中国地级以上城市公园绿地服务水平评估:数据、模型和方法
|
许泽宁, 高晓路, 王志强, 马妍, 邓羽, 龙灜
|
Evaluation of the service of parks in Chinese urban areas
|
Zening XU, Xiaolu GAO, Zhiqiang WANG, Yan MA, Yu DENG, Ying LONG
|
|
表4 全国地级以上城市公园绿地服务水平的分等级评估结果(综合得分前20位) |
Tab. 4 The evaluation result of urban park service quality of prefecture-level cities in China |
|
排序 | 城市 | 公园绿地服务覆盖率(a,%) | 优 (b,%) | 良 (c,%) | 一般 (d,%) | 综合得分 (e=(3×b+2×c+1×d)/6) | 标准化指数 (f=e/max(e)) | 1 | 池州 | 99.6 | 90.5 | 6.4 | 2.7 | 0.478 | 1 | 2 | 珠海 | 97.9 | 68.0 | 28.7 | 1.2 | 0.438 | 0.915 | 3 | 宜春 | 99.5 | 56.9 | 41.1 | 1.5 | 0.424 | 0.887 | 4 | 深圳 | 98.4 | 59.8 | 36.1 | 2.6 | 0.423 | 0.885 | 5 | 马鞍山 | 98.6 | 54.6 | 43.7 | 0.2 | 0.419 | 0.876 | 6 | 伊春 | 100.0 | 50.9 | 48.3 | 0.8 | 0.417 | 0.872 | 7 | 舟山 | 98.0 | 53.8 | 36.2 | 8.0 | 0.403 | 0.842 | 8 | 北京 | 94.7 | 59.7 | 26.4 | 8.6 | 0.401 | 0.838 | 9 | 宜宾 | 96.3 | 40.9 | 54.5 | 0.8 | 0.388 | 0.811 | 10 | 南充 | 97.3 | 37.8 | 57.2 | 2.3 | 0.384 | 0.802 | 11 | 肇庆 | 88.2 | 56.0 | 24.3 | 8.0 | 0.374 | 0.782 | 12 | 汕尾 | 96.4 | 40.4 | 46.5 | 9.5 | 0.373 | 0.779 | 13 | 武汉 | 90.6 | 43.4 | 42.7 | 4.5 | 0.367 | 0.767 | 14 | 岳阳 | 94.9 | 35.2 | 54.2 | 5.5 | 0.366 | 0.765 | 15 | 通辽 | 86.2 | 44.3 | 39.0 | 2.9 | 0.356 | 0.745 | 16 | 厦门 | 85.1 | 49.4 | 27.1 | 8.6 | 0.352 | 0.735 | 17 | 乌兰察布 | 91.1 | 28.9 | 61.3 | 0.9 | 0.350 | 0.732 | 18 | 常德 | 87.4 | 43.2 | 36.1 | 8.2 | 0.350 | 0.731 | 19 | 包头 | 91.6 | 37.6 | 42.8 | 11.3 | 0.349 | 0.730 | 20 | 南京 | 91.2 | 41.4 | 34.9 | 14.9 | 0.348 | 0.728 |
|
|
|