城市游憩场点系统结构分形及优化——以苏州市区为例

doi:10.11821/yj2010010008

地理研究 ›› 2010, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (1): 79-92.doi: 10.11821/yj2010010008

城市游憩场点系统结构分形及优化——以苏州市区为例

黄泰^1,2,3, 保继刚¹, 刘艳艳¹, 王行风⁴

1. 中山大学地理科学与规划学院,广东广州 510275;
2. 苏州大学旅游管理系,江苏苏州 215021;
3. 滑铁卢大学环境学院,安大略省加拿大 N2L 3G1;
4. 中国矿业大学环测学院,江苏徐州 210093

收稿日期:2009-02-27 修回日期:2009-06-30 出版日期:2010-01-20 发布日期:2010-01-20
作者简介:黄泰(1977-),男,江苏丰县人,博士研究生,讲师,加拿大滑铁卢大学访问学者。主要从事旅游与城市游憩空间规划、旅游信息化方面的教学和研究。E-mail:huangtai_fx@163.com
基金资助:
国家留学基金全额资助项目(留金出[2007]3021号);江苏省教育厅高校哲学社会科学研究指导项目(08SJD7900048)

Research on the fractal structure and its optimization of city recreation site system: A case study of Suzhou city

HUANG Tai^1,2,3, BAO Ji-gang¹, LIU Yan-yan¹, WANG Xing-feng⁴

1. School of Geography and Planning, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China;
2. Department of Tourism Management, Soochow University, Suzhou 215021, Jiangsu, China;
3. Faculty of Environmental Studies, University of Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3G1, Canada;
4. School of Environment Science and Spatial informatics, China Mining University, Xuzhou 221116,Jiangsu,China

Received:2009-02-27 Revised:2009-06-30 Online:2010-01-20 Published:2010-01-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

以苏州市区为例,采用Zipf分维数、空间关联维数以及交通长度－半径维数三个指标,分别对城市游憩场点系统的等级结构、空间结构及交通网络通达性进行分维刻画。研究发现:首先,苏州游憩场点系统及其交通道路支持系统都具有较好的分形特性;其次,各分维指标能够准确地刻画城市游憩场点系统及交通道路支持系统的结构分异,可以为游憩场点系统的结构优化提供标准依据并指明方向;其三,苏州游憩场点系统的等级结构和空间结构均呈现出一种核心松散、外围紧致的结构递变趋势,自组织能力的离心化现象比较突出;最后,从分形几何和系统论的角度揭示、证实了游憩场点系统和旅游景点系统在结构分形及自组织演化上存在着显著差异。

关键词: 城市游憩场点系统, 等级结构, 空间结构, 分形优化, 苏州市区

Abstract:

The hierarchical and spatial structures of recreation sites in Suzhou city are studied during the socioeconomic transformation in China using fractal theory and methods. The system of recreation sites are divided into three recreation subsystems in the ancient city, new city and outer city areas, which are the three levels of urban regional structure based on the 2008 general planning of Suzhou city. Then, using the Zipf fractal dimension, spatial correlation dimension and traffic length-radius dimension as indexes, the hierarchical, spatial and traffic structures of the recreation sites are studied separately. It is found that both the recreation site system and transportation system of Suzhou city have good fractal characteristics. The fractal index depicts recreation system structure well and can be used for its optimization. Both the hierarchical and spatial structures of Suzhou city exhibit a gradient tendency from a loose core to a compact extended structure. Meanwhile the decentralization phenomenon of self-organization ability is distinct. Accordingly, the tracking analysis of structure evolvement of recreation site system and its optimization, as well as the strengthening guidance and improvement of its self-organization ability, are necessary for the harmonious urban planning and development. In addition, combining the previous research conclusions about the fractal in tourism, the result reveals and verifies the significant differences between fractal structure and self-organization evolvement in both recreation site system and tourism attraction system.

Key words: city recreation sites system, hierarchical structure, spatial structure, fractal and optimization, Suzhou city

黄泰,保继刚,刘艳艳,王行风. 城市游憩场点系统结构分形及优化——以苏州市区为例[J]. 地理研究, 2010, 29(1): 79-92.

HUANG Tai, BAO Ji-gang, LIU Yan-yan, WANG Xing-feng. Research on the fractal structure and its optimization of city recreation site system: A case study of Suzhou city[J]. GEOGRAPHICAL RESEARCH, 2010, 29(1): 79-92.

参考文献

[1] Gregory D. Spatial structure. In: Johnstone R J, Gregory D, Smith D M(ed). The Dictionary of Human Geography(2nd edn). Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1988. 450~451.

[2] Preobrazensky V S, Krivosheyev V M. Recreational Geography of the USSR. Moscow: Progress Publishers. 1982. 31~42.

[3] Pearce D G. Tourist District in Paris: structure and functions. Tourism Management, 1998, 19(1):49~65.

[4] Christos Siderelis & Roger L. Moore. Recreation demand and the influence on site preference variables. Journal of Leisure research, 1998, 30(3): 301~318.

[5] 吴承照. 游憩效用与城市居民户外游憩分布行为. 同济大学学报, 1999, 27(6): 718~722.

[6] 苏平, 党宁, 吴必虎. 北京环城游憩带旅游地类型与空间结构特征. 地理研究, 2004, 23(3): 403~410.

[7] Benguigui L, Czamanski D, Marinov M,etal. When and where is a city fractal? Environment and Planning: Planning and Design, 2000, 27: 507~519.

[8] Allen P M. Cities and Regions as Self-organizing Systems: Models of Complexity. 1997.

[9] Mandelbrot B B. The fractal geometry of nature. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company, 1983.

[10] Batty M. The fractal nature of geography. Geographical Magazine, 1992, 64(5): 34~36.

[11] 钱学森,等. 论系统工程. 长沙: 湖南科技出版社, 1982.

[12] 陈永红, 周桐, 何岱海,等. 研究多中心奇异吸引子混沌相位的新方法. 物理学报, 2002, 51(4): 731~735.

[13] Batty M. Cities as fractal: simulating growth and form. In: Crilly Tetal. Fractal and Chaos. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1991. 43~69.

[14] 陈彦光,刘继生. 城市土地利用结构和形态的定量描述:从信息熵到分数维. 地理研究, 2001, 20(2): 146~152.

[15] Dekeersmaecker M L, Frankhauser P, Thomas I. Using fractal dimensions to characterize intra-urban diversity: the example of Brussels. Geographical Analysis, 2003, 35: 310~328.

[16] 陈彦光. 城市化: 相变与自组织临界性. 地理研究, 2004, 23(3): 302~312.

[17] 刘继生,陈彦光,刘志刚. 点-轴系统的分形结构及其空间复杂性探讨. 地理研究, 2003, 22(4): 447~454.

[18] Yanguang Chen, Yixing Zhou. Reinterpreting central place networks using ideas from fractals and self-organized criticality. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 2006, 33: 345~ 364.

[19] Shen, G. A Fractal Dimension Analysis of Urban Transportation Networks. Geographical and Environmental Modelling, 1997, 1: 221~236.

[20] 柏春广,蔡先华. 南京市交通网络的分形特征. 地理研究, 2008, 27(6): 1419~1426.

[21] Beckmann M J. City hierarchies and distribution of city size. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 1958, 6: 243~248.

[22] Yanguang Chen, Yixing Zhou. The rank-size rule and fractal hierarchies of cities: mathematical models and empirical analyses. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 2003, 30: 799~818.

[23] 刘继生, 陈彦光. 基于GIS的细胞自动机模型与人地关系的复杂性研究——关于人地关系研究的技术模式探讨.地理研究, 2002, 21(2): 155~162.

[24] WhiteR, EngelenG. Cellular automata and fractal urban form: a cellularmodelling approach to the evolution of urban land-use patterns. Environment and Planning A, 1993, 25: 1175 ~1199.

[25] 戴学军, 丁登山, 许志晖,等. 旅游景区(点)系统空间结构随机聚集分形研究: 以南京市旅游景区(点)系统为例. 自然资源学报, 2005, 20(5): 706~713.

[26] 戴学军, 丁登山. 旅游景区(点)系统空间结构关联维数分形研究: 以南京市旅游景区(点)系统为例. 资源科学, 2006, 28(1): 180~185.

[27] 戴学军, 林岚, 丁登山,等. 基于分形的旅游景区(点)系统等级结构研究. 地理科学, 2006, 26(2): 244~250.

[28] 杨国良, 游勇, 李海燕. 旅游景区(点)系统空间分布的分形发育及演化特征. 自然资源学报, 2007, 22(6): 963~973.

[29] 杨国良, 张捷, 刘波,等. 旅游流流量位序-规模分布变化及其机理——以四川省为例.地理研究, 2007, 26(4): 662~672.

