关中地区公众气候变化感知的时空变异

doi:10.11821/yj2009010007

地理研究 ›› 2009, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (1): 45-54.doi: 10.11821/yj2009010007

关中地区公众气候变化感知的时空变异

周旗, 郁耀闯

宝鸡文理学院灾害监测与机理模拟陕西省重点实验室,陕西宝鸡 721013

收稿日期:2008-01-14 修回日期:2008-07-19 出版日期:2009-01-25 发布日期:2009-01-25
作者简介:周旗(1963-),男, 重庆市荣昌县人,教授, 博士。主要从事地理科学与环境科学的教学与研究工作。Email:zhouqi@bjwlxy.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目《中国西部地区公众灾害感知的地理研究 (40471053)》、国家社会科学基金项目《区域自然灾害风险综合评估研究 (07XZZ006)》、陕西省重点实验室项目《关中地区干旱化的环境响应与适应对策(05JS41)》和宝鸡文理学院重点科研项目《区域灾害可接受性研究(05ZK06)》成果。

Spatio-temporal variation of public perception on climate change in the Guanzhong area

ZHOU Qi, YU Yao-chuang

Key Lab. of Disaster Monitoring and Mechanism Simulating of Shaanxi Province|Baoji University of Arts and Sciences, Baoji 721013, Shaanxi, China

Received:2008-01-14 Revised:2008-07-19 Online:2009-01-25 Published:2009-01-25
Supported by:
国家自然科学基金项目《中国西部地区公众灾害感知的地理研究 (40471053)》、国家社会科学基金项目《区域自然灾害风险综合评估研究 (07XZZ006)》、陕西省重点实验室项目《关中地区干旱化的环境响应与适应对策(05JS41)》和宝鸡文理学院重点科研项目《区域灾害可接受性研究(05ZK06)》成果。

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

公众对气候变化的感知是制定有效适应策略的基础。通过问卷调查和实测数据对比的方式,揭示了关中地区居民对当地气温和降水变化的感知差异。结果表明:(1)从总体趋势上,居民对温度、降水的感知与实测数据相对一致。在温度、降水变率较大的时段,居民的感知差异也较大;(2)关中东、西部地区居民对当地温度的感知强度均随年龄变小而在波动中呈上升趋势,中部地区则相反;对当地降水的感知强度,中、西部在波动中呈下降趋势,东部地区则相反;(3)居民的感知变化与实测数据的变化具有偏差。与实测的数据对比,居民的温度变化感知一致率东、中、西部分别为37.5％、75％、37.5％,而对降水变化的感知的一致率均为50％。

关键词: 感知强度, 气候变化, 时空变异, 关中地区

Abstract:

Public perception of climate change can support the development of adaptation strategy. By comparing the questionnaire survey results with climate data, this paper revealed the perception difference to the local air temperature and precipitation in the Guanzhong area. The results show that: (1) the local residents' perceptions of temperature and precipitation changes are in accord with, and proportionate to the real data; (2) the residents' perception intensities to the local temperature in the eastern and western Guanzhong area show an increasing trend with the aged becoming small, while the central part is opposite; the perception intensities to the precipitation, the central and western areas are a decreasing trend,while the eastern is opposite; (3) The deviations exist between the resident's perception and the real data changes. In contrast to the real data, the consistent ratings of the residents' perception to temperature changes in the eastern, central and western Guanzhong area are 37.5%, 75%, 37.5%, respectively; to the precipitation changes' consistent ratings is 50% each.

Key words: perceptual intensity, climate change, spatio-temporal variation, Guanzhong area

周旗, 郁耀闯. 关中地区公众气候变化感知的时空变异[J]. 地理研究, 2009, 28(1): 45-54.

ZHOU Qi, YU Yao-chuang. Spatio-temporal variation of public perception on climate change in the Guanzhong area[J]. GEOGRAPHICAL RESEARCH, 2009, 28(1): 45-54.

参考文献

[1] IGBP.全球变化与地球系统:一颗重负之下的行星.2001.

[2] 周旗, 庞德谦,方修琦.灾害对策学.北京:中国环境科学出版社,1997.

[3] 叶笃正.中国的全球变化与可持续发展研究.地球科学进展,1999,14(4):317~318.

[4] 叶笃正,吕建华.对未来全球变化影响的适应和可持续发展.中国科学院院刊,2000,(3):183~187.

[5] 刘东生.全球变化和可持续发展科学.地学前沿,2002,9(1):1~8.

[6] 陈宜瑜.全球变化与社会可持续发展.地球科学进展,2003,18(1):1~3.

[7] 符淙斌,董文杰,温刚,等.全球变化的区域响应和适应.气象学报,2003,61(2):245~250.

[8] Guy Brasseur. 3rd IGBP Congress Overview. Global Change News Letter, 2003,55:1~3.

[9] Lowe T. Vicarious experience vs. scientific information in climate change risk perception and behaviour: A case study of undergraduate students in Norwich, UK, Tyndall Centre Technical Report.Stewart R, Wiener J. 2003, Reconstructing Climate Policy: Beyond Kyoto, The AEI Press, Washington, D.C.

[10] Kempton W.How the public views climate change. Environment,1997,39(9):12~21.

[11] Berk R, Fovell R.Public perceptions of climate change: A'Willingness to Pay" assessment. Climatic Change, 1999, 413~446.

[12] Jing-Yi Li. Assessment of public risk perception in North-western China. Risk Assessment and Management,2008,8(4):353~361.

[13] Pomerance R. The dangers from climate warming: A public awakening. In:Abrahamson D E (Ed.), The Challenge of Global Warming. Washington, D.C: Island Press,1989.259~269.

[14] Leiserowitz, A. Communicating the risks of global warming: American risk perceptions,affective images and interpretive communities. In:Moser S C, Dilling L(Eds.), Creating a Climate for Change: Communicating Climate Change and Facilitating Social Change.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,2007.44~63.

[15] Leiserowitz A, Kates R W, Parris T M. Do global attitudes and behaviors support sustainable development? Environment, 2005,47(9): 22~38.

[16] Leiserowitz A. Global warming in the American mind: The roles of affect, imagery, and worldviews in risk perception, policy preferences and behavior. Unpublished Dissertation,University of Oregon, Eugene,2003.

[17] Leiserowitz A. Before and after The Day After Tomorrow:A U.S. study of climate change risk perception. Environment, 2004,46(9):22~37.

[18] Leiserowitz A. American risk perceptions: Is climate change dangerous? Risk Analysis, 2005,25(6):1433~1442.

[19] Leiserowitz A. Climate change risk perception and policy preferences: The role of affect, imagery, and values. Climatic Change, 2006,77, 45~72.

[20] 葛全胜,陈泮勤,方修琦,等.全球变化的区域适应研究:挑战与研究对策.地球科学进展,2004,19(4):516~524.

[21] Bostrom A, Morgan M G, Fischhoff B, et al. What do people know about global climate change? Risk Analysis, 1994,14(6):959~970.

[22] Bord R J, Fisher A, & O'Connor R E.Public perceptions of global warming: United States and international perspectives. Climate Research, 1998,11:75~84.

[23] Poortinga W, Pidgeon N, Lorenzoni I. Public perceptions of nuclear power, climate change and energy options in Britain: Summary findings of a survey conducted during October and November 2005. Technical Report (No. Understanding Risk Working Paper 06-02). Norwich: Centre for Environmental Risk,2006.

[24] Berrien MOORE Ⅲ.Challenges of a changing earth:Towards a scientific understanding of global change. Earth Science Frontiers (China University of Geosciences ,Beijing), 2002,9(1):1~47.

[25] 张兰生,方修琦,任国玉.全球变化.北京:高等教育出版社,2003.

[26] 田青.人类感知和适应气候变化的行为学研究－以吉林省敦化市乡村为例. 博士论文,北京师范大学,2005.

