GEOGRAPHICAL RESEARCH ›› 2020, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (5): 1070-1087.doi: 10.11821/dlyj020190376
• Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
GU Weinan1,2,4, LIU Hui1,2,3(), WANG Liang1,2,4
Received:
2019-05-13
Revised:
2019-07-16
Online:
2020-05-20
Published:
2020-07-20
Contact:
LIU Hui
E-mail:liuh@igsnrr.ac.cn
GU Weinan, LIU Hui, WANG Liang. The multiple structure and formation mechanisms of the scientific collaboration network in the Belt and Road regions[J].GEOGRAPHICAL RESEARCH, 2020, 39(5): 1070-1087.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks
Tab. 1
Classification of countries in the Belt and Road (BRI) regions"
分区类型 | 具体国家 |
---|---|
中国 | 中国 |
蒙俄区 | 蒙古、俄罗斯 |
中亚区 | 哈萨克斯坦、吉尔吉斯斯坦、乌兹别克斯坦、塔吉克斯坦、土库曼斯坦 |
东南亚区 | 新加坡、马来西亚、印度尼西亚、菲律宾、文莱、泰国、缅甸、老挝、越南、柬埔寨、东帝汶 |
南亚区 | 印度、巴基斯坦、阿富汗、孟加拉国、斯里兰卡、马尔代夫、不丹、尼泊尔 |
西亚北非区 | 格鲁吉亚、亚美尼亚、阿塞拜疆、伊朗、土耳其、伊拉克、叙利亚、巴勒斯坦、以色列、约旦、黎巴嫩、沙特阿拉伯、阿联酋、科威特、巴林、卡塔、阿曼、也门、埃及 |
中东欧区 | 爱沙尼亚、拉脱维亚、立陶宛、波兰、捷克、斯洛伐克、匈牙利、斯洛文尼亚、阿尔巴尼亚、白俄罗斯、波黑、保加利亚、克罗地亚、摩尔多瓦、黑山、罗马尼亚、塞尔维亚、马其顿、乌克兰 |
Tab. 4
Network statistical characteristics on hierarchical structure of the scientific collaboration network of the BRI countries"
国家数量 | 网络密度 | 平均点度中心性 | 平均强度中心性 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
不同等级 | 2013年 | 2018年 | 2013年 | 2018年 | 2013年 | 2018年 | 2013年 | 2018年 | |||
整体网络 | 65 | 65 | 0.59 | 0.81 | 37.7 | 51.6 | 2571.5 | 5462.8 | |||
第一等级 | 1 | 2 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 60.0 | 63.0 | 19402.0 | 30041.0 | |||
第二等级 | 12 | 11 | 0.85 | 0.95 | 55.5 | 61.0 | 6332.7 | 11583.6 | |||
第三等级 | 23 | 33 | 0.67 | 0.83 | 44.9 | 56.3 | 2812.0 | 5551.7 | |||
第四等级 | 29 | 19 | 0.39 | 0.47 | 23.9 | 36.7 | 244.0 | 567.1 |
Tab. 5
The betweenness centrality of BRI countries in the scientific collaboration network"
层级 | 2013年国家 | 2018年国家 |
---|---|---|
高值 | 中国 | 中国、印度、俄罗斯、波兰 |
较高值 | 俄罗斯、波兰 | 捷克、土耳其、马来西亚、伊朗 |
较低值 | 印度、土耳其、捷克、伊朗、马来西亚、埃及、巴基斯坦、泰国、以色列、新加坡、菲律宾、印尼、沙特 | 巴基斯坦、埃及、以色列、泰国、菲律宾、新加坡、匈牙利、阿联酋、沙特、乌克兰、斯洛文尼亚、越南、塞尔维亚、印尼、罗马尼亚、阿曼、哈萨克斯坦、白俄罗斯、保加利亚 |
低值 | 阿联酋、波塞、阿曼、缅甸、越南、孟加拉、尼泊尔、哈萨克斯坦、不丹、约旦、塞尔维亚、乌兹别克斯坦、罗马尼亚、匈牙利、斯里兰卡、黎巴嫩、白俄罗斯、爱沙尼亚、亚美尼亚、格鲁吉亚、保加利亚、乌克兰、克罗地亚、卡塔尔、拉脱维亚、吉尔吉斯斯坦、斯洛伐克、巴勒斯坦、斯洛文尼亚、立陶宛、文莱、蒙古、阿塞拜疆、也门、伊拉克、马尔代夫、阿尔巴尼亚、马其顿、柬埔寨、巴林、塔吉克斯坦、科威特、摩尔多瓦、阿富汗、老挝、黑山、叙利亚、东帝汶、土库曼斯坦 | 立陶宛、斯洛伐克、孟加拉、黎巴嫩、克罗地亚、格鲁吉亚、斯里兰卡、爱沙尼亚、卡塔尔、尼泊尔、亚美尼亚、阿塞拜疆、乌兹别克斯坦、叙利亚、柬埔寨、马其顿、蒙古、科威特、约旦、拉脱维亚、文莱、黑山、阿富汗、伊拉克、缅甸、摩尔多瓦、波黑、吉尔吉斯斯坦、巴林、阿尔巴尼亚、老挝、塔吉克斯坦、也门、不丹、土库曼斯坦、马尔代夫、巴勒斯坦、东帝汶 |
Tab. 6
The negative binomial regression of the scientific collaboration network"
模型1 | 模型2 | 模型3 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2013年 | 2018年 | 2013年 | 2018年 | 2013年 | 2018年 | |||
国家a科研能力 | 0.368*** (0.058) | 0.403*** (0.060) | — | — | 0.302*** (0.050) | 0.372*** (0.050) | ||
国家b科研能力 | 0.252*** (0.048) | 0.271*** (0.060) | — | — | 0.205*** (0.030) | 0.213*** (0.030) | ||
国家a经济水平 | 0.113*** (0.029) | 0.094** (0.023) | — | — | 0.109*** (0.028) | 0.087** (0.024) | ||
国家b经济水平 | 0.108*** (0.027) | 0.097** (0.025) | — | — | 0.101*** (0.026) | 0.083** (0.025) | ||
国家a对外开放程度 | 0.172*** (0.025) | 0.188*** (0.024) | — | — | 0.168*** (0.024) | 0.184*** (0.024) | ||
国家b对外开放程度 | 0.182*** (0.013) | 0.185*** (0.013) | — | — | 0.171*** (0.033) | 0.165*** (0.033) | ||
地理邻近 | — | — | -0.093*** (0.004) | -0.069*** (0.003) | -0.044*** (0.003) | -0.028*** (0.003) | ||
社会邻近 | — | — | 0.477*** (0.081) | 0.495*** (0.081) | 0.457*** (0.094) | 0.484*** (0.098) | ||
语言邻近 | — | — | 0.003*** (0.003) | -0.006*** (0.004) | 0.013*** (0.003) | -0.008*** (0.005) | ||
样本数 | 1226 | 1676 | 1226 | 1676 | 1226 | 1676 |
[1] | Scherngell T, Barber M J . Distinct spatial characteristics of industrial and public research collaborations: Evidence from the Fifth EU Framework Programme. The Annals of Regional Science, 2011,46(2):247-266. |
[2] |
Adams J, Loach T . Comment: A well-connected world. Nature, 2015,527(7577):S58-S59.
doi: 10.1038/527S58a pmid: 26560452 |
[3] |
Adams J . Collaborations: The rise of research networks. Nature, 2012,490(7420):335-336.
doi: 10.1038/490335a pmid: 23075965 |
[4] | 马海涛 . 基于知识流动的中国城市网络研究进展与展望. 经济地理, 2016,36(11):207-213. |
[ Ma Haitao . Research progress and prospects of city networks based on knowledge flow in China. Economic Geography, 2016,36(11):207-213.] | |
[5] | Gluckler J . Economic geography and the evolution of networks. Journal of Economic Geography, 2007,7(5):619-634. |
[6] | Nascimbeni F . Collaborative knowledge creation in development networks: Lessons learnt from a transnational. The Journal of Community Informatics, 2013,9(3):1-8. |
[7] |
Breschi S, Catalini C . Tracing the links between science and technology: An exploratory analysis of scientists’ and inventors’ networks. Research Policy, 2009,39(1):14-26.
