信息渠道对城市居民迁居空间的影响——以南京为例
作者简介:秦萧(1987- ),男,江苏盐城人,助理研究员,主要研究信息技术与城市地理。E-mail: qinxiao1070@126.com
收稿日期: 2016-03-20
要求修回日期: 2016-07-26
网络出版日期: 2016-10-26
基金资助
国家自然科学基金项目(41571146)
The impacts of information channels on moving space:A case study on Nanjing
Received date: 2016-03-20
Request revised date: 2016-07-26
Online published: 2016-10-26
Copyright
根据搜寻空间理论,网络渠道能够提供比传统渠道更多的住房信息,减少居民迁居过程中对原住房周边区域的依赖,从而扩大了居民迁居的搜寻范围。但是,与远程办公和住房选择关系的研究相比,学者较少关注网络渠道对居民实际迁居空间的影响。基于南京城区居民迁居活动调查数据,利用三维核密度和多项式逻辑回归模型,重点分析不同信息渠道使用者的迁居时空特征、信息渠道对使用者迁居空间的影响。研究发现,近年来网络渠道已经成为居民迁居过程中的主导住房信息获取方式,其使用者的迁居距离大于传统渠道使用者,丰富了现有关于ICT对居民迁居空间影响的学术研究,也为城市住房信息管理和住房空间规划提供借鉴。
秦萧 , 甄峰 . 信息渠道对城市居民迁居空间的影响——以南京为例[J]. 地理研究, 2016 , 35(10) : 1846 -1856 . DOI: 10.11821/dlyj201610004
According to the theories of housing search space and anchor point, Internet channels (e.g., housing websites, real estate agents) can provide more housing information (e.g., prices, locations, styles, years, facilities) than traditional channels (e.g., newspaper, TV, advertisements, introduction from friends or relatives) to reduce limitations of previous houses where movers have higher flexibility to choose their new houses to extend search spaces in their moving processes. However, the previous studies usually focused on some factors of residential mobility including housing price, transport, household composition, lifestyle, service facility, neighbourhood environment, employment opportunity, rather than ICT (telecommuting and information channel). Meanwhile, compared with studies on relationships between telecommuting and residential mobility (telecommuters are more likely to make longer moving distance or move into suburban areas because of flexible ways of working, which can reduce limitations of workplace in the moving processes), few scholars have paid their attention to the impacts of information channels on residents' moving space. This paper collected data from the survey of residential mobility in Nanjing city. It mainly used 3D Kernel density analysis to simulate space-time characteristics of different information channel users, and also Multinomial Logistic Regression to demonstrate the impacts of information channel on moving space. Three consequences were found by the above analyses. Firstly, males, young persons, and high-educated and high-income individuals preferred to use Internet channels to collect housing information. Secondly, Internet channel has become the most popular tool for residential mobility to obtain housing information in recent years compared to usage of traditional channels in the earlier times. Finally, more importantly, the Internet channel users were likely to make longer moving distance than the traditional channel users because of more and detailed housing information obtained from websites and real estate agents. On the one hand, these findings can enrich the present studies in the impacts of ICT on moving space in which internet channels take a directive role in the expansion of moving space as well as telecommuting. On the other hand, they are useful to housing information management (e.g., sharing platform building of urban housing information for reducing the "digital divide" among different groups) and housing spatial planning for urban governments (e.g., optimization of urban housing space, especially the one in suburban areas).
Key words: Internet channels; traditional channels; moving space; Nanjing
Fig. 1 The administrative division of Nanjing (2012) and the locations of questionnaires图1 2012年南京市行政区划和问卷发放点分布 |
Tab. 1 The percentages of different information channel usages in Nanjing city表1 南京城区居民不同类型信息渠道使用百分比 |
| 属性小类 | 传统渠道(%) | 网络渠道(%) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 报纸、电视等 | 亲戚朋友介绍 | 广告、宣传单等 | 其他方式 | 小计 | 中介机构 | 房产信息网站 | 小计 | ||
| 男性 | 4 | 15 | 4 | 22 | 45 | 25 | 30 | 55 | |
| 女性 | 7 | 23 | 5 | 21 | 56 | 23 | 22 | 44 | |
| 20~29岁 | 4 | 19 | 4 | 21 | 47 | 25 | 27 | 53 | |
| 30~39岁 | 8 | 21 | 4 | 19 | 52 | 22 | 25 | 48 | |
| 40岁以上 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 41 | 71 | 18 | 11 | 29 | |
| 高中/中专及以下 | 11 | 32 | 4 | 15 | 62 | 25 | 13 | 38 | |
| 大专及本科 | 5 | 20 | 4 | 20 | 49 | 23 | 28 | 51 | |
| 研究生及以上 | 2 | 13 | 4 | 23 | 41 | 32 | 28 | 59 | |
| 3000元及以下 | 6 | 24 | 4 | 31 | 65 | 21 | 14 | 35 | |
| 3000~5000元 | 5 | 19 | 5 | 19 | 47 | 23 | 30 | 53 | |
| 5001~8000元 | 6 | 9 | 2 | 20 | 37 | 29 | 34 | 63 | |
| 8000元以上 | 9 | 14 | 2 | 22 | 47 | 26 | 28 | 53 | |
| 政府/事业单位人员 | 6 | 19 | 5 | 15 | 45 | 26 | 29 | 55 | |
| 企业办公人员 | 5 | 20 | 3 | 15 | 43 | 26 | 31 | 57 | |
| 自由职业者 | 6 | 21 | 8 | 15 | 50 | 31 | 19 | 50 | |
| 商业服务人员 | 4 | 17 | 4 | 30 | 54 | 22 | 24 | 46 | |
| 制造业工人 | 0 | 75 | 0 | 0 | 75 | 0 | 25 | 25 | |
| 外出务工人员 | 14 | 29 | 14 | 0 | 57 | 14 | 29 | 43 | |
| 其他 | 26 | 10 | 0 | 38 | 74 | 13 | 13 | 26 | |
Fig. 2 The Kernel density of time-distance of residential mobility in Nanjing city图2 南京城区居民迁居的时间—距离核密度分析 |
Tab. 2 The results of Multinomial Logistic Regression表2 多项式逻辑回归结果 |
| 自变量 | 迁居距离 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0~5 km(含5 km) | 5~10 km(含10 km) | ||||
| 系数 | 标准差(鲁棒检验) | 系数 | 标准差(鲁棒检验) | ||
| 信息渠道(参照项:传统渠道) | |||||
| 网络渠道 | -2.280*** | 0.859 | -1.689* | 0.900 | |
| 混合渠道 | -1.174 | 0.928 | -3.114** | 1.446 | |
| 远程办公水平(参照项:低水平) | |||||
| 高水平 | -1.271* | 0.701 | 0.045 | 0.868 | |
| 中水平 | -2.122** | 0.934 | -0.067 | 1.188 | |
| 主要通勤方式(参照项:私家车) | |||||
| 非机动车 | 0.912 | 1.056 | 0.483 | 1.213 | |
| 公共交通 | -0.514 | 0.809 | -0.324 | 0.827 | |
| 房价(2012年) | -0.049 | 0.296 | 0.109 | 0.293 | |
| 房屋拥有权(参照项:租住房屋) | |||||
| 自有房屋 | -1.661** | 0.741 | -0.316 | 0.878 | |
| 年龄 | -0.046 | 0.338 | 0.089 | 0.311 | |
| 性别(参照项:女性) | |||||
| 男性 | 0.590 | 0.633 | 0.035 | 0.760 | |
| 教育水平(参照项:低水平) | |||||
| 高水平 | 0.228 | 1.385 | -0.723 | 1.436 | |
| 截距 | 3.987** | 1.759 | 2.280 | 1.851 | |
| 样本数 | 94 | ||||
| -2倍对数似然值 | 154.439 | ||||
| 似然比 | 32.171* | ||||
注:模型因变量为迁居距离,参照类为>10 km;*表示显著性<0.1,**表示显著性<0.05,***表示显著性<0.01。 |
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
[
|
| [13] |
[
|
| [14] |
[
|
| [15] |
[
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
[
|
| [43] |
[
|
| [44] |
|
| [45] |
|
| [46] |
|
| [47] |
|
| [48] |
|
| [49] |
|
| [50] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |