基于多代理模型的城市土地利用博弈模拟

doi:10.11821/yj2009010011

地理研究 ›› 2009, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (1): 85-96.doi: 10.11821/yj2009010011

基于多代理模型的城市土地利用博弈模拟

季民河^1,2, Michael Monticino³, Miguel Acevedo⁴

1. 华东师范大学地理信息科学教育部重点实验室,上海 200063;
2. 上海财经大学公共经济与管理学院,上海 200064;
3. Department of Mathematics University of North Texas, Denton, TX 76203, USA;
4. Biological and Environmental Engineering Program, University of North Texas, Denton, TX 76203, USA

收稿日期:2008-04-25 修回日期:2008-10-09 发布日期:2010-11-20
作者简介:季民河(1955-),博士,教授。研究方向为地理信息处理、环境遥感、空间分析、土地利用模拟。 E-mail:mhji@geo.ecnu.edu.cn
基金资助:
美国国家科学基金会"环境中的生物复杂性"项目(CNH BCS-0216722)

Multi-agent based modeling of land-use decision making process in a democratic setting

JI Min-he^1,2, Michael Monticino³, Miguel Acevedo⁴

1. Key Lab of Geographic Information Science, Ministry of Education of China, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200063, China;
2. School of Public Economics and Management, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, Shanghai 200064, China;
3. Department of Mathematics, University of North Texas, TX 76203, USA;
4. Biological and Environmental Engineering Program, University of North Texas, TX 76203, USA

Received:2008-04-25 Revised:2008-10-09 Published:2010-11-20
Supported by:
美国国家科学基金会"环境中的生物复杂性"项目(CNH BCS-0216722)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

以美国达拉斯北部地区为例,通过建立基于多代理的人类系统和自然系统的耦合互动模型,研究不同土地管理策略的有效性。自然系统包含土地覆盖变化、流域水文动力学和野生动物栖息地生态系统。人类系统包括土地利益相关者(地主、屋主、开发商、政府)的影响土地利用变化价值观。系统强调自然对土地利用决策的反馈机制,不同类型代理相对空间位置的重要作用,以及同一类别中不同类型代理在特定情形下的相互转化。研究进行了两类模拟,一是模拟初始化的若干情景,包括不同类型地主和户主的分布、不同类型政府以及经济模型的假定;二是模拟主动式土地政策的实施效果。模拟结果表明,当政府购置保留地时考虑土地拥有者的价值观,较之单纯基于机会或生态因素更能导致有效的增长管理策略。

关键词: 土地开发管理, 土地政策模拟, 决策模型, 可持续发展, 多代理模拟, 系统耦合

Abstract:

Residential development is a major driving force in the dynamics of urban land use and ecosystems. The type and rate of land development depend on the complex interaction among the stakeholders and their responses to the environmental consequences after a development decision is made. This paper introduces a framework of a coupled human and natural system and uses a multi-agent model to simulate the complex interactions among land stakeholders with respect to the decision making process for local land development. The human system was built on a multi-agent model, with each class of agents representing different types of landowners, homeowners, municipal government, and commercial developers, respectively. The decision making process of each agent class was modeled using an agent-specific multi-attribute utility function. The complex interactions among different classes of agents as well as among the agents of the same class were simulated with a given time lag in sequence. The natural system was built on a cellular automata platform, where the land cover transition rules were governed by a landscape model (MOSAIC) and a patch model (FACET). The environmental quality indices to be used as feedback to the human system were generated from a hydrological model and a habitat model. In each lifecycle of simulation, human decisions on land development were passed to the natural system, which in turn generated environmental indices to be considered by the concerned agents (such as homeowners and the government) in the land-related decision making in the next cycle. Using a fast-urbanizing region in northern Texas as the study area, the model was run to produce simulations with a 25-year time span. Preliminary results demonstrated the ability of the model in simulating real dynamic situations at the qualitative level. It revealed a cyclic trend of interactions among agents, which was also observed in the real situation, with landowners and homeowners being the most active agent types. In addition, this study tested several land management strategies and revealed that considering landowner values when targeting available open space for preservation may lead to more effective growth management strategies than solely purchasing land based on opportunity or ecological factors. Extensive efforts are also required when applying this modeling framework to different socioeconomic and cultural settings, such as China.

Key words: land development management, land policy simulation, decision model, sustainable development, multi-agent based modeling, coupled human and natural system

季民河, Michael Monticino, Miguel Acevedo. 基于多代理模型的城市土地利用博弈模拟[J]. 地理研究, 2009, 28(1): 85-96.

JI Min-he, Michael Monticino, Miguel Acevedo. Multi-agent based modeling of land-use decision making process in a democratic setting[J]. GEOGRAPHICAL RESEARCH, 2009, 28(1): 85-96.

参考文献

[1] Parker D C, Manson S M, Jansen M A, et al. Multi-Stakeholder systems for the simulation of Land-Use and Land-Cover Change: A review. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 2003, 93(2): 314~337.

[2] Fan C. The interdisciplinary activities in NSF.Bulletin of National Natural Science of Foundation of China, 2005, 19(2):122~124.

[3] Monticino M, Acevedo M, Callicott B, Ji M, et al. Coupled human and natural systems: A Multi-agent based approach. In: Pahl-Wostl C, Schmidt S, Rizzoli A E,et al, (eds. ). Complexity and Integrated Resources Management. Transactions of the 2^nd Biannual Meeting of the International Environmental Modeling and Software Society, iEMSs: Manno, Switzerland. June 4-17, 2004. 1:196~202.

[4] Janssen M A.Complexity and Ecosystem Management: The Theory and Practice of Multi-Agent Systems. Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing Co. , 2003. 12~14.

[5] Lei Z, Pijanowski C, Olson J. Distributed modeling architecture of a Multi-agent based behavioral economic landscape (MABEL) model. Simulation, 2005, 81(7): 503~515.

[6] Bonabeau E.Agent-based modeling: Methods and techniques for simulating human systems. In: Proceedings of National Academics and Sciences, 2002, 99:7280~7287.

[7] Hoffmann M, Kelley H, Evans T. Simulating land-cover changes in south-central Indiana: An agent-based model of deforestation and aforestation. In: Janssen, M A eds. Complexity and Ecosystem Management: the Theory and Practice of Multi-Agent System, Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishers, 2003. 218~247.

[8] Evans T P, Kelley H. Multi-scale analysis of a household level Agent-based model of land cover change. Journal of Environmental Management, 2004, 72(1-2):57~72.

[9] Box P. Spatial units as agents: Making the landscape an equal player in agent-based simulations. In: Gimblett H, (eds. ). Integrating Geographic Information Systems and Agent-based Modeling Techniques for Simulating Social and Ecological Processes.New York: Oxford University Press,2002.59~82.

[10] Nute D. NED-2: An agent based decision support system for forest ecosystem management. Environmental Modeling and Software,2004,19(9):831~843.

[11] Gimblett H. Integrating GIS, Agent-based technologies for modeling and simulating social and ecological phenomena. In: Gimblett H, (eds. ). Integrating Geographic Information Systems and Agent-based Modeling Techniques for Simulating Social and Ecological Processes. New York: Oxford University Press,2002.1~20.

[12] 蔡运龙. 土地利用/土地覆被变化研究:寻求新的综合途径.地理研究,2001, 20(6) : 645~652.

[13] 陶海燕, 黎夏, 陈晓翔, 等. 基于多智能体的地理空间分异现象模拟——以城市居住空间演变为例. 地理学报, 2007, 62(6) : 579~588.

[14] 魏芳.北京人口分布CA/MAS仿真模型.硕士学位论文,哈尔滨理工大学,2007.1~53.

[15] 张金牡,吴波,沈体雁. 基于Agent模型的北京市土地利用变化动态模拟研究.东华理工学院学报,2004, 27(1): 80~83.

[16] 刘小平,黎夏,叶嘉安.基于多智能体系统的空间决策行为及土地利用格局演变的模拟. 中国科学D辑,地球科学,2006, 36(11) : 1027~1036.

