WAN Quanyou²

1. The Department of Land Resources and Tourism Sciences,Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093,China;
2. Urban-rural Planning and Landscape Design Institute,Sichuan Normal University, 610068, China;
3. College of Geography and Resources Science, Sichuan Normal University, Chengdu 610068, China;
4. Zhenjiang Urban Planning Department, Zhenjiang 212001,China

Received:2006-10-21 Revised:2007-03-26 Online:2007-07-25 Published:2007-07-25
Supported by:
国家自然科学基金项目(40371030);四川省科技厅重点项目(05ZR025-111)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以四川省为实证区,借助齐夫(Zipf)定律,证明了国内旅游流和入境旅游流的流量位序—规模分布均满足齐夫法则。在此基础上进一步分析了1996~2005年各年旅游流流量位序—规模双对数坐标图上无标度区范围、标度分段特征和各标度区内部流量密度分布的变化规律。结果表明,无论是国内还是入境旅游流,其流量规模分布结构的无标度区范围都呈逐年扩大趋势,但其空间分形结构和分布形态变化却有较大差异,其中国内旅游流的分形结构由最初的局部分形演化为单分形,再由单分形退化为双分形结构;空间分布形态则由帕雷托(Pareto)分布模式向对数正态分布模式转变。入境旅游流的分形结构没有出现双分形退化,其空间分布形态也基本保持不变,仍呈帕雷托分布模式。两种旅游流规模分布不同步变化的主要原因可能是交通条件改善和新旅游景区(点)开发对国内旅游者和入境旅游者的目的地选择行为的影响不一致造成的。

关键词: 旅游流, 位序—规模分布, 齐夫(Zipf)定律, 无标度区, 四川省

Abstract: The Zipf theory is the law to study the relation between word frequency and word sequence which has been widely used in the fields of urban system, transportation net and metrology. It is also involved in tourist flow, but only used for simple analysis on the ranking of tourist flow size, without deep discussion for the spatial distribution evolution rules of size structure. This paper studied the spatial distribution changing characteristics and the mechanism of tourist flow size by Zipf Rules. It tried to find the changing law of the size distribution to guide the tourism resource development sequence, and to provide new theoretical support for spatial distribution of tourism scenic sites and urban system of tourist nodes. Compared with traditional quantitative method, Zipf theory can be used to judge the non-scaling section of tourist flow size distribution more precisely, and to interpret the varying characteristic of tourist size distribution based on non-scaling section and Zipf parameters. This will provide new quantitative method for the study on the spatial distribution variation of tourist flow. In this paper, Sichuan Province is taken as the study area. From size distribution analysis of domestic and inbound tourist flow during 1996-2005, it proves that the size distribution structure satisfies Zipf law in each year. Based on this result, this paper further analyzed the variation law of non-scaling range, non-scaling section characteristic and internal structure of each non-scaling range on tourist flow rank-size ln-ln graph. The conclusion shows that non-scaling range for both domestic and inbound tourist flow vary identically on ln-ln graph, with a gradually expanding tendency. However, the variation of spatial fractal structure and distribution pattern is not synchronous. From spatial fractal structure, domestic tourist flow size distribution varies from local fractal in 1997 to single fractal of 1998-2003, then to local fractal in 2004 and finally double fractal in 2005, while inbound tourist flow varies from local fractal in 1998 to single fractal in 1999 and till now, without double fractal. The spatial distribution variation also shows the difference: domestic tourist flow is changing from Pareto distribution pattern to lognormal distribution, but spatial distribution of inbound tourist flow is still steady as Pareto pattern. Perhaps the main reason is that the transportation improvement and new scenic sites development has more effect on destination choice of domestic tourists than on that of inbound tourists. This leads to the more apparent distribution variation of domestic tourist flow size structure.

Key words: tourist flow, rank-size distribution, Zipf theory, non-scaling section, Sichuan Province

杨国良, 张捷, 刘波, 李敏, 万全友. 旅游流流量位序—规模分布变化及其机理——以四川省为例[J]. 地理研究, 2007, 26(4): 662-672.

YANG Guo-liang, ZHANG Jie, LIU Bo, LI Min, WAN Quanyou. Study on tourists flow rank-size distribution variation andthe mechanism: Taking Sichuan Province as an example[J]. GEOGRAPHICAL RESEARCH, 2007, 26(4): 662-672.

参考文献

[1] Carroll C. National city-size distributions: What do we know after 67 years of research? Progress in Human Geography, 1982,6(1):1~43.

[2] 周一星.城市地理学.北京:商务印书馆,1995.265~267.

[3] 崔旭,邵力军.齐普夫定律的相关问题研究.现代情报,2003,(9):45~46.

[4] 姜永波.确定城镇体系发展阶段的定量方法.山东建筑工程学院学报,1994,9(4):44~49.

[5] 陈勇,陈嵘,艾南山,等.城市规模的分形研究.经济地理,1993,13(3):48~53.

[6] 陈彦光,刘继生.城市体系分形特征的初步研究.人文地理,1994,9(1):26~30.

[7] 仵宗卿,戴学珍,杨吾扬.帕雷托公式重构及其与城市体系演化.人文地理,2000,15(1):15~19.

[8] David T,Herbert,Colin J Thomas.Urban Geography. John Wiley ＆ Sons Ltd. ,1982.91~96.

[9] Mandelbert B B. The Fractal Geometry of Nature. New York:W.H.Freeman,1982.

[10] 李后强,艾南山.具有黄金分割特征和分形性质的市场网络.经济地理,1992,12(4):1~5.

[11] 陈彦光,刘继生.城市系统的异速生长关系与位序-规模法则——对Steindl模型的修正与发展.地理科学,2001,21(5):412~416.

