广西崇左市可持续综合发展及对策初探

doi:10.11821/yj2008040022

地理研究 ›› 2008, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (4): 938-948.doi: 10.11821/yj2008040022

广西崇左市可持续综合发展及对策初探

张健, 濮励杰

南京大学地理与海洋科学学院,南京 210093

收稿日期:2007-10-08 修回日期:2008-03-21 出版日期:2008-07-25 发布日期:2008-07-25
作者简介:张健(1981-),男,安徽滁州人,博士研究生。主要从事区域规划等相关领域研究。E-mail:jchangnju@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(40371106、70341021);江苏省自然科学基金项目 (BK2005080);广西崇左市土地利用总体规划前期修编项目

Preliminary study on the integrated sustainable development of Chongzuo City in Guangxi

ZHANG Jian, PU Li-jie

School of Geographic and Oceanographic Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China

Received:2007-10-08 Revised:2008-03-21 Online:2008-07-25 Published:2008-07-25
Supported by:
国家自然科学基金项目(40371106、70341021);江苏省自然科学基金项目 (BK2005080);广西崇左市土地利用总体规划前期修编项目

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

以我国西部新兴边贸城市崇左市为研究区域,根据社会经济发展、资源—能源消耗及环境污染的相互关系,结合生态学表现,利用三角模型工具分析评估区域经济可持续发展状况和长期趋势。探求崇左市1985~2005年可持续综合利用情况,对研究区经济发展现状问题的解决具有实用价值,对区域经济的可持续综合利用具有方法论意义。结果表明2005年崇左市可持续综合发展处于一般可持续性状态,且区域内7个行政子单元可持续综合发展水平介于弱可持续性到一般可持续性状态,东南部可持续综合发展状况优于西北部。崇左市可持续综合发展水平1985~1990年呈一般可持续性趋势;1991~1995年呈强可持续性趋势;1996~2000年呈一般可持续性趋势;2001~2005年呈一般可持续性趋势,但较前一阶段有下降趋势。这些状况和趋势与近20年间崇左市大力发展经济,加大环境保护力度有一定关系。

关键词: 综合发展, 可持续性, 生态效应, 三角模型, 崇左市

Abstract:

The triangle method, as an intuitive platform for illustrating sustainability status and trends in economic development, seems to hold promise as an analytical management tool liable to be used by researchers and policy-makers at different levels due to its simplicity and flexibility.Based on the interrelationships among economic development, resource-energy consumption, and environmental pollution, in conjunction with the ecological performance and the triangle method, a definition to sustainable economic development was proposed, and a novel triangle method was designed to evaluate economic development sustainability. This paper selected Chongzuo City, a newly-established frontier trade city in western China, as a research region. Chongzuo City is located in the western zone among the country's three major zones of the eastern zone, middle zone and western zone. It had a total population of 2.3065 million in 2005. It covers a total area of 1.7345million hm² with five counties, one city and one district under its jurisdiction. As a case study, the triangle method was applied to assess the sustainability status and long-term trends of Chongzuo's integrated sustainability development. The results show that the integrated sustainability development in 2005 represents a relatively common state of sustainability, and the seven administrative sub-units in Chongzuo City reflect sustainability positions ranging from weak sustainability, strong sustainability to common sustainability. The sustainability in the southeastern part is better than in the northwestern. The Chongzuo's integrated sustainable development revealed a common sustainable trend during 1985-1990, a strong sustainable trend during 1991-1995, a common sustainable trend during 1996-2000, and a common sustainable trend during 2001-2005, but is lower than the former stage. Chongzuo's unremitting efforts in environmental protection and in the increasing integration of the environmental considerations within the economic development process over the last twenty years are contributory to these status and trends.

Key words: integrated development, sustainability, ecological effect, triangle model, Chongzuo City

张健, 濮励杰. 广西崇左市可持续综合发展及对策初探[J]. 地理研究, 2008, 27(4): 938-948.

