产业结构对区域碳排放的影响——基于多国数据的实证分析
作者简介:原嫄(1986- ),女,陕西西安人,讲师,主要从事区域经济学研究。E-mail: paipaidm@126.com
收稿日期: 2015-06-23
要求修回日期: 2015-11-05
网络出版日期: 2016-01-23
基金资助
国家重点基础研究发展计划(973计划)项目(2012CB955802)
国家自然科学基金项目(41171099)
The impact of the industrial structure on regional carbon emission: Empirical evidence across countries
Received date: 2015-06-23
Request revised date: 2015-11-05
Online published: 2016-01-23
Copyright
人类行为所引起的全球气候变暖趋势已经无可争议,所带来的影响可能对全球发展方向和生产方式产生重大的作用。在建立产业结构对区域碳排放的影响模型基础上,在全球尺度下进行计量分析,主要结论:第一,理论模型证明区域碳排放随经济发展推进具有先上升后下降的不可抗的基本客观规律,故减排应从降低峰值高度、促进峰值提前等方向入手;第二,实证结果说明第二产业份额对碳排放的影响强度为恒正值,而服务业的影响强度逐步降低,促使第二产业向服务业的份额流动最终将带来整体影响强度的下降;第三,产业结构调整所引起的碳排放变动强度具有明显差异,产业升级对于中高等发展水平国家的减排效率明显高于极高发展水平国家,且中等发展水平国家将在更早的发展阶段迎来碳排放高峰。
原嫄 , 席强敏 , 孙铁山 , 李国平 . 产业结构对区域碳排放的影响——基于多国数据的实证分析[J]. 地理研究, 2016 , 35(1) : 82 -94 . DOI: 10.11821/dlyj201601008
Global warming is a direct consequence of the increasing CO2 concentration in the atmosphere, which is caused by the abnormal increase in carbon emission levels. Such phenomenon has become a threat to the safety of living conditions. Many studies had proven that the increase in carbon emissions over the past century was mainly caused by human activities, but the factors currently known that contribute to carbon emissions are difficult to be mitigated. Therefore, further studies on the effect of economic development on carbon emissions might provide more feasible and efficient techniques for reducing carbon emissions. First, based on the framework of the effect of industrial structure on carbon emissions, the industrial structure determines the convergence of the equilibrium path of the regional economy and the final output. The final output and industrial structure influence carbon emissions simultaneously. The dynamic model shows that when higher energy intensity has a low share, its growth will dominate the overall regional carbon emissions. By contrast, when the lower energy intensity has a high share, its growth will lead the whole region to reduce carbon emissions. Second, an empirical analysis is performed to investigate the influence of industrial structure on global carbon emissions. Both the shares of the manufacturing and service industries positively affect carbon emissions. However, the influencing intensity of the service industry decreases along with an increasing share. Therefore, in the early stages of economic development, the rapid growth in the share of the manufacturing sector will increase the amount of carbon emissions; however, in the matured stages of economic development, the increasing share of the service sector and the declining share of the manufacturing sector will decrease the overall influencing intensity of these sectors. Third, an empirical analysis is conducted under different groups of countries according to the developing levels. All in all, compared with very-high-class group of countries, upgrading the industrial structure is a more efficient mitigating path in high-class and middle-class groups of countries. Meanwhile, adjusting the internal structure of their manufacturing and service sectors can inhibit the influencing intensities of different industries as well.
Tab. 1 The definitions of the variables in the model表1 模型变量定义及说明 |
| 变量类别 | 变量名称 | 变量含义 | 对应指标 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 被解释变量 | LCAR | 区域碳排放指数 | 由区域燃料燃烧产生碳排放的对数表示 | |
| 解释变量 | 工业化水平 | IND | 第二产业份额 | 由采矿业和制造业、建筑业总产业份额值表示 |
| 服务化水平 | SER | 服务业份额 | 由批发零售及餐饮住宿业、交通运输和仓储业和其他产业等总产业份额值表示 | |
| 控制变量 | LPOP | 区域规模指数 | 由区域人口数量的对数表示 | |
| LENE | 区域技术水平指数 | 由区域单位GDP能源使用量的对数表示 | ||
Tab. 2 The.results of the regression with Driscoll-Kraay standard errors表2 D-K标准误回归模型估计结果 |
| 变量名称 | 系数 | 回归结果 |
|---|---|---|
| IND | β2 | 5.482*** |
| (16.57) | ||
| SER2 | Β3 | -2.583** |
| (-4.08) | ||
| SER | β4 | 7.674*** |
| (9.13) | ||
| LPOP | β5 | 1.224*** |
| (17.69) | ||
| LENE | β6 | 0.218*** |
| (8.09) | ||
| _cons | -22.58*** | |
| (-21.56) | ||
| N | 1326 | |
| R2 | 0.427 |
注:括号中为t值;*、**、***分别表示在10%、5%、1%的水平。数据来源:由STATA软件分析结果整理得到。 |
Tab. 3 The results of the regression with Driscoll-Kraay standard errors in different groups of countries表3 不同发展水平国家集团的D-K标准误回归模型估计结果 |
| 变量名称 | 系数 | 极高发展水平 | 高等发展水平 | 中等发展水平 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 模型一 | 模型一 | 模型二 | 模型一 | ||
| IND | β 2 | 3.367** | 5.870*** | 5.830*** | 5.270*** |
| (-4.16) | (-7.81) | (-7.73) | (-9.73) | ||
| SER2 | β 3 | -3.723*** | -0.259 | -4.671** | |
| (-5.07) | (-0.21) | (-3.50) | |||
| SER | β 4 | 8.172*** | 5.415** | 5.130*** | 9.365*** |
| (-6.00) | (-3.37) | (-5.19) | (-6.31) | ||
| LPOP | β 5 | 0.605*** | 1.644*** | 1.646*** | 2.140*** |
| (-28.67) | (-27.7) | (-27.78) | (-35.6) | ||
| LENE | β 6 | -0.0591 | 0.333*** | 0.336*** | 0.434*** |
| (-1.81) | (-5.00) | (-5.14) | (-9.51) | ||
| _cons | -9.842*** | -29.81*** | -29.76*** | -40.31*** | |
| (-10.15) | (-23.25) | (-23.30) | (-57.04) | ||
| N | 532 | 458 | 458 | 336 | |
| R2 | 0.488 | 0.373 | 0.373 | 0.660 | |
注:括号中为t值;*、**、***分别表示在10%、5%、1%的水平。数据来源:由STATA软件分析结果整理得到。 |
Fig. 1 The schematic diagram of the influencing intensities of carbon emissions during the evolution in industrial structure in different groups of countries.图1 第二产业降低、服务业份额上升过程中各类型国家集团区域碳排放变化强度示意图 |
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
[
|
| [3] |
[
|
| [4] |
IPCC. Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2013.
|
| [5] |
[
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
[
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
[
|
| [21] |
[
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
[
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
[
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
[
|
| [33] |
[
|
| [34] |
[
|
| [35] |
[
|
| [36] |
[
|
| [37] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |