集聚经济、制度约束与汽车产业跨国公司在华功能区位

doi:10.11821/yj2011090006

地理研究 ›› 2011, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (9): 1606-1620.doi: 10.11821/yj2011090006

集聚经济、制度约束与汽车产业跨国公司在华功能区位

刘作丽¹, 贺灿飞^2,3

1. 北京市经济与社会发展研究所,北京 100120;
2. 北京大学城市与环境学院,北京 100871;
3. 北京大学-林肯研究院城市发展与土地政策研究中心,北京 100871

收稿日期:2010-09-23 修回日期:2011-02-26 出版日期:2011-09-20 发布日期:2011-09-20
通讯作者: 贺灿飞(1972-),男,江西永新人,教授,主要从事经济地理,产业和区域经济研究。 E-mail: hecanfei@urban.pku.edu.cn
作者简介:刘作丽(1981-),女,山东费县人,博士,主要从事经济地理,产业和区域经济研究。 E-mail: lzl_pku@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金面上项目(40871065);科技基础性工作专项(2007FY140800-2)

Agglomeration, institutions and the functional location of auto TNCs in China

LIU Zuo-li¹, HE Can-fei^2,3

1. Beijing Municipal Institute for Economic and Social Development, Beijing 100120, China;
2. College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China;
3. Peking University-Lincoln Institute Center for Urban Development and Land Policy, Beijing 100871, China

Received:2010-09-23 Revised:2011-02-26 Online:2011-09-20 Published:2011-09-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 基于全球500强在华投资数据,研究了汽车产业跨国公司在华功能区位。随着汽车产业跨国公司在华功能不断拓展,不同功能的空间分离已非常明显;服务功能主要集中在北京、上海,而生产功能则对上海、天津、重庆、广州等城市具有更强的偏好。条件逻辑模型的研究结果表明,集聚经济和制度约束是影响汽车产业跨国公司在华不同功能区位选择的重要因素。总体而言,生产功能区位选择的被动式嵌入特征明显,其在受制度约束的同时十分关注部门集聚效益,地方化经济对其具有很强的解释力,城市化经济也在一定程度上发挥作用;而服务功能区位选择则十分关注功能集聚和城市化经济,靠近政策源头布局也是其区位抉择的重要参考依据。

关键词: 汽车产业跨国公司, 功能区位, 中国

Abstract: In the new millennium, the global economic map is more complicated at present than that only a few decades ago. Through the actions and interactions of transnational corporations (TNCs) and states within a volatile technological environment, the simple international division of labor between industries has been replaced by the more complicated new international division of labor across activities. Within a host economy, TNCs may be distributed with different types of activities or functions in different locations to fully exploit the comparative and institutional advantages. This study examined the functional location of auto TNCs in China based on the Fortune 500 TNCs data. It is shown that different functions of auto TNCs in China have different spatial patterns. The service functions tend to be concentrated in large cities, mainly in Beijing and Shanghai, while production facilities prefer to be agglomerated in specialized cities, such as Shanghai, Tianjin, Chongqing and Guangzhou. Results from the conditional logit model indicate that agglomeration and institutions undermine the locational choices of auto TNCs' functions. Production facilities favor cities which can easily acquire specialized labor and components and parts suppliers while service functions are significantly attracted to cities with functional agglomeration. Production facilities are located in the places which allow them to acquire partners while service functions tend to be concentrated in the places where the policy is made.

Key words: auto TNCs, functional location, China

刘作丽, 贺灿飞. 集聚经济、制度约束与汽车产业跨国公司在华功能区位[J]. 地理研究, 2011, 30(9): 1606-1620.

LIU Zuo-li, HE Can-fei. Agglomeration, institutions and the functional location of auto TNCs in China[J]. GEOGRAPHICAL RESEARCH, 2011, 30(9): 1606-1620.

参考文献

[1] Athukorala P. Product Fragmentation and trade patterns in east Asia. Asian Economic Papers, 2005, 4(3): 1~27.

[2] Baldone S, Sdogati F, Tajoli L. Patterns and determinants of international fragmentation of production: Evidence from outward processing trade between the EU and central eastern European countries. Review of World Economics, 2001, 137(1): 80~104.

[3] Hummels D, Ishii J, Yi K. The nature and growth of vertical specialization in world trade. Journal of International Economics, 2001, 54(1): 75~96.

