东北地区煤炭城市脆弱性与可持续发展模式
收稿日期: 2009-01-18
修回日期: 2009-07-15
网络出版日期: 2010-02-20
基金资助
国家自然科学基金资助项目(40571041),国家自然科学基金重点项目(40635030)
Vulnerability and sustainable development model of coal-mining cities in Northeast China
Received date: 2009-01-18
Revised date: 2009-07-15
Online published: 2010-02-20
采用实地走访调研以及座谈等方式对东北地区煤炭城市的脆弱性状况进行定性的诊断,利用东北地区煤炭城市2000年和2005年统计数据进行脆弱性的定量分析。研究表明:①自然系统的脆弱性表现在先天的不稳定和敏感性、水资源破坏、大气污染、土地和森林资源的破坏、固体废弃物的堆积等方面;②经济系统的脆弱性表现在资源储量、产业结构、企业生产能力、技术创新等方面;③社会系统的脆弱性表现在产业结构单一造成的就业结构和劳动技能的缺乏,以及再就业的难度大;④对东北地区煤炭城市的脆弱性进行类型分异,2000年,研究区域除鹤岗市较低脆弱之外,其余城市均属于中度脆弱区;2005年,研究区域均转变为中度脆弱区;⑤总结出东北地区煤炭城市可持续发展的四种模式,即综合型发展模式、期待型培育模式、接续型发展模式和创建和谐社会模式。
李博,佟连军,韩增林 . 东北地区煤炭城市脆弱性与可持续发展模式[J]. 地理研究, 2010 , 29(2) : 361 -372 . DOI: 10.11821/yj2010020018
The development of coal-mining cities in Northeast China is the hot topic which the country pays attention to. The article carries out the vulnerability appraisal of coal-mining cities in Northeast China from three levels of natural system, economic system, social system and from three description angles of exposure, sensitivity, and resilience. In 2000, Hegang city belongs to relatively low vulnerability district, and other coal-mining cities belong to intermediate ones. In 2005, all the coal-mining cities belong to intermediate vulnerability districts, in which vulnerability indexes in Jixi and Qitaihe cities are nearly 0.5701 and 0.5568, respectively. At the same time, it points out the vulnerability phenomenon, the approach to reduce vulnerability and diagnoses the vulnerability of natural system, economic system and social system, as well as the existing problems. Vulnerability of natural system is presented in ecological environment deterioration, water pollution, air pollution and forest resource destruction. Culture and community employment structure in coal-mining cities closely relate to urban economic structure and shortage of labor skills of mining industry, which have aggravated the unemployment and the difficulty of re-employment. Besides, the high pressure causes urban poverty and disadvantaged groups to get jobs, which have caused social vulnerability. Some other problems may cause the economic vulnerability, such as the unreasonable resource utilization, unreasonable productivity distribution and single industrial structure, Regional natural system, economic system and society system affect each other. This article discusses the coupling mechanism from the aspects of ecology, humanity and society. The intrinsic agents which affect the coal-mining cities are the limited resources and the changed exploitation capacity, and they are the key aspects to restrict vulnerability of human-land system. Then some models are put forward to reduce vulnerability, such as comprehensive development model, anticipation cultivation model, connection development model and harmonious society model. Finally, it puts forward some sustainable development countermeasures which provide the valuable reference for the reforming, ecology construction and community development of coal-mining cities. Besides, it is suggested that the development model could be built for coal-mining cities specifically in different development stages and vulnerability phenomenon.
Key words: Northeast China; coal-mining city; vulnerability; sustainable development
[1] Buchman Nina, Canadell Jossep, Graumlich Lisa, et al. Global land project: Science plan and implementation strategy. IGBP Report, 2005,19~53.
[2] Roberto Sanchez-Rodriguez, Karen C.Seto, David Simon, et al. Science Plan:Urbanization and Global Environmental Change.IHDP Report,2005,15.
[3] Young Oran R, et al. Science plan: institutional dimensions of global environmental change. IHDP Report, 2005,16.
[4] 牛文元.生态环境脆弱带ECOTONE的基础判定. 生态学报, 1989, 9(2):97~105.
[5] Doerfliger N, et al.Water vulnerability assessment in Karst environments a new method of defining protection areas using a multiattribute approach and GIS tools. Environmental Geology,1999,39(2):165~176.
[6] JM Fernandes, JR Kinghorn, IA Johnston. Differential regulation of multiple alternatively spliced transcripts of MyoD, 2006, 391(2): 178~185.
[7] 陈荣平.资源型城市现代化转型的概念性分析框架——以克拉玛依市为例.城市规划汇刊,2003,(5):59~62.
[8] 齐建珍.资源型城市转型学.北京:人民出版社,2004:48~52.
[9] 张米尔,武春友.资源型城市产业转型障碍与对策研究.经济理论与经济管理,2001,(2): 35~37.
[10] 蒋建全,马延吉,佟连军.东北区城市煤矿城市可持续发展的问题探讨.地理科学,2003,(3):16~20.
[11] 张米尔,孔令伟.资源型城市产业转型的模式选择.西安交通大学学报:社会科学版,2003,23(1):31~39.
[12] 沙景华,刘刚.资源型城市产业结构优化问题研究—以陕西省大同市为例.中国矿业,2005,14(1):90~93.
[13] 于言良.科学发展观与资源型城市经济转型.大连理工大学学报,2005,26(4):45~49.
[14] 孙淼,丁四保.我国资源型城市衰退的体制原因分析.经济地理,2005,25(2):273~276.
[15] 方创琳,董锁成.我国沿海地区矿产资源态势与跨世纪可持续发展战略.地理研究,1997,16(1):85~91.
[16] 范英宏,陆兆华,程建龙.中国煤矿区主要生态环境问题及生态重建技术.生态学报,2003,23(10):2144~2152.
[17] 申玉铭,杨彬彬.资源型城市的生态环境问题与综合整治—以济宁市为例.地理研究,2006,25(3):430~438.
[18] 刘燕华,李秀彬.脆弱性生态环境与可持续发展.北京:商务印书馆,2001:13~24.
[19] Moss R H, Malone E L, Brenkert A L.2002,Vulnerability to climate change: A quantitative approach, Prepared for the US Department of Energy. Available online: http://www.globalchange. umd.edu/dgi-bin/Details.pl?sref=PNNL-13765.
[20] http://www.fews.org/fewspub.html.
[21] 耿殿明,姜福兴.我国煤炭矿区生态环境问题分析.中国煤炭,2002,28(7):21~24.
[22] 李冰.资源型城市经济转型研究.国有资产管理,2005,(2):36~39.
[23] 王实.促进资源枯竭型城市下岗职工再就业.辽宁经济,2006,(8):16~17.
[24] 贺艳,刘勇.关于资源型城市的可持续发展与再城市化问题.中国人口.资源与环境,2000,10(3):54~56.
[25] 牛文元.中国可持续发展总论.北京:科学出版社,2007:253~255.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |