科技型创新区人本化构建的国际实践及启示

doi:10.11821/dlyj201804016

Abstract

Abstract:

Of the urban economy and city competitiveness, innovation districts have increasingly become the most important component, particularly in the current era when science and technology (S&T) are emerging as the dominant and even decisive factors in driving the innovative economic development and urban vitality. Therefore, this paper tries to identify the common elements, benchmark and principles for the effective place making of S&T innovation districts, through the systematic review of the three international innovation districts, i.e., 22@Barcelona in Europe, Boston Innovation District in North America and One North Innovation District in Asia. The three best practices above prove that the humanity-oriented place making has become a major trend in successful S&T innovation district development, with the essence to meet various kinds of human needs to a maximized extent in terms of their life stages and hierarchy of needs, as well as by integrating the selected key elements to further give full play to their functional mechanism. The comparative study of the three best practices concludes that seven key elements, i.e., creative talent, enterprise cluster, enabling infrastructure, supportive financing, operational management, spatial structure and cultural ambience, should be identified and deemed as a whole system for making and promoting a well-performed S&T innovation district. Aligned with the analysis, the paper puts forward some implications to high-quality development of China's S&T innovation districts in the following five aspects: (1) vision-based sustained nurturing; (2) forward-looking positioning; (3) humanity-oriented spatial arrangement; (4) innovation-inspired activities programming; (5) multi-stakeholder participation. Lastly, the paper proposes that the systematic research should be conducted in the four aspects, i.e., how to identify the human needs in holistic way by their development stages; how to effectively integrate culture into place feeling and experience; how to construct a multi-dimensional habitat environment; how to brand the uniqueness and specificity of various types of innovation districts, in an aim to form an integrated theory on humanity-oriented place making.

Key words: S&T innovation districts;, humanity-oriented, international best practices, place making, implications, mechanism

Jing LIN, Jianming CAI, WEBSTER Douglas, MULLER Larissa. Humanity-oriented place making in S&T innovation districts: International best practices and the implications[J].GEOGRAPHICAL RESEARCH, 2018, 37(4): 834-846.

Figures/Tables 8

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Fig. 5

Fig. 6

Tab. 1

Fig. 7

References 39

[1]	蔡建明, 林静. 中国新愿景下的文化与空间有机融合的地理途径与机遇. 地理研究, 2016, 35(11): 2001-2014.
	[Cai Jianming, Lin Jing.New marriage of culture and space under China's new vision: Approach and opportunities from geographical perspective. Geographical Research, 2016, 35(11): 2001-2014.]
[2]	Black D, Henderson V.Spatial evolution of population and industry in the United States. The American Economic Review, 1999, 89(2): 321-327. doi: 10.1257/aer.89.2.321
[3]	Akhavan M.Development dynamics of port-cities interface in the Arab Middle Eastern world: The case of Dubai global hub port-city. Cities, 2017, 60: 343-352. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2016.10.009
[4]	李琳, 韩宝龙, 李祖辉, 等. 创新型城市竞争力评价指标体系及实证研究: 基于长沙与东部主要城市的比较分析. 经济地理, 2011, 31(2): 224-229.
	[Li Lin, Han Baolong, Li Zuhui, et al.Evaluation index system for the competitiveness of innovative cities and its empirical application: Comparative analysis among Changsha city and some other major cities in the Eastern China. Economic Geography, 2011, 31(2): 224-229.]
[5]	倪鹏飞, 赵璧, 魏劭琨. 城市竞争力的指数构建与因素分析: 基于全球500典型城市样本. 城市发展研究, 2013, 20(6): 72-79. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-3862.2013.06.011
	[Ni Pengfei, Zhao Bi, Wei Shaokun.The index construction and factor analysis of urban competitiveness: Based on the global 500 typical urban samples. Urban Development Studies, 2013, 20(6): 72-79.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-3862.2013.06.011
[6]	Anttiroiko A.City-as-a-platform: The rise of participatory innovation platforms in Finnish cities. Sustainability, 2016, 8(9): 922-952. doi: 10.3390/su8090922
[7]	杜德斌. M全球科技创新中心: 动力与模式. 上海: 上海人民出版社, 2015.
	[Du Debin.Global Science and Technology Innovation Center: Dynamics and Models. Shanghai: Shanghai People's Publishing House, 2015.]
[8]	林宇, 何舜辉, 王倩倩, 等. 新加坡创新型城市的发展及其对上海的启示. 世界地理研究, 2016, 25(3): 40-48. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9479.2016.03.005
	[Lin Yu, He Shunhui, Wang Qianqian, et al.Singapore's development of innovative city and its inspirations for Shanghai. World Regional Studies, 2016, 25(3): 40-48.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9479.2016.03.005
[9]	申玉铭, 邓秀丽, 任旺兵, 等. 我国创意产业发展的支撑条件评价及空间发展战略. 地理研究, 2012, 31(7): 1269-1279. doi: 10.11821/yj2012070010
	[Shen Yuming, Deng Xiuli, Ren Wangbing, et al.Study of evaluation on the support conditions and spatial strategy of creative industry development in China. Geographical Research, 2012, 31(7): 1269-1279.] doi: 10.11821/yj2012070010
[10]	刘宏芳, 明庆忠, 鲁芬. 旅游地景与地方的关联机理初探: 基于空间与文化的交汇视角. 人文地理, 2014, 29(5): 134-141.
	[Liu Hongfang, Ming Qingzhong, Lu Fen.The preliminary research of the interrelationship between tourism landscape and place: Based on the converging perspective of space and culture. Human Geography, 2014, 29(5): 134-141.]
[11]	文嫮, 胡兵. 中国省域文化创意产业发展影响因素的空间计量研究. 经济地理, 2014, 34(2): 101-107.
	[Wen Hu, Hu Bing.A spatial econometric study on the influence factors of provincial cultural and creative industries development in China. Economic Geography, 2014, 34(2): 101-107.]
[12]	梁增贤, 保继刚. 文化转型对地方意义流变的影响: 以深圳华侨城空间文化生产为例. 地理科学, 2015, 35(5): 544-550.
