旅游与文化

古村落旅游地游线固化的路径依赖——世界遗产地西递、宏村实证分析

展开
  • 1. 中山大学旅游发展与规划研究中心,广州 510275;
    2. 佛山职业技术学院,佛山528237
徐红罡(1967-),女,云南昆明人,教授,博士生导师。研究方向为区域旅游、系统动力学。 E-mail:xuhonggang@sina.com

收稿日期: 2009-08-17

  修回日期: 2009-11-15

  网络出版日期: 2010-07-20

基金资助

国家自然科学基金资助项目(40871060)

Path dependence in travel route formation in ancient village tourism destinations:An empirical study of Xidi and Hongcun

Expand
  • 1. Center for Tourism Planning and Development, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China;
    2. Foshan Polytechnic College, Foshan 528237,Guang dong,China

Received date: 2009-08-17

  Revised date: 2009-11-15

  Online published: 2010-07-20

摘要

以西递、宏村为例,分析了古村落旅游地高度集中的旅游线路的形成和固化过程。依据新制度经济学理论,游线固化实质是一个路径依赖的结果,其中大众游客的市场结构、消费文化因素、权力因素、古建保护因素、制度因素和经济因素等形成的正反馈机制是不断加强游线固化效果、形成路径依赖的主要力量。在这些影响因素的共同作用下,目前的线路已经陷入锁定状态(Locked-in),短时间内改变则会由于巨大的机会成本而变得困难重重。黟县及西递、宏村村镇政府必须坚持加大对东部民居保护及旅游设施发展投资,设计多样化的专题旅游线路,多样化发展游客市场,并通过市场的力量促进遗产保护、旅游建设以及社区居民的全面、协调、可持续发展。

本文引用格式

徐红罡,吴悦芳,彭丽娟 . 古村落旅游地游线固化的路径依赖——世界遗产地西递、宏村实证分析[J]. 地理研究, 2010 , 29(7) : 1324 -1334 . DOI: 10.11821/yj2010070017

Abstract

In recent years, visiting ancient villages, ancient towns or world cultural heritages has been popular. However, with tourism development in the humanistic destinations, problems have emerged. The over concentration of travel routes has been criticized for a long time,as it leads to a series of consequences, including the spatial concentration of tourist activities, confined business opportunities, limited resident participation and unbalanced community development. Although local residents as an integrated community are crucial in forming an attractive humanistic and cultural landscape in these destinations,it is possible for only a small proportion of them living along the travel routes or owning farmland to be fully integrated in tourism development. The permeation of tourism into the community breaks down the balanced status and perplexes the power relation, where there might be disparity and conflict. Moreover, concentration of tourist activities places tremendous pressure on heritage, infrastructure and tourism management, while it also deteriorates the satisfaction of both the tourists and residents. However, although dispersion of tourist activity has been advocated by the tourism experts, few measures have been taken. This paper analyzes the formation and solidification of travel routes in ancient village destinations in the cases of Xidi and Hongcun world heritage sites. It points out that it is not optimistic in tourism management, community participation and development as well as in heritage protection, which are not economically, socially, culturally or environmentally sustainable. The solidification process of the travel routes follows a path dependence pattern often discussed in neo-institutional economics. There are six feedback loops motivating the process, including the mass tourist market structure, Chinese consumptive culture, ancient architecture protection, power relation, institution settings and economic factor. System dynamics is utilized to model the feedback system. Currently, the travel routes in Xidi and Hongcun are locked in an unsatisfactory status, where drastic change will be under tremendous opportunity cost.

参考文献


[1] Campbell C K. An Approach to Research in Recreational Geography. British Columbia: Department of Geography, University of British Columbia, 1967. 325~364.

[2] Stewart S I, Vogt C A. Multi-destination trip patterns. Annals of Tourism Research, 1997, 24(2): 458~461.

[3] Lundgren J J. The development of tourist travel system: A metropolitan economic hegemony par excellence. Tourism Review, 1973, 28(1): 2~14.

[4] 傅沂. 产业变迁中的路径依赖研究.博士学位论文. 广州:暨南大学, 2006. 18~39.

[5] 仝松峰. 旅游购物"回扣"现象形成的路径依赖研究. 重庆工学院学报(社会科学版), 2007, 21(3): 71~73.

[6] 徐红罡, 田美蓉. 城市旅游的增长机制研究. 中山大学学报(自然科学版), 2006, 45(3): 95~99.

[7] 方世敏. 基于路径依赖理论的旅游边缘地区开发创新研究——以彭德怀故里乌石为例. 北京第二外国语学院学报(旅游版), 2007, 8(7): 94~99.

[8] 李俊鹏, 徐红罡. 路径依赖中的黄金周制度研究. 旅游学刊, 2008, 23(3): 68~73.

[9] 徐红罡. 文化遗产旅游商业化的路径依赖理论模型. 旅游科学, 2005, 19(3): 74~78.

[10] 保继刚, 楚义芳. 旅游地理学. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 1999. 241~247.

[11] 陆林,凌善金,焦华富,杨兴柱. 徽州古村落的演化过程及其机理. 地理研究,2004,23(5):686~694.

[12] 黄成林. 徽州文化景观初步研究. 地理研究, 2000, 19(3):257~263.

[13] Lew A A, McKercher B. Trip destinations, gateways and itineraries: The example of Hong Kong. Tourism Management, 2002, 23: 609~621.

[14] Sofeld T H B. Empowerment for Sustainable Tourism Development. Berlin: Pergamon, 2003. 251~264.

[15] 张骁鸣. 体制精英的个人经验及其对农村社区旅游的影响——皖南X村案例. 中国农村观察, 2006,(1): 30~38.

[16] 贺雪峰. 面子、利益与村庄的性质:村支书与村委会主任关系的一个解释框架. 开放时代,2000, 11(9): 62~67.

[17] 郭正林.卷入民主化的农村精英:案例研究.中国农村观察, 2003,(1): 66~75.

文章导航

/