土壤相对湿度在东北地区农业干旱监测中的适用性分析
作者简介:安雪丽(1991- ),女,河南濮阳人,硕士,研究方向为农业干旱监测、评估。E-mail:xlan1992@163.com
收稿日期: 2016-12-04
要求修回日期: 2017-03-09
网络出版日期: 2017-05-20
基金资助
国家国际科技合作专项(2013DFG21010)
中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金和教育部创新团队资助项目(IRT1108)
Assessing the relative soil moisture for agricultural drought monitoring in Northeast China
Received date: 2016-12-04
Request revised date: 2017-03-09
Online published: 2017-05-20
Copyright
分析土壤相对湿度(RSM)与标准化植被指数(SVI)、站点农气灾情数据及产量数据的关系,探究土壤相对湿度对东北地区农业干旱的监测能力。结果表明:① 土壤相对湿度与SVI有较好的相关关系,76%的站点能够通过0.05的检验;水分胁迫下,作物生长状态对土壤湿度的滞后时间为10天。② 土壤相对湿度低于60时,超过58%的作物生长状态受到影响;土壤相对湿度低于35时,超过92%的作物生长状态受到影响。③ 土壤相对湿度对农气灾情数据记录的不同等级干旱的正确检测概率都超过了50%。④ 7月上旬土壤相对湿度和产量的相关关系最好。土壤相对湿度在东北地区农业干旱监测中具有较好的适用性,本文可为农业干旱监测提供理论支持。
安雪丽 , 武建军 , 周洪奎 , 李小涵 , 刘雷震 , 杨建华 . 土壤相对湿度在东北地区农业干旱监测中的适用性分析[J]. 地理研究, 2017 , 36(5) : 837 -849 . DOI: 10.11821/dlyj201705003
Soil moisture is an important factor affecting crop growth, development and production. Currently, the presence of a growing number of long-term soil moisture networks allowed users to obtain precise soil moisture data. Therefore, it is reasonable to consider soil moisture observation data as a potential approach for monitoring agricultural drought. In Northeast China, the soil moisture dataset at agro-meteorological stations is relatively complete. In order to study the ability of Relative Soil Moisture (RSM) monitoring agricultural drought, we firstly analyzed the correlation and lag time between relative soil moisture and Standardized Vegetation Index (SVI), and investigated the response of crop growth state to soil moisture. Secondly, by the comparison between relative soil moisture and the drought disaster data recorded by the national agro-meteorological stations, we analyzed the probability of detection of relative soil moisture to drought disaster record data. Finally, the relationship between relative soil moisture and crop yield was analyzed. The results are as follows: (1) The RSM has good correlations with SVI in the growing season, 76% of the stations can pass the 0.05 test. Under water stress, SVI and RSM have the best correlation at 10-day lag. (2) Through the analysis of corresponding relationship between RSM and the 10-day lagged SVI, we point out that the RSM is able to depict the influence of different drought intensities on crop growth status. With the decrease of RSM, the effect on both the crop growth status and the probability are increasing. When RSM is below 60, more than 58% of the crop growth status was affected; When RSM is below 35, more than 92% of the crop growth status was affected. (3) The probabilities of detection of RSM on the different drought grades recorded by the national agro-meteorological stations are all more than 50%. But if we do not classify the RSM into drought grades, the probability of detection of RSM on moderate drought recorded by the national agro-meteorological stations reaches 73%. (4) The impacts of RSM on crop yield during the main growing season were also explored using 10-day RSM data. The result shows that the key period was the first dekad in July. RSM has a good applicability in agricultural drought monitoring in Northeast China, and this study can provide theoretical support for agricultural drought monitoring.
Fig.1 Study area showing the MODIS cropland and agro-meteorological stations in this study图1 研究区作物及农气站点分布图 |
Fig.2 Spatial distribution of the maximum correlation coefficient by significance test site and lag time for SVI and relative soil moisture at different depths图2 各站点SVI与土壤相对湿度的最大相关系数及各站点SVI对土壤相对湿度响应的滞后时间空间分布图 |
Tab.1 The maximum correlation coefficient between SVI and RSM at different depths表1 SVI与各层土壤相对湿度最大相关系数表 |
| 农气站点 | RSM(10 cm) | RSM(20 cm) | RSM(50 cm) | RSM(0~50 cm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50468(黑河) | 0.37** | 0.36** | 0.37** | 0.38** |
| 50564(孙吴) | 0.22** | 0.24** | 0.45** | 0.31** |
| 50655(德都) | 0.44** | 0.48** | 0.45** | 0.48** |
| 50658(克山) | 0.30** | 0.32** | 0.35** | 0.35** |
| 50742(富裕) | 0.41** | 0.49** | 0.45** | 0.47** |
| 50756(海伦) | 0.20** | 0.25** | 0.29** | 0.23** |
| 50788(富锦) | 0.32** | 0.32** | 0.16* | 0.33** |
| 50879(桦南) | 0.43** | 0.47** | 0.48** | 0.45** |
| 50949(前郭尔罗斯) | 0.14* | 0.19** | -0.14 | 0.08 |
| 50953(哈尔滨) | 0.26** | 0.16* | 0.05 | 0.19** |
| 50954(肇源) | 0.15* | 0.06 | 0.01 | 0.11 |
| 50958(阿城) | 0.24** | 0.22** | 0.32** | 0.24** |
| 50964(方正) | 0.28** | 0.24** | -0.01 | 0.19** |
| 54049(长岭) | 0.22** | 0.25** | 0.17* | 0.24** |
| 54064(农安) | 0.23** | 0.19** | 0.25** | 0.23** |
| 54072(榆树) | 0.17* | 0.15* | 0.16* | 0.16* |
| 54080(五常) | 0.07 | 0.09 | -0.01 | 0.02 |
| 54154(梨树) | 0.25** | 0.30** | 0.42** | 0.34** |
| 54165(双阳) | 0.17* | 0.08 | 0.02 | 0.10 |
| 54213(翁牛特旗) | 0.09 | 0.07 | 0.18** | 0.09 |
| 54236(彰武) | 0.23** | 0.30** | 0.29** | 0.24** |
| 54266(梅河口) | 0.18** | 0.22** | 0.24** | 0.21** |
| 54291(珲春) | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.20** | 0.13 |
| 54292(延吉) | -0.05 | -0.04 | -0.17 | -0.09 |
| 54326(叶柏寿) | 0.10 | 0.11 | 0.18** | 0.13 |
| 54335(黑山) | 0.07 | 0.14* | 0.14* | 0.08 |
| 54454(绥中) | 0.23** | 0.25** | 0.18** | 0.23** |
| 54563(瓦房店) | 0.29** | 0.34** | 0.42** | 0.37** |
| 54584(庄河) | 0.21** | 0.25** | 0.16* | 0.25** |
注:*、**分别表示0.05显著性水平和0.01显著性水平。 |
Fig.3 Correlation between dedak RSM and SVI during the main growing season in Northeast China (n=348)图3 东北地区生长季不同时段(旬尺度)土壤相对湿度和SVI的相关关系分析(n=348) |
Tab.2 Proportion of SVI in relative soil moisture at different degrees表2 不同土壤相对湿度分级下SVI变化情况 |
| 等级 | 土壤相对湿度(%) | 水分亏缺事件总数 | SVI<0事件数 | 比例(%) | SVI均值 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 55≤RSM<60 | 177 | 103 | 0.5820 | -0.2637 |
| 2 | 50≤RSM<55 | 119 | 73 | 0.6134 | -0.2562 |
| 3 | 45≤RSM<50 | 82 | 52 | 0.6341 | -0.3137 |
| 4 | 40≤RSM<45 | 56 | 38 | 0.6786 | -0.4235 |
| 5 | 35≤RSM<40 | 35 | 24 | 0.6857 | -0.4884 |
| 6 | 30≤RSM<35 | 13 | 12 | 0.9231 | -0.6657 |
| 7 | RSM<30 | 4 | 4 | 1.0000 | -1.0569 |
Fig.4 Variation of NDVI anomaly proportion along with the drought intensity图4 作物生长状态异常(SVI<0)的事件比例随土壤水分胁迫加剧的变化趋势 |
Tab.3 Comparison between severe drought event monitored by root zone relative soil moisture and historical records表3 土壤相对湿度指示的重度干旱事件和站点农气旱灾灾情数据对比 |
| 区站号 | 年份 | 月份 | 土壤相对湿度 | 农业旱灾灾情记录 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50468 | 2007 | 7月2旬-8月1旬 | RSM<40(重旱) | 2007年7月2旬至8月1旬,春小麦和大豆发生了重度干旱,受旱面积近100万亩,大豆受害百分比接近100% |
| 50655 | 2001 | 6月1旬-7月2旬 | RSM<40(重旱) | 2001年6月1旬至7月2旬发生了中度干旱事件,其中6月3旬发生重度干旱事件 |
| 50742 | 2007 | 8月1旬-9月1旬 | RSM<40(重旱) | 2007年8月1旬至9月2旬都发生了重度干旱 |
| 54049 | 2007 | 8月1旬-9月3旬 | RSM<40(重旱) | 2007年8月1旬为重度干旱,8月2旬为中度干旱,8月3旬至9月3旬为重度干旱,受旱面积超过100万亩,受旱百分比为90%~100% |
| 54213 | 2003 | 8月2旬-9月3旬 | RSM<40(重旱) | 2003年8月2旬至9月2旬,发生重度干旱灾害,受旱面积超过100万亩,受旱百分比为90%~100% |
| 54326 | 2009 | 9月2旬 | RSM<40(重旱) | 2009年9月1旬至9月3旬发生重度干旱灾害,受旱面积超过100万亩,受旱百分比达80%~89% |
Tab.4 The probability of different degree drought monitored by root zone soil moisture表4 根区土壤相对湿度对不同等级干旱的正确检测概率 |
| 重旱 | 中旱 | |
|---|---|---|
| 同等程度干旱POD | 0.58 | 0.5 |
| 干旱POD | 0.65 | 0.73 |
Fig.5 Correlation between dedak relative soil moisture and crop yield during the main growing season in Northeast China (n=178)图5 东北地区生长季不同时段(旬尺度)土壤相对湿度和产量的相关关系分析(n=178) |
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
| [1] |
[
|
| [2] |
[
|
| [3] |
[
|
| [4] |
[
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
[
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
[
|
| [10] |
[
|
| [11] |
[
|
| [12] |
[
|
| [13] |
[
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
[
|
| [18] |
[
|
| [19] |
[
|
| [20] |
[
|
| [21] |
[
|
| [22] |
[
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
[
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
[
|
| [33] |
[
|
| [34] |
[
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
[
|
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
[
|
| [40] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |