大都市边缘区制度性生态空间的多元治理--政策网络的视角

doi:10.11821/yj2011070007

地理研究 ›› 2011, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (7): 1215-1226.doi: 10.11821/yj2011070007

大都市边缘区制度性生态空间的多元治理--政策网络的视角

马学广

1. 北京大学深圳研究生院城市规划与设计学院,深圳 518055;
2. 北京大学城市与环境学院,北京 100871

收稿日期:2010-06-17 修回日期:2011-02-22 出版日期:2011-07-20 发布日期:2011-07-20
作者简介:马学广(1979-),男,汉族,山东临沂人,博士后。研究方向为城市土地利用、城市空间的政治经济分析。E-mail:maxg@szpku.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(41001091、40830747)

Multi-stakeholders governance of institutional eco-space in metropolitan urban-rural fringe:In the view of policy network

MA Xue-guang

1. School of Urban Planning and Design, Shenzhen Graduate School of Peking University, Shenzhen 518055, Guangdong, China;
2. College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China

Received:2010-06-17 Revised:2011-02-22 Online:2011-07-20 Published:2011-07-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 生态城市的塑造和低碳社会的发展使得城市生态空间发挥出越来越重要的作用,而城市边缘区的制度性生态空间因其本身演进中的社会-空间转型和刚性制度约束下的社会互动而使得政策网络的内涵、演变和运作方式在我国快速城市化和大都市区化的发展背景下更具有典型性和代表性。政策网络视角下的广州海珠区万亩果园空间治理研究揭示出空间治理的过程是多元利益相关者参与的过程,需要动态的把握政策演变过程及其内在规律,同时考察政策网络成员立场、目标和策略的变化,推动政策网络由传统的政府内部封闭循环的运作模式向多元利益相关者利益平衡基础上的公私合作运作模式转变,并且采取多样化的激励手段推动政策网络的运作以实现城市空间的有效治理。政策网络分析方法的引入为城市边缘区社会-空间转型中的空间治理提供了理论解释与方法借鉴。

关键词: 城市边缘区, 制度性生态空间, 多元治理, 政策网络

Abstract: With the making of eco-city and building of low-carbon society, urban eco-space plays more and more important roles in city development. Meanwhile, the intention, evolution and operation modes of policy network tended to be even more typical and representative than any other analysis methods under the background of social-spatial transformation and rigid structural constraints of institutional eco-space in urban-rural fringe. The study of policy network on spatial governance in Wan-mu-guo-yuan Area revealed multi-stakeholders participation process of spatial governance which needs to hold the revolution process and the internal discipline of policy dynamically, to inspect changes of standpoints, goals and tactics of stakeholders, to give impetus on transformation of policy network operation modes from inner loop mode to public-private operation mode which realized the goal of good governance in urban spatial governance with diversified incentives. The application of policy network analysis provided theoretical explanations and quotable methods to spatial governance in social-spatial transformation process of metropolitan urban-rural fringe.

Key words: urban-rural fringe, institutional eco-space, multi-stakeholders governance, policy network

马学广. 大都市边缘区制度性生态空间的多元治理--政策网络的视角[J]. 地理研究, 2011, 30(7): 1215-1226.

MA Xue-guang. Multi-stakeholders governance of institutional eco-space in metropolitan urban-rural fringe:In the view of policy network[J]. GEOGRAPHICAL RESEARCH, 2011, 30(7): 1215-1226.

参考文献

[1] 王春福.政策网络的开放与公共利益的实现.中共中央党校学报,2009,13(1):99~103.

[2] Richardson J J,Jordan A G.Governing under Pressure: The Policy Process in A Post-parliamentary Democracy. Oxford: Robertson, 1979.1~20.

[3] Kenis P,Schneider V.Policy networks and policy analysis: Scrutinizing a new analytical toolbox.In: Marin B,Mayntz R.Policy Network: Empirical Evidence and Theoretical Considerations.Frankfurt am Main:Campus Verlag,1991.25~59.

[4] 马学广,王爱民,闫小培.基于增长网络的城市空间生产方式变迁研究--从计划经济向市场经济的转型.经济地理,2009,29(11): 1827~1832.

[5] 王爱民,马学广,闫小培.基于行动者网络的土地利用冲突及其治理机制研究--以广州市海珠区果林保护区为例.地理科学,2010,30(1):80~85.

[6] 艾少伟,苗长虹.行动者网络理论视域下的经济地理学哲学思考.经济地理,2009,29(4): 545~550.

[7] 杨友仁,夏铸九.跨界生产网络的组织治理模式--以苏州地区信息电子业台商为例.地理研究,2005,24(2):253~264.

[8] Provan K G, Milward H B.Do networks really work? A framework for evaluating public-sector organizational networks.Public Administration Review,2001,(4):414~423.

[9] Klijn, E H.Governance and governance networks in Europe: An assessment of 10 years of research on the theme.Public Management Review,2008,10(4):505~525.

[10] 冷希炎.中国开发区制度空间研究.沈阳:东北师范大学博士学位论文,2006.30.

[11] Harvey D.The Condition of Postmodernity: An Enquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change.Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, 1989.66~98.

[12] (美)安东尼·奥罗姆,陈向明.城市的世界--对地点的比较分析和历史分析.上海:上海人民出版社,2005.24.

[13] Harvey D.From managerialism to entrepreneurialism: The transformation in urban governance in late capitalism.Geografiska Annaler, 1989,71(1):3~17.

[14] 叶蓓华.美浓水库兴建之政策网络分析.台湾:国立政治大学(台湾)公共行政学系硕士学位论文,2000.153~158.

[15] Peters B G,Pierre J.Governance without government? rethinking public administration.Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,1998,8(2):223~243.

[16] Kooiman J. Modern Governance: New Government-society Interactions.London,Newbury Park:Sage,1993.35~48.

[17] Rhodes R W.Understanding Governance: Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexivity and Accountability.Buckingham: Open University Press,1997.9~10.

[18] 谢涤湘,魏清泉,梁志伟.城市边缘区绿色开敞空间的保护与利用研究--以广州市海珠区果树保护区为例.生态经济,2005,(11):37~41.

[19] 孙柏瑛,李卓青.政策网络治理:公共治理的新途径.中国行政管理,2008,(5):106~109.

[20] 石凯,胡伟.政策网络理论:政策过程的新范式.国外社会科学,2006,(3):28~35.

[21] Richardson J.Government, interest groups and policy change. Political Studies, 2000,48(5):1006~1025.

[22] 赵科亮,崔日初.都市绿洲-广州万亩果林的困境与对策.规划师,2005,21(9):47~51.

[23] Pfeffer J,Salancik G R.The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective.New York: Harper and Row, 1978.3.

大都市边缘区制度性生态空间的多元治理--政策网络的视角

Multi-stakeholders governance of institutional eco-space in metropolitan urban-rural fringe:In the view of policy network

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 8

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	刘星南, 吴志峰, 骆仁波, 吴艳艳. 基于多源数据和深度学习的城市边缘区判定[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(2): 243-256.
[2]	何艳冰, 黄晓军, 杨新军. 快速城市化背景下城市边缘区失地农民适应性研究——以西安市为例[J]. 地理研究, 2017, 36(2): 226-240.
[3]	张宁,方琳娜,周杰,宋金平,江君. 北京城市边缘区空间扩展特征及驱动机制[J]. 地理研究, 2010, 29(3): 471-480.
[4]	曹广忠, 刘涛, 缪杨兵. 北京城市边缘区非农产业活动特征与形成机制^*[J]. 地理研究, 2009, 28(5): 1352-1364.
[5]	曹广忠, 缪杨兵, 刘涛. 基于产业活动的城市边缘区空间划分方法——以北京主城区为例[J]. 地理研究, 2009, 28(3): 771-780.
[6]	吴铮争, 宋金平, 王晓霞, 成弈, 张宁. 北京城市边缘区城市化过程与空间扩展——以大兴区为例[J]. 地理研究, 2008, 27(2): 285-294.
[7]	祁新华, 程煜, 陈烈, 朱宇. 大城市边缘区人居环境系统演变规律——以广州市为例[J]. 地理研究, 2008, 27(2): 421-430.
[8]	顾朝林, 熊江波. 简论城市边缘区研究[J]. 地理研究, 1989, 8(3): 95-101.