[4] Ando M. Fragmentation and vertical intra-industry trade in East Asia. North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 2006, 17(3): 257~281.

[5] Amighini A. China in the international fragmentation of production: Evidence from the ICT industry. The European Journal of Comparative Economics, 2005, 2(2): 203~219.

[6] Jones R , Kierzkowski H. International fragmentation and the new economic geography. North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 2005, 16(1): 1~10.

[7] Jones R, Kierzkowski H. A framework for fragmentation. In: Arndt S, Kierzkowski H. Fragmentation and International Trade. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.

[8] Yeung H. Organising regional production networks in Southeast Asia: Implications for production fragmentation, trade, and rules of origin. Journal of Economic Geography, 2001, (3): 299~321.

[9] Venables A. Fragmentation and multinational production. European Economic Review, 1999, 43: 935~945.

[10] Feenstra R. Integration of trade and disintegration of production in the global economy. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1998, 12(4): 31~50.

[11] Krugman P, Cooper R, Srinivasan T. Growing world trade: Causes and consequences. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1995, (1): 327~377.

[12] Jones R, Kierzkowski H. The role of services in production and international trade: A theoretical framework. In: Jones R, Krueger A. The Political Economy of International Trade. Basil Blackwell: Oxford, 1990.

[13] Kimura F, Ando M. Two-dimensional fragmentation in East Asia: Conceptual framework and empirics. International Review of Economics and Finance, 2005, 14(3): 317~348.

[14] Helg R, Tajoli L. Patterns of international fragmentation of production and the relative demand for labor. North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 2005, 16(2): 233~254.

[15] Duranton G, Puga D. From sectoral to functional urban specialisation. Journal of Urban Economics, 2005, 57(2): 343~370.

[16] Defever F. Functional fragmentation and the location of multinational firms in the enlarged Europe. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 2006, 36(5): 658~677.

[17] 徐康宁,陈健.跨国公司价值链的区位选择及其决定因素.经济研究,2008,(3):138~149.

[18] 宁越敏,李健.上海城市功能的转型:从全球生产系统角度的透视.世界地理研究,2007,16(4): 47~54.

[19] 马丽,刘卫东,刘毅.经济全球化下地方生产网络模式演变分析——以中国为例.地理研究, 2004, 23(1): 87~96.

[20] 刘作丽,贺灿飞.中国外商直接投资区位研究述评.地理科学进展,2009, 28(6): 952~961.

[21] Carr D, Markusen J, Maskus K. Estimating the knowledge-capital model of the multinational enterprise: Reply. American Economic Review, 2003, 93(3): 995~1001.

[22] Alcacer J. Location choices across the value chain: How activity and capability influence collocation. Management Science, 2006, 52(10): 1457~1471.

[23] Carr D, Markusen J, Maskus K. Estimating the knowledge-capital model of the multinational enterprise. American Economic Review, 2001, 91(3): 693~708.

[24] Duranton G, Puga D. Micro-Foundations of Urban Agglomeration Economies. CEPR, 2003.

[25] Marshall A. Principles of Economics. London: Macmillan, 1898.

[26] Markusen J. Multinational Firms and the Theory of International Trade. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 2002.

[27] Markusen J, Deardorff A, Irwin D. Modeling the Offshoring of White-Collar Services: From Comparative Advantage to the New Theories of Trade and Foreign Direct Investment. Brooking Trade Forum,2005.

[28] Caves R. International Corporations: The industrial economics of foreign investment. Economica ( New Series), 1971, 38(149): 1~27.

[29] Meyer K. Institutions, transaction costs, and entry mode choice in Eastern Europe. Journal of International Business Studies, 2001,32: 357~367.

[30] Wan, Hoskisson R. Home country resource environments, corporate diversification strategies and firm performance. Academy of Management Journal, 2003, 46:27~45.

[31] Dicken P. Global Shift-reshaping the Global Economic Map in 21st Century. New York: The Guilford press, 2003.

[32] 贺灿飞.外商直接投资区位:理论分析与实证研究.北京:中国经济出版社, 2005.

[33] Shave J. Do foreign-owned and U.S.-owned establishment exhibit the same location pattern in U.S. Manufacturing industries? Journal of International Business Studies, 1998, 29: 469~492.

[34] Johanson J, Vahlne J. The internationalization process of the firm:A model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitments. Journal of International Business Studies, 1977,8(1): 23~32.