ZHANG Jian, PU Li-jie. Preliminary study on the integrated sustainable development of Chongzuo City in Guangxi[J]. GEOGRAPHICAL RESEARCH, 2008, 27(4): 938-948.

参考文献

[1] 李得锋,郑度.区域可持续发展评价——以拉萨地区为例.地理研究, 2004, 23(4): 551~560.

[2] National Research Council Board on Sustainable Development. Our Common Journey: A Transition toward Sustainability. Washington, DC, National Academy Press, 1999.

[3] 王志宪, 虞孝感, 徐科峰, 等. 长江三角洲地区可持续发展的态势与对策. 地理学报, 2005, 60(3): 381~391.

[4] 张正栋. 珠江河口地区可持续发展评价研究. 地理科学, 2005, 25(1): 29~35.

[5] Chris Sneddon, Richard B Howarth, Richard B. Norgaard. Sustainable development in a post-Brundtland world. Ecological Economics, 2006, 57(2): 253~268.

[6] 廖志杰, 刘岳. 中国区域可持续发展水平及其空间分特征. 地理学报, 2000, 55(2): 139~150.

[7] Fabio Orecchini. A "measurable" definition of sustainable development based on closed cycles of resources and its application to energy systems. Sustainability Science, 2007, 2(2): 245~252.

[8] Xu F L, Zhao S S, Richard W Dawson, et al. A triangle model for evaluating the sustainability status and trends of economic development. Ecological Modelling, 2006, 1953(4): 327~337.

[9] 盖文启. 我国沿海地区城市群可持续发展问题探析: 以山东半岛城市群为例. 地理科学, 2000, 20(3): 274~278.

[10] 温军. 西藏产业的可持续发展问题研究. 地理研究, 2000, 19(2): 202~208.

[11] Ilias Mariolakos. Water resources management in the framework of sustainable development. Desalination, 2007, 213(1-3): 147~151.

[12] Robert Blinc, Aleksander Zidansek, et al. Sustainable development and global security. Energy, 2007, 32(6): 883~890.

[13] Ramón E López, Gustavo Anríquez, Sumeet Gulati. Structural change and sustainable development. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2007, 53(3): 307~322.

[14] Moldan B, Billharz S. Sustainability indicators: Report of the project on indicators of sustainable development, SCOPE 58. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons, 1997.

[15] 毛汉英. 山东省跨世纪可持续发展的综合调控研究. 地理学报, 1998, 53(5): 413~421.

[16] 包慧娟, 李振山, 王涛. 沙漠化地区可持续发展的概念模型. 地理科学, 2007, 27(2): 173~176.

[17] IISD (International Institute for Sustainable Development). Compendium of sustainable development indicator initiatives and publications, 2000.

[18] Swart R. Raskin, et al. Critical challenges for sustainability science.Science, 2002, 297: 1994~1995.

[19] Ulla Rosenstr m, Simo Kyll nen. Impacts of a participatory approach to developing national level sustainable development indicators in Finland. Journal of Environmental Management, 2007, 84(3): 282~298.

[20] Jeffrey Wilson, Peter Tyedmers,Ronald Pelot.Contrasting and comparing sustainable development indicator metrics.Ecological Indicators, 2007, 7(2): 299~314.

[21] Knut H Alfsen, Mads Greaker.From natural resources and environmental accounting to construction of indicators for sustainable development.Ecological Economics, 2007, 61(4): 600~610.

[22] Surekha Dudhani A K, Sinha S S Inamdar.Assessment of small hydropower potential using remote sensing data for sustainable development in India.Energy Policy, 2006, 34(17): 3195~3205.

[23] H Wiggering, K Rennings. Sustainability indicators:Geology meets economy.Environmental Geology,1997, 32(2): 71~77.

[24] Alexander G. Information-based tools for building community and sustainability.Future, 2000, 32: 317~337.

