京沪生产性服务业比较研究

doi:10.11821/yj2009020018

地理研究 ›› 2009, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (2): 441-450.doi: 10.11821/yj2009020018

京沪生产性服务业比较研究

申玉铭¹, 邱灵^2,3, 尚于力¹, 任旺兵⁴

1. 首都师范大学资源环境与旅游学院,北京 100048;
2. 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所,北京 100101;
3. 中国科学院研究生院,北京 100049;
4. 国家发展和改革委员会宏观经济研究院,北京 100038

收稿日期:2008-09-01 修回日期:2008-12-21 出版日期:2009-03-25 发布日期:2009-03-25
作者简介:申玉铭(1968-),男,河南浚县人,博士,教授。主要从事区域经济与区域可持续发展研究。 E-mail:shenyuming@263.net
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(40871069);国家"十一五"科技支撑计划重大项目(2006BAJ05A06);北京市自然科学基金项目(9072002)

Comparative research on producer services between Beijing and Shanghai

SHEN Yu-ming¹, QIU Ling^2,3, SHANG Yu-li¹, REN Wang-bing⁴

1. College of Resources Environment and Tourism, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, China;
2. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China;
3. Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;
4. Academy of Macroeconomic Research, NDRC, Beijing 100038, China

Received:2008-09-01 Revised:2008-12-21 Online:2009-03-25 Published:2009-03-25
Supported by:
国家自然科学基金项目(40871069);国家"十一五"科技支撑计划重大项目(2006BAJ05A06);北京市自然科学基金项目(9072002)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

基于产业关联与空间分布的区域比较研究,探讨京沪生产性服务业发展的一般规律及其差异性。研究表明: ①京沪生产性服务业发展速度加快,金融业、交通运输业、房地产业是其主体;北京生产性服务业已步入发展成熟阶段,而上海尚处于发展起步阶段。②京沪第三产业对生产性服务业的中间需求最大,且呈现上升趋势;北京生产性服务业对服务经济的支撑作用突出,而上海生产性服务业与制造业的融合发展趋势更为明显。③京沪服务业对金融业的中间需求最大,但需求结构存在明显差异。④京沪制造业对生产性服务业的中间需求结构差异显著,北京制造业中间需求结构趋于高级化,而上海制造业对中间投入服务的消耗层次偏低。⑤京沪生产性服务业集中分布于中心区和近郊区,圈层衰减特征明显;不同行业乃至同一行业、不同发展阶段的空间分布特征均存在差异,但各行业空间集中与分散的变化趋势总体上存在一致性。

关键词: 生产性服务业, 产业关联, 空间分布, 区域比较

Abstract:

The development of producer services greatly promotes urban synthesized function and strengthens urban international competition. Based on an analysis of industry relevancy and its spatial distribution, this paper conducted an empirical study on the regional comparison of producer services between Beijing and Shanghai. The following conclusions are drawn. Firstly, the growth of producer services speeded up evidently from 1997 to 2002 both in Beijing and Shanghai. Finance, transportation and real estate were the main components of the producer services. Secondly, the output of producer services was mainly consumed by tertiary industries. There was an upward trend of the intermediate demand from 1997 to 2002. The share of tertiary industries on intermediate demand was higher in Beijing, while that of manufacturing industries on intermediate demand was higher in Shanghai. Thirdly, the main consumption by tertiary industries focused on finance, but the structure of intermediate demand was quite different between Beijing and Shanghai. Fourthly, the structure of intermediate demand by different types of manufacturing industries was quite different between Beijing and Shanghai. Finally, the spatial distribution of producer services focused on inner city and suburbs both in Beijing and Shanghai, which also presented a structure of circle attenuation. The structure of spatial distribution by different types of producer services was dissimilar, which could be divided into four types.

Key words: producer services, industry relevancy, spatial distribution, regional comparison

申玉铭, 邱灵, 尚于力, 任旺兵. 京沪生产性服务业比较研究[J]. 地理研究, 2009, 28(2): 441-450.

SHEN Yu-ming, QIU Ling, SHANG Yu-li, REN Wang-bing. Comparative research on producer services between Beijing and Shanghai[J]. GEOGRAPHICAL RESEARCH, 2009, 28(2): 441-450.

参考文献

[1] Greenfield H. Manpower and the Growth of Producer Services. New York: Columbia University Press,1966.

[2] Bayson J R. Business service firms, service space and the management of change. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development,1997,9(2):93~111.

[3] Shearmur R, Alvergne C. Intrametropolitan patterns of high-order business service location: A comparative study of seventeen sectors in Iie-de-France. Urban Studies,2002,39(7),1143~1163.

[4] Harrington J W. Empirical research on producer service growth and regional development: International comparisons. Professional Geographer,1995,47(1):66~69.

[5] 程大中. 中国生产者服务业的增长、结构变化及其影响——基于投入产出的分析. 财贸经济,2006,(10):45~52.

[6] 魏作磊,胡霞. 发达国家服务业需求结构的变动对中国的启示———项基于投入产出表的比较分析. 统计研究,2005,(5): 32~36.

[7] Karao Merlioglu D, Carlsson B. Manufacturing in decline? A matter of definition. Economy, Innovation, New Technology,1999,(8):175~196.

[8] Guerrieri Meliciani. International competitiveness in producer services. Paper presented at the SETI meeting Rome, 2003.

[9] 李冠霖. 第三产业投入产出分析——从投入产出的角度看第三产业的产业关联与产业波及特性. 北京:中国物价出版社,2002.

[10] Paolo G, Valentina M. Technology and international competitiveness: The interdependence between manufacturing and producer services. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics,2005,16(2):489~500.

[11] Illeris S. The nordic countries: High quality services in a low density environment. Progress in planning,1995,43(3):205~221.

[12] 阎小培. 广州信息密集服务业的空间发展及其对城市地域结构的影响. 地理科学,1999,19(5):405~410.

[13] Sassen S. The Global City: New York, London, Tokyo. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press,1991.

[14] Benntt R J, Graham D J, Braggon W. The location and concentration of business in Britain: Business clusters, business services, market coverage and local economic development. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers,1999,24(4):393~420.

[15] O'Connor k, Hutton T A. Producer services in the Asia Pacific region: An overview of research issue. Asia Pacific Viewpoint,1998,39(2):139~143.

[16] Oh'Uallachain B, Leslie T. Producer services in the urban core and suburbs of Phoenix, Arizona. Urban Studies,2007,44(8):1581~1601.

[17] Oh'Uallachain B, Reid N. The location and growth of business and professional services in American metropolitan areas, 1976-1986. Annals of the Association of American Geographers,1991,181(2):254~270.

[18] Pandit N R, Cook G A S, Swann G M P. A comparison of clustering dynamics in the British broadcasting and financial services industries. International Journal of the Economics of Business,2002,9(2):195~224.

[19] Yusuf S, Nabeshima K. Creative industries in East Asia. Cities,2005,22(2):109~122.

[20] 申玉铭,邱灵,任旺兵,等. 中国服务业空间差异的影响因素及空间分异特征. 地理研究,2007,26(6):1255~1264.

[21] 钟韵,闫小培. 改革开放以来香港生产性服务业对广州同行业的影响. 地理研究,2006,25(1):151~160.

[22] 段杰,阎小培. 粤港生产性服务业合作发展研究. 地域研究与开发,2003,22 (3) :26~30.

[23] 吴智刚,段杰,阎小培. 广东省生产性服务业的发展与空间差异研究. 华南师范大学学报,2003,(3):131~139.

[24] 杨亚琴,王丹. 国际大都市现代服务业集群发展的比较研究——以纽约、伦敦、东京为例的分析.世界经济研究,2005,(1):61~66.

[25] 孙钰,姚晓东. 城市服务业发展的国际比较——天津与巴黎的对比研究. 东北财经大学学报,2006,(2): 49~52.

[26] 申玉铭,邱灵,王茂军,等. 中国生产性服务业产业关联效应分析. 地理学报,2007,62(8):821~830.

[27] 杨波,卞伟,薛伟. 区位基尼系数与黑龙江地区产业分布状态的研究. 学术交流,2007,(3):97~100.

[28] Coffey W J. The geographies of producer services. Urban Geography,2002,21(2):170~183.

京沪生产性服务业比较研究

Comparative research on producer services between Beijing and Shanghai

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	朱晟君, 金文纨, 胡晓辉. 关联视角下的区域产业动态研究进展与反思[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(5): 1045-1055.
[2]	林金萍, 雷军, 吴世新, 杨振, 李建刚. 新疆绿洲乡村聚落空间分布特征及其影响因素[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(5): 1182-1199.
[3]	王雪芹, 戚伟, 刘盛和. 中国小城镇空间分布特征及其相关因素[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(2): 319-336.
[4]	李鹏, 赵敏, 艾伦·沃森, 杨鹏, 余丹. 美国荒野风景河流的空间分布特征及其对中国的启示[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(1): 166-185.
[5]	王辉, 栾维新, 康敏捷. 渤海氮污染的来源结构与污染压力空间分布[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(1): 186-199.
[6]	邓粒子, 保继刚. 中国避暑型与避寒型宜人气候的分布特征及差异[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(1): 41-52.
[7]	刘晔,王若宇,薛德升,曾经元. 中国高技能劳动力与一般劳动力的空间分布格局及其影响因素[J]. 地理研究, 2019, 38(8): 1949-1964.
[8]	周亮, 张亚. 中国顶尖学术型人才空间分布特征及其流动趋势——以中国科学院院士为例[J]. 地理研究, 2019, 38(7): 1749-1763.
[9]	梁晨霞, 王艳慧, 徐海涛, 齐文平, 程序, 赵文吉. 贫困村空间分布及影响因素分析——以乌蒙山连片特困区为例[J]. 地理研究, 2019, 38(6): 1389-1402.
[10]	马志飞, 尹上岗, 张宇, 李在军, 吴启焰. 中国城城流动人口的空间分布、流动规律及其形成机制[J]. 地理研究, 2019, 38(4): 926-936.
[11]	龙飞, 刘家明, 朱鹤, 李涛. 长三角地区民宿的空间分布及影响因素[J]. 地理研究, 2019, 38(4): 950-960.
[12]	周旭, 吕建树. 山东省广饶县土壤重金属来源、分布及生态风险[J]. 地理研究, 2019, 38(2): 414-426.
[13]	陈强强, 刘峰贵, 方修琦, 周强, 陈琼, 陈锐杰. 新石器时代晚期华北地区耕地重建[J]. 地理研究, 2019, 38(12): 2927-2940.
[14]	王硕, 蔡立梅, 王秋爽, 罗杰, 唐翠华, 穆桂珍, 蒋慧豪, 刘天勇. 中国城市地表灰尘中重金属的富集状况及空间分布特征[J]. 地理研究, 2018, 37(8): 1624-1640.
[15]	黄小莉, 李仙德, 温家洪, 李卫江, 杜士强. 极端洪灾情景下上海汽车制造业经济损失与波及效应评估[J]. 地理研究, 2017, 36(9): 1801-1816.