城市与乡村

从事旅游业者对旅游影响认知水平的测量

展开
  • 1. 山西财经大学旅游管理学院,太原 030012;
    2. 山西大学黄土高原研究所,太原 030006;
    3. 北京大学旅游研究与规划中心,北京 100871;
    4. 山西财经大学环境经济系,太原 030006
程占红 (1972-),男,山西新绛人,博士,副教授。从事生态旅游研究。E-mail :chengzh@sxu.edu.cn

收稿日期: 2005-11-18

  修回日期: 2006-04-23

  网络出版日期: 2007-01-25

基金资助

国家自然科学基金资助项目 (40371036)

Measurement and analysis on the perception of the residents engaging in tourism industry and its impact

Expand
  • 1. College of Tourism Management,Shanxi University of Finance and Economy,Taiyuan 030012, China;
    2. Institute of Loess Plateau, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, China;
    3. Center for Recreation and Tourism Research, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China;
    4. Department of Environment Economy,Shanxi University of Finance and Economy,Taiyuan 030006, China

Received date: 2005-11-18

  Revised date: 2006-04-23

  Online published: 2007-01-25

Supported by

国家自然科学基金资助项目 (40371036)

摘要

本文以芦芽山自然保护区为例,采用TWINSPAN和DCA对从事旅游业者对旅游影响程度的认知水平进行了分析。结果表明: (1)TWINSPAN是一种较好的数量分类方法,将32个样本分为成熟积极型、非成熟积极型、退却型和冷漠型4组; (2)DCA第一轴主要反映了样本的性别和收入特征,第二轴反映了样本的受教育程度; (3)优势因子的分布格局在很大程度上决定着样本类型的分布格局; (4)TWINSPAN分类的结果与DCA排序的结果基本一致,具有良好的可比性。它们都客观地反映出从事旅游业者对旅游影响认知水平的生态关系。

本文引用格式

程占红, 吴必虎, 牛莉芹 . 从事旅游业者对旅游影响认知水平的测量[J]. 地理研究, 2007 , 26(1) : 141 -148 . DOI: 10.11821/yj2007010018

Abstract

To study residents’ perception toward tourism impact is of practical significance for developing tourism industry.Taking Luya Mountains Nature Reserve as a case, the background characteristics of the residents engaging in tourism industry and the perception toward 27 indices about tourism impact are investigated on the spot, and the relationship between their characteristics and the perception level is analyzed by two-way indicator species analysis (TWINSPAN) and detrended correspondence analysis (DCA) in the paper.The results show that: (1) TWINSPAN is a kind of better classifying way, and can divide 32 samples into mature and active group, immature and active group, retreating group and apathy group. (2) Each group has its own distribution area and borderline on the DCA ordination figure. Axis 1 of DCA reflects the samples' sex and income mainly, and Axis 2 shows their education level. (3) The distribution pattern of dominant factors decides on the distribution pattern of the samples' groups to a great extent. (4) The classification of TWINSPAN needs to combine with actual fact, and DCA can eliminate "arch effects" obviously. The result of TWINSPAN is consistent with that of DCA, and both are comparable. Both can show the ecological relationship between the residents engaging in tourism industry and their perception toward its impact objectively. However, it still needs farther studies on how to express their interrelationship more directly.

参考文献



[1] Belisle F J,Hoy D R. The perceived impact of tourism by residents: a case study in Santa Maria,Columbia.Annals of Tourism Research,1980,7(1):83~101.



[2] Pearce J A.Host community acceptance of foreign tourists: strategic considerations.Annals of Tourism Research,1980,7(2):224~233.



[3] Milman A,Pizam A. Social impacts of tourism on central Florida.Annals of Tourism Research,1988,15(2):191~204.



[4] Lankford S V,Howard D R. Developing a tourism impact attitude scale.Annals of Tourism Research,1994,21(1):121~139.



[5] Ap J,Crompton L. Developing and testing a tourism impact scale.Journal of Travel Research,1998,37(2):120~130.



[6] Mason P,Cheyne J. Residents’ attitudes to proposed tourism development.Annals of Tourism Research,2000,27(2):391~411.



[7] Mathieson A,Wall G. Tourism: Economic, Physical and Social Impacts.Harlow: Longman,1982.



[8] Faulkner B,Tideswell C. A framework for monitoring the community impacts of tourism.Journal of Sustainable Tourism,1997,5(1):2~28.



[9] Murphy P E. Tourism: A Community Approach.New York: Routledge,1985.



[10] Madrigal R. Residents' perceptions and the role of government. Annals of Tourism Research,1995,22(1):86~102.



[11] Cooke K. Guidelines for socially appropriate tourism development in British Columbia. Journal of Travel Research,1982,21(1):22~28.



[12] Ritchie B J R. Consensus policy formulation in tourism: measuring resident views via survey research. Tourism Management,1988,9(3):199~212.



[13] Allen L R,Long P T,Perdue R R,et al. The impact of tourism development on residents’ perceptions of community life.Journal of Travel Research,1988,26(1):16~21.



[14] Liu J C,Var T. Resident attitudes toward tourism impacts in Hawaii. Annals of Tourism Research,1986,13(2):193~214.



[15] Williams J,Lawson R. Community issues and resident opinions of tourism. Annals of Tourism Research,2001,28(2):269~290.



[16] 陆林.旅游地居民态度调查研究——以皖南旅游区为例.自然资源学报,1996,11(4):377~382.



[17] 戴凡,保继刚.旅游社会影响研究——以大理古城居民学英语态度为例.人文地理,1996,11(2):37~42.



[18] 宣国富,章锦河,陆林,等.海滨旅游地居民对旅游影响的感知——海南省海口市及三亚市实证研究.地理科学,2002,22(6):741~746.



[19] 苏勤,林炳耀.基于态度与行为的我国旅游地居民的类型划分——以西递、周庄、九华山为例.地理研究,2004,23(1):104~114.



[20] 程占红,张金屯.芦芽山自然保护区生态旅游客源特征分析.山西大学学报(自然科学版),2002,25(1):82~85.



[21] 张金屯.植被数量生态学方法.北京:中国科学技术出版社,1995.217~225.
文章导航

/