快速城市化背景下城乡结合部发展特征与机制 ——以北京海淀区为例

doi:10.11821/yj2009020023

地理研究 ›› 2009, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (2): 499-512.doi: 10.11821/yj2009020023

快速城市化背景下城乡结合部发展特征与机制 ——以北京海淀区为例

刘玉¹, 冯健², 孙楠³

1. 中国人民大学区域与城市经济研究所,北京 100872;
2. 北京大学城市与环境学院,北京 100871;
3. 中国人民大学社会学系,北京 100872

收稿日期:2008-11-04 修回日期:2008-12-26 出版日期:2009-03-25 发布日期:2009-03-25
作者简介:刘玉(1975-),女,江苏丰县人,博士,讲师。主要从事区域政策、城市与区域发展等方面的研究。E-mail:liuyu@mparuc.edu.cn *通讯作者 : 冯健(1975-)|男,江苏沛县人,副教授、博士。主要从事城镇化与城市社会地理方面的研究。 E-mail:fengjian@pku.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(40501023);国家科技支撑计划课题(2006BAJ11B01)

The characteristics and mechanism of the development of rural-urban fringe in the background of fast urbanization: A case study of Haidian District, Beijing

LIU Yu¹, FENG Jian², SUN Nan³

1. Institute of Regional and Urban Economy, RUC, Beijing 100872, China;
2. College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China;
3. Department of Sociology, RUC, Beijing 100872, China

Received:2008-11-04 Revised:2008-12-26 Online:2009-03-25 Published:2009-03-25
Supported by:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(40501023);国家科技支撑计划课题(2006BAJ11B01)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

通过对北京海淀区城乡结合部的实地调查,探讨了快速城市化背景下城乡结合部的发展特征及其形成机制。发现:海淀区城乡结合部居民构成复杂且就业、收入不稳定,社会保障水平偏低的弱势群体集中;外来人口规模庞大且具有乡镇集聚指向特点,其生产、生活方式与状态对城乡结合部发展影响深远;土地产权复杂交错,土地征用和土地流转存在诸多矛盾;农村经济的长期影响和居民消费能力等制约了城乡结合部的产业发展层次,新兴产业区的高新技术产业、现代化服务业难以与当地传统、低端产业对接,辐射带动能力非常有限;基础设施总体欠账严重,其建设主体多元化、交叉化,投资能力存在差异。独特的地域特点、复杂的历史背景,以及制度、规划与政策的缺失是影响城乡结合部发展的主要因素,未来发展应注重体制、规划与决策的创新。

关键词: 快速城市化, 城乡结合部, 北京, 海淀区

Abstract:

Based on plenty of field work and relevant theoretic analysis, this paper unveils and summarizes the developmental characteristics and the driving forces of the urban-rural fringe of Haidian District. The conclusion is the same with other urban-rural fringes in Beijing and in other large cities of China. Results show that the composition of residents in the urban-rural fringe of Haidian District is very complicated. Many people have no steady job and income, and their social welfare is also at a lower level. The size of floating population is almost equal to that of domicile population, and most of them live in the villages and towns of Haidian District. The manner of living and working of floating population has great effect on the development of urban-rural fringe. The proportion of green land in urban-rural fringe is much higher, and the compensation of taking up green land and the development right in green belt has not been resolved very well. The village-owned land is nearly half of the total area. The scarcity of reasonable criterion on land expropriation, development and management results in heavy conflicts. The traditional rural economy and low purchasing power of people impedes the improvement of industry of urban-rural fringe. There are many new industry parks in urban-rural fringe, but because of the great discrepancy between high-tech industry and traditional industry, they can not match very well. It is difficult for high-tech industry to bring into play it diffuse effect. There are more investors and managers of infrastructure than one in urban-rural fringe, and their capabilities are different. To be worse, the responsibilities of building infrastructure among different investors and managers are intersectant. All of these bring up a "dirty, disorder, bad and dangerous" urban-rural fringe. Special location, complicated background and weak system, planning and policy are main factors that influence the development of the urban-rural fringe.

Key words: fast urbanization, rural-urban fringe, Haidian District, Beijing

刘玉, 冯健, 孙楠. 快速城市化背景下城乡结合部发展特征与机制 ——以北京海淀区为例[J]. 地理研究, 2009, 28(2): 499-512.

LIU Yu, FENG Jian, SUN Nan. The characteristics and mechanism of the development of rural-urban fringe in the background of fast urbanization: A case study of Haidian District, Beijing[J]. GEOGRAPHICAL RESEARCH, 2009, 28(2): 499-512.

参考文献

[1] Pryor R J. Defining the rural-urban fringe. Social Forces, 1968, 47(2): 202~215.

[2] 任荣荣,张红.城乡结合部界定方法研究.城市问题,2008,(4):44~48.

[3] 戚本超,周达.北京城乡结合部的发展演变及启示.城市问题,2007,(1):61~64.

[4] Hushak L J. The urban demand for urban-rural fringe land. Land Economics, 1975, 51(2): 112~123.

[5] McMillen D P. A empirical model of urban fringe land use. Land Economics, 1989, 65(2): 138~145.

[6] 刘灵辉,陈银蓉,石伟伟.城乡结合部农地价格确定方法研究.安徽农业科学,2007,35(19):5873~5874.

[7] 马贤磊,曲福田.经济转型期土地征收增值收益形成机理及其分配.中国土地科学,2006,20(5):3~12.

[8] 何春阳,史培军,陈晋,等.北京地区土地利用/覆盖变化研究.地理研究,2001,20(6):679~689.

[9] 郭爱请,王辉.城乡结合部被征地农民利益保护研究.安徽农业科学,2007,35(4):1196~1197.

[10] 吴铮争,宋金平,王晓霞,等.北京城市边缘区城市化过程与空间扩展.地理研究,2008,27(2):285~294.

[11] López E, Bocco G, Mendoza M, et al. Predicting land-cover and land-use change in the urban fringe: A case in Morelia city, Mexico. Landscape Urban Planning, 2001, 55(4): 271~285.

[12] 刘盛和.城市土地利用扩展的空间模式与动力机制.地理科学进展,2002,21(1):43~50.

[13] 魏书华.城乡结合部城市化与农村集体资产处置.城市问题,2002,(4):66~69.

[14] 张勋宗,陈思君.城乡结合部社区管理的几个切入点研究.成都大学学报(教育科学版),2007,(8):133~135.

[15] Zhou Y X, Ma L J C. China’s urbanization levels: Reconstructing comparable time-series data based on the fifth population census. China Quarterly, 2003,173: 184~204.

[16] Zhou Y X, Ma L J C. China’s urban population statistics: A critical evaluation. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 2005,46(4): 272~289.

[17] Gu C L, Wang F H, Liu G L. The structure of social space in Beijing in 1998: A socialist city in transition. Urban Geography, 2005, 25(2): 167~192.

[18] Feng J, Wu F L, Logan J. From homogenous to heterogeneous: The transformation of Beijing's socio-spatial structure. Built Environment, 2008, 34(4): 482~497.

[19] Li Z G, Wu F L. Tenure-based residential segregation in post-reform Chinese cities: A case study of Shanghai.Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 2008, 33 (3): 404~419.

[20] Wu F L, Phelps N. Creating edge cities with Chinese characteristics: Transforming global city-regions in Beijing and Shanghai. Built Environment, 2008, 34(4): 423~438.

[21] Lin G C S. Chinese urbanism in question: State, society, and the reproduction of urban spaces.Urban Geography, 2007, 28: 7~29.

[22] Lin G C S. Reproducing spaces of Chinese urbanisation: New city-based and land-centred urban transformation. Urban Studies, 2007, 44: 1827~1855.

[23] Gallent N. The rural-urban fringe: A new priority for planning policy? Planning, Practice & Research, 2006,21(3): 383~393.

[24] 陈孟平.城乡结合部地区的制度安排、利益关系及调整.城市问题,2006,(9):94~97.

[25] Fang J, Wu F L, Logan J.From homogenous to heterogeneous: The transformation of Beijing's socio-spatial structure.Built Environment, 2008, 34(4): 482~497.

快速城市化背景下城乡结合部发展特征与机制 ——以北京海淀区为例

The characteristics and mechanism of the development of rural-urban fringe in the background of fast urbanization: A case study of Haidian District, Beijing

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	杨振山, 苏锦华, 杨航, 赵永宏. 基于多源数据的城市功能区精细化研究——以北京为例[J]. 地理研究, 2021, 40(2): 477-494.
[2]	杨成凤, 韩会然, 宋金平. 非首都功能疏解背景下批发市场商户的搬迁意愿及区位再选择因素——以北京市动物园服装批发市场为例[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(8): 1755-1768.
[3]	党艺, 余建辉, 张文忠. 环境类邻避设施对北京市住宅价格影响研究——以大型垃圾处理设施为例[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(8): 1769-1781.
[4]	湛东升, 张文忠, 张娟锋, 李佳洺, 谌丽, 党云晓. 北京市公共服务设施集聚中心识别分析[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(3): 554-569.
[5]	焦毅蒙, 赵娜, 岳天祥, 邓佳音. 城市化对北京市极端气候的影响研究[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(2): 461-472.
[6]	黄姣, 马冰滢, 李双成. 农业多功能性与都市区土地利用管理——框架和案例分析[J]. 地理研究, 2019, 38(7): 1791-1806.
[7]	唐晓峰. 北京传统城市空间治理：遗产与挑战[J]. 地理研究, 2019, 38(6): 1290-1298.
[8]	朱莎, 姜珊, 陶犁. 外围赌注和社区居民旅游承诺行为影响机制——以京郊市级民俗户为例[J]. 地理研究, 2019, 38(5): 1208-1221.
[9]	刘霄泉, 孙铁山, 李国平. 北京市域制造业的空间演化特征[J]. 地理研究, 2018, 37(8): 1575-1586.
[10]	赵美风, 刘盛和, 戚伟. 社区尺度下流动人口聚居区空间识别与尺度效应——以北京市为例[J]. 地理研究, 2018, 37(6): 1208-1222.
[11]	高新月, 戴君虎, 张明庆. 1965-2014年北京西郊地区植物观赏期对气候变化的响应[J]. 地理研究, 2018, 37(12): 2420-2432.
[12]	李佳洺, 孙威, 张文忠. 北京典型行业微区位选址比较研究——以北京企业管理服务业和汽车制造业为例[J]. 地理研究, 2018, 37(12): 2541-2553.
[13]	高斯瑶, 程杨. 北京市老年人口迁移意愿及影响因素研究[J]. 地理研究, 2018, 37(1): 119-132.
[14]	王芳, 牛方曲, 王志强. 微观尺度下基于商圈的北京市商业空间结构优化[J]. 地理研究, 2017, 36(9): 1697-1708.
[15]	吕永强, 郑新奇, 周麟. 路网中心性与城市功能用地空间分布相关性研究——以北京城市中心区为例[J]. 地理研究, 2017, 36(7): 1353-1363.