大连城市居住适宜性的空间评价

doi:10.11821/yj2008030021

地理研究 ›› 2008, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (3): 683-692.doi: 10.11821/yj2008030021

大连城市居住适宜性的空间评价

任学慧¹, 林霞¹, 张海静¹, 张文忠²

1. 辽宁师范大学城市与环境学院,大连116029;
2. 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所,北京100101

收稿日期:2007-12-03 修回日期:2008-02-15 出版日期:2008-05-25 发布日期:2008-05-25
作者简介:任学慧(1963-),女,博士,黑龙江勃利人,副教授。主要从事区域环境与可持续发展等方向研究。Email:rxh0202@sohu.com *通讯作者 : 张文忠(1966-),男,呼和浩特市人,博士,研究员。研究方向是城市和区域发展等。 Email: zhangwz@igsnrr.ac.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(40571048);国家自然科学基金重点项目(40635026)

The spatial evaluation of urban residential suitability in Dalian

REN Xue-hui¹, LIN Xia¹, ZHANG Hai-jing¹, ZHANG Wen-zhong²

1. College of City and Environment, Liaoning Normal University, Dalian 116029, China;
2. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China

Received:2007-12-03 Revised:2008-02-15 Online:2008-05-25 Published:2008-05-25
Supported by:
国家自然科学基金(40571048);国家自然科学基金重点项目(40635026)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为创造更好、更适宜人们居住、生活和工作的空间,不断提高市民的生活质量,选择城市的生活方便性、健康性、居住安全性、环境舒适度和出行方便性等为指标,在问卷调查量化数据的基础上,采用层次分析法和Q型聚类分析方法,从行政区和不同功能片区两个角度,进行了大连城市居住适宜性空间评价,以期为大连城市建设提供参考。研究表明:大连城市居住适宜性以位于市区政治经济商业中心的区域得分最高,西、北部市郊结合部排名最后,部分远郊区宜居性虽然较好,但各指标分值差异却很大。总体而言,大连城市宜居性在空间格局上体现出由中心城区向外围逐渐降低、差异程度变大的特性,该空间特征分析结论与行政区评价结果具有很好的一致性。

关键词: 大连, 城市, 居住适宜性, 空间评价

Abstract:

In recent years, in order to create a better and more suitable space for living and work, and also for improving the living standard of people continuously, whether a city is amenity city has become the research focus of scholars. Hence attention should be paid to the research on spatial characteristics of urban residential suitability which are still inadequately dealt with.Study on the spatial structure of urban residential suitability and restrict factors has great theoretical and practical significance to urban development programming and city environmental planning. Therefore choosing convenience, health, safety, environment comfort level and convenience of going out to travel as the indexes, questionnaires are designed to investigate the residents who had stable life in Dalian for more than half a year. Then the spatial characteristics of urban residential suitability in Dalian are evaluated by AHP and Q cluster analysis method taking administrative divisions and functional regions as basic unit.And the analysis is based on the data of quantifiable questionnaires.We hope that it can provide reference for the urban construction of Dalian.The following conclusions are drawn: In citizens'opinion, some differences exist in urban residential suitability in different districts,and in downtown, the satisfaction descends gradually from the eastern coastal region to the northwestern urban-rural-integration-area. Comparatively speaking, the urban residential suitability in Zhongshan district is the best contrarily, Ganjingzi district in urban-rural-integration-area is ranked last in urban residential suitability evaluation. And in outer suburbs, urban residential suitability satisfaction in Lushunkou district and development zone is higher than Jinzhou district. At the same time, the result of clustering analysis of different functional regions shows that the area which is political, economic and commercial center of Dalian has the highest score of urban residential suitability; the intersections of urban and rural areas in northwest of the city have the lowest score; although the urban residential suitability in some of the outer suburbs is better, the difference is significant among indicators. On the whole, the score descends gradually from city center to suburbs in spatial pattern and divergences of indexes are also lager. It accords with the result of evaluation on district.

Key words: Dalian, urban, residential suitability, spatial evaluation

任学慧, 林霞, 张海静, 张文忠. 大连城市居住适宜性的空间评价[J]. 地理研究, 2008, 27(3): 683-692.

REN Xue-hui, LIN Xia, ZHANG Hai-jing, ZHANG Wen-zhong. The spatial evaluation of urban residential suitability in Dalian[J]. GEOGRAPHICAL RESEARCH, 2008, 27(3): 683-692.

参考文献

[1] 张文忠.宜居北京评价的实证研究.北京规划建设,2007,(1):25~30.

[2] Evans P. Livable cities urban struggles for livelihood and sustainability. California, USA:University of California Press Ltd, 2002.32~34.

[3] Salzano E.Seven aims for the livable city in lennard. S H S von Ungern-Sternberg, H L Lennard(eds.).Making Cities Livable. International Making Cities Livable Conferences. California, USA:Gondolier Press, 1997.22~23.

