火车站地区建设用地功能组合及空间结构——以广州站和广州东站为例

doi:10.11821/yj2007060020

地理研究 ›› 2007, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (6): 1265-1274.doi: 10.11821/yj2007060020

火车站地区建设用地功能组合及空间结构——以广州站和广州东站为例

曹小曙¹, 张凯², 马林兵¹, 闫小培¹

1. 中山大学地理科学与规划学院,广州 510275;
2. 珠江恒昌房地产顾问有限公司,广州 510080

收稿日期:2007-05-15 修回日期:2007-09-20 出版日期:2007-11-25 发布日期:2007-11-25
作者简介:曹小曙(1970-),男,甘肃人,博士,副教授,博士生导师。主要从事交通地理与城市地理研究。 E-mail:Caoxsh@mail.sysu.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助(40571052)

Research on function combination and spatial structure of construction land in Guangzhou railway station and railway eastern station area

CAO Xiao-shu¹, ZHANG Kai², MA Lin-bing¹, YAN Xiao-pei¹

1. School of Geography and Planning, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China;
2. Evergreen Real Estate Consultants Limited, Guangzhou 510080, China

Received:2007-05-15 Revised:2007-09-20 Online:2007-11-25 Published:2007-11-25
Supported by:
国家自然科学基金资助(40571052)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

选取广州火车站和广州东站地区为研究案例,利用相似性指数和均质度概念,分析了广州站和广州东站地区建设用地功能组合及空间结构特征。结果显示,广州站地区用地功能组合呈现以两类用地为主的混合化及两类以上用地组合的复杂化状态,广州东站地区以两类混合化用地为主;广州站与广州东站地区用地类型多数与居住功能相组合,使得在车站本身交通流量的基础上叠加了居住区交通流量;广州站地区各类建设用地在空间上呈片状的组团结构分布,根据网格斑块的破碎程度可以划分为两个部分,西北部的网格斑块较为破碎,东南部斑块相对完整;广州东站地区中部网格斑块相对完整,周边地区相对破碎;广州东站地区的对外交通用地分布较为紧凑;广州站和广州东站地区各种用地类型在均质程度上表现出较大不同,绿地和居住用地空间分布相对较为紧凑,而其他用地类型空间分布则比较破碎,广州东站地区各用地类型组团均质度均值一般都大于广州站地区。火车站地区极易产生土地利用低效和空间结构混乱状况,广州站地区建设用地功能组合的复杂化程度高于广州东站地区,广州东站地区建设用地空间结构在一定程度上更为合理。

关键词: 城市交通, 火车站, 建设用地, 功能, 结构

Abstract:

With the comparability index and the evenness concept, this paper analyses the function combination and spatial structure characteristics of construction land in Guangzhou railway station and railway eastern station areas. The results indicate that, in railway station area, plots of the first function category occupy 33.33% of the total, in which the public service function plots predominate; plots of the second function category occupy 47.62%, of which the plots with residential, travel industrial and commercial functions predominate; and plots of the third function category occupy 19.05% of the total.The function combination of railway station area presents a mixture of two categories and dominated land use and complexity of more than two categories dominated construction land use, being 66.67% according to plot statistics. In railway eastern station area, plots of the first function category reach 20% of the total, in which the residential function plots predominate; plots of the second function category occupy 65%, in which the plots with official and residential mixed function predominate; and plots of the third function category occupy 15% of the total. The construction land function in Guangzhou railway station and railway eastern station areas mainly combine with residential function, leading to a higher transport flow than the normal residential area. Construction land of all categories in railway station area is distributed spatially as group structure in sheets. It could be divided into two parts according to the fragmentation degree of grid plots, one is northwestern part which is relatively fragmentized, and the another is southeastern part which is relatively integrated. The external traffic land in railway eastern station area is rather compact. In this area, the grid plots in the middle are relatively integrated, and the ones in its periphery are relatively fragmentized. Various categories of construction land in these two railway station areas are distributed spatially as group structure, but very different in evenness. According to the evenness of all kinds of construction land in railway station area, the list is:G(0.65)>R(0.55)>T(0.48)>C(0.40)>U(0.39);and in railway eastern station area, it is:G(0.74)>R(0.56)>C(0.46)>T(0.27).In these two areas, the spatial distribution of green land and residential land is relatively compact (evenness>0.50),and the distribution of other kinds of land is relatively fragmentized(evenness<0.50).The average evenness of various kinds of land in eastern station area is larger than it is in theother area. Thus, the spatial structure of construction land in railway eastern station is better.

Key words: urban transportation, railway station, construction land, function, structure

曹小曙, 张凯, 马林兵, 闫小培. 火车站地区建设用地功能组合及空间结构——以广州站和广州东站为例[J]. 地理研究, 2007, 26(6): 1265-1274.

CAO Xiao-shu, ZHANG Kai, MA Lin-bing, YAN Xiao-pei. Research on function combination and spatial structure of construction land in Guangzhou railway station and railway eastern station area[J]. GEOGRAPHICAL RESEARCH, 2007, 26(6): 1265-1274.

参考文献

[1] 坎尼斯·鲍威尔.铁路建筑的发展方向.世界建筑,1995,(3):67~71.

[2] 王瑾.火车站与城市现代化——论斯图加特21世纪工程.世界建筑,1998,(4):40~42.

[3] Andre Sorensen. Land readjustment and metropolitan growth: An examination of suburban land development and urban sprawl in the Tokyo metropolitan area. Progress in Planning, 2000,53:217~330.

