城市居住用地防灾适宜度评价的OWA方法

doi:10.11821/yj2009010001

地理研究 ›› 2009, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (1): 1-10.doi: 10.11821/yj2009010001

• 地球信息科学 • 下一篇

城市居住用地防灾适宜度评价的OWA方法

朱庆杰, 苏幼坡, 陈静

河北理工大学建筑工程学院,河北唐山 063009

收稿日期:2008-03-24 修回日期:2008-07-22 出版日期:2009-01-25 发布日期:2009-01-25
作者简介:朱庆杰(1966-),男,河北邢台人,教授,博士。主要从事城市综合防灾方向的研究工作。 *通讯作者 : 苏幼坡(1956-),男,河北唐山人,教授,博士。主要从事结构防灾方向的研究工作。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(50678059);河北理工大学学科建设项目资助

Suitability evaluation of residential area for disaster prevention with GIS-based OWA method

ZHU Qing-jie, SU You-po, CHEN Jing

College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Hebei Polytechnic University, Tangshan 063009, China

Received:2008-03-24 Revised:2008-07-22 Online:2009-01-25 Published:2009-01-25
Supported by:
国家自然科学基金项目(50678059);河北理工大学学科建设项目资助

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

城市居住用地的安全受到多种灾害威胁,防灾决策的主要问题之一是开发基于GIS的多准则评价 (MCE)方法。文章介绍了在基于GIS的次序权重平均法 (OWA)中,依据重要性等级计算次序权重和应用层次分析程序 (AHP)构建比较矩阵计算准则权重的方法;通过OWA评价方法与布尔决策和权重线性叠加 (WLC)等多准则评价方法的比较,分析了不同方法的决策风险和指标等级重要次序的影响,并以唐山市为例,建立了各灾害因子的适宜度评价准则,计算了唐山市居住用地的防灾适宜度,对唐山市居住用地的合理开发提出了几点建议。

关键词: 适宜度, OWA, 多准则评价, 防灾, GIS, 唐山

Abstract:

Land safety of urban resident area is threatened by many disaster factors with different evaluation criteria, and the developing of GIS-based multi-criteria evaluation (MCE) method is the key of suitability evaluation for disaster prevention. Ordered weighted averaging (OWA) is a multi-criteria evaluation procedure, which can generate a wide range of decision strategies through calculating order weights and criterion weights. The calculation method of order weights based on rank-order approximation, and the construction method of comparison matrix for criterion weight based on analytical hierarchy program (AHP), are introduced. The difference in decision strategy between OWA and other GIS-based MCE methods, such as Boolean overlay and weighted linear combination (WLC), is analyzed through analyzing OWA evaluation procedure. Furthermore, the method to establish evaluation criteria based on distance is investigated. As an example, GIS-based OWA method is applied to Tangshan City. According to the data of geological disaster in Tangshan City, evaluation criteria for every disaster factor based on distance is constructed, and attribute values of disaster factors are fuzzy quantifiers; comparison matrix is calculated based on AHP, criteria weights and consistency ratio are obtained; order weights based on rank-order approximation are calculated, and land-use suitability affected by geological disaster factors in Tangshan City is calculated with OWA. The differences between OWA results and WLC results are analyzed. Through comparsion with the distribution of floor area ratio of residential areas, some advice is proposed for rational development of land resource in Tangshan City. Residential areas should be developed in the northwestern part of Tangshan City, where the suitability is relatively high, and moderate-low floor area ratio should be suitable for the middle part of the city in order to avoid the disaster-induced loss.

Key words: suitability, OWA, MCE, disaster prevention, GIS, Tangshan

朱庆杰, 苏幼坡, 陈静. 城市居住用地防灾适宜度评价的OWA方法[J]. 地理研究, 2009, 28(1): 1-10.

ZHU Qing-jie, SU You-po, CHEN Jing. Suitability evaluation of residential area for disaster prevention with GIS-based OWA method[J]. GEOGRAPHICAL RESEARCH, 2009, 28(1): 1-10.

参考文献

[1] Malczewski J.GIS-based land-use suitability analysis:A critical overview.Progress in Planning, 2004,6(2):3~65.

[2] Chakhar S, Martel J M. Enhancing geographical information system capabilities with multi-criteria evaluation functions. Journal of Geographic Information and Decision Analysis, 2003, 7(2): 47~71.

[3] Yager R R. Quantifier guided aggregation using OWA operation. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 1996,11(1): 49~73.

[4] Xu Z S, Da Q L. Hybrid aggregation operator and it s application to multiple attribute decision making problems. Journal of Southeast University (English Edition), 2003,19(2): 174~177.

[5] Xu Z S, Chen J. An interactive method for fuzzy multiple attribute group decision making. Information Sciences, 2007,177 (1): 248~263.

[6] Wang Y M, Luo Y, Hua Z S. Aggregating preference rankings using OWA operator weights. Information Sciences, 2007,177 (16):3356~3363.

[7] Wang Y M, Luo Y, Liu X W. Two new models for determining OWA operator weights. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2007, 52 (2):203~209.

[8] Byeong S A. Preference relation approach for obtaining OWA operators weights. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 2008, 47 (2):166~178.

[9] Yager R R. Using trapezoids for representing granular objects: Applications to learning and OWA aggregation. Information Sciences, 2008,178 (1): 363~380.

[10] Makropoulos C K, Butler D. Spatial ordered weighted averaging: Incorporating spatially variable attitude towards risk in spatial multi-criteria decision-making. Environmental Modelling & Software, 2006,21 (1):69~84.

[11] Malczewski J. Ordered weighted averaging with fuzzy quantifiers: GIS-based multicriteria evaluation for land-use suitability analysis. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 2006, 8(4): 270~277.

[12] 刘贵利.城乡结合部建设用地适宜性评价初探.地理研究,2000,19(1):80~85.

[13] 陈松林. 基于GIS 的荒地资源适宜性评价.福建地理,2001,16(1):34~37.

[14] 陈雯,孙伟,段学军,等. 苏州地域开发适宜性分区.地理学报,2006,61(8):839~846.

[15] 千怀遂,任玉玉,李明霞. 河南省棉花的气候风险研究.地理学报,2006,61(3):319~326.

[16] 梁涛,蔡春霞.城市土地的生态适宜性评价方法——以江西萍乡市为例.地理研究,2007,26(4):782~789.

[17] 宗跃光,王蓉.城市建设用地生态适宜性评价的潜力限制性分析—以大连城市化区为例.地理研究,2007, 26(6):1117~1127.

[18] 梁军,朱庆杰,苏幼坡,等.地质灾害影响下的唐山市土地利用适宜度评价.世界地震工程,2007, 23(4): 19~24.

[19] 柴慧霞,周成虎.基于地理格网的新疆地貌区划方法与实现.地理研究,2008,27(3):481~493.

[20] 任学慧,林霞.大连城市居住适宜性的空间评价.地理研究,2008,27(3): 683~693.

城市居住用地防灾适宜度评价的OWA方法

Suitability evaluation of residential area for disaster prevention with GIS-based OWA method

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	胡国建, 金星星, 陆玉麒, 陈娱, 李恩康. 中国上市公司总部与注册地跨城市分离的格局、形成过程和影响因素[J]. 地理研究, 2021, 40(2): 402-418.
[2]	王钧, 宫清华, 宇岩, 袁少雄, 陈军, 黄光庆. 粤港澳大湾区城市群自然灾害综合承灾能力评价[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(9): 2189-2199.
[3]	郭岩, 杨昌鸣, 张雨洋. 场域视角下清代北京宣南雅文化核心区范围及空间关联特征[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(4): 836-852.
[4]	张海平, 周星星, 汤国安, 周蕾, 叶信岳. 基于GIS场模型的城市餐饮服务热点探测及空间格局分析[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(2): 354-369.
[5]	蒋佳佳, 邵景安, 谭少军, 杜建平. 重庆两江新区低丘缓坡开发建设生态适宜性评价[J]. 地理研究, 2019, 38(6): 1403-1419.
[6]	刘云刚, 陆大道, 保继刚, 叶超, 汤茂林, 刘瑜, 赵耀龙, 冯章献, 黄晓军, 郝庆, 黄耿志, 王丰龙, 魏宗财, 王立, 谢阳, 钱丽芸. 如何回归地理学：我的思考与实践[J]. 地理研究, 2018, 37(6): 1049-1069.
[7]	张济婷, 周素红. 转型期广州市居民职住模式的群体差异及其影响因素[J]. 地理研究, 2018, 37(3): 564-576.
[8]	赵明松, 李德成, 张甘霖, 王世航. 1980-2010年安徽省土壤有机碳密度及储量时空变化分析[J]. 地理研究, 2018, 37(11): 2206-2217.
[9]	顾丽娟, 曾菊新. 社会经济及环境因子对不同收入群体自评健康的影响[J]. 地理研究, 2017, 36(7): 1257-1270.
[10]	李江苏, 唐志鹏. 再生型资源型城市产业的结构性增长研究——以唐山市为例[J]. 地理研究, 2017, 36(4): 707-718.
[11]	欧定华, 夏建国. 基于粒子群算法的大城市近郊区景观格局优化研究——以成都市龙泉驿区为例[J]. 地理研究, 2017, 36(3): 553-572.
[12]	杨传开, 刘晔, 徐伟, 宁越敏. 中国农民进城定居的意愿与影响因素——基于CGSS2010的分析[J]. 地理研究, 2017, 36(12): 2369-2382.
[13]	杨昆, 杨玉莲, 朱彦辉, 李岑, 孟超. 中国PM_2.5污染与社会经济的空间关系及成因[J]. 地理研究, 2016, 35(6): 1051-1060.
[14]	师满江, 颉耀文, 曹琦. 干旱区绿洲农村居民点景观格局演变及机制分析[J]. 地理研究, 2016, 35(4): 692-702.
[15]	陈烨烽, 王艳慧, 王小林. 中国贫困村测度与空间分布特征分析[J]. 地理研究, 2016, 35(12): 2298-2308.