安徽淮河流域洪涝灾害防灾减灾能力评估

doi:10.11821/yj2011030013

地理研究 ›› 2011, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (3): 523-530.doi: 10.11821/yj2011030013

安徽淮河流域洪涝灾害防灾减灾能力评估

黄大鹏¹, 郑伟², 张人禾¹, 霍治国¹, 李加林³, 彭顺风⁴

1. 中国气象科学研究院,北京 100081;
2. 国家卫星气象中心,北京 100081;
3. 宁波大学建筑工程与环境学院,宁波 315211;
4. 淮河水利委员会,蚌埠 233001

收稿日期:2010-09-16 修回日期:2010-12-18 出版日期:2011-03-20 发布日期:2011-03-20
作者简介:黄大鹏(1978-),男,安徽潜山人,博士,主要从事遥感与GIS技术、自然灾害监测评估研究。 E-mail: dapenghuang@163.com
基金资助:
"十一五"国家科技支撑计划课题(2008BAK50B02);国家自然科学基金项目(40901231);浙江省科技厅自然基金项目(2010A610105)

Assessment of capacity of flood disaster prevention and reduction of Huaihe River Basin in Anhui Province

HUANG Da-peng¹, ZHENG Wei², ZHANG Ren-he¹, HUO Zhi-guo¹, LI Jia-lin³, PENG Shun-feng⁴

1. Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences, Beijing 100081, China;
2. National Satellite Meteorological Center, Beijing 100081, China;
3. Faculty of Architecturel, Civil Engineering and Environment, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, Zhejiang, China;
4. Huaihe River Commission, Ministry of Water Resources, Bengbu 233001, Anhui, China

Received:2010-09-16 Revised:2010-12-18 Online:2011-03-20 Published:2011-03-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 采用层次分析法并融合专家意见,遵循客观性、数据获取便利性、指标量化可行性并突出主导因素等原则,构建综合防洪除涝能力、监测预警能力、抢险救灾与恢复重建能力以及灾害管理能力的洪涝灾害防灾减灾能力综合评估指标体系,对安徽淮河流域各县市洪涝灾害防灾减灾能力进行评估。评估表明:蚌埠市防灾减灾能力最高,其次为淮南市、淮北市,再次为凤台县、阜阳市、滁州市、濉溪县、宿州市,其余县市为较低以下防灾减灾能力。分析发现:淮河干流以南县市洪涝灾害防灾减灾能力相对较低,淮北平原相对较高;沙颍河右侧的临泉县和阜南县防灾减灾能力低,左侧县市相对较高;涡河蒙城以上的涡阳县和亳州市防灾减灾能力较低。

关键词: 淮河流域, 安徽, 洪涝灾害, 防灾减灾能力

Abstract: Taking the Huaihe River Basin in Anhui Province as the study area and following principles of objectivity, data availability, feasibility of index quantification and highlighting dominant factors, the index system of assessment of capacity of flood disaster prevention and reduction was established at city-county level, which is composed of capacity of flood prevention and waterlogging control, capacity of flood monitoring and warning, capacity of rescue and rehabilitation, and capacity of disaster management. The judge matrixes of index system and index weights were established by the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) approach based on opinions from experts. Then a capacity map of flood disaster prevention and reduction of the Huaihe River Basin in Anhui Province was generated. The result shows that the capacity of flood disaster prevention and reduction is the highest in Bengbu city, followed by Huainan city, Huaibei city, Fengtai county, Fuyang city, Chuzhou city, Suixi county and Suzhou city, while the others have relatively low and even lower capacity of flood disaster prevention and reduction. A further analysis shows that the capacity is low in regions to the south of the mainstream of the Huaihe River compared with northern Huaihe River plain and the same is to the result of right-hand regions of Shaying River compared with the left-hand regions. The capacity is relatively low in Guoyang county and Bozhou city among the regions along the Guohe river. The index system and assessment method helps provide references for assessment of capacity of flood disaster prevention and reduction in other basins or regions, and may provide a basis for the work of flood prevention and reduction in China.