[17] 杨青生,黎夏.多智能体与元胞自动机结合及城市用地扩张模拟.地理科学,2007,27(4): 542~548.

[18] NCTCOG. North central texas council of governments demographic estimates, www.dfwinfo.com. 2003.

[19] Keeney R L and Raiffa H. Decisions with Multiple Objectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.

[20] Berry B J L. Long-Wave Rhythms in Economic Development and Political Behavior. Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University Press, 1991.

[21] Duerksen C, Snyder C. Nature friendly communities: Habitat protection and land use. Washington, DC, Island Press, 2005.

基于多代理模型的城市土地利用博弈模拟

Multi-agent based modeling of land-use decision making process in a democratic setting

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	高卿, 苗毅, 宋金平. 青藏高原可持续发展研究进展[J]. 地理研究, 2021, 40(1): 1-17.
[2]	余慧容, 杜鹏飞. 农业景观保护路径历史回顾及启示[J]. 地理研究, 2021, 40(1): 152-171.
[3]	汪芳, 安黎哲, 党安荣, 韩建业, 苗长虹, 王静, 张广汉, 赵勇. 黄河流域人地耦合与可持续人居环境[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(8): 1707-1724.
[4]	臧玉珠, 刘彦随, 杨园园, 王永生. 中国精准扶贫土地整治的典型模式[J]. 地理研究, 2019, 38(4): 856-868.
[5]	李玉恒, 阎佳玉, 宋传垚. 乡村振兴与可持续发展——国际典型案例剖析及其启示[J]. 地理研究, 2019, 38(3): 595-604.
[6]	李玉恒, 宋传垚, 阎佳玉, 刘彦随. 转型期中国农户生计响应的时空差异及对乡村振兴战略启示[J]. 地理研究, 2019, 38(11): 2595-2605.
[7]	李扬, 汤青. 中国人地关系及人地关系地域系统研究方法述评[J]. 地理研究, 2018, 37(8): 1655-1670.
[8]	葛全胜, 董晓峰, 毛其智, 张文忠, 杜龙江, 张伟, 何春阳, 吴殿廷, 吕拉昌, 陈明星, 孙进柱, 孙斌栋, 赵鹏军, 潘竟虎, 彭建, 强海洋. 雄安新区：如何建成生态与创新之都[J]. 地理研究, 2018, 37(5): 849-869.
[9]	李郇, 吴康, 龙瀛, 李志刚, 罗小龙, 张学良, 王德起, 杨东峰, 郐艳丽, 李裕瑞, 杨振山, 周恺, 胡毅, 宋涛, 戚伟, 李昊, 高舒琦. 局部收缩：后增长时代下的城市可持续发展争鸣[J]. 地理研究, 2017, 36(10): 1997-2016.
[10]	向秀容, 潘韬, 吴绍洪, 刘卫东, 马丽, 王晓峰, 尹云鹤, 李静. 基于生态足迹的天山北坡经济带生态承载力评价与预测[J]. 地理研究, 2016, 35(5): 875-884.
[11]	温晓金, 杨新军, 王子侨. 多适应目标下的山地城市社会—生态系统脆弱性评价[J]. 地理研究, 2016, 35(2): 299-312.
[12]	丁蕾, 吴小根, 王腊春, 章锦河. 水体旅游可持续发展评价[J]. 地理研究, 2015, 34(3): 578-586.
[13]	王岱, 蔺雪芹, 刘旭, 孙鸣喆. 北京市县域都市农业可持续发展水平动态分异与提升路径[J]. 地理研究, 2014, 33(9): 1706-1715.
[14]	王连勇, 霍伦贺斯特·斯蒂芬. 创建统一的中华国家公园体系——美国历史经验的启示[J]. 地理研究, 2014, 33(12): 2407-2417.
[15]	王楠楠, 章锦河, 刘泽华, 钟士恩, 李升峰. 九寨沟自然保护区旅游生态系统能值分析[J]. 地理研究, 2013, 32(12): 2346-2356.