	[The impacts of cultural transformation on place becoming: A case study of Shenzhen Overseas Chinese Town. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2015, 35(5): 544-550.]
[13]	张捷, 卢韶婧, 杜国庆, 等. 中、日都市旅游街区书法景观空间分异及其文化认同比较研究. 地理科学, 2014, 34(7): 831-839.
	[Zhang Jie, Lu Shaojing, Du Guoqing.On spatial differentiation and related cultural identity of calligraphic landscapes in tourist districts: A comparative study between China and Japan. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2014, 34(7): 831-839.]
[14]	周尚意, 吴莉萍, 张瑞红. 浅析节事活动与地方文化空间生产的关系: 以北京前门—大栅栏地区节事活动为例. 地理研究, 2015, 34(10): 1994-2002. doi: 10.11821/dlyj201510016
	[Zhou Shangyi, Wu Liping, Zhang Ruihong.An analysis of the relation between festivals and production of space. Geographical Research, 2015, 34(10): 1994-2002.] doi: 10.11821/dlyj201510016
[15]	韩丽, 吕拉昌, 韦乐章, 等. 广东城市创新空间体系研究. 经济地理, 2010, 30(12): 1978-1984.
	[Han Li, Lv Lachang, Wei Yuezhang, et al.Research on spatial system of innovation in the cities of Guangdong province. Economic Geography, 2010, 30(12): 1978-1984.]
[16]	王承云, 秦健, 杨随. 京津沪渝创新型城区研发产业集群研究. 地理学报, 2013, 68(8): 1097-1109.
	[Wang Chengyun, Qin Jian, Yang Sui.Analysis of the cluster mode of R&D industry in the innovation city districts: Taking Beijing, Tianjin, Shanghai and Chongqing as examples. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2013, 68(8): 1097-1109.]
[17]	王承云. 日本研发产业的空间集聚与影响因素分析. 地理学报, 2010, 65(4): 387-396. doi: 10.11821/xb201004001
	[Wang Chengyun.Spatial agglomeration and influencing factors of Japanese R&D industry. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2010, 65(4): 387-396.] doi: 10.11821/xb201004001
[18]	李明超. 文化规划的发展成效、模式分析与经验启示: 以英国为例. 城市发展研究, 2015, 22(11): 25-30. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-3862.2015.11.005
	[Li Mingchao.Development effectiveness, pattern analysis and experience inspiration of cultural planning in Britain. Urban Development Studies, 2015, 22(11): 25-30.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-3862.2015.11.005
[19]	Lin J, Cai J, Han Y, et al.Identifying the conditions for rural sustainability through place-based culture: Applying the CIPM and CDPM models into Meibei ancient village. Sustainability, 2017, 9(8): 1334-1348. doi: 10.3390/su9081334
[20]	Tuan Y.A life of learning. Charles homer haskins lecture for 1998. A life of learning. Charles homer haskins lecture for 1998. , 2017-11-12.
[21]	陆小璇. 初论段义孚人本主义地理学思想的形成. 人文地理, 2014, 29(4): 13-18.
	[Lu Xiaoxuan.On formation of Yi-Fu Tuan's thoughts on humanistic geography. Human Geography, 2014, 29(4): 13-18.]
[22]	屠启宇, 邓智团. 创新驱动视角下的城市功能再设计与空间再组织. 科学学研究, 2011, 29(9): 1425-1434.
	[Tu Qiyu, Deng Zhituan.On the innovation-driven perspective to the redesign of urban function and reorganization of urban space. Studies in Science of Science, 2011, 29(9): 1425-1434.]
[23]	马海涛, 方创琳, 王少剑. 全球创新型城市的基本特征及其对中国的启示. 城市规划学刊, 2013, (1): 69-77. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3363.2013.01.010
	[Ma Haitao, Fang Chuanglin, Wang Shaojian.Indicators of global innovative cities and their implications for China. Urban Planning Forum, 2013, (1): 69-77.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3363.2013.01.010
[24]	Bublitz E, Fritsch M, Wyrwich M.Balanced skills and the city: An analysis of the relationship between entrepreneurial skill balance, thickness, and innovation. Economic Geography, 2015, 91(4): 475-508. doi: 10.1111/ecge.12097
[25]	Copus A, Skuras D, Tsegenidi K.Innovation and peripherality: An empirical comparative study of SMEs in six European Union member countries. Economic Geography, 2008, 84(1): 51-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1944-8287.2008.tb00391.x
[26]	Wei Y D, Li W, Wang C.Restructuring industrial districts, scaling up regional development: A study of the Wenzhou model, China. Economic Geography, 2007, 83(4): 421-444. doi: 10.1111/j.1944-8287.2007.tb00381.x
[27]	高远. 22@新区规划. 城市建筑, 2015, (4): 76-79.
	[Gao Yuan.Planning of 22@Barcelona. Urban Architecture, 2015, (4): 76-79.]
[28]	关成华. 辍学市长打造波士顿城市创新奇迹. 中国社会组织, 2015, (4): 26-27.
	[Guan Chenghua.Urban innovation miracle in Boston by the mayor who dropped out of school. China Social Organization, 2015, (4): 26-27.]
[29]	柳庆元. 基于生态人本理念的新加坡绿色可持续规划实践与思考. 上海城市规划, 2015, (1): 70-75.
	[Liu Qingyuan.The green sustainable planning practice and review of Singapore based on ecology and human-oriented perspective. Shanghai Urban Planning, 2015, (1): 70-75.]
[30]	滕熙, 沙永杰. 新加坡产业空间发展历程及启示. 上海城市规划, 2014, (4): 77-82.
	[Teng Xi, Sha Yongjie.Planning process and development experience of Singapore industrial spaces: The process and experience. Shanghai Urban Planning, 2014, (4): 77-82.]
[31]	段德忠, 杜德斌, 刘承良. 上海和北京城市创新空间结构的时空演化模式. 地理学报, 2015, 70(12): 1911-1925.
	[Duan Dezhong, Du Debin, Liu Chengliang.Spatial-temporal evolution mode of urban innovation spatial structure: A case study of Shanghai and Beijing. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2015, 70(12): 1911-1925.]
[32]	Beugelsdijk S.The regional environment and a firm's innovative performance: A plea for a multilevel interactionist approach. Economic Geography, 2007, 83(2): 181-199. doi: 10.1111/j.1944-8287.2007.tb00342.x
[33]	Bertamino F, Bronzini R, De Maggio M, et al. Regional policies for innovation: The case of technology districts in Italy. Questioni Di Economia E Finanza, 2016 Online Appendix A: 1-14. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2016.1255321
[34]	Patrucco P P.Institutional variety, networking and knowledge exchange: Communication and innovation in the case of the Brianza Technological District. Regional Studies, 2003, 37(2): 159-172. doi: 10.1080/0034340022000057497
[35]	Tuan Y.Life as a field trip. Geographical Review, 2001, 91(1-2): 41-45. doi: 10.2307/3250803
[36]	冯健, 吴芳芳. 质性方法在城市社会空间研究中的应用. 地理研究, 2011, 30(11): 1956-1969. doi: 10.11821/yj2011110003
	[Feng Jian, Wu Fangfang.The application of qualitative research method in urban socio-spatial structure research. Geographical Research, 2011, 30(11): 1956-1969.] doi: 10.11821/yj2011110003
[37]	Tuan Y.On human geography. Daedalus, 2003, 132(2): 134-137.
[38]	顾朝林. 人居拟态环境研究的佳作: 《人居环境的地理学研究: 从实证主义到人本主义》评介. 地理研究, 2015, 34(9): 封二.
	[Gu Chaolin. Geographical research of human settlements: From Positivism to Humanism: The Best Work on Virtual Human Settlements Research. Geographical Research, 2015, 34(9): Cover 2.]
[39]	李雪铭, 李欢欢, 李建宏, 等. 人居环境的地理学研究: 从实证主义到人本主义. 北京: 科学出版社, 2015.
	[Li Xueming, Li Huanhuan, Li Jianhong, et al.Geographical Research of Human Settlement from Positivism to Humanisim. Beijing: Science Press, 2015.]

要素	22@巴塞罗那	波士顿创新区	北壹创新区
创意人才	过半员工拥有高学历	从艺术家、媒体人才转型为科技型人才	位于新加坡高校集群区域
企业集群	ICT、媒体、医药技术、能源和设计	生物技术、清洁能源、初创企业	生物科技、ICT、媒体、工程
能动设施	Wifi全覆盖、步行道和自行车道、餐厅	多模式换乘交通体系	绿色中央廊道;共享实验室、教室、演讲厅等
资金保障	政府主导型投资	私人主导型投资	政府完全主导型
运营管理	政府公司引导下的多利益群体参与	政府部门领导下的多利益群体参与	政府多部门协调与参与
空间结构	大量第三空间、公园、绿色步道系统	20%用于共享创新空间	清晰的功能分区;楼宇内部及楼宇之间的高度连通性
文化氛围	社交会员制和各种文化活动	演艺中心、画廊空间、公共图书馆	酒吧、俱乐部、咖啡厅、各种文化活动

Humanity-oriented place making in S&T innovation districts: International best practices and the implications

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 8

References 39

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 10

[1]	Chunguang HOU, Debin DU, Wentian SHI, Qinchang GUI. The influence of the spatial agglomeration of the world first-class universities on the spatial distribution of R&D intensive enterprises: A case study of the United States [J]. GEOGRAPHICAL RESEARCH, 2019, 38(7): 1720-1732.
[2]	Peijun RONG, Lijun ZHANG, Yaochen QIN, Yang LI, Zhicheng ZHENG. Impact of built environment on carbon emissions from daily travel of urban residents: A case study of 248 residential areas in Kaifeng [J]. GEOGRAPHICAL RESEARCH, 2019, 38(6): 1464-1480.
[3]	Meijuan HU, Zaijun LI, Zhengshan DING, Nianxing ZHOU, Yichen SHEN. The spatio-temporal heterogeneity and driving mechanism of China's water transfer from agriculture to non-agriculture [J]. GEOGRAPHICAL RESEARCH, 2019, 38(6): 1542-1554.
[4]	Weiwei LI, Tian CHEN, Xiaolong MA. Mechanisms and spatial pattern of land use changes of the urban tourism complex: A case study of Qujiang, Xi’an [J]. GEOGRAPHICAL RESEARCH, 2019, 38(5): 1103-1118.
[5]	Zhao YANG, Hao CHENG. Driving mechanism of tourism entrepreneurial migrants’ settlement in natural sightseeing places: A case study of Tangkou [J]. GEOGRAPHICAL RESEARCH, 2019, 38(5): 1147-1161.
[6]	Zhifei MA, Shanggang YIN, Yu ZHANG, Zaijun LI, Qiyan WU. Spatial distribution, flowing rules and forming mechanism of inter-cities floating population in China [J]. GEOGRAPHICAL RESEARCH, 2019, 38(4): 926-936.
[7]	Lin ZHU, Lei LI, Su LIU, Yurui LI. The evolution of village land-use function in the metropolitan suburbs and its inspiration to rural revitalization: A case study of Jiangjiayan Village in Chengdu City [J]. GEOGRAPHICAL RESEARCH, 2019, 38(3): 535-549.
[8]	Yingnan ZHANG, Hualou LONG, Li MA, Shuangshuang TU, Kunqiu CHEN. Research progress of urban-rural relations and its implications for rural revitalization [J]. GEOGRAPHICAL RESEARCH, 2019, 38(3): 578-594.
[9]	Yuanzhi GUO, Yang ZHOU, Yue HAN. Population aging in rural China: Spatial-temporal pattern and countermeasures for rural revitalization [J]. GEOGRAPHICAL RESEARCH, 2019, 38(3): 667-683.
[10]	Yufan CHEN, Kaiyong WANG. Influence and mechanism of "Turning Counties (Cities) into Districts" on urban space expansion:Taking Hangzhou as a case study [J]. GEOGRAPHICAL RESEARCH, 2019, 38(2): 221-234.
[11]	Kangchuan SU, Qingyuan YANG, Bailin ZHANG, Zhongxun ZHANG. The coupling mechanism between rural land use transition and small-scale peasant economy change in mountainous areas [J]. GEOGRAPHICAL RESEARCH, 2019, 38(2): 399-413.
[12]	Jie FAN, Rui GUO. Re-recognition of precondition and driving mechanism of new-type urbanization [J]. GEOGRAPHICAL RESEARCH, 2019, 38(1): 3-12.
[13]	LI Qiong,ZHOU Yu,TIAN Yu,WU Xiongzhou,ZHANG Lanlan. Spatial and temporal differentiation and driving mechanism of social security level in China during 2002-2015 [J]. GEOGRAPHICAL RESEARCH, 2018, 37(9): 1862-1876.
[14]	LI Xiaoyun,YANG Yu,LIU Yi. The evolution process and its mechanism of man-land relationship in China [J]. GEOGRAPHICAL RESEARCH, 2018, 37(8): 1495-1514.
[15]	YE Shilin,CAO Youhui,WANG Jiawei,QI Xinhua. Spatio-temporal evolution characteristics and mechanism of the port logistics system along the Yangtze River [J]. GEOGRAPHICAL RESEARCH, 2018, 37(5): 925-936.