[30] 张振宇, 汪波. 旅游交通网络空间分析——以浙江松阳县为例. 浙江理工大学学报, 2006, 23(2): 219~222.

[31] 刘继生, 陈彦光.城镇体系空间结构的分形维数及其测算方法. 地理研究, 1999, 18(2): 171~172.

[32] 刘继生, 陈彦光. 交通网络空间结构的分形维数及其测算方法探讨. 地理学报, 1999, 54(5): 471~475.

[33] 吴敏金. 关于分形的定义与分维的计算. 华东师范大学学报(自然科学版). 1992, (3): 27~37.

[34] Kaye B H. A Random Walk through Fractal Dimensions. VCH Verlagsgesellshaft, Germany, 1989.

[35] 吴必虎, 董莉娜, 唐子颖. 公共游憩空间分类与属性研究. 中国园林, 2003, (4): 48~50.

[36] Fenario F. The evaluation of tourist resources: an applied methodology. Journal of Travel Research, 1979, (3): 182~187.

[37] Frankhauser P. La Fractalité des Structures Urbaines (The Fractal Aspects of Urban Structures). Paris: Economica, 1994.

[38] White R, Engelen G. Cellular automata and fractal urban form: A cellular modeling approach to the evolution of urban land-use patterns. Environment and Planning A, 1993, 25(8): 1175~1199

[39] Yanguang Chen, Yixing Zhou. Multi-fractal measures of city-size distributions based on the three-parameter Zipf model. Chaos, Solitons and Fractals. 2004, 22: 793~805.

城市游憩场点系统结构分形及优化——以苏州市区为例

Research on the fractal structure and its optimization of city recreation site system: A case study of Suzhou city

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	王亚飞,樊杰. 基于中国主体功能区划的国家与省级点-轴结构解析[J]. 地理研究, 2019, 38(7): 1651-1663.
[2]	李鲁奇,孔翔,李一曼,许杨博文. “一带一路”倡议下中国与中亚合作的战略支点选择[J]. 地理研究, 2019, 38(7): 1705-1719.
[3]	吴威,曹有挥,梁双波,张璐璐,刘玮辰. 民用机场区域服务能力的结构与空间格局——以长江经济带民用机场体系为例[J]. 地理研究, 2019, 38(6): 1512-1526.
[4]	朱建华,戚伟,修春亮. 中国城市市辖区的空间结构及演化机制[J]. 地理研究, 2019, 38(5): 1003-1015.
[5]	张雷,杨波. 中国资源环境基础的空间结构特征分析[J]. 地理研究, 2018, 37(8): 1485-1494.
[6]	齐梦溪,鲁晗,曹诗颂,王文娟,邵静,赵文吉. 基于引力模型的经济空间结构时空演变分析——以河南省为例[J]. 地理研究, 2018, 37(5): 883-897.
[7]	朱佩娟,贺清云,朱翔,崔树强,吴小双. 论城市空间破碎化研究[J]. 地理研究, 2018, 37(3): 480-494.
[8]	黄银洲,王乃昂,付娇,唐菊. 鄂尔多斯高原秦汉遗址空间分布及环境指示意义[J]. 地理研究, 2018, 37(11): 2165-2176.
[9]	王春兰,杨上广,何骏,刘陆雪. 上海城市社会空间演化研究——基于户籍与职业双维度[J]. 地理研究, 2018, 37(11): 2236-2248.
[10]	李涛,刘家明,徐庆颖,朱鹤,余玲. 中国省域文化旅游资本的空间结构与流动——基于主题公园投资数据的分析[J]. 地理研究, 2017, 36(7): 1283-1296.
[11]	杨天荣,匡文慧,刘卫东,刘爱琳,潘涛. 基于生态安全格局的关中城市群生态空间结构优化布局[J]. 地理研究, 2017, 36(3): 441-452.
[12]	叶磊,段学军,吴威. 基于交通信息流的长三角地区网络空间结构及其效率研究[J]. 地理研究, 2016, 35(5): 992-1002.
[13]	沈惊宏,周葆华,余兆旺. 泛长三角地区城市的空间结构演变[J]. 地理研究, 2016, 35(3): 482-492.
[14]	乐晓辉,陈君娴,杨家文. 深圳轨道交通对城市空间结构的影响——基于地价梯度和开发强度梯度的分析[J]. 地理研究, 2016, 35(11): 2091-2104.
[15]	胡文海,孙建平,余菲菲. 安徽省区域旅游经济发展的时空格局演变[J]. 地理研究, 2015, 34(9): 1795-1806.