城市与乡村

不同道路类型对澜沧江流域景观的生态影响

展开
  • 北京师范大学环境学院 水环境模拟国家重点实验室,北京 100875
刘世梁,(1976-),男,山东沂水人,博士,讲师。主要从事土地利用、景观生态学和土壤学等方面研究,发表论文30余篇。

收稿日期: 2006-08-08

  修回日期: 2006-12-21

  网络出版日期: 2007-05-25

基金资助

国家重点基础研究发展规划项目(2003CB415104)和国家自然科学基金(40501067)

Ecological effects of different road classes on landscape in the Lancang River valley

Expand
  • School of Environment, State Key Laboratory of Water Environment Simulation, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China

Received date: 2006-08-08

  Revised date: 2006-12-21

  Online published: 2007-05-25

Supported by

国家重点基础研究发展规划项目(2003CB415104)和国家自然科学基金(40501067)

摘要

生境破碎化引发一系列潜在的生态效应,定量表达道路建设造成破碎化特征对于道路生态系统管理具有重要意义。针对澜沧江流域,利用GIS和FragStat软件,通过情景分析,分析了不同级别道路建设对景观的影响。结果表明:澜沧江流域一级路所影响面积最大,三级路最小,而影响的斑块数目则为一级路>二级路>三级路>高速路;生态系统影响面积为林地>草地>旱地>灌丛>水田>建设用地,斑块数目以旱地最高,其次为林地。情景分析表明,随着道路的建设和规划方案的实施,影响域内斑块平均面积减少,斑块数目、平均分维数增加,但总体上,高速路建设对生境破碎化的贡献率较小。土壤侵蚀分布结果表明,侵蚀面积为一级路>二级路>高速路>三级路。

本文引用格式

刘世梁, 温敏霞, 崔保山 . 不同道路类型对澜沧江流域景观的生态影响[J]. 地理研究, 2007 , 26(3) : 485 -490 . DOI: 10.11821/yj2007030008

Abstract

The existence and extension of road networks affect adjacent landscape patterns and processes.The direct or indirect influences of ecological process caused by roads can extend from population to landscape level. Road development is a primary mechanism of fragmentation, removing original land cover, creating edge habitat, altering landscape structure and function, and increasing access for humans.Nowadays road ecology becomes a newly-emerging field in the ecologic research. Studies of the road effects on population and ecosystems were carried out in the past few years. But large scale research beyond ecosystem level has just been initiated.As series of potential ecological effects are brought out by landscape fragmentation due to road construction, it is significant to quantify the fragmentation features for management of road and its surrounding ecosystem.Meanwhile the regional ecological security attracts more and more attention as the road network expands.This paper focuses on the Lancang River valley and analyzes the relationship between ecosystem fragmentation and road construction and planning using GIS and FragStat software. By scenario analysis, the paper got the landscape change with seven road construction scenarios. The results show that the first level roads affect the largest area, next is the second level while the third level roads affect the least. The sequence of affected patch number is first level road > second level road > third level road > expressway. For the different ecosystems, the effect shows similar tendency and the area order is forest > grassland > arable land > shrub land > paddy field > construction land and patch number is arable land > forest.Scenario analysis showed that in the Lancang River valley road network development results in the increase of patch complexity and landscape fragmentation, also the trend suggests that the third level roads have larger effect on fragmentation.The average patch area decreases while the patch number and fractal dimension increase with the actualization of road construction and planning.But the expressway affects little in general. The results suggest that expressways may affect the larger ecosystem area, but they have far less effect on regional landscape fragmentation. Soil eroded area sequence is first level road > second level road > expressway>third level road and the erosion intensity mainly exhibits middle level.

参考文献



[1] Forman R T T. Estimate of the area affected ecologically by the road system in the United States. Conservation Biology,2000,14:31~35.



[2] 宗跃光,等.道路生态学研究进展.生态学报,2003,23(11):2396~2405.



[3] 刘世梁,等.道路对景观的影响及其生态风险评价——以澜沧江流域为例.生态学杂志,2005,24(8):897~901.



[4] 摆万奇,等.大渡河上游地区土地利用动态模拟分析.地理研究,2005,24(2):206~213.



[5] 李月辉,等.道路生态研究进展.应用生态学报,2003,14(3):447~452.



[6] Saunders S C, Mislivets M R, Chen J Q, et al. Effects of roads on landscape structure within nested ecological units of the Northern Great Lakes Region, USA. Biological Conservation,2002,103:209~225.



[7] Merrill T, Mattson D J, Wrighy R G, et al. Defining landscapes suitable for restoration of grizzly bears Ursus arctos in Idaho.Biological Conservation,1999,87:231~248.



[8] Forman R T T, et al. Road traffic and nearby grassland bird patterns in a suburbanizing landscape.Environmental Management,2000,29:782~800.



[9] Forman R T T, Deblinger R D.The ecological road effect zone of a Massachusetts (USA) suburban highway. Conservation Biology,2000,14:36~46.



[10] 蔡志洲.论公路建设的生态影响.公路交通科技, 1995,12(1):43~48.



[11] 张镱锂,等.青藏公路对区域土地利用和景观格局的影响——以格尔木至唐古拉山段为例.地理学报, 2002, 57(3): 253~266.



[12] 史培军,等.深圳市土地利用变化机制分析.地理学报,2000,55(2):151~160.



[13] 俞孔坚.生物保护的景观生态安全格局.生态学报,1999,19(1):8~15.



[14] 宗跃光,等.大都市空间扩展的廊道效应与景观结构优化——以北京市为例.地理研究,1998,17(2):119~125.



[15] 李双成,等.中国道路网与生态系统破碎化关系统计分析.地理科学进展,2004,23(5):77~85.
文章导航

/