Key words: Huaihe River Basin, Anhui Province, flood disaster, capacity of disaster prevention and reduction

黄大鹏, 郑伟, 张人禾, 霍治国, 李加林, 彭顺风. 安徽淮河流域洪涝灾害防灾减灾能力评估[J]. 地理研究, 2011, 30(3): 523-530.

HUANG Da-peng, ZHENG Wei, ZHANG Ren-he, HUO Zhi-guo, LI Jia-lin, PENG Shun-feng. Assessment of capacity of flood disaster prevention and reduction of Huaihe River Basin in Anhui Province[J]. GEOGRAPHICAL RESEARCH, 2011, 30(3): 523-530.

参考文献

[1] 汤奇成,程义,李秀云. 中国洪水灾害的分类分级和危险度评价方法研究. 见:王劲峰. 中国自然灾害影响评价方法研究. 北京:中国科学技术出版社,1993.

[2] 史培军. 中国自然灾害、减灾建设与可持续发展. 自然资源学报,1995,11(3):267~278.

[3] 刘树坤. 国外防洪减灾发展趋势分析. 水利水电技术,2000,(1):2~10.

[4] Barredo J I,Lavalle C,De Roo A. European flood risk mapping. EC DG JRC- Weather Driven Natural Hazards,2005.

[5] Tingsamchali T,Karim M F. Flood hazard and risk analysis in the southwest region of Bangladesh. Hydrological Processes,2005,19:2055~2069.

[6] Kron F. Flood risk=Hazard * Values * Vulnerability. Water Int.,2005,30(1):58~68.

[7] 杜鹃,何飞,史培军. 湘江流域洪水灾害综合风险评价. 自然灾害学报,2006,15(6):38~44.

[8] 田国珍,刘新立,王平,等. 中国洪水灾害风险区划及其成因分析. 灾害学,2006,21(2):1~6.

[9] 黄大鹏,刘闯,彭顺风. 洪灾风险评价与区划研究进展. 地理科学进展,2007,26(4):11~22.

[10] 万君,周月华,王迎迎,等. 基于GIS的湖北省区域洪涝灾害风险评估方法研究. 暴雨灾害,2007,26 (4):328~333.

[11] Huang Dapeng,Liu Chuang,Peng Shunfeng,et al. Assessment of waterlogging risk in Lixiahe region of Jiangsu province based on AVHRR and MODIS image. Chinese Geographical Science,2008,18(2):178~183.

[12] 宫清华,黄光庆,郭敏,等. 基于GIS技术的广东省洪涝灾害风险区划.自然灾害学报,2009,18(1):58~63.

[13] 刘荆,蒋卫国,杜培军. 基于相关分析的淮河流域暴雨灾害风险评估. 中国矿业大学学报,2009,38(5):735~740.

[14] Jiang Weiguo,Lei Deng,Chen Luyao,et al. Risk assessment and validation of flood disaster based on fuzzy mathematics. Progress in Natural Science,2009,19:1419~1425.

[15] Apel H,Aronica G T,Kreibich H,et al. Flood risk analyses:How detailed do we need to be? Natural hazards,2009,49:79~98.

[16] Dang N M,Babel M S,Luong H T. Evaluation of flood risk parameters in the Day River flood diversion area,Red River Delta,Vietnam. Natural Hazards,2011,56:169~194.

[17] Bizimana J P,Schilling M. Geo-information technology for infrastructural flood risk analysis in unplanned settlements:A case study of informal settlement flood risk in the Nyabugogo Flood Plain, Kigali City,Rwanda. In:Showalter P S,Lu Y. Geospatial techniques in urban hazard and disaster analysis. Frankfurt:Springer Science+Business Media,2010. 99~124.

[18] 郭永芳,查良松. 安徽省洪涝灾害风险区划及成灾面积变化趋势分析. 中国农业气象,2010,31(1):130~136.

[19] 王静静,刘敏,权瑞松,等.中国东南沿海地区暴雨洪涝风险分区及评价.华北水利水电学院学报,2010,31(1):14~16.

[20] 盛绍学,石磊,刘家福,等. 沿淮湖泊洼地区域暴雨洪涝风险评估. 地理研究,2010,29(3):416~422.

[21] 张会,张继权,韩俊山. 基于GIS技术的洪涝灾害风险评估与区划研究——以辽河中下游地区为例. 自然灾害学报,2005,14(6):141~146.

[22] 张婧,郝立生,许晓光. 基于GIS技术的河北省洪涝灾害风险区划与分析. 灾害学,2009,24(2):51~56.

[23] 张京红,田光辉,蔡大鑫,等. 基于GIS技术的海南岛暴雨洪涝灾害风险区划.热带作物学报,2010,31(6):1014~1019.

[24] Fang G H,Gao Y Q. Construction of evaluation index system and evaluation model of flood disaster risk. In: Proceedings of 16th IAHR-APD Congress and 3rd Symposium of IAHR-ISHS.2008.

[25] 黄大鹏. 淮河洪泽湖以上流域洪涝灾害风险评估研究. 北京:中国科学院研究生院博士学位论文, 2009.

[26] Saaty T L. A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of Mathmatical Psychology,1977,(15):59~62.

安徽淮河流域洪涝灾害防灾减灾能力评估

Assessment of capacity of flood disaster prevention and reduction of Huaihe River Basin in Anhui Province

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	高超,李学文,许莹,李德. 淮河流域蚌埠闸以上地区夏玉米生育阶段水分供需时空变化特征研究[J]. 地理研究, 2019, 38(7): 1833-1846.
[2]	赵明松,李德成,张甘霖,王世航. 1980-2010年安徽省土壤有机碳密度及储量时空变化分析[J]. 地理研究, 2018, 37(11): 2206-2217.
[3]	周宇建,张永勇,花瑞祥,左其亭,陈豪. 淮河中上游浮游植物时空分布特征及关键环境影响因子识别[J]. 地理研究, 2016, 35(9): 1626-1636.
[4]	胡文海,孙建平,余菲菲. 安徽省区域旅游经济发展的时空格局演变[J]. 地理研究, 2015, 34(9): 1795-1806.
[5]	姚梦婷,高超,陆苗,刘青,胡春生. 1959-2008年淮河流域极端径流的强度和频率特征[J]. 地理研究, 2015, 34(8): 1535-1546.
[6]	张桂香, 霍治国, 吴立, 王慧芳, 杨建莹. 1961-2010年长江中下游地区农业洪涝灾害时空变化[J]. 地理研究, 2015, 34(6): 1097-1108.
[7]	盛绍学, 张建军, 王晓东. 安徽省夏玉米气候适宜性及时空格局特征[J]. 地理研究, 2014, 33(8): 1467-1476.
[8]	赵春雨, 苏勤, 盛楠. 农村劳动力转移就业的时空路径[J]. 地理研究, 2014, 33(8): 1503-1514.
[9]	张正涛, 高超, 刘青, 翟建青, 王艳君, 苏布达, 田红. 不同重现期下淮河流域暴雨洪涝灾害风险评价[J]. 地理研究, 2014, 33(7): 1361-1372.
[10]	周彝馨, 吕唐军. 聚落形态演变与防洪功能变化的关系——以广东高要地区为例[J]. 地理研究, 2014, 33(3): 439-450.
[11]	高超, 张正涛, 陈实, 刘青. RCP4.5情景下淮河流域气候变化的高分辨率模拟[J]. 地理研究, 2014, 33(3): 467-477.
[12]	李卫江, 温家洪, 吴燕娟. 基于PGIS的社区洪涝灾害概率风险评估——以福建省泰宁县城区为例[J]. 地理研究, 2014, 33(1): 31-42.
[13]	周亮, 徐建刚. 大尺度流域水污染防治能力综合评估及动力因子分析——以淮河流域为例[J]. 地理研究, 2013, 32(10): 1792-1801.
[14]	韩国圣, 吴佩林, 黄跃雯, 杨钊. 山地旅游发展对社区居民的去权与形成机制———以安徽天堂寨旅游区为例[J]. 地理研究, 2013, 32(10): 1948-1963.
[15]	石磊, 王胜, 盛绍学. 近50年安徽省气候年景评估方法[J]. 地理研究, 2012, 31(9): 1580-1588.