清洁生产和末端治理环境绩效对比分析

doi:10.11821/yj2011030011

地理研究 ›› 2011, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (3): 505-512.doi: 10.11821/yj2011030011

清洁生产和末端治理环境绩效对比分析

高迎春^1,2, 佟连军¹, 马延吉¹, 李名升³

1. 中国科学院东北地理与农业生态研究所,长春 130012;
2. 中国科学院研究生院,北京 100049;
3. 中国环境监测总站,北京 100012

收稿日期:2010-03-02 修回日期:2010-08-10 出版日期:2011-03-20 发布日期:2011-03-20
通讯作者: 佟连军,(1960-),吉林省人,研究员,博士生导师,主要研究方向为区域环境与发展、生态经济, E-mail:tonglj@neigae.ac.cn
作者简介:高迎春(1978-),男,山西繁峙人,博士,主要研究方向为资源环境与区域发展。 E-mail:yingchun_gao@126.com
基金资助:
中国科学院知识创新工程重要方向项目(KZCX2-YW-342-2);国家自然科学基金重点项目(40635030)

Environmental performance analysis of clean production and end-pipe treatment

GAO Ying-chun^1,2, TONG Lian-jun¹, MA Yan-ji¹, LI Ming-sheng³

1. Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, CAS, Changchun 130012, China;
2. Graduate University of Chinese Acadmy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;
3. China National Enviromental Monitoring Center, Beijing 10012,China

Received:2010-03-02 Revised:2010-08-10 Online:2011-03-20 Published:2011-03-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以吉林省为例,应用无残差完全分解模型,将工业污染产生量和排放量的变化分解为规模效应、空间结构效应和技术效应,分析清洁生产和末端治理不同产业生态化策略导向下的环境绩效,探索产业生态化发展改进方向。结果表明:清洁生产的控污效果在数量上大于末端治理的减排效果,产业生态化发展表现出以预防策略为主的特征。但是,环境目标主要通过清洁生产和末端治理来实现,产业生态化集聚发展滞后;清洁生产和末端治理之间的技术效应相关性较差,清洁生产主要通过技术进步来实现污染控制,而技术水平进步和规模的扩长都可以带来末端治理排污强度的降低;吉林省需要在源头预防策略指导下积极推动面向产品过程的污染控制转向面向系统过程的环境管理,促进产业生态系统的形成和发展。

关键词: 环境绩效, 完全分解模型, 清洁生产, 末端治理, 吉林省

Abstract: Based on statistics of industrial pollutant yields and discharge quantity in Jilin Province, the non-residual decomposition model was applied to quantify the net amount of environmental benefits of clean production and end-pipe treatment respectively. Environmental performances of end-of-pipe and pollution prevention strategies were further analyzed to explore an appropriate way of improving regional industrial ecological transition. The results showed that industrial symbiosis did not exert a positive effect on environment improvement. Technical factor promoted environmental performance improvement in clean production, while both technical factor and scale factor did in end-pipe treatment. Clean production was superior to end-pipe treatment in pollution volume reduction, which implied that prevention strategy dominated over end-of-pipe strategy, but the improvement of clean production tended to slow down. It is necessary to construct a proper industrial ecological system for the realization of environmental goals.

Key words: environmental performance, complete decomposition model, clear production, end-pipe treatment, Jilin Province

高迎春, 佟连军, 马延吉, 李名升. 清洁生产和末端治理环境绩效对比分析[J]. 地理研究, 2011, 30(3): 505-512.

GAO Ying-chun, TONG Lian-jun, MA Yan-ji, LI Ming-sheng. Environmental performance analysis of clean production and end-pipe treatment[J]. GEOGRAPHICAL RESEARCH, 2011, 30(3): 505-512.

参考文献

[1] Lundberg K, Balfors B, Folkeson L. Framework for environmental performance measurement in a Swedish public sector organization. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2009,17(11):1017~1024.

[2] Ramos T B, Alves I, Subtil R, et al.The state of environmental performance evaluation in the public sector: The case of the Portuguese defence sector. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2009, 17(1):36~52.

[3] Zhou P, Ang B W, Poh K L. Measuring environmental performance under different environmental DEA technologies. Energy Economics, 2008,30(1):1~14.

[4] Srebotnjak T. The role of environmental statisticians in environmental policy: The case of performance measurement.Environmental Science and Policy, 2007,10(5):405~418.

[5] Mayer A L. Strengths and weaknesses of common sustainability indices for multidimensional systems.Environment International, 2008,34 (2):277~291.

[6] Lundberg K, Balfors B, Folkeson L. Framework for environmental performance measurement in a Swedish public sector organization. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2009,17(11):1017~1024.

[7] 关伟.区域水资源与经济社会耦合系统可持续发展的量化分析.地理研究,2007,26(4):685~692.

[8] Wagner M. How to reconcile environmental and economic performance to improve corporate sustainability: Corporate environmental strategies in the European paper industry. Journal of Environmental Management, 2005, 76(2) :105~118.

[9] Basu A J, Zyl D J A. Industrial ecology framework for achieving cleaner production in the mining and minerals industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2006,14(3-4):299~304.

[10] Wagner M. How to reconcile environmental and economic performance to improve corporate sustainability: Corporate environmental strategies in the European paper industry. Journal of Environmental Management, 2005,76(2):105~118.

[11] Kassinis G, Vafeas N. Environmental performance and plant closure. Journal of Business Research, 2009,62(4): 484~494.

[12] 高迎春,佟连军.区域工业污染物增长份额偏离分析.环境科学,2010,31(4):1114~1120.

[13] Sun J W.Change in energy consumption and energy intensity: A complete decomposition mode. Energy Economics, 1998,20(1): 85~100.

[14] 李凯,李明玉,郁培丽,等.辽宁省能源消费的因素分解——基于完全分解模型.东北大学学报(自然科学版),2007,28(11):1656~1659.

[15] 李名升,佟连军,仇方道.工业废水排放变化的因素分解与减排效果.环境科学,2009,30(3):707~712.

[16] 孙才志,王妍.辽宁省产业用水变化驱动效应分解与时空分异.地理研究,2010,29(2):244~252.

[17] Jasch C. Environmental performance evaluation and indicators. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2000, 8 (1):79~88.

[18] Chandak S P."Desire", demonstration in small industries for reducing waste. Industrial Environment, 1994,17(4):41~45.

清洁生产和末端治理环境绩效对比分析

Environmental performance analysis of clean production and end-pipe treatment

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 8

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	郭付友, 佟连军, 魏强, 张慧敏, 仇方道. 松花江流域（吉林省段）产业系统生态效率时空分异特征与影响因素[J]. 地理研究, 2016, 35(8): 1483-1494.
[2]	秦丽杰, 靳英华, 常永智, 张辉. 虚拟水视角下吉林省西部玉米耕作方式优化[J]. 地理研究, 2012, 31(8): 1456-1464.
[3]	方恺, 沈万斌, 董德明. 能源足迹核算的改进与预测——以吉林省为例[J]. 地理研究, 2011, 30(10): 1835-1846.
[4]	程叶青,邓吉祥,房艳刚. 吉林省中部粮食主产区城乡关联的空间分析[J]. 地理研究, 2010, 29(4): 727-736.
[5]	张继权, 刘兴朋, 佟志军. 草原火灾风险评价与分区——以吉林省西部草原为例[J]. 地理研究, 2007, 26(4): 755-762.
[6]	张新营, 韩良, 佟连军. 吉林省生态经济区竞争力评价[J]. 地理研究, 2005, 24(6): 975-981.
[7]	刘惠清, 龙花楼. 为生态建设服务的吉林省西部景观类型研究^*[J]. 地理研究, 1998, 17(4): 389-397.
[8]	方创琳, 董锁成. 中国沿海地区矿产资源态势与跨世纪可持续发展战略^*[J]. 地理研究, 1997, 16(1): 85-91.