海南省松涛水库流域土壤侵蚀及控制方案

doi:10.11821/yj2009050006

地理研究 ›› 2009, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (5): 1197-1207.doi: 10.11821/yj2009050006

海南省松涛水库流域土壤侵蚀及控制方案

曾红娟¹, 杨胜天¹, 王凌², 郑东海¹, 张翠萍², 王雪蕾¹, 高云飞¹

1. 遥感与地理信息系统研究中心,环境遥感与数字城市北京市重点实验室, 北京师范大学地理学与遥感科学学院,北京 100875;
2. 海南岛环境科学研究院,海口 100053

收稿日期:2009-02-18 修回日期:2009-06-15 出版日期:2009-09-25 发布日期:2009-09-25
作者简介:曾红娟(1982-),女,贵州德江人,博士研究生。主要研究方向为生态水文遥感。 E-mail:zhj_eve@126.com *通讯作者 : 杨胜天(1965-),男,贵州贵阳人,教授,博士生导师。主要从事遥感和GIS应用研究。 E-mail:yangshengtian@bnu.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(40671123)

The situation and control scheme of soil erosion in Songtao Reservoir Basin of Hainan Island

ZENG Hong-juan¹, YANG Sheng-tian¹, WANG Ling², ZHENG Dong-hai¹, ZHANG Cui-ping², WANG Xue-lei¹, GAO Yun-fei¹

1. Research Center for Remote Sensing and GIS, Beijing Key Laboratory for Remote Sensing of Environment and Digital Cities, School of Geography, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China;
2. Environmental Sciences Academy of Hainan Province, Haikou 570206, China

Received:2009-02-18 Revised:2009-06-15 Online:2009-09-25 Published:2009-09-25
Supported by:
国家自然科学基金项目(40671123)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

采用RS和GIS技术,基于USLE方程实现了热带地区海南岛松涛水库流域2003~2005年平均土壤侵蚀的定量模拟,通过情景分析研究了流域土壤侵蚀控制方案。结果表明:流域内潜在土壤侵蚀量约为4261万t/a,超过容许土壤流失量的60倍;在植被的保护下,现有年均土壤侵蚀量约为51.46万t/a,主要集中在退化的林地、浆纸林和橡胶林;流域平均土壤侵蚀模数略低于容许土壤流失量,但空间分布不均,部分区域侵蚀发育强烈;如对经济林、园地和耕地采取水土保持措施或恢复林草植被,能有效控制流域内土壤侵蚀,分别减少侵蚀量22.46万t和14.15万t,减少侵蚀面积98.48km²和65.90km²。

关键词: 土壤侵蚀, USLE, 控制方案, 热带, 松涛水库流域

Abstract:

As the most important water source region in Hainan Island, the Songtao Reservoir Basin has witnessed significant increases in both soil erosion and sediment in local rivers due to the exploration and utilization in recent years, so it is very important to study the situation and the control scheme of soil erosion in the basin for the protection of water environment. Taking Remote Sensed Imagery and Digital Elevation Model as basic data resource, we accomplished the quantitative simulation and analysis on the soil erosion in the Songtao Reservoir Basin based on Universal Soil Erosion Equation using Remote Sensing and Geographic Information System techniques through the wide investigation and experiments. Then we put forward a scheme for soil erosion control. The results showed that: (1) Potential soil erosion in the Songtao Reservoir Basin was about 42.6 million tons per year which was about more than 60 times of soil loss tolerance. Under the protection of vegetation, the soil erosion was about 514.6 thousand tons per year and mainly occurred to the degraded forestry, Eucalyptus forest and rubber plantation. The soil erosion in Eucalyptus forest plantation was the most severe. (2) The average soil erosion modulus in the basin was a little smaller than soil loss tolerance, but distributed unevenly. Some areas located in Xishui village were strongly eroded and reached acuity degree. (3) Vegetation was a main factor that controls soil erosion, therefore it is very essential to strengthen the protection of vegetation, especially those natural forests. According to the scene analysis, the establishment of relevant soil and water conservation facilities in plantation could help decrease soil erosion and loss coverage by 224.6 thousand tons per year and 98.48 km² respectively, while the rehabilitation of the destroyed forests and bare land could contribute to a reduction of soil losses by 65.9 km² and about 141.5 thousand tons per year. Both methods could control the soil erosion and non-point pollution effectively. From what is said above, we can draw a conclusion that the Songtao Reservoir Basin is facing serious potential soil erosion and more attention should be paid to taking specific measures to control soil erosion when this area is exploited.

Key words: soil erosion, USLE, control scheme, tropic, the Songtao Reservoir Basin

曾红娟, 杨胜天, 王凌, 郑东海, 张翠萍, 王雪蕾, 高云飞. 海南省松涛水库流域土壤侵蚀及控制方案[J]. 地理研究, 2009, 28(5): 1197-1207.

ZENG Hong-juan, YANG Sheng-tian, WANG Ling, ZHENG Dong-hai, ZHANG Cui-ping, WANG Xue-lei, GAO Yun-fei. The situation and control scheme of soil erosion in Songtao Reservoir Basin of Hainan Island[J]. GEOGRAPHICAL RESEARCH, 2009, 28(5): 1197-1207.

参考文献

[1] Valentin C B, Favis-Mortlock J, Ingram D,et al.The GCTE Soil Erosion Network. Proceedings of the ISCO meeting,in 12th International Soil Conservation Organization Conference. Beijing:Tsinghua University Press,2002.299~30.

[2] Novotny V,Olem H.Water Quality:Prevention,Identification and Management of Diffuse Pollution.New York:Van Nostrand Reinhold Company,1993.

[3] 林媚珍,张镱锂.海南岛热带天然林动态变化.地理研究,2001,20(6):703~712.

[4] 赵玉国,张甘霖,龚子同.SOTER支持下海南岛土壤侵蚀模拟与影响因子分析.土壤通报,2003,34(3):219~224.

[5] Zhao Yuguo,Zhang Ganlin,Gong Zitong.SOTER-based soil water erosion simulation in Hainan Island. Pedosphere,2003,13(2): 139~146.

[6] 余炜敏,漆智国.SOTER支持下海南土壤侵蚀量估算.水土保持学报,2003,17(6):51~54.

[7] 肖寒,欧阳志云,王效科,等.GIS支持下的海南岛土壤侵蚀空间分布特征.土壤侵蚀与水土保持学报,1999,5(4):75~80.

[8] 岳建华,张廷龙,周海燕,等.松涛水库生态清洁流域的建设构想.中国人口·资源与环境,2005,15(6):90~94.

[9] 张光辉.土壤水蚀预报模型研究进展.地理研究,2001,20(3):274~281.

[10] Van Remortel R D,Hamilton M E,Hickey R J. Computing the LS factor for the revised universal soil loss equation through array-based slope processing of digital elevation data using C++ executable. Computers & Sciences, 2004,30:1043~1053.

[11] Wischmeier W H,Smith D D. Predicting rainfall-erosion losses from cropland east of the Rocky Mountains. USDA Agricultural Handbook, No.282, 1965.

[12] 章文波,谢云,刘宝元.用雨量和雨强计算次降雨侵蚀力.地理研究,2002,21(3):384~390.

[13] 周伏建,黄炎和,等.福建省降雨侵蚀力指标R值.水土保持学报,1995,9(1):13~18.

[14] Williams J R, Renard E P. A new method for assessing erosion’s effect on soil productivity. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 1983,38(1):381~383.

[15] 黄炎和,卢程隆,付勤,等. 闽东南土壤流失预报研究.水土保持学报.1993,(4):13~18.

[16] 蔡崇法,丁树文,史志华,等. 应用USLE和地理信息系统IDRISI预测小流域土壤侵蚀量的研究. 水土保持学报, 2000,14(2):19~24.

[17] Renard K G,Foster G R,Weesies G A,et al. Prediction soil erosion by water: A guide to conservation planning with revised universal soil loss equation. USDA Agricultural Handbook, No.703, 1997.

海南省松涛水库流域土壤侵蚀及控制方案

The situation and control scheme of soil erosion in Songtao Reservoir Basin of Hainan Island

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	寇志翔, 姚永慧, 胡宇凡. 基于地理探测器的中国亚热带北界探讨[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(12): 2821-2832.
[2]	李焱沐, 王绍强, 钱钊晖, 陈蝶聪, 张雷明, 周国逸, 闫俊华, 孟泽. 亚热带针阔混交林光化学植被指数与光能利用效率关系研究[J]. 地理研究, 2017, 36(11): 2239-2250.
[3]	刘宇. 土壤侵蚀研究中的景观连通度：概念、作用及定量[J]. 地理研究, 2016, 35(1): 195-202.
[4]	宁静, 杜国明, 孟凡浩, 匡文慧, 闫凤丽, 张英秀. 巴西热带雨林森林景观转化时空特征及破碎化分析[J]. 地理研究, 2015, 34(7): 1235-1246.
[5]	张晴华, 王红亚, 徐琳, 郑卓, 杨士雄, 陈效逑. 广东惠州黄洞水库沉积物特征及其反映的近50年土壤侵蚀意义[J]. 地理研究, 2014, 33(4): 643-653.
[6]	何福红, 高丙舰, 王焕芝, 王瑞, 赛莉莉. 基于GIS的侵蚀冲沟与地貌因子的关系[J]. 地理研究, 2013, 32(10): 1856-1864.
[7]	李勋贵, 魏霞. 区域土壤侵蚀演化风险分析——以泾河流域为例[J]. 地理研究, 2011, 30(8): 1361-1369.
[8]	陈晓琳, 李忠武, 王晓燕, 申卫平, 张雪, 郭旺, 张越男. 中亚热带红壤丘陵区松林生态系统表层土壤活性有机碳空间分异规律[J]. 地理研究, 2011, 30(10): 1825-1834.
[9]	程先富, 余芬. 安徽省土壤侵蚀空间分布及其与环境因子的关系[J]. 地理研究, 2010, 29(8): 1461-1470.
[10]	刘前进, 于兴修. 北方土石山区土壤侵蚀强度垂直景观格局——以沂蒙山区为例[J]. 地理研究, 2010, 29(8): 1471-1483.
[11]	刘宇,吕一河,傅伯杰,刘国华. ¹³⁷Cs示踪法土壤侵蚀量估算的本底值问题[J]. 地理研究, 2010, 29(7): 1171-1181.
[12]	蓝勇. 近500年来长江上游亚热带山地中低山植被的演替[J]. 地理研究, 2010, 29(7): 1182-1192.
[13]	李春梅, 汪美华, 王红亚. 贵州麦岗水库沉积物的矿物磁性特征及其土壤侵蚀意义[J]. 地理研究, 2010, 29(11): 1971-1980.
[14]	王晗,侯甬坚. 清至民国洛川塬土地利用演变及其对土壤侵蚀的影响[J]. 地理研究, 2010, 29(1): 163-172.
[15]	朱连奇, 史学建, 韩慧霞. 影响淤地坝建设的地理要素——以黄河中游多沙粗沙区为例[J]. 地理研究, 2009, 28(6): 1625-1632.