doi: 10.24095/hpcdp.39.1.01 pmid: 30652838 |
[8] | TerWal A L . Cluster emergence and network evolution: A longitudinal analysis of the inventor network in Sophia Antipolis. Regional Studies, 2013,47(5):651-668. |
[9] | Scherngell T, Hu Y J . Collaborative knowledge production in China: Regional evidence from a gravity model approach. Regional Studies, 2011,45(6):755-772. |
[10] |
Balland P A . Proximity and the evolution of collaboration networks: Evidence from research and development projects within the global navigation satellite system (GNSS) industry. Regional Studies, 2012,46(6):741-756.
doi: 10.1080/00343404.2010.529121 |
[11] |
Cassi L, Plunket A . Research collaboration in co-inventor networks: Combining closure, bridging and proximities. Regional Studies, 2015,49(6):936-954.
doi: 10.1080/00343404.2013.816412 |
[12] | De Prato G, Nepelski D . Global technological collaboration network: Network analysis of international co-inventions. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 2014,39(3):358-375. |
[13] |
Nepelski D, De Prato G . The structure and evolution of ICT global innovation network. Industry and Innovation, 2018,25(10):940-965.
doi: 10.1080/13662716.2017.1343129 |
[14] |
Fischer M M, Griffith D . Modeling spatial autocorrelation in spatial interaction data. An application to patent citation data in the European Union. Journal of Regional Science, 2008,48(5):969-989.
doi: 10.1111/jors.2008.48.issue-5 |
[15] |
Scherngell T, Barber M J . Spatial interaction modelling of cross-region R&D collaborations: Empirical evidence from the 5th EU framework programme. Papers in Regional Science, 2009,88(3):531-546.
doi: 10.1111/pirs.2009.88.issue-3 |
[16] |
Ma H T, Fang C L, Pang B , et al. Structure of Chinese city network as driven by technological knowledge flows. Chinese Geographical Science, 2015,25(4):498-510.
doi: 10.1007/s11769-014-0731-0 |
[17] |
Matthiessen C W, Schwarz A W, Find S . The ups and downs of global research centers. Science, 2002,297(5586):1476-1477.
doi: 10.1126/science.297.5586.1476b pmid: 12211242 |
[18] |
Breschi S, Lenzi C . Co-invention networks and inventive productivity in US cities. Journal of Urban Economics, 2016,92:66-75.
doi: 10.1016/j.jue.2015.12.003 |
[19] |
Matthiessen C W, Schwarz A W, Find S . World cities of scientific knowledge: Systems, networks and potential dynamics. An analysis based on bibliometric indicators. Urban Studies, 2010,47(9):1879-1897.
doi: 10.1177/0042098010372683 |
[20] | Ma H T, Fang C L, Lin S N , et al. Hierarchy, clusters, and spatial differences in Chinese inter-city networks constructed by scientific collaborators. Journal of Geographic Science, 2018,28(12):1793-1809. |
[21] |
Liefner I, Hennemann S . Structural holes and new dimensions of distance: The spatial configuration of the scientific knowledge network of China’s optical technology sector. Environment and Planning A, 2011,43(4):810-829.
doi: 10.1068/a43100 |
[22] | Li Y C, Phelps N . Megalopolis unbound: Knowledge collaboration and functional polycentricity within and beyond the Yangtze River Delta Region in China, 2014. Urban Studies, 2018,53(2):1035-1047. |
[23] |
马海涛, 黄晓东, 李迎成 . 粤港澳大湾区城市群知识多中心的演化过程与机理. 地理学报, 2018,73(12):2297-2314.
doi: 10.11821/dlxb201812003 |
[ Ma Haitao, Huang Xiaodong, Li Yingcheng . The evolution and mechanisms of megalopolitan knowledge polycentricity of Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2018,73(12):2297-2314.]
doi: 10.11821/dlxb201812003 |
|
[24] |
Schartinger D, Rammera C, Fischer M M , et al. Knowledge interactions between universities and industry in Austria: Sectoral patterns and determinants. Research Policy, 2002,31(3):303-328.
doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00111-1 |
[25] |
Fritsch M, Kauffeld M . The impact of network structure on knowledge transfer: An application of social network analysis in the context of regional innovation networks. The Annals of Regional Science, 2010,44(1):21-38.
doi: 10.1007/s00168-008-0245-8 |
[26] |
Huggins R, Prokop D . Network structure and regional innovation: A study of university-industry ties. Urban Studies, 2017,54(4):931-952.
doi: 10.1177/0042098016630521 |
[27] |
Hou H, Kretschmer H, Liu Z . The structure of scientific collaboration networks in Scientometrics. Scientometrics, 2008,75(2):189-202.
doi: 10.1007/s11192-007-1771-3 |
[28] | Leydesdorff L, Persson O . Mapping the geography of science: Distribution patterns and networks of relations among cities and institutes. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2010,61(8):1622-1634. |
[29] |
Li D, Wei Y H, Wang T . Spatial and temporal evolution of urban innovation network in China. Habitat International, 2015,49:484-496.
doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.05.031 |
[30] |
李丹丹, 汪涛, 魏也华 , 等. 中国城市尺度科学知识网络与技术知识网络结构的时空复杂性. 地理研究, 2015,34(3):525-540.
doi: 10.11821/dlyj201503011 |
[ Li Dandan, Wang Tao, Wei Yehua , et al. Spatial and temporal complexity of scientific knowledge network and technological knowledge network on China's urban scale. Geographical Research, 2015,34(3):525-540.]
doi: 10.11821/dlyj201503011 |
|
[31] | 吕拉昌, 梁政骥, 黄茹 . 中国主要城市间的创新联系研究. 地理科学, 2015,35(1):30-37. |
[ Lv Lachang, Liang Zhengji, Huang Ru . The innovation linkage among Chinese major cities. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2015,35(1):30-37.] | |
[32] |
Giuliani E . Network dynamics in regional clusters: Evidence from Chilean wine cluster. Research Policy, 2013,42(8):1406-1419.
doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2013.04.002 |
[33] |
Ballanda P A, Suireb R, Vicentec J . Structural and geographical patterns of knowledge networks in emerging technological standards: Evidence from the European GNSS industry. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 2013,22(1):47-72.
doi: 10.1080/10438599.2012.699773 |
[34] |
Hazır C S, LeSage J, Autant-Bernard C . The role of R&D collaboration networks on regional knowledge creation: Evidence from information and communication technologies. Papers in Regional Science, 2018,97(3):549-567.
doi: 10.1111/pirs.v97.3 |
[35] | 汪涛, 李丹丹 . 知识网络空间结构演化及对NIS 建设的启示: 以我国生物技术知识为例. 地理研究, 2011,30(10):1861-1872. |
[ Wang Tao, Li Dandan . Spatial structure evolution of knowledge network and its impact on the NIS: Case study of biotechnology in China. Geographical Research, 2011,30(10):1861-1872.] | |
[36] |
王秋玉, 曾刚, 吕国庆 . 中国装备制造业产学研合作创新网络初探. 地理学报, 2016,71(2):251-264.
doi: 10.11821/dlxb201602006 |
[ Wang Qiuyu, Zeng Gang, Lv Guoqing . Structural evolution of innovation networks of China's equipment manufacturing industry. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2016,71(2):251-264.]
doi: 10.11821/dlxb201602006 |
|
[37] |
周灿, 曾刚, 王丰龙 , 等. 中国电子信息产业创新网络与创新绩效研究. 地理科学, 2017,37(5):661-671.
doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2017.05.003 |
[ Zhou Can, Zeng Gang, Wang Fenglong , et al. Innovation network structure and innovative performance: A study of China’s electronic information industry. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2017,37(5):661-671.]
doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2017.05.003 |
|
[38] |
Heimeriks G, Boschma R . The path-and place-dependent nature of scientific knowledge production in biotech 1986-2008. Journal of Economic Geography, 2014,14(2):339-364.
doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbs052 |
[39] | Gertler M S . Tacit knowledge and the economic geography of context, or the undefinable tacitness of being (there). Journal of Economic Geography, 2003,3(1):75-99. |
[40] | 李丹丹, 汪涛, 周辉 . 基于不同时空尺度的知识溢出网络结构特征研究. 地理科学, 2013,33(10):1180-1187. |
[ Li Dandan, Wang Tao, Zhou Hui . The structural characteristics of knowledge spillover networks based on different spatial and temporal scales. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2013,33(10):1180-1187.] | |
[41] | Rigby D . Technological relatedness and knowledge space: Entry and exit of US cities from patent classes. Regional Studies, 2015,49(11):1922-1937. |
[42] |
Bathelt H, Malmberg A, Maskell P . Clusters and knowledge: Local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation. Progress in Human Geography, 2004,28(1):31-56.
doi: 10.1191/0309132504ph469oa |
[43] |
Hoekman J, Frenken K, Tijssen R J W . Research collaboration at a distance: Changing spatial patterns of scientific collaboration within Europe. Research Policy, 2010,39(5):662-673.
doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.012 |
[44] |
Balland P A, Boschma R, Frenken K . Proximity and innovation: From statics to dynamics. Regional Studies, 2015,49(6):907-920.
doi: 10.1080/00343404.2014.883598 |
[45] |
Autant-Bernard C, Billand P, Frachisse D , et al. Social distance versus spatial distance in R&D cooperation: Empirical evidence from European collaboration choices in micro and nanotechnologies. Papers in Regional Science, 2007,86(3):495-519.
doi: 10.1111/pirs.2007.86.issue-3 |
[46] |
Agrawal A, Kapur D, McHale J . How do spatial and social proximity influence knowledge flows? Evidence from patent data. Journal of Urban Economics, 2008,64(2):258-269.
doi: 10.1016/j.jue.2008.01.003 |
[47] |
Breschi S, Catalini C . Mobility of skilled workers and co-invention networks: An anatomy of localized knowledge flows. Journal of Economic Geography, 2009,9(4):439-468.
doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbp008 |
[48] |
Cassi L, Plunket A . Proximity, network formation and inventive performance: In search of the proximity paradox. The Annals of Regional Science, 2014,53(2):395-422.
doi: 10.1007/s00168-014-0612-6 |
[49] |
Leszczyńska D, Khachlouf N . How proximity matters in interactive learning and innovation: A study of the Venetian glass industry. Industry and Innovation, 2018,25(9):1-23.
doi: 10.1080/13662716.2016.1264065 |
[50] |
Caragliu A, Nijkamp P . Space and knowledge spillovers in European regions: The impact of different forms of proximity on spatial knowledge diffusion. Journal of Economic Geography, 2015,16(3):749-774.
doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbv042 |
[51] |
Crescenzi R, Nathan M, Rodríguez-Pose A . Do inventors talk to strangers?: On proximity and collaborative knowledge creation. Research Policy, 2016,45(1):177-194.
doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2015.07.003 |
[52] | Miorner J, Zukauskaite E, Trippl M , et al. Creating institutional preconditions for knowledge flows in cross-border regions. Environment and Planning C, 2018,36(2):201-218. |
[53] | Boschma R, Martin R. The Handbook of Evolutionary Economic Geography. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2010: 120-135. |
[54] |
Broekel T, Mueller W . Critical links in knowledge networks: What about proximities and gatekeeper organisations?. Industry and innovation, 2018,25(10):919-939.
doi: 10.1080/13662716.2017.1343130 |
[55] |
Nooteboom B . Learning by interaction: Absorptive capacity, cognitive distance and governance. Journal of Management and Governance, 2000,4(1):69-92.
doi: 10.1023/A:1009941416749 |
[56] | Balland P A, Belso-Martínez J A, Morrison A . The dynamics of technical and business knowledge networks in industrial clusters: Embeddedness, status or proximity?. Economic Geography, 2016,92(1):35-60. |
[57] | 张翼鸥, 谷人旭, 马双 . 中国城市间技术转移的空间特征与邻近性机理. 地理科学进展, 2019,38(3):370-382. |
[ Zhang Yiou, Gu Renxu, Ma Shuang . Spatial characteristics and proximity mechanism of technology transfer among cities in China. Progress in Geography, 2019,38(3):370-382.] | |
[58] |
Boschma R . Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment. Regional Studies, 2005,39(1):61-74.
doi: 10.1080/0034340052000320887 |
[59] |
Romero C C . Personal and business networks within Chilean biotech. Industry and Innovation, 2018,25(9):1-33.
doi: 10.1080/13662716.2016.1264065 |
[60] | 刘卫东, 田锦尘, 欧晓理 , 等. “一带一路”战略研究. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2017: 32-38. |
[ Liu Weidong, Tian Jinchen, Ou Xiaoli , et al. The Belt and Road Strategy Research. Beijing: The Commercial Press, 2017: 32-38.] | |
[61] | World Bank. World Bank Country and Lending Groups. , 2019-02-15. |
[62] |
Li Y C, Phelps N . Knowledge polycentricity and the evolving Yangtze River Delta megalopolis. Regional Studies, 2017,51(7):1035-1047.
doi: 10.1080/00343404.2016.1240868 |
[63] |
刘承良, 桂钦昌, 段德忠 , 等. 全球科研论文合作网络的结构异质性及其邻近性机理. 地理学报, 2017,72(4):737-752.
doi: 10.11821/dlxb201704014 |
[ Liu Chengliang, Gui Qinchang, Duan Dezhong , et al. Structural heterogeneity and proximity mechanism of global scientific collaboration network based on co-authored papers. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017,72(4):737-752.]
doi: 10.11821/dlxb201704014 |
|
[64] |
Mitze T, Strotebeck F . Centrality and get-richer mechanisms in interregional knowledge networks. Regional Studies, 2018,52(11):1-13.
doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2018.11.145 pmid: 30581922 |
[65] |
Yoon J, Blumer A, Lee K . An algorithm for modularity analysis of directed and weighted biological networks based on edge-betweenness centrality. Bioinformatics, 2006,22(24):3106-3108.
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl533 pmid: 17060356 |
[66] |
Hazir C, Autant-Bernard C . Determinants of cross-regional R&D collaboration: Some empirical evidence from European biotechnology. Annals of Regional Science, 2014,53(2), 369-393.
doi: 10.1007/s00168-014-0606-4 |
[67] | Mitze T, Strotebeck F . Determining factors of interregional research collaboration in Germany’s biotech network: Capacity, proximity, policy?. Technovation, 2019,80(3):40-53. |
[68] |
Cao Z, Derudder B, Peng Z W . Interaction between different forms of proximity in inter‐organizational scientific collaboration: The case of medical sciences research network in the Yangtze River Delta region. Papers in Regional Science, 2019,98(4):1-22.
doi: 10.1111/pirs.v98.1 |
[69] |
Ter Wal A L, Boschma R . Co-evolution of firms, industries and networks in space. Regional Studies, 2011,45(7):919-933.
doi: 10.1080/00343400802662658 |
[70] | Cassi L, Morrison A, Rabellotti R . Proximity and scientific collaboration: Evidence from the global wine industry. Tijdschriftvoor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 2015,106(2):205-219. |
[71] |
Laursen K, Reichstein T, Salter A . Exploring the effect of geographical proximity and university quality on university-industry collaboration in the United Kingdom. Regional Studies, 2011,45(4):507-523.
doi: 10.1080/00343400903401618 |
[72] |
Plotnikova T, Rake B . Collaboration in pharmaceutical research: Exploration of country-level determinants. Scientometrics, 2014,98(2):1173-1202.
doi: 10.1007/s11192-013-1182-6 |
No related articles found! |
|