[12] 梁进社.逆序的Beckmann 城镇等级—规模模式及其对位序—规模法则的解释力.北京师范大学学报(自然科学版),1999,35(1):132~135.

[13] 刘继生,陈彦光.城镇体系等级结构的分形维数及其测算方法.地理研究,1998,17(1):82~89.

[14] 陈彦光,周一星.城市等级体系的多重Zipf 维数及其地理空间意义.北京大学学报(自然科学版),2002,38(6):823~830.

[15] White R, Engelen G.Cellular automata and fractal urban form:A cellular modeling approach to the evolution of urban land-use patterns. Environment and Planning A,1993,25:1175~1199.

[16] Batty M, Longley P A.Fractal Cities: A Geometry of Form and Function. London: Academic Press, 1994.

[17] 姜世国,周一星.北京城市形态的分形集聚特征及其实践意义.地理研究,2006,25(2):204~211.

[18] 刘继生,陈彦光.交通网络空间结构的分形维数及其测算方法探讨.地理学报,1999,54(5):471~475.

[19] 梁立明.科学计量学:指标·模型·应用.北京:科学出版社,1995.

[20] 朱竑,吴旗韬.中国省际及主要旅游城市旅游规模.地理学报,2005,60(6):919~927.

[21] 杨国良,张捷,艾南山,等.旅游流齐夫结构及空间差异化特征.地理学报,2006,61(12):1281~1289.

[22] 陈彦光,刘继生.城市规模分布的分形和分维.人文地理,1999,14(2):43~48.

[23] 岳文泽,徐建华,等.分形理论在人文地理学中的应用研究.地理学与国土研究,2001,17(2):51~56.

[24] 刘继生,陈彦光.城市地理学的分形研究的回顾与前瞻.地理科学,2000,20(2):166~171.

[25] Benguigui L, Daoud M. Is the suburban railway system a fractal? Geographical Analysis, 1991, 23:362~368.

[26] White R, Engelen G.Urban systems dynamics and cellular automata: Fractal structures between order and chaos.Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 1994, 4(4):563~583.

[27] 刘继生,陈彦光.东北地区城市规模分布的分形特征.人文地理,1999,14(3):1~6.

[28] 王益谦,王放.城市人口分布的多重分形特征刻画.大自然探索,1997,16(4):72~77.

[29] 戴学军,丁登山,许志晖,等.基于分形方法的旅游景区(点)系统等级结构研究.地理科学,2006,26(2):244~250.

[30] 许志晖,戴学军,等.南京市旅游景点系统空间结构分形研究.地理研究,2007,26(1):132~140.

旅游流流量位序—规模分布变化及其机理——以四川省为例

Study on tourists flow rank-size distribution variation andthe mechanism: Taking Sichuan Province as an example

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	郭向阳, 穆学青, 明庆忠, 丁正山, 胡美娟. 旅游地快速交通优势度与旅游流强度的空间耦合分析[J]. 地理研究, 2019, 38(5): 1119-1135.
[2]	刘军胜, 马耀峰. 基于发生学与系统论的旅游流与目的地供需耦合成长演化与驱动机制研究——以西安市为例[J]. 地理研究, 2017, 36(8): 1583-1600.
[3]	陈超, 马海涛, 陈楠, 陈胡玥. 中国农民旅游流网络重心轨迹的演化[J]. 地理研究, 2014, 33(7): 1306-1314.
[4]	汪德根. 武广高速铁路对湖北省区域旅游空间格局的影响[J]. 地理研究, 2013, 32(8): 1555-1564.
[5]	卢松, 吉慧, 蔡云峰. 黄山市自驾车入游流旅行空间行为研究[J]. 地理研究, 2013, 32(1): 179-190.
[6]	王兆峰. 入境旅游流与航空运输网络协同演化及差异分析——以西南地区为例[J]. 地理研究, 2012, 31(7): 1328-1338.
[7]	李创新, 马耀峰, 张颖, 魏颖. 1993～2008年区域入境旅游流优势度时空动态演进模式——基于改进熵值法的实证研究[J]. 地理研究, 2012, 31(2): 257-268.
[8]	杨兴柱, 顾朝林, 王群. 旅游流驱动力系统分析[J]. 地理研究, 2011, 30(1): 23-36.
[9]	刘法建,张捷,章锦河,陈冬冬. 中国入境旅游流网络省级旅游地角色研究[J]. 地理研究, 2010, 29(6): 1141-1152.
[10]	赵媛, 牛海玲, 杨足膺. 我国石油资源流流量位序-规模分布特征变化[J]. 地理研究, 2010, 29(12): 2121-2131.
[11]	钟士恩, 张捷, 周强, 董雪旺, 李敏, 刘泽华. 农村居民国内旅游流空间集中性[J]. 地理研究, 2009, 28(6): 1562-1571.
[12]	黄震方, 袁林旺, 俞肇元, 吴江, 周年兴. 生态旅游区旅游流的时空演变与特征——以盐城麋鹿生态旅游区为例[J]. 地理研究, 2008, 27(1): 55-64.
[13]	林岚, 康志林, 甘萌雨, 叶金玉. 基于航空口岸的台胞大陆旅游流空间场效应分析[J]. 地理研究, 2007, 26(2): 403-413.
[14]	章锦河, 张捷, 李娜, 梁琳, 刘泽华. 中国国内旅游流空间场效应分析[J]. 地理研究, 2005, 24(2): 293-303.
[15]	刁承泰. 试论城市地貌环境与城市道路系统的关系^*——以四川省几个城市为例[J]. 地理研究, 1991, 10(1): 95-102.