地理研究 ›› 2011, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (6): 1129-1136.doi: 10.11821/yj2011060016

• 土地资源与利用 • 上一篇    下一篇

香港与深圳土地集约利用对比研究

秦鹏1,2, 陈健飞2   

  1. 1. 中山大学地理科学与规划学院土地研究中心,广州 510275;
    2. 广州大学地理科学学院,广州 510006
  • 收稿日期:2010-04-26 修回日期:2010-11-14 出版日期:2011-06-20 发布日期:2011-06-20
  • 通讯作者: 陈健飞(1955-),男,福建莆田人,教授,主要从事自然地理学与土地资源学研究。 E-mail: cjf@gzhu.edu.cn E-mail:cjf@gzhu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:秦鹏(1984-),男,山东禹城人,博士研究生,主要从事土地资源研究。 E-mail: qinpeng_star@163.com
  • 基金资助:

    教育部科学技术研究重点项目(206107);广东省科技计划项目(2008B080701050)

A comparative study on intensive land use in Shenzhen and Hong Kong

QIN Peng1,2, CHEN Jian-fei2   

  1. 1. Center of Land Research, College of Geographic and Planning, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China;
    2. School of Geographical Sciences, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China
  • Received:2010-04-26 Revised:2010-11-14 Online:2011-06-20 Published:2011-06-20

摘要: 土地集约利用区域差异与对比研究的成果,对于改变土地经济运行方式、提高土地资源利用效率、减少土地粗放利用、实施土地节约集约利用政策有积极意义。本文以香港和深圳为例,采用遥感数据与统计数据,提取了两地土地利用信息和社会经济统计信息,建立土地集约利用定量分析数据库;依据土地集约利用的内涵,构建土地集约利用评价指标体系,对深圳和香港分别进行土地集约利用量化评价。研究发现:两地的土地集约利用水平存在差异,香港明显高于深圳;香港的土地利用程度比深圳低,而土地投入程度和土地利用效益比深圳高得多;香港在土地高效、集约利用方面对深圳具有借鉴作用。

关键词: 城市用地, 集约利用, 评价体系, 区域对比, 深圳, 香港

Abstract: Remote sensing data of Hong Kong and Shenzhen and statistical data were used to extract the land use information and socio-economic statistical information, and the intensive land use database was established based on the data. According to the concept of intensive land use, the system on the evaluation of intensive land use was set up. The results of the evaluation of intensive land use were acquired as follows. The analysis shows that due to historical, economic status and differences in the international context, there were obvious differences on intensive land use between the study areas. In terms of land use intensity, Hong Kong was higher than Shenzhen. Due to the terrain and the more advanced land management system, Hong Kong had a poorer appearance in the aspects of land use and sustainable land use, but it had a better appearance than Shenzhen in the aspects of land input and effective land use. The experience of Hong Kong was used for reference to Shenzhen. Some measures should be taken to promote closer regional cooperation and major infrastructure docking. Industrial cooperation should be strengthened to build a high-quality living circle. The approach to cooperation should be innovated.

Key words: urban land, intensive use, evaluation system, comparative analysis, Shenzhen, Hong Kong