[4] Iain Docherty.Cities on rails:The redevelopment of railway station areas.Urban Studies,2000,37(8):1464~1466.

[5] Bertolini L. Node and place:Complexities of railway station redevelopment. European Planning Studies,1996,4(3):331~345.

[6] Bertolini L. Station area redevelopment in five European countries:An international perspective on a complex planning challenge. International Planning Studies,1998,3(2):163~184.

[7] Bertolini L, Clercq F, Kapoen L. Sustainable accessibility:A conceptual framework to integrate transport and land use plan-making. Transport Policy, 2005,12:207~220.

[8] Peter W G Newman, Jeffrey R Kenworthy.The land use-transport connection. Land Use Policy, 1996,13(1):1~22.

[9] Sebastiaan de Wilde, Andy van den Dobbelsteen.Space use optimization and sustainability:Environmental comparison of international cases. Journal of Environment Management,2004,73:91~101.

[10] S S Y Lau,R Giridharan,S Ganesan. Multiple and intensive land use:Case studies in Hong Kong. Habitat International,2005,29(3):527~546.

[11] 刘盛和, 吴传钧, 陈田. 评析西方城市土地利用的理论研究. 地理研究,2001, 20(1):111~119.

[12] 姜广辉, 张凤荣, 孔祥斌,等. 北京山区建设用地扩展空间分异分析. 地理研究, 2006, 25(5):905~912.

[13] 周国华, 贺艳华.长沙城市土地扩张特征及影响因素. 地理学报,2006, 61(11):1171~1180.

[14] 林目轩,师迎春,等. 长沙市区建设用地扩张的时空特征.地理研究,2007,26(2):265~274.

[15] 张复明. 区域性交通枢纽及其腹地的城市化模式.地理研究,2001,20(1):48~54.

[16] 武廷海. 大型基础设施建设对区域形态的影响研究述评. 城市规划,2002,26(4):18~22.

[17] 张泉.城市火车站地区设计研究——以合肥新站试验区为例. 安徽建筑工业学院学报(自然科学版),2005,13(6):28~31.

[18] 杜洪涛,城市综合交通枢纽的规划与设计研究——以广州铁路新客站为例. 城市规划,2006, 30(7):85~88.

[19] 张小星.有轨交通转变下的广州火车站地区城市形态发展.华南理工大学学报(自然科学版),2002,30(10):24~28.

[20] 姚燕华,李颖,师雁.火车站地区开发的新模式探讨.规划师,2005,21(4):40~43.

[21] 胡华颖.城市·空间·发展——广州城市内部空间分析. 广州:中山大学出版社,1993.

[22] 李天宏,张洋,倪晋仁,等.城市土地利用空间结构分析的尺度效应.应用基础与工程科学学报,2004,12(2):132~139.

火车站地区建设用地功能组合及空间结构——以广州站和广州东站为例

Research on function combination and spatial structure of construction land in Guangzhou railway station and railway eastern station area

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	李婧昕, 张红旗. 新疆昌吉绿洲耕地适宜规模研究[J]. 地理研究, 2021, 40(3): 613-626.
[2]	游猎, 王睿. 特大城市郊区建设用地效益比较研究——以天津市11个市郊区县为例[J]. 地理研究, 2021, 40(3): 793-807.
[3]	陈妍, 王士君, 梅林. 东北地区非资源型城市与资源型城市产业转型的对比研究[J]. 地理研究, 2021, 40(3): 808-820.
[4]	邹利林, 李裕瑞, 刘彦随, 王建英. 基于要素视角的耕地“三生”功能理论建构与实证研究[J]. 地理研究, 2021, 40(3): 839-855.
[5]	杨文龙, 游小珺, 杜德斌. 商品贸易网络视角下地缘经济系统的属性与功能演进[J]. 地理研究, 2021, 40(2): 356-372.
[6]	杨振山, 苏锦华, 杨航, 赵永宏. 基于多源数据的城市功能区精细化研究——以北京为例[J]. 地理研究, 2021, 40(2): 477-494.
[7]	钱肖颖, 孙斌栋. 基于城际创业投资联系的中国城市网络结构和组织模式[J]. 地理研究, 2021, 40(2): 419-430.
[8]	康蕾, 刘毅. 粤港澳大湾区优化发展的关键要素特征及其功能升级[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(9): 2015-2028.
[9]	杨成凤, 韩会然, 宋金平. 非首都功能疏解背景下批发市场商户的搬迁意愿及区位再选择因素——以北京市动物园服装批发市场为例[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(8): 1755-1768.
[10]	张甜歌, 吴晋峰, 石晓腾, 吴宝清, 邓纯纯, 吴珊珊. “轮毂”模型：城市自驾旅游者的出游空间结构——以北京、西安、武汉为例[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(8): 1822-1835.
[11]	刘卫东. 新冠肺炎疫情对经济全球化的影响分析[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(7): 1439-1449.
[12]	文嫮, 张强国, 粟旭. 互联网影响下的“网剧”与传统“台剧”生产网络的结构差异[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(6): 1329-1342.
[13]	吴志才, 张凌媛, 黄诗卉. 粤港澳大湾区旅游经济联系的空间结构及协同合作模式[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(6): 1370-1385.
[14]	顾伟男, 刘慧, 王亮. “一带一路”沿线国家科研合作网络的多元结构及形成机制[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(5): 1070-1087.
[15]	高志玉, 赵雪雁, 兰海霞, 石育中. 多重压力对重点生态功能区农户生计资产可得性的影响——以甘南黄河水源补给区为例[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(5): 1152-1165.