[35] Johanson J, Vahlne J. The mechanism of internationalisation. International Marketing Review,1990,7(4): 11~24.

[36] Johanson J, Vahlne J.Business relationship learning and commitment in the internationalization process. Journal of International Entrepreneurship,2003,(1): 83~101.

[37] Belderbos R, Carree M. The location of Japanese investments in China: Agglomeration effects, keiretsu, and firm heterogeneity. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 2002, 16(2): 194~211.

[38] Head C, Ries J , Swenson D. Attracting foreign manufacturing: Investment promotion and agglomeration. Regional Science and Urban Economics ,1999, 29(2): 197~218.

[39] Head C, Ries J, Swenson D. Agglomeration benefits and location choice: Evidence from Japanese manufacturing investments in the United States. Journal of International Economics, 1995, 38(3~4): 223~247.

[40] Liu W, Dicken P. Transnational corporations and obligated embeddedness’ : Foreign direct investment in China’s automobile industry. Environment and Planning A, 2006, 38: 1229~1247.

[41] Sit V, Liu W. Restructuring and spatial change of China’s auto industry under institutional reform and globalization. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 2000, 90(4): 653~673.

[42] 张纪康.跨国公司进入及其市场效应——以中国汽车产业为例.中国工业经济, 1999, (4):77~80.

[43] 赵英.中国汽车工业的发展趋势及对策.中国工业经济, 2003, (04):18~24.

[44] McFadden D.Conditional logit analysis of quantitative choice behavior. In: Zarembka P. Frontier in Econometrics. New York: Academic Press,1974.

[45] Yeung H. Transnational corporations, global production networks, and urban and regional development: A geographer’s perspective on multinational enterprises and the global economy. Growth and Change, 2009, 40(2): 197~226.

集聚经济、制度约束与汽车产业跨国公司在华功能区位

Agglomeration, institutions and the functional location of auto TNCs in China

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	谢玉欢, 贺灿飞. 地方集群网络、信息溢出效应与中国ICT产品出口地理网络扩张[J]. 地理研究, 2021, 40(3): 689-707.
[2]	姚作林, 金凤君, 陈卓. 全球产业转移与GVC区域竞争——基于中国与中南半岛四国的分析[J]. 地理研究, 2021, 40(2): 326-342.
[3]	刘桂芳, 诸云强, 关瑞敏, 冯亚飞, 刘情, 夏梦琳, 张亚星, 卢鹤立. 大数据时代中国气候变化科学数据共享服务的发展现状与趋势分析[J]. 地理研究, 2021, 40(2): 571-582.
[4]	钱肖颖, 孙斌栋. 基于城际创业投资联系的中国城市网络结构和组织模式[J]. 地理研究, 2021, 40(2): 419-430.
[5]	周佳宁, 邹伟, 秦富仓. 等值化理念下中国城乡融合多维审视及影响因素[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(8): 1836-1851.
[6]	李艳, 孙阳, 姚士谋. 基于财富中国500强企业的中国城市群城市网络联系分析[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(7): 1548-1564.
[7]	刘振, 戚伟, 齐宏纲, 刘盛和. 1990—2015年中国县市尺度人口收缩的演变特征及影响因素[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(7): 1565-1579.
[8]	张博胜, 杨子生. 中国城镇化的农村减贫及其空间溢出效应——基于省级面板数据的空间计量分析[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(7): 1592-1608.
[9]	宁志中, 王婷, 杨雪春. 2001年以来中国旅游景区时空格局演变与景区群形成[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(7): 1654-1666.
[10]	杨帆, 何凡能, 李美娇. 中国西部地区历史草地面积重建的方法——以甘宁青新区为例[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(7): 1667-1679.
[11]	李娜, 伍世代. FDI技术转化及制造业集聚创新空间响应[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(6): 1311-1328.
[12]	于婷婷, 左冰, 宋玉祥, 吴媛媛. 中国旅游业发展对区域经济效率的影响——基于中国283个地级市的实证证据[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(6): 1357-1369.
[13]	童春阳, 周扬. 中国精准扶贫驻村帮扶工作成效及其影响因素[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(5): 1128-1138.
[14]	刘逸. 关系经济地理的研究脉络与中国实践理论创新[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(5): 1005-1017.
[15]	李一飞, 王开泳, 王甫园. 县市分等方法及中国县市等第特征的分异规律[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(4): 772-786.