[4] Timothy D Berg.Reshaping Gotham:The city livable movement and the redevelopment of New York city,1961~1998. Purdue University Graduate School.1998.17~18.

[5] Jian Ge,Hokao Kazunori. Residential environment index system and evaluation model established by subjective and objective methods. Journal of Zhejiang University Science, 2004, 5:1028~1034.

[6] Gideon E.D.Omuta.The quality of urban life and the perception of livability:A case study of neighborhoods in Benin city, Nigeria. Social Indicators Research, 1998, 20(4):25~26.

[7] 顾文选,罗亚蒙.宜居城市科学评价标准.北京规划建设, 2007,(1):7~10.

[8] 楚建群,董黎明.创造良好的城市宜居环境.北京规划建设, 2007,(1):15~17.

[9] 张文忠.宜居城市的内涵及评价指标体系探讨.城市规划学刊, 2007,(3):30~34.

[10] 刘维新.以"三大标准"看北京宜居之路.北京规划建设, 2007,(1):46~47.

[11] 周志田,等.中国适宜人居城市研究与评价.中国人口资源与环境, 2004,(1):27~29.

[12] 张文忠. 城市内部居住环境评价的指标体系和方法. 地理科学, 2007,l27(1):17~23.

[13] 陈静,尹卫红,张景秋.宜居城市与北京城市宜居性评价.北京联合大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2006, 4(2):15~19.

[14] 张文忠,尹卫红,张景秋,等.中国宜居城市研究报告.北京:社会科学文献出版社, 2006.15~18.

[15] 李丽萍,吴祥裕.宜居城市评价指标体系研究.中共济南市委党校学报, 2007,(1):16~21.

[16] 李雪铭,刘巍巍.城市居住小区环境归属感评价——以大连市为例.地理研究, 2006, 25(5):785~791.

大连城市居住适宜性的空间评价

The spatial evaluation of urban residential suitability in Dalian

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	王一凡, 崔璨, 王强, 宁越敏, 杨振山. “人才争夺战”背景下人才流动的空间特征及影响因素——以中国“一流大学”毕业生为例[J]. 地理研究, 2021, 40(3): 743-761.
[2]	严东, 郭源园, 梁勇林. 城市旧住宅区改造三方利益关系探讨：以深圳市为例[J]. 地理研究, 2021, 40(3): 779-792.
[3]	游猎, 王睿. 特大城市郊区建设用地效益比较研究——以天津市11个市郊区县为例[J]. 地理研究, 2021, 40(3): 793-807.
[4]	陈妍, 王士君, 梅林. 东北地区非资源型城市与资源型城市产业转型的对比研究[J]. 地理研究, 2021, 40(3): 808-820.
[5]	汪洋, 杨丹, 闵婕, 翟非同, 王雨, 吴晓娇, 张洪睿. 山地高密度城市热岛效应的多约束因子格局分析与定量探测——重庆都市区案例研究[J]. 地理研究, 2021, 40(3): 856-868.
[6]	李玮, 黄耿志, 薛德升. 世界城市制造业地域嵌入生产性服务业的过程及其影响因素——以广汽本田和空客汉堡为例[J]. 地理研究, 2021, 40(2): 343-355.
[7]	李留通, 张森森, 赵新正, 权东计, 罗伊. 文化产业成长对城市空间形态演变的影响——以西安市核心区为例[J]. 地理研究, 2021, 40(2): 431-445.
[8]	杨振山, 苏锦华, 杨航, 赵永宏. 基于多源数据的城市功能区精细化研究——以北京为例[J]. 地理研究, 2021, 40(2): 477-494.
[9]	党云晓, 湛东升, 谌丽, 张文忠, 吴绍华. 城市更新过程中流动人口居住-就业变动的协同机制研究——以北京为例[J]. 地理研究, 2021, 40(2): 513-527.
[10]	钱肖颖, 孙斌栋. 基于城际创业投资联系的中国城市网络结构和组织模式[J]. 地理研究, 2021, 40(2): 419-430.
[11]	曹广忠, 刘嘉杰, 刘涛. 空气质量对中国人口迁移的影响[J]. 地理研究, 2021, 40(1): 199-212.
[12]	吴康, 戚伟. 收缩型城市：认知误区、统计甄别与测算反思[J]. 地理研究, 2021, 40(1): 213-229.
[13]	张衔春, 杨宇, 单卓然, 林雄斌, 牛方曲. 珠三角城市区域治理的尺度重构机制研究——基于产业合作项目与交通基础设施项目的比较[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(9): 2095-2108.
[14]	李艳, 孙阳, 姚士谋. 一国两制背景下跨境口岸与中国全球城市区域空间联系——以粤港澳大湾区为例[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(9): 2109-2129.
[15]	王甫园, 王开泳, 虞虎, 陈田. 珠三角城市群生态游憩空间分异特征及关联性因素[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(9): 2148-2164.