[27] 叶笃正,符淙斌,季劲钧,等. 有序人类活动与生存环境.地球科学进展,2003,16(4):453~460.

[28] 彭聃龄,张必隐.认知心理学.杭州:浙江教育出版社,2004,6.

[29] 彭聃龄.普通心理学.北京:北京师范大学出版社,2004.648.

[30] Nick Pidgeon,Risk assessment,risk values and the social science programme:Why we do need risk perception research? Reliability Engineering and System Safety,1998,59:5~15.

[31] Bernard lcohen.Public perception versus of scientific risk analysis. Reliability Engineering and System Safety,1998,59:101~105.

关中地区公众气候变化感知的时空变异

Spatio-temporal variation of public perception on climate change in the Guanzhong area

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	田庆春, 裴瑜, 石培宏. 可可西里地区中更新世以来气候演化周期特征分析[J]. 地理研究, 2021, 40(3): 900-911.
[2]	刘桂芳, 诸云强, 关瑞敏, 冯亚飞, 刘情, 夏梦琳, 张亚星, 卢鹤立. 大数据时代中国气候变化科学数据共享服务的发展现状与趋势分析[J]. 地理研究, 2021, 40(2): 571-582.
[3]	马超, 崔培培, 钟广睿, 孟梦, 杨城, 马雯思. 气候变化和工程活动对青藏铁路沿线植被指数时空变化的影响[J]. 地理研究, 2021, 40(1): 35-51.
[4]	付阳, 陈辉, 张斯琦, 杨祎, 赵元杰. 基于群落类型的寒区旱区物候特征及其对气候因子的响应——以2000—2019年柴达木盆地为例[J]. 地理研究, 2021, 40(1): 52-66.
[5]	熊思鸿, 阎建忠, 吴雅. 农户生计对气候变化的恢复力研究综述[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(8): 1934-1946.
[6]	刘晓琼, 孙曦亮, 刘彦随, 张健, 赵新正, 芮旸. 基于REOF-EEMD的西南地区气候变化区域分异特征[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(5): 1215-1232.
[7]	张立娟, 李艳红, 任涵, 王丽园, 朱文博, 朱连奇. 气候变化背景下青冈分布变化及其对中国亚热带北界的指示意义[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(4): 990-1001.
[8]	谢舒笛, 莫兴国, 胡实, 陈学娟. 三北防护林工程区植被绿度对温度和降水的响应[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(1): 152-165.
[9]	王灵恩,韩禹文,高俊,吕宁,Chris Ryan. 气候变化背景下青藏高原地区游客决策与体验分析[J]. 地理研究, 2019, 38(9): 2314-2329.
[10]	高超, 李学文, 许莹, 李德. 淮河流域蚌埠闸以上地区夏玉米生育阶段水分供需时空变化特征研究[J]. 地理研究, 2019, 38(7): 1833-1846.
[11]	白孟鑫, 郑景云, 郝志新, 张学珍. 20世纪以来美国树木生长响应气候变化敏感度的时空差异[J]. 地理研究, 2019, 38(4): 822-830.
[12]	高新月, 戴君虎, 张明庆. 1965-2014年北京西郊地区植物观赏期对气候变化的响应[J]. 地理研究, 2018, 37(12): 2420-2432.
[13]	吴卓, 戴尔阜, 林媚珍. 气候变化和人类活动对南方红壤丘陵区森林生态系统影响模拟研究——以江西泰和县为例[J]. 地理研究, 2018, 37(11): 2141-2152.
[14]	马超, 刘玮玮, 赵鹏飞, 马雯思, 马威. 1962-2016年达里诺尔流域水、草退化及气候响应[J]. 地理研究, 2017, 36(9): 1755-1772.
[15]	史培军, 王季薇, 张钢锋, 孔锋, 王静爱. 透视中国自然灾害区域分异规律与区划研究[J]. 地理研究, 2017, 36(8): 1401-1414.