[25] 袁雯, Philip James, 杨凯. 社区可持续发展指标体系研究——以上海崇明为例. 地理研究, 2003, 22(4): 484~494.

[26] Liverman D M, Hanson M, Brown B J, et al. Global sustainability: Toward measurement.Environmental Management,1998, 12(2): 133~143.

[27] Roland Clift, Brad Allenby, Robert Ayres, et al. Forum on sustainability.Clean Products and Processes,2000, (2): 67~70.

[28] Roland Clift. Sustainable development and its implications for chemical engineering.Chemical Engineering Science, 2006, 61(13): 4179~4187.

[29] World Summit on Sustainable Development. Johannesburg Declaration on Sustainable Development. New York: United Nations, 2002.

[30] Krissa Nichols. Alternative urban futures: Planning for sustainable development in cities throughout the world. Ecological Economics,2006, 59(1): 182~183.

[31] Dipak K Dey, Wang Y Z. Wavelet modeling of priors on triangles.Journal of Multivariate Analysis,2004, 89(2),338~350.

[32] 曾磊, 雷军, 鲁奇. 我国城乡关联度评价指标体系构建及区域比较分析. 地理研究, 2002, 21(6): 763~771.

[33] 李香云, 王立新, 章予舒, 等. 西北干旱区土地荒漠化中人类活动作用及其指标选择. 地理科学, 2004, 24(1): 68~75.

[34] 方创琳, Yehua Dennis Wei. 河西地区可持续发展能力评价及地域分异规律. 地理学报, 2001, 56(5): 561~569.

[35] 袁兴中, 刘红, 陆健健. 生态系统健康评价——概念构架与指标选择. 应用生态学报, 2001, 12(4): 627~629.

广西崇左市可持续综合发展及对策初探

Preliminary study on the integrated sustainable development of Chongzuo City in Guangxi

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 11

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	熊思鸿, 阎建忠, 吴雅. 农户生计对气候变化的恢复力研究综述[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(8): 1934-1946.
[2]	彭建, 杜悦悦, 刘焱序, 吴健生, 王仰麟. 从自然区划、土地变化到景观服务：发展中的中国综合自然地理学[J]. 地理研究, 2017, 36(10): 1819-1833.
[3]	马海涛. 基于人才流动的城市网络关系构建[J]. 地理研究, 2017, 36(1): 161-170.
[4]	叶龙浩, 周丰, 郭怀成, 高伟, 何成杰, 王翠榆. 基于水环境承载力的沁河流域系统优化调控[J]. 地理研究, 2013, 32(6): 1007-1016.
[5]	边雪, 陈昊宇, 曹广忠. 基于人口、产业和用地结构关系的城镇化模式类型及演进特征——以长三角地区为例[J]. 地理研究, 2013, 32(12): 2281-2291.
[6]	侯鹏, 王桥, 王昌佐, 蒋卫国, 赵彦伟. 流域土地利用/土地覆被变化的生态效应[J]. 地理研究, 2011, 30(11): 2092-2098.
[7]	张华, 何红, 李锋瑞, 张洪荣. 科尔沁沙地灌木对风沙土壤的生态效应[J]. 地理研究, 2005, 24(5): 708-716.
[8]	方创琳. “水资源约束下西北干旱区城市化过程及生态效应”研究进展[J]. 地理研究, 2005, 24(5): 822-822.
[9]	蔡龙, 赵清, 丁登山. 风景名胜区规划实施的景观生态效应——以南京市幕燕风景名胜区为例[J]. 地理研究, 2004, 23(5): 605-613.
[10]	吴佩林. 中欧合作科研项目“可持续性农业生态系统管理与城乡互动发展研究”启动会召开[J]. 地理研究, 2002, 21(6): 741-741.
[11]	傅泽强, 蔡运龙, 杨友孝. 中国食物安全基础的定量评估[J]. 地理研究, 2001, 20(5): 555-563.