地理研究 ›› 2011, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (9): 1577-1591.doi: 10.11821/yj2011090004

• 经济与区域发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

地理区位与权力——以广州市X市场为例

林耿   

  1. 中山大学地理科学与规划学院城市与区域规划系,城市与区域研究中心,广州 510275
  • 收稿日期:2011-01-15 修回日期:2011-04-08 出版日期:2011-09-20 发布日期:2011-09-20
  • 作者简介:林耿(1972-),男,广东潮州人,博士,副教授,主要从事消费地理学和城市地理学研究。 E-mail:lingeng00@163.com
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金项目(40971088);教育部人文社会科学研究项目基金(09YJAZH105);广东省自然科学基金项目(S2011010002712);中山大学高校基本科研业务费专项资金(111gpy70); 2009年中山大学研究生教育教学改革研究项目(ZGEI026)

Location and power: A case study of X Market in Guangzhou City

LIN Geng   

  1. Center for Urban and Regional Studies, Department of Urban and Regional Planning, School of Geography and Planning, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China
  • Received:2011-01-15 Revised:2011-04-08 Online:2011-09-20 Published:2011-09-20

摘要: 从人本主义视角,以广州X市场为个案,以权力为主线,揭示地理区位和社会系统的内在关系。研究表明:(1)地方权力关系适度嵌入地理区位,地理区位具有权力依赖指向。(2)权力空间化下的地理区位具有不确定性。市场是作为客体而存在的,地理区位更多的是体现了精英的主体性,精英群体权力的空间化控制、建构或者瓦解着市场。权力空间的生产性,决定市场的地理区位是不确定的。(3)地理区位具有强地方性,是地方响应全球化的表现形式。既表现在经济精英的本土化,也充分反映在地方政治精英力量的强势表达。(4)地理区位是精英群体权力秩序的表征。地理区位和权力之间不是二元化的决定和被决定的关系,而是一种权力与地理区位的共在(co-presence)关系,地理区位是权力秩序的表征。

关键词: 权力, 地理区位, 经济精英, 政治精英

Abstract: Geographic location has become an important analytical focal point in academic circle since the 1880s. The existing literature suggests that in terms of the maximization of economic benefits, the optimal industrial location is determined by either traditional economic elements or modern knowledge and technology factors. Because the explanations are under the assumption of rational economic man, which pay relatively little attention to the subjectivity of human beings and social system, they did not go beyond the mode of seeking causation for inevitable results. This paper attempts to reveal the inherent relationship between location and social system from the perspective of humanism. Taking X market in Guangzhou as a case study, this paper analyzes how economic elites and political elites construct their power relations to determine the location of X market under the context of economic globalization. The main conclusions can be drawn as follows. (1) Local power relationship is embedded in market location, which is power-dependent. (2) Location is socially constructed, rather than ontologically pre-given. The construction and reconstruction of X market indicates that location is an outcome of social struggle for power and control. (3) Power relations of the location are strongly localized. These localized power relations are important for maintaining the prosperity of X market and retaining a relatively fixed market location. (4) Related to the first and second points, location is the arena where socio-spatial power relations are contested and compromises are negotiated and regulated. The development of X market suggests that the production of location is a dynamic process contingent upon the contestation and negotiation between economic and political elites.

Key words: power